Dr. Christopher E. Larsen Author of: Paintball & Airsoft Battle Tactics (2008). Voyageur Press. www.amazon.com/Paintball-Airs... (Rifle: Colt M16A1 Reproduction)
Пікірлер: 38
@christopherlarsen77883 жыл бұрын
Wow. My egregious omission of the depth of Area Defense is that I left out a discussion on secondary positions and alternate positions. In a nutshell, secondary positions include defensive trenches and bunkers BEHIND the main line of defense. A secondary position can engage the enemy as they begin to assault the first trench line. That is, the secondary position looks at the same Engagement Area as the FLOT. A tertiary position would likewise face the same direction, and when tertiary trenches were dug, they could engage any enemy attacking the second line of defense. This added forward depth. An alternate position may also be created behind the FLOT, however an alternate position defends from an entirely new angle of attack. Think of this as a defense oriented on a valley below a ridge. But an alternate position near the top of the ridge is perhaps oriented 90 degrees in a new direction to cover the possibility that an enemy force might try to flank the defensive line. In this way, there is forward depth and lateral depth in an Area Defense. And this holds true even if we don't use trenches at all. Perhaps we use micro-terrain and mature wooded forests. Or perhaps we use the structures of a village. In any case, this is how an Area Defense creates depth. And with the reserves as well as forward screening forces, the Area Defense can quickly transform its combat force into an offense when the situation suits us.
@sbura_2 жыл бұрын
I suggest you make a serie of videos about various military unit types (tanks, ifvs, apcs, attack helis, infantry, rifleman, machinegunner etc, armored cars, artillery, rocket artillery, sp art, manpads, etc ) and explain what's their purpose and they're employed, and since they dont necessarily operate in pure formations, how they're organized with other units
@christopherlarsen77882 жыл бұрын
Okay, okay...good recommendations...just a little at a time. Cool?
@blackquiver2 жыл бұрын
I like that word screening..
@0816nmj3 ай бұрын
I am South Korean and I find a thumbnail photo very familiar haha
@bryananderson37722 жыл бұрын
Keep making these videos. Your channel will grow if you put two or more videos out per week. It's hard work but that's what it takes. Either way, I'll be watching. Thank you for teaching
@christopherlarsen77882 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the advice...and for watching.
@moonasha Жыл бұрын
@@christopherlarsen7788 he's right, you put more videos like this out, with higher production quality (overlays, etc), some more history focused videos with good clickbait titles (how the battle of XXX was won by YYY (e.g., well designed area defense)), people will flock here. This type of content is growing rapidly on youtube right now and you're one of the best qualified and most well spoken I've seen
@nickglover7183 Жыл бұрын
Pete Longstreet (pace Shelby Foote)
@colesammons79593 жыл бұрын
Excellent Chris! Keep em coming!
@williamwimmer54733 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation as always.
@raylast38732 жыл бұрын
The Maginot line was solid. The Germans going around it was kind of part of the plan. That plan was to coordinate with Belgium and hold the Germans off IN Belgium where instead of forts they had natural obstacles in the form of Rivers. Where the plan failed is that these forces that were in theory sufficient to beat back or slow down the enemy advance were defeated in the field. Part of the reason for this was that the forces meant to hold the flank of the defending armies did not expect to defend against a full-scale attack and were too slow to respond to it. There is also the accusation leveled at Belgium, including by Churchill that they surrendered much too quickly, thus depriving the Allies of a good 22 Divisions and robbed the remaining armies of the time to mount a more effective defense. It is apparently the case that after the Munich conference, the Belgian leadership tried to move closer to Germany to the detriment and at partial cost of of the cooperation with France and Britain. On the one hand there is the question of how far this abandonment went, i.e. did the Belgian King decided to surrender because he wasn‘t prepared to oppose Germany completely (unlike the Dutch Queen Wilhelmina, Leopold III stayed in Belgium and became a German prisoner). Just how far it was reasonable to resist is always a question here (although the same goes for France after the Fall of Paris). On the other hand, there is the very real possibility that the fudging of the military cooperation meant that the forces that were supposed to be in place well ahead of time had to be rushed into position and were thus ill-prepared and vulnerable to the German offensive, which ultimately led to them getting defeated and cut off.
@christopherlarsen77882 жыл бұрын
Agreed. It is easy to play "Monday morning quarterback" years after the battle. With all that can be known from historic analysis, our conclusions are often unfair. After all, the leaders of that time did not have situational awareness and years of analysis! The failures of the Allies in the early part of WWII were too many to count. The Phony War failed to strike at Germany when Hitler's military was most vulnerable as it was deployed and fighting in Poland. The French had steadfastly strangled military resources of the Maginot Line so badly that, ironically, the German military might have fared well by simply attacking it in frontal assaults. The Maginot Line was essentially a hollow shell by the onset of WWII. And the British, French, and Belgians were incompetently unimaginative in believing that an armored force could not penetrate through the Ardennes Forest. Yet, our greatest lesson from the German invasion of France in 1940 is simply this... Hannibal Barca is supposed to have said as he planned to invade Rome through the Alps Mountains, "We'll either find a way, or make one." US GEN George Patton would later quip something to the effect that if Hannibal could pass through the snowy Alps with elephants, then no defense was undefeatable. In a very quantifiable sense, the defense is stronger than the offense. Yet, the defense is a temporary position. It does not impose our will upon our opponent. In time, it will fail.
@neurofiedyamato8763 Жыл бұрын
Arguably Belgium's refusal to station French or British troops was irrelevant. The French and British did enter Belgium and got quite far. Perhaps not as fast as they would have originally hoped, but they got deep enough that the breakthrough at the Ardennes basically cut the forces in Belgium from France entirely. the decisive factor wasn't really in Belgium but in North Eastern France.
@raylast3873 Жыл бұрын
@@neurofiedyamato8763 nope, it was definitely in Belgium. For one thing, it makes a tremendous difference whether you „just got there“ or actually had time to dig in. For a defence that is absolutely crucial (the USSR had the same exact problem although for different reasons).
@neurofiedyamato8763 Жыл бұрын
@@raylast3873 They didn't lose in Belgium though. They lost the in northern France which left the forces in Belgium stranded. That was why they had to be evacuated by sea at the end. Even if they had dug in, they would be facing essentially the wrong direction without further logistical support. There weren't a lot of troops around the Ardennes area rather they were already dug in at Belgium or not. Once Germany broke through the Ardennes, they encircled the forces in Belgium and rapidly advanced through the French plains. It would be unlikely for the forces in Belgium to last without France still around to support and break them out.
@raylast3873 Жыл бұрын
@@neurofiedyamato8763 the reason the Germans ever got into France was because the defensive lines that should have been in Belgium didn‘t exist.
@advrider7777 Жыл бұрын
Hi mate, is there a link to purchase the books on display. Much appreciated it Cheers ps keep the vids coming 👍
@christopherlarsen7788 Жыл бұрын
Let's see if this does the trick... Light Infantry Tactics: for Small Teams (2005). AuthorHouse Publisher. www.amazon.com/Light-Infantry-Tactics-Small-Teams/dp/1418472077 Paintball and Airsoft Battle Tactics (2008). Voyageur Press. www.amazon.com/Paintball-Airsoft-Battle-Tactics-Christopher/dp/0760330638 The Small Unit Tactics SMARTbook, 1-3rd editions (2008). The Lightning Press. www.thelightningpress.com/smartbooks/suts3-small-unit-tactics-smartbook-3rd-ed/ The OPFOR SMARTbook 3: Red Team Army, 1-2nd editions (2013). The Lighting Press. www.thelightningpress.com/smartbooks/opfor3-smartbook-red-team-army-2nd-ed/ The OPFOR SMARTbook 5: Irregular & Hybrid Threat, 1st edition (2022). The Lightning Press. www.thelightningpress.com/smartbooks/opfor-smartbook-5-irregular-hybrid-threat/
@advrider7777 Жыл бұрын
@@christopherlarsen7788 Thank you for taking the time with this reply! Greatly appreciate it Cheers 👍
@dm6222 жыл бұрын
Great overview, and love the channel content. Have you ever touched on counter tunnel/subterranean warfare? Lots of examples in history and recent conflicts. Curious what measures an area defense can take to avoid an enemy tunneling (or having previously built tunnels) under through their lines and popping up in the rear or in an undefended area. Thanks!
@christopherlarsen77882 жыл бұрын
Fair question, and to be certain there is a doctrine on this! But it is in the realm of Combat Engineers, and I'm simply not familiar with tunneling operations. I will say that I had first-hand experience in the Korean DMZ with tunneling detection and reporting. Frankly, seismic measuring offers the best detection, and techniques like sound propagation and shot acoustics provide clear targeting solutions.
@dm6222 жыл бұрын
@@christopherlarsen7788 Great, thanks. I'm uneducated on the subject, but it sounds like it might fall into a technology category that a smaller grunt element digging in might not have access too, but hopefully with intel beforehand, their area and especially their rear area can be measured and cleared by engineering units before they select it for their defense.
@blackquiver2 жыл бұрын
18:25. Troy walls fall to Greece.. Just have to think out side the box..
@SmallTeamSupply3 жыл бұрын
Say Chris, I was under the impression that the guys you would be using as a screen would not used out of the reserve, but rather would be part of a rotation. 1/3 on the line, 1/3 in reserve, and 1/3 performing screens and spoiling attacks. Am i mistaken? or did this change based on the length of the line the commander was tasked with as drawn? I'm also curious, as drawn, would each individual platoon be preforming those tasks, line, reserve and screens. Or would it simply be managed at this larger scale?
@christopherlarsen77883 жыл бұрын
Good question, Mike. Not surprisingly...it's situationally dependent (METT-TC). The "local area security" is provided by the unit occupying the FLOT. And to be certain, a screening force might require 1/3 of the entire force. But that's not often the case. This becomes an economy of force issue. The main effort is to occupy the length of terrain we must defend. But that will almost certainly fail if we don't have the resources to add depth. If we don't have those resources - then choose another piece of ground! So screening forces and LP/OP offer local area security forward of the FLOT. That's conceptually the "first line" of our defense. Then we build a robust defense - fighting positions, concertina wire, bunkers, and then trenches. This includes primary, secondary, and tertiary lines of the defense. That's some real depth! Now add the reserve force. In battle, this allows us to plug holes in the line to repel a determined enemy. And/or we can use the reserve to pursue the enemy once they are repelled. Finally, the tactical reserve offers a relatively "safe space" to rest, eat, clean weapons, and prepare for a patrol forward of the FLOT. Keep in mind that higher echelon assets may also be operating forward of our FLOT. For example, brigade reconnaissance teams may be conducting long range patrols, or a platoon from the company in the battalion reserve may move forward of the FLOT to conduct an ambush. Lots of coordination required here. So, don't assume that only our platoon, company, or battalion is operating forward of the FLOT. Pay attention to those maneuver graphic phase lines! Yeah?
@SmallTeamSupply3 жыл бұрын
@@christopherlarsen7788 thank you for refining my understanding!
@blackquiver2 жыл бұрын
14:19,, sending out skirmishes to give chase.
@raylast38732 жыл бұрын
Will this look at all different if the defenders are intentionally applying a multi-layered defense on the operational level (think Kursk)? Or is that only relevant to the higher echelons?
@christopherlarsen77882 жыл бұрын
The martial philosophy of defense is that, while it is the stronger position, the defense does not impose the defender's will upon an opponent. Therefore, the defense is only temporary. Being a temporary status, the layers of any defense depend most critically on the time allotted to form a defensive posture. The defense is positional by nature. Multiple layers are the default, but again, only in as much as time, terrain, and resources allow. Will these principles vary with the intent of the defender? Yes, I'm confident they will.
@user-rcghjewqw Жыл бұрын
200 m for a company(well, 2 platoons) ... Isn't it too crowded?
@christopherlarsen7788 Жыл бұрын
Yes. That's a very DENSE defensive area for just a rifle company. Typically, a rifle platoon will cover 200m with two squads on the line, and a third held in reserve. Using this method, a rifle company would cover about 600m with all three platoons on the line and the HQ section (command, medic, mortars) behind in support. Of course, this is all rule-of-thumb depending on METT-TC. Chiefly terrain.
@totalstranger8412Ай бұрын
Thanks🫡
@blackquiver2 жыл бұрын
15:28.. These screening tactics u r describing, they r L.R.Ps. (Long range patrols) ..?..
@blackquiver2 жыл бұрын
15:15,, yeah they r probing your lines. Id that..
@blackquiver2 жыл бұрын
2.24 .. Well to me it ain't inches of ground. I c why ppl say that, mostly due to y.. It's ignorance on the person who say y, when it comes to ppl living free from an oppressive government regime or a regimeist entity that's dead set on destroying a way of life. God won't let it happen, so those inches to me r necessary to life and Liberty .. It's sad most the time when I refect on history.. So meny lives lost and for what ..?. So we becomes Slaves to an oppressive government in our time. In OUR TIME!!.. So meny lives lost, families destroy because of war, I'm not talking just about the loss of life, it's what ppl bring home with them.demons destroy Gods creation .. America has already had a civil war, how far foes that Apple drop from a tree for ppl to remember the horrors of war... SMFH.. So I get it, when I here that opinion I try to be tolerant of their ignorance to a life that has sacrificed their freedom for their Liberty in today that has abused a Gift from God. I SMFH.