Article 370 Hearing, 370 Will End, CJI Tutors Sibal

Рет қаралды 394,785

10 ай бұрын

Article 370 Hearing, 370 Will End, CJI Tutors Sibal #SupremeCourtIndia #LawChakra
Visit Our Website:- lawchakra.in/
Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
#Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh
Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r
For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
#SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
#Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
*This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
@Lawchakra
👉Twitter
/ lawchakra
👉 Instagram.
/ lawchakras
📑*Fair Use Policy -*
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

Пікірлер: 831

@chittaranjandas7140 10 ай бұрын

Sibal feels he can create technical ambiguity and twist the case on his favour but Honble Judges are alao equal careful.

@suvarnanaik8261 10 ай бұрын

😂👍

@Surihampi 10 ай бұрын

Honorable Judges are not only careful but they are brilliant and impartial. This is why when everything fails to do justice, we believe in Honorable Courts for justice. Hats off to them.

@ubaidarshad 10 ай бұрын

@@Surihampiwhat is justice according to you

@positive120 10 ай бұрын

@@ubaidarshadmake people to abide by laws framed by democratically elected Indian govt.

@cccc2740 10 ай бұрын

@@ubaidarshad 70 year old not being able to 6 year old girl..first point of justice...

@asrajan2489 10 ай бұрын

Mr. Sibal confuses to the maximum. Honourable Judges should be very careful in dealing with him.

@bahdeng5588 9 ай бұрын

No, Mr. Sibal is 100℅ right.

@dalinaik9996 9 ай бұрын

Anti nation sibal

@deepakkumarjoshi 9 ай бұрын

Subal said what's in the constitution, centre can't make Uttar Pradesh as union territory just because they don't like ppl there, same goes for jNk, ppl should decide.

@AnilSharma-vo8ok 9 ай бұрын

@@deepakkumarjoshi for you kind information J&k is not UT.

@ParikhTirth 10 ай бұрын

The fact is Amit Shah and team has done the job so flawlessly that no arguments are worthy enough to reverse the decision... Amit Shah in his reply confidently spoke that there is no way this can be reversed

@ritakaul99 9 ай бұрын

887

@digvijaysingh2305 10 ай бұрын

Sibal is down to the level of "Chahe mujhe pitt do, lekin gariyao mat". 😂😂😂

@MayankKumar-tl5rx 10 ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@user-wq6mk8vk6q Ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@rocketsingh4830 10 ай бұрын

What a waste of time by a senior sc lawyer once in congress, habits don't go easily 😂😂😂

@swapankantabosechowdhury677 10 ай бұрын

Old habits die hard

@gvija69 10 ай бұрын

These two lawyers Sibal and Singhvi are like Imran Khan. They are fighting cases for so many people and on other side making congress weak by weak day by day. Good work for BJP

@ismail3901 9 ай бұрын

They r fighting in behalf of Pakistan

@vikashbkj 9 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@manoharshirsat2864 9 ай бұрын

😂😂They earn Congress looses

@Antharishk 10 ай бұрын

The 370 and Sheik abdulla a gone case. Why so much seriousness on this issue. Why sibal wants Kashmir burning again

@dhkw007 10 ай бұрын

To make some money. He also knows the result

@Saqib_weqyq 10 ай бұрын

If it is injustice it will not happen, If its justice then it must happen without worrying about further consequences Truth must revealed

@ishiinghajput1230 10 ай бұрын

@@Saqib_weqyq what injustice, injustice happens with kashmiri pandits did you admit and re habilate them no you wants to make kashmir apart of pakistans it will never happen and poi will back soon

@VijayKumar-76 10 ай бұрын

Who is fighting for what? Who is on whose side and what this is all for.... Pls someone could explain me .. ty

@Ashish-rf2eh 10 ай бұрын

@@Saqib_weqyq original victims are kamiri pandit not muslim

@hanumanthrao3465 10 ай бұрын

I feel like Sibbal is pleading the judges to give him a face saving from this embarrassment.....atleast once say "here you are right Sibbal" but...

@user-ci6vk8iy5f 10 ай бұрын

Agreed. That is why .he keeps saying “ Milords “ after every sentence hoping that the esteemed judges will sympathise with him and rule in his favour. 😂

@nageshlali 10 ай бұрын

Sibal is arguing the case as if he is arguing in a Bail matter very very POOR SHOW

@esasidharan6573 9 ай бұрын

😅

@sidhainsan1 10 ай бұрын

Sibal is stuck between temporary and permanent. Everyday he is changing his stand. For this he charges 25-30 lac per hearing. Kismet ho to Natthulal jaisi

@ads7506 10 ай бұрын

He has habit of getting stuck

@nagarampasulamogili3912 10 ай бұрын

In view of non existence of constitutional assembly of J&K as of now the temporary status of Artcle 370 will become permanently temporary and it will continue to be applicable.

@suvarnanaik8261 10 ай бұрын

😂👍

@damon5517 10 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂 Congress ☕☕☕

@nikshrivastava5514 10 ай бұрын

He thinks he can justify his fees by misleading judges.

@dhrdas 10 ай бұрын

Congress created the problem in Kashmir. Half of Kashmir was lost due to negligence of Neheru, Neheru went to UN and made it an international dispute, Neheru did not change Article 370 neither Indira Gandhi did although she almost changed the entire constitution. Now when the the temporary article is removed, Congress is again creating trouble to bring it back. What Congress really want?

@paapkishtwaer 10 ай бұрын

modi came to power in2014. how much pok taken back ????

@AnkitSingh-zm9dg 10 ай бұрын

@@paapkishtwaerpappu jaisi bate mat kar bro… it cannot be taken back unless UN intervenes, bcz pappu k nehru ne apni marayi ja k UN me… muh ka kaur ni hai ki le lenge… Army can capture it anytime they want but cannot bcz we have not to attack first policy… understand the logics..

@raghavendravishwas5929 10 ай бұрын

@@paapkishtwaer👌

@abhinavgoswami9574 10 ай бұрын

@@paapkishtwaerHow to say I am immature without saying it...

@TheKrish1972 10 ай бұрын

@@paapkishtwaer in my view, there is no need to get POK because we get 4m more peaceful in this process. As long as there is not killing in Kashmir and life is normal, I am happy. 😂

@sagarviswanathan1956 10 ай бұрын

Sibal is fighting for money and nothing else. He knows that his argument is hollow and he will only face failure. For Sibal temporary provision can be permanent 😂. How much money he has taken to fight this case which he will lose without a doubt.

@suryavaliveti8355 10 ай бұрын

He's testing their patience. They will strike down this petition soon.

@ranapartap1501 10 ай бұрын

hopefully they send him to jail for 50 years for wasting time and Jhangerssi suer

@subramaniampanchacharam9438 10 ай бұрын

Sibal's argument-- if you keep stolen items long enough, then it becomes your property. Humbug arguments. Fiction.

@madhusoodananunniyattil9421 9 ай бұрын

If these guys comes to power, then imagine the situation of India : Let alone Kashmir and Ladakh

@deepakkumarjoshi 9 ай бұрын

@@madhusoodananunniyattil9421like the current situation in the china border 😂

@chatrukripalani7671 10 ай бұрын

Mr Sibal should clarify whether J&K is an integral part of India? If yes, then, how come, it can have its own constitution, national flag, and a prime minister. In that case Mr Sibal should explain why should India have the responsibility of protecting, feeding, and incurring financial expenditure in its development, yet have no authority to protect its own safety and security, and of Hindus living there?

@somashreechowdhury2382 10 ай бұрын

Exact"?"ly so that's exactly what the" messiah,of the santidoot international gang" have to answer,"". Also every

@kumark214 10 ай бұрын

Isn’t it obvious? Because it was given special status by India, just like Assam, Sikkim etc.

@somashreechowdhury2382 10 ай бұрын

Also every legislation and Articles ,Amendments,proviso,additions,to the Constitution are to be read with the appeasement scenario in which such proviso ,amendments additions,legislations were laid by & under the governance of a govt. as we gather from The history had been headed by Mr. Nehru who did not have a single of the 16 "VOTES" of the representatives representing the people of BHARAT and as such are imperatively questionable????And therefore such proviso, acts, Articles, legislations ,need neccessarily&imperatively be read with such history of appeasement & power sharing formulas that were the cause of such provisos , legislations, amendments , additions outrageous to the sanctity of the power of the government elected

@kumark214 10 ай бұрын

@@somashreechowdhury2382 complete nonsense. Regardless of who is in power, constitution is the same. Anything can be done if allowed by constitution, if not it’s illegal like this repeal.

@XPERTEDUCATOR 10 ай бұрын

Not integral part but temporary part

@leelaaiyappa6277 10 ай бұрын

Well replied by CJI👍

@RajeevAnand 10 ай бұрын

Sibal needs to take english classes again if he doesn't understand the basic difference between temporary and permanent. This will be a good judgement to also remove caste based reservations which was also temporary.

@vinayakdhulap 10 ай бұрын

The National Conference and the like think that they will always have the dine in and India will take care of the washing and kitchen.Then they were worried of their minority status and reservation. Whats wrong if we say let's all be at the dinner table and enjoy?All states are equal for last 76 years and prosperous.

@PC-tz6rw 10 ай бұрын

You have a case there! Bravo!!

@prakashnarasimha1044 10 ай бұрын

Sibal was heard suggesting Brexit like vote for the people of J & K. I wonder what kind of man is this and what kind of mentality is this ?

@divyasatheesh2529 10 ай бұрын

Precious court time got wasted!!! CJI should not encourage this.still thousands of laymen are waiting for justice. But nowadays I feel that SC favours VIPs..they are ready to take political cases that too of opposition mostly even at midnight.

@AnandSharma-qt3gi 10 ай бұрын

Sibbal knows how to exploit loopholes of Constitution by intrepreting it so subjectively.. But judges should be ekadiken ( one step more)

@Saumil5 10 ай бұрын

Shukracharya hay

@RS-sx1lo 10 ай бұрын

The logic is simple J&K is happier and more peaceful now ! 370 has to go !

@lasu596 10 ай бұрын

Sibal lost the case He dint hv anything to say except what Abdulla wanted

@nikshrivastava5514 10 ай бұрын

After hearing all the arguments of CJI. It is clear that sibal is just wasting time of the court and acting like a stubborn child that keep on ranting without logic to prove his point.

@subash32118 10 ай бұрын

HOW MUCH ANTI INDIAN LOBBY IS WORKING IN INDIA

@manjunathaks607 10 ай бұрын

Sibal is famous for confusing Indian courts by doing China and Pakistani laws in India..😂

@pandit-jee-bihar 10 ай бұрын

Sibal wants 370 to stay not because it's abrogation he deem was unconstitutional but because there is no clarity on when and how a temporary provision became permanent. Looks like it became permanent on it's own without exercising 368 because no government said anything till date. I think such cases should be dismissed simply based on Article 1, 2 & 3 which gives centre enough power to parliament to reorganise or change the boundaries of any state without state's consent.

@susilkumarbarik8304 10 ай бұрын

Advocate like sibal not only confusing honorable SC but also betry indians and this is the true face of Congress....

@nimmamithra-learning7647 10 ай бұрын

Sibal's procrastination is at the height of his obedience to dynasty.

@vandemataram2506 10 ай бұрын

After 100/200 years, people will remember Kapil as a Villain Advocate in History!!!

@ListenSilent121 10 ай бұрын

🎯

@bahdeng5588 9 ай бұрын

Ater 100/200 yrs people will remember kabil not as villain but as Hero (advocate)like kapil indian cricketer.

@user-ks1lj4uz2j 10 ай бұрын

Sibal feels, J&K is part of Pakistan, he even feels India to be part of Pakistan too. but he wants Indian money, that too in crores per every day of his attendance in court/parliament.

@petergriffin6575 10 ай бұрын

Have u ever read law?

@megacharizardx2276 10 ай бұрын

@@petergriffin6575Plz explain what is a law I'm an law student. Sibbal comparing UK & India but he forgets in UK there is no Reservation system SC St Obc doesn't enjoy job food dress from tax payers money is there any equality between UK & India?

@petergriffin6575 10 ай бұрын

@@megacharizardx2276 considering u r a law student let me give u a piece of advice that a lawyer should always see loopholes in the case and argue them and twist the facts to favour him. It's not necessary to provide only facts.

@user-ks1lj4uz2j 10 ай бұрын

@@petergriffin6575 In general sense yes, articles from here and there, cannot say as expert, My comment is not about law, about a person. As a lawyer he may be doing good, his argument struck like Gramaphone needle at one place, he do not want the judges to even debate/venture into other relevant points. if this is what law is, then i do not subscribe to it, my understanding is law should be for greater good not for one or select few!

@karma5396 10 ай бұрын

@@petergriffin6575does exploiting loophole strengthen our democracy? Asking as a lay man with zero understanding of Constitution.

@nadieperumal5770 10 ай бұрын

\\One thing is for sure: No going Back

@sayand2706 10 ай бұрын

Sibal is going round and round but CJI called out his bluff ..

@VipinSingh-vg8iq 10 ай бұрын

it feels so sad that we are hearing this kind cases being accepted in the courts of our country that challenges the authority of our country over our own state. Sibal is appearing for some anti-India client here, court shouldn't have accepted the Plea in the first place. It's a wastage of taxpayers hard earned money and resources. Moreover, it further raises question on the non-transparent model of working of the judiciary itself.

@mazerrackham1280 10 ай бұрын

As a Kashmiri i have always rejoiced the 370 abrogation since it was nothing but a dead horse and most probably SC will uphold the abrogation as well. What i fail to understand is why is it irking so many people. The deliberations upon it in the highest court only reflects the true character of Indian democracy and the fact that arbitary legislations are liable to be struck down if passed in an illegitimate manner. If you ask me the proceedings itself is enhancing the democratic spirit of the country rather than doing any harm.

@miskangan986 10 ай бұрын

Mal gudood

@malayaranjansahu7650 10 ай бұрын

same bro...i don't understand why...may be this gives us hint that what national prosperity & security means to these people who are represented by sibal.

@Aj.K.R 10 ай бұрын

We love constitution Democracy and Supreme court. We are not biased and court as well to hear any significant cases. Sibbal is trying his best argument. Law is important than your emotions. Law makes a country not an uneducated King.

@malayaranjansahu7650 10 ай бұрын

@@Aj.K.R but is it good to waste time on a sealed case which was needed for the security of India???

@ydgokhale1 10 ай бұрын

Great point.

@ramalingamsadasivan2835 10 ай бұрын

How can a politician become a lwayer, conflict of interest.

@jatmartial 10 ай бұрын

We don't need British for dividing India. British mindset is present in the blood of these advocates and their masters who are so inclined to break Kashmir away from India.

@kmrao06 10 ай бұрын

@@Faizan39318: You look ti be another legal luminary like sibal. Pl enlighten me if the British Parliament revokes India Independence Act, will we become British subjects again!!😂😂

@AmitSingh-ez5is 10 ай бұрын

@@Faizan39318Aa gya Auranzab ko pujne wala 🤣🤓

@ads7506 10 ай бұрын

Congress is the instrument of British.

@chiragcapri 10 ай бұрын

@@Faizan39318Indian Independence Act was not made with aim of India acceding to Britain to have its own rights, which is the case in J&K.

@chiragcapri 10 ай бұрын

@@Faizan39318 I was pointing out a different thing. Independent India was not formed with an aim for it to accede to Britain.. so that india can have its own constitution, flag and special provisions. It was granted Independence through the Act.

@raghavuchil2098 10 ай бұрын

Why we are still folowing British way of addressing judges as " My Lord" ? As per Indian tradition, we must call them at the best " Your Honor" Calling them My Lord makes no sense. Only Lord for us is our Gods and no one else...

@sigmamale3115 10 ай бұрын

Judge k samne jra bolna ye baat....juban se pocha na lgwa dia th wo bhi judge ni

@deepakkumarjoshi 9 ай бұрын

But do you want to use? Old caste based way of addressing?

@drsubashn4025 10 ай бұрын

SC has made it clear in its famous judgement that parliament has the power to amend the constitution or enact laws without affecting the basic structure of the constitution. Then why can Art 370 not amended or abrogated or deleted by the parliament? Removal of Art 370 does not affect the basic structure of the constitution !

@vishalbharti1139 9 ай бұрын

Due to the presence of the explicit process on the removal of Article 370

@drsubashn4025 9 ай бұрын

@vishalbharti1139 can you please explain , sir ? That was an explicit process , otherwise, what other processes are available? Govt did not resort to the ordinance route. I am sorry I do not understand. .

@vishalbharti1139 9 ай бұрын

@@drsubashn4025 Sir,it was explicitly mentioned that the abrogation of article 370 can be held by the President but only on the advice of the Constituent Assembly of the J&K which Sibbal is arguing of.What the Union has done is through an implicit process,which is right in the sense and logic but a question on the process of abrogation of the article.

@aeonsleo2 9 ай бұрын

The recommendation to remove 370 should come from constituent assembly because at that time jnk Constitution was not in place. Then Constitution came and elections and constiruent assembly was dissolved. So arguably the recommendation should come from legislative Assembly which wasn't there because of President rule. This isbthe argument.

@drsubashn4025 9 ай бұрын

When J&K constituent assembly was dissolved and J&K constitution was replaced with Indian constitution , was the replacement not 100% ? How come some laws of Indian constitution were not accepted in to-to ? That's what one would expect. All provisions of Indian constitution were accepted and according to the same Indian constitution, govt of India and Indian parliament have the right and capacity amend any law without touching the basic tenets of the Indian constitution. I am not able to understand how some provisions were left out when J&K constitution was replaced with Indian constitution. . .

@kuldipsharma3119 10 ай бұрын

Very good discussion.

@grpublishers 2 ай бұрын

Chief Justice should be the role model of our youngsters rather than some chapri influencers.... Look how humble je is and how convincingly he talks.....

@swagbaba69 10 ай бұрын

I never saw this lawyer ever fighting for good of nation

@ranjnasandeep 10 ай бұрын

Sibal feels that he can make fool any one

@suvarnanaik8261 10 ай бұрын

😂👍

@yogendravasadia7922 10 ай бұрын

Because he himself is fooled by Modi Govt 😂

@ranjnasandeep 10 ай бұрын

👍😄

@arijitpyne3435 9 ай бұрын

He thinks anyone can be fooled but it is he who is actually a fool

@kamathmanoj Ай бұрын

How is CJI allowing Seeballs to interrupt his own speech 😮 contempt 😡

@pawanballi 10 ай бұрын

No law supreme than country..... Always first nation...... Law should be changed according to the need and conditions of the country....

@truthexposed4403 10 ай бұрын

Country is for the people who want to be governed by themselves by their choices,not by foreigners or any intruders who autocratically break their laws made for the govern.first human being then country then law it is the actual sequence.

@haqeeqat256 10 ай бұрын

Great discussion sibal

@sundareshkrishna6457 Ай бұрын

CJI rocks……awesome sir…🙏🏿🙏🏿

@sairamsairam9890 10 ай бұрын

I hope S C will DISMISS the Application...

@paapkishtwaer 10 ай бұрын

what if they give verdict against the abrogation ?

@vikasgowda1391 10 ай бұрын

@@paapkishtwaerhell no, just see the cross questions by CJI to sibal. And even CJI know if he restore 370 then central govt will pass the bill in both houses easily because if any opposition goes against it then it will be a death of their own in upcoming elections.

@rockyvillan562 10 ай бұрын

If it's temporary it's temporary. What's the difference then if it's permanent ??

@mitron7588 10 ай бұрын

4:47 really he is saying that temporary is not part of A370 😂😂😂

@rishavsingh2356 10 ай бұрын

Remember Sibil is mp of RS from SP which is part of I.N.D.I.A and he is in court for restoring Article 370.

@anandnairkollam 10 ай бұрын

How does the hon judge have so much time for such cases but not for common man's cases?

@vasudevannagaswamy7068 10 ай бұрын

Akanda Bharat is following sanatana dharma. Every devoted hindu should wake up from slumber and hear what Kapil Sibal is arguing. Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India and all states should follow what is practised from immemorial times. Vallabhai Patel and Ambedkar was not fir article 370. Article 370 has done so much harm to hindus and particularly Kashmiri pandits.

@sarojjena9947 10 ай бұрын

CHAPPAL IS CONFUSED OF HIS OWN EXISTENCE AS A BHARATIYA. . . . . .

@theexposer9483 10 ай бұрын

During British time many Indian lawyers use to appear against Indians and one of them was father of j l Nehru. They made lot of money by going against Indians, the same breed of people are still practising even today. No country in this world will have such type of people thriving.

@PC-tz6rw 10 ай бұрын

In fact it is this batch of people who are now termed as liberaaaands!

@truthseeker327 10 ай бұрын

they are the lutyens gang or khan market gang. they are extremely intolerant towards those who do not belong to their ilk

@medasbabu 10 ай бұрын

Sad part even after 70 years, we see people like Sibal thriving and given so much importance, he is a national shame.

@deepakkumarjoshi 9 ай бұрын

India is intact bcz of such great ppl not bcz of RSS rioter

@PC-tz6rw 9 ай бұрын

@@deepakkumarjoshi I can bet you are the devil's advocate! Very unlikely that your ID is real. The new law which has been presented in parliament will definitely make life miserable for such a lot , which passes opinions as judgements and truth. Very soon, if you shoot off the hip, even in courts, you'll have to come up with evidence and hearsay will not make a dent on judgements. That goes for fake news and concocted news too!

@surendr3645 9 ай бұрын

Between 1956 and 1994, 47 Presidential Orders were passed without any Constituent Assembly but the Order removing 370 without such an Assembly is a problem

@spikes1210 10 ай бұрын

Sibal. One man who is always hand in hand with anti-India forces

@somashreechowdhury2382 10 ай бұрын

Particular Officer of the SUPREME COURT is of the FIRM CONVICTION that ..."I am the Supreme law , I am the Supreme court Department of Telecommunication, Governm

@vking4535 10 ай бұрын

I had read Article 370 long time back and if I remember correctly it has mentioned in the definition of Art.370 that it's temporary. That word is there. So Hon.Sibbal saying it's not mentioned there in Art.370 isn't right. Although I respect Sibbals arguments here, he has made 1-2 very good points. Debates are welcome in democracy. But Kashmir was part of Bharat since Rishi Kashyap and it will be forever. Jai Hind!

@Motherfuckerofmorons 10 ай бұрын

Please Stop saying Jai Hind: we should say Mera Bharat mahaan

@Motherfuckerofmorons 10 ай бұрын

Hind and Hindustan should stop.

@nadegenius6830 10 ай бұрын

Sibbal is saying that 370 is temporary but only state assembly can provoke it. Centre can not abbrogate it without allowance from state assembly. This is the point.

@vaibhavpatel5326 10 ай бұрын

@nadegenius6830 there is no such provision that centre can not remove it

@Motherfuckerofmorons 10 ай бұрын

@@nadegenius6830 Did you watch, Farooq Abdullah's speech in parliament. Then you would never allow that to happen. This is Bharat varsh and if you allow they will allow every state to merge with Pakistan. Did you forget what happened, when Nizam's were thrown out of the throne. They wanted Hyderabad should be a Pakistani state in central India.

@phoneix_bicycle_garage 10 ай бұрын

I really respect CJI who duely have opportunity to restarin and even with can make a joke using his power as CJI but still was in control to respect his senior as it was a court proceeding for the matter of fact...hats off to personality and emotional control of CJI... And I believe as citizen of India..that our constitution and judicial system may be attacked or poisoned by politics of the present situation but still it will stand for the conscience of Indian citizen his rights ...

@pankajshah9094 9 ай бұрын

One can doubt the integrity and honesty of the Supreme Court of India. People will not have faith on such system.

@shankarcg786 9 ай бұрын

When in 1976 the word secular was introduced when half the parliament was in jail that was not violation of constitution 😊

@thankcode 10 ай бұрын

Kapil Sibal was our Law minister once, what a shame for the country.

@rameshchandrasahoo8872 10 ай бұрын

When khangress is out of power and no remote in its hand that time India is bad boy

@amitavadas7533 10 ай бұрын

We have fullest faith in this Constitutional Bench headed by Hon'ble CJI

@anshulthakre8987 10 ай бұрын

Don't so easy bro Aapne hi dhoka diya karte hai

@777-Movies 2 ай бұрын

What the Hell , Congress want 370 ?

@bluesailengineering5003 10 ай бұрын

CHAPPAL IS GOOD AT BAIL ONLY. HE HARDLY WINS ANY CASE.

@vaghelas4719 10 ай бұрын

Some body must challange "secualr word" Introduced in Constitution by Indira Gandhi during imergency on similar ground

@kamathak 10 ай бұрын

Sibbal is clueless.. He is just wasting court's time.

@LojiNeed Ай бұрын

Constitution can be amended whenever necessary for safety of the country.

@bhakarism 10 ай бұрын

If assembly consent is mandatory then how did Telangana get carved??

@hemantmallapur Ай бұрын

If Sibal is Devil's advocate who is the Devil?

@satishreddyparpelly 10 ай бұрын

People like sibble No need any other enemy for our country

@vipstervipster5002 10 ай бұрын

Stop wasting courts time, send Kapil Sibal to Pakistan. Let us close the matter of 370 and solve the evil intent of Kapil Sibal.

@paritoshpanigrahi455 9 ай бұрын

The entire nation stands with Modi Ji in the issue of Article 370.

@bhabanishankar3096 9 ай бұрын

मैं दोहराता हूं कि कोई भी जम्मू-कश्मीर में धारा 370 को दोबारा वापस नहीं ला सकता

@utsavgoel8254 10 ай бұрын

Who pays for sibbal's fees...is it the Congress party ?

@anshulthakre8987 10 ай бұрын

May be soros or Singham

@jagannathsutar2841 10 ай бұрын

They have lots of free time

@avnitchaudhary3528 9 ай бұрын

Supreme kotha of India

@maheshnag944 10 ай бұрын

कृपया हिंदी में subtitile डालें ताकि हम हिंदीभाषी भी देश के जिम्मेदार लोगों के अनुच्छेद ३७० पर उनके विचार जाने

@n.s.karanth1381 10 ай бұрын

It is a dilemma of both the parties, the hon judge and sibbal how best they can perpetuate the wishes of nehru irrespective of the wishes of constituent assembly and the larger wishes of the indian people

@prashantrathod6418 10 ай бұрын

What is Mr.Sibbal's or for that matter ANY Indian lawyers'interest against the abrogation of 370 ?? This defines logic ... The MAIN achievement of this case will be that the abrogation will get the stamp from the Supreme Court hence this problem will be settled for posterity... Well played GOI and SC... 👏

@SomTugnait 10 ай бұрын

Indian Parliament amended a law for the good of entire country.. Period...

@aryanraj-jp5nu 9 ай бұрын

Smart move by Dalal Sibal . He knows how to deal with people. Challenging court is actually telling court to put in effect Article 370 .

@Lakshyam9 9 ай бұрын

6.38 _ CJI nails it. The 370 was a temporary provision brought in- the Constituent Assembly of J&K could have made it permanent. They didn't , while agreeing to acede to India. Assembly dissolved. 370 remains a TEMPORARY providion, NEVER made permanent. Case closed. Bye Sibal. Sibal has no case.

@basudevdas1264 2 ай бұрын

Valuable VDO.

@unknownisbest 9 ай бұрын

This is a fixed match to remove public perception that Chandrachud is Sibbal’s 24/7-on-duty peon!

@ramakrishnagogineni5924 9 ай бұрын

🙏🙏🌼🌼

@nirmalk8861 2 ай бұрын

If Sibal is fighting a case, then it must be the wrong side

@ketanpatel-wu3ds 10 ай бұрын

Only a selfish lawyer would argue so vehemently for overturning the decision on abrogation of Article 370 which has brought peace to Kashmir and given human rights to the downtrodden segments of Kashmir. Disgusting.

@unnikrishnanpanikkar5254 10 ай бұрын

The very heading will frighten every patriotic Indian!!!

@user-gm8qg9cd9e 2 ай бұрын

Jai hind

@manithiruvengadaamy8491 10 ай бұрын

Kapil Sibal has to accept the tutorship of the CJI as you always claim the Judiciary is supreme

@prabhatlall160 9 ай бұрын

This is for People of India to see who are the people who don't wish good for the Nation.

@shajicherian8983 10 ай бұрын

Both are classic class of their own, Argue mentally the best.

@sidharthsanyal4243 10 ай бұрын

Shame we are discusing this even now

@gauravnathan5701 10 ай бұрын

CJI DY chandrachund is so clear, he is the real protector,,, he is really a justice

@peacekeeper9840 10 ай бұрын

Waste of taxpayers money. Some issues are above law and thats why wars are fought.

@thomasmawlong4179 10 ай бұрын

Good job sibal

@Ramarao-dq8mf 9 ай бұрын

When there is so much confusion,why do we need it? Let's have one without contradictions.

@jayaramhn8950 9 ай бұрын

Whatever may be the arguments J&K is one state among the other states of India. There were Maharajas in all other states also. Democracy is now the King of India. J&K must be treated at par with all other states. It needs no special status. Hyderabad Nizam did not wanted to join Union of India. What was done then? Same applies to J&K also. Article 370 must end. This is the opinion of more than 80% of the people of India.