Doubtful that would impress you either

God protect the arch from the whole time day and year

@@jhunethehunterlofttv7960 gap theory .

Good idea but that would be almost like a scientific experiment! Could we vote for who would crew it? I suggest Ken Ham, Matt Powell and "Dr" Kent Hovind for a start. At least we would get rid of those wastes of space for a year!

Of course, you need to add the 50-70 decades AIG estimates it took to build the 510 foot thing to survive catastrophic flooding using only pegs and untreated lumber. I bet Ham was on wood rot and bilge pump duty 'cause that baby would have taken on a lot of water.

I'm surprised you do believe it.. lol

@@StayBlessed47 (I'm pretty sure they're being sarcastic)

@@theroamer2663 Scrolling through the comments I might have to agree with you.

Well he was like 800 years old so he had gained a lot of wisdom

@@djarmstrong23 AND HE WAS THE YOUGEST IN THE FAMILY

LOL Yepper!

Cant get a better laugh... perhaps a flat earther🤔

Keep watching ,guarantee u won't stay an atheist I've seen it happen

entertaining and educational, I learned so much. apparently, the dinosaurs. excuse me, pterosaurs, 18:05 "presumed extinct" were on Noah's Ark 5,000 years ago. way cool. I was always taught the Cretaceous period was much older than 5,000 years ago. but the proof is in the penguins, who can not only live in warm climates, but they also live at the south pole and polar bears live at the north pole, and that's proven science. so dinosaurs must have been on Noah's Ark. chas v'shalom, I had it all wrong for so long

Apparently, you have not considered the fact that atheism is philosophically untenable. I will assume that you do not claim to know every mystery in the universe. Once you are willing to admit that you do not know everything in the universe, for all you know God is somewhere hidden in the holes of your knowledge. If on the other hand, you claim to know everything, then you have just made yourself the Supreme Being that you deny ... that is quite the conundrum for you. The best that you can claim is agnosticism; maybe there is and then again maybe there is no God. But atheism is a logical fallacy.

There are two other points about the title that you didn't mention. The title is in actuality a lie. First of all, atheists LIKE creationists - and they like young earth creationists the most of all. The reason for this is precisely because young earth creationist belief is itself a great demonstration, and such an obvious example, of the fundamentally irrational nature of religious belief. Second, the very premise of the title's remark is completely bogus - this is because, in reality the vast majority of NON-atheists (i.e., theists) around the world reject the religious doctrine of young earth creationism and disagree with young earth creationists JUST LIKE ATHEISTS DO. Indeed, even the vast majority of Christians around the world reject young earth creationism - and they think young earth creationism pseudoscience is just as bogus as atheists do. It's because of this obvious fact, that the very premise of the title is a lie: Every single time a creationist tries to pretend that this is some kind of "theists versus atheists" debate, he is literally employing a blatant lie. Of course, that is certainly NOT the only lie employed in creationist rhetoric. Creationist rhetoric is absolutely PERMEATED with all sorts of different lies like this, from one end to the other. It's all of these lies, big and little, that fill creationist rhetoric, because belief in creationism, and young earth creationism especially, literally REQUIRES all of these lies in order to sustain it and promote it.

@@steveg1961 I would agree that the title is presumptuous, unless there is some kind of a way to measure the reaction of atheist that shows that atheist actually "do not like this part..." For example, does it always stump them in debates, is there a poll, a statistic; was there a questionaire that went out? Personally, I don't think the point of any ministry should be to "stump" the opposition to the Gospel. I don't see anywhere in the Bible when God asks us for help to defend his existance, and to scientifically validate the Word of God. Certainly, we should not intentionally provoke animosity in those who are already offended by the Word of God. Our job is not to mock "weak arguemnents," or talk down to people if they make arguements with little scientific evidence or big words. Worldly scoffers, and mockers and opponents to God will always be around, and increasingly more so in these latter times. But, our job as Christians is to bear the brunt of it with patience, not with rebuttles, and counter-mocking and counter-scoffing. Our job is to simply present the Good news that God provided the Lamb of God, Jesus Christ, to be a substitute for our execution in judgment. The sin of Adam courses through our veins. We are the blood enemies of God by virtue of our Adamic ancestry. But God had mercey on us, like He had mercy on Noah and his family, insomuch that He has provided another Ark of Salvation for anyone who chooses to enter through the door. Praise God.

@ D Rodriguez You are right from one perspective. However the click bait phenomenon has been employed here and without question has served it's purposes.

@@steveg1961 It appears the atheist will always be entertained by facts they cannot comprehend or are afraid to ponder. The lack of understanding generates a notion of fear and always has a response of ridicule or profanity. This acts as a mechanism to make quite any aroused interest in uncomfortable truth. Shame really because they are willingly ignorant. However we Christians are compelled by God's love to lay the truth before them so they have opportunities to hear truth and are without excuse when judgement is executed. I genuinely fear for them. The collective bravado that encourages them to ignore things that really matter.,,😟

Good point! Did you know with your last name that you could have sephardic jewish roots in your family history?

It’s amazing that Pangaea was most likely a thing and then they actually addressed how Noah got the animals in the video. You might even say it’s believable.

or Noah didn't go to the animals, the animals came to Noah. crazy concept, I know

@@nathanrussell6483 Yeah, because the time of Pangaea completely fits in with the bible timeline. Sure, uh huh.

@@nathanrussell6483 are you for real? I can't tell.

@@bboennemann Right, because Pangaea existed 5k years ago 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Politely, it's been 4 told, we're the second most dangerous critter on the face of the earth. 1st is mosquitoes. B Strong, stand your ground.

How about all the other creatures on Earth are you going to make them also. You don't make any sense.

God promised He wouldn't destroy the Earth with water again.

Fire next

@@jamesbrice6619 maybe so but humans will 😆

The more things change.. the more they are the same

It wasn't done 6000 years ago. It wasn't done ever. It's a fairy tale.

@@NBGTFO even with alll the proof that is presented. Those that do not want to see, let them remain blind;-)

@@NBGTFO when you are judged by God, you will find out it isn’t a fairytale. Trust me, God is real. Creation is proof. The Big Bang makes no sense and goes against science “matter can not be created or destroyed,” but somehow creation just came from nothing. A creator only makes sense

@@NBGTFO How do you know?

yes it the best joke ever

did you know it was flood damaged when it first went up, and they couldn't claim, very amusing. god being mysterious.

Yup! God controlled the animals’ instincts for the family’s safety in the time until the ark landed (and also to make them mass migrate to the upper Mesopotamian Valley where Noah’s ark was before the flood) so it’s likely that this lasted a bit longer.

Rig Driscoll says: *My favorite part of the story is when the ark landed the carnivores waited long enough for the herbivores to reproduce before eating them.* There were no carnivores on the Ark because all animals ate plants prior to Noah's flood. What was on the Ark were the herbivore ancestors of carnivores and those carnivores descended or evolved sometime after Noah's flood after the population of animals had already increased.

@@danielblair4413 evolved?????? descended ????????? so Evolution is true..........

@@Rob2000 😂

@@Rob2000 nobody has ever denied the ability for animals and plants to adapt over time. That's a straw man

Nope, Unicorns are mentioned in the Bible as are dragons (Dinos)....You need to do your research.

@@alantasman8273 the definition of unicorn as we know it today didn't come about until a few hundred years ago. The unicorn that is mentioned in the Bible is also known as the single horned rhinoceros.

@@dustinumholtz2864 I'll check that. Unicorns are mentioned in book of Job, I think.

The Far Side?

Ken Hamm both claims that there were dinosaurs on the ark and that the flood wiped out the dinosaurs.

Creationists can't even provide a biological definition of KIND.

Since (according to fundamentalists) the flood is supposed to have occurred in 2350 BC, and Abraham was born 232 years after the flood. That means most of that diversification would have had to be done in less than 232 years. Because Abraham's story is set in the late early bronze age, we have lots of evidence from that period of diverse interconnected civilizations spanning a globe full of diversity. I used to entertain the idea of a flood more like 14000 years ago (because there was a big flood) but it was not global. Which means the Noah story is more of a cautionary tale borne out of racial memory. "Fill the world with violence and the world will be destroyed" Everyone should believe that part of the story. "Do not allow the imagination of your heart to be only evil continually, or bad things happen." That's true. And that was the point. The point was never, "Oh wow, look at all the engineering Noah did." They strain out gnats and swallow camels.

GOD is the answer. The only one I need. “For the wisdom of this WORLD is foolishness in God’s sight. As it is written: “He catches the wise in their craftiness”;” ‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭3:19‬ ‭NIV‬‬

There is a huge difference between macro and micro evolution. Please educate yourself before you attack.

@@con.troller4183 Wolf is a kind Cat is a kind If you have one of each you would have two kinds. Pretty simple.

it makes perfect sense that only the baby dinosaurs would fit onto the arc

@@hoppyandhisholidayhelpers1714 Yes, those old video clips of Jesus galloping into Bethlehem on the back of a stegosaurus has always been the proof enough I guess...

@@airmark02 I was taught that Jesus rode in on a T-Rex and had an M-16, and a light saber. but I was raised reformed, not fundamentalist.

@@hoppyandhisholidayhelpers1714 So it was his side kick Susie the Hedgehog who rode the Stegosaurus?..

@@airmark02 anything is possible on this Ark. I think that even PT Barnum would find the concept of 'dinosaurs on Noah's Ark' to be too profane to make a profit on.

What a stunning and brave choice to allow for criticism.

To be fair, it's also one of the few times (in my experience) where a creationist video has so few vulgar remarks by atheists regarding creationists intelligence.

@@ervindark Yes, atheists can be better about this. Myself included.

I was stunned when I saw the comments were open.

@@tookie36 and we're all super impressed with that observation

You are not going to like burning in hell for eternity.

Plot twist: you really aren't an atheist.

@@joemariejames4757 But it's so amusing. What's there not to like?

God bless you Alec :)

What are you waiting for friend?

but this isn't ... fun Fact Since they are using actual lights, lets only talk about how long has man been using electricity this way ... Realistically (as fucking amazing as it is) we've only been using Electricity since about 150 to 200 years ago, i mean i'm not talking about when the greeks discovered the existence of electrical charge, i'm talking about THE ACTUAL PRACTICAL PUTTING TO USE OF IT (say Lights, Street Lights) Only about 200 years THAT'S A FACT !!! fucking weird, huh ?

@@martinkuliza I think the Leyden Jar, invented 1745, was the first practical use of electricity. Though it wasn't commonly used by the general public, it was used in diverse scientific experiments, including those of Benjamin Franklin -- who coined the term "battery" to describe a series of such jars all lined up like a battery of cannons.

No silly, they had thousands of candles that they would keep lit, and a few extra tons of wax, Obviously!

You forgot to mention the AC

@@martinkuliza My mother was born in 1923 and their home had no electricity until FDR and Rural Electrification, when she was 10 or so. Just imagine!

Lol(!!) ... good one 🙂 ...

in 2006 and beyond, gospel-preaching prophets predicted DT would have 2 consecutive terms but second term would be stolen, he would be impeached, a plague would go worldwide, god would remove Roe, remove JB, and purge USA of corrupt leaders, all at once. tube serch trump.prophecies and kim.clement. God is removing many world leaders in 2022 - so far the prime minsters of India, Sri Lanka, UK, Italy, Pakistan, and ex-PM of Japan who was still very politically active. And more to go, like the PM of CN. When you see more fulfilled prophecy, you will call it a coincidence.

Why’s that? You don’t state your case.

@@alitlweird Fishing but the fish aren't biting. Maybe try a different river?

@@alitlweird That you even need to ask the question after watching the video makes my point.

@@charlesvandenburgh5295 being cryptic is not impressive

its a miracle we made it this far.

BTW, the word “kind” is used in a nonsensical fashion at this “museum”.

lots of coffee

As long as it is a young male and female why not? I assume you have a number of objections but I won't assume what they are.

Yeah. Why not?

Inbreeding. A population restarted from two animals have a genetic pool full of mutations. But, but, God may be an answer to all of you whose tv only played the tv evangelicals while you were growing up. But for those of us who grew up with the Discovery Channel, learned real science in school, not an answer.

@@jefferygoldthorpe919 the only objection you need is we now with science would be able to tell all animals came from inbreeding. Every single test of ANY animal would show the same results...but what do you know!!! Nothing.... If you are interested look at the cheetah and how we know they were almost extinct

@@jerusalem330 science, that's why

You need to look into the soft dinosaur tissue found on at least five continents so far. You seem dogmatic about evolution so you probably would support that soft dinosaur tissue can last 65+ millions of years. Now that would be laughable.

@@alantasman8273 cite peer reviewed publications please. What you call "soft tissue" is likely fossilized tissue that was put in a acid bath for weeks in order to separate it from something else. And it becomes softer in the process. Everytime I hear a creationist say we found "soft tissue" it turns out to be either a lie or a complete misunderstanding of what the scientists actually did.

@@alantasman8273 What is laughable is the willful ignorance on display here.

@@alantasman8273 Yeah let's go with that......all the non-christian scientific experts in their particular fields are alllll wrong about dinosaurs and you have it right. It's all a big huge conspiracy. (Rolls eyes)

@@stevenkinney2740 Soft dinosaur tissue discoveries have been made by reputable scientists who have published their research. Stop being a science denier.

Thats what im saying, as amazing as that replica looks...does not prove anything

Not "evolution" purported change in genetic information, natural selection-- loss or suppression of genetic information-- see Mendel. This is especially true for r selected populations compared to K selected.

God shut the lions' mouths when Daniel was thrown into pit and He put Adam to sleep during Eve's creation so He could've put them into a slow motion existence or whatever. Yet, this is a guessing game on the part of the exhibit creators so since no one knows 100% what the kinds looked like they had to do their best.

They believe in evolution within kinds but do not believe in evolution as far as one kind morphing into another kind. For example, from cats you get all kinds of cats but they don't believe that a cat could turn into a dog.

It’s “variation” not evolution. One kind can have many different variations. We are all one humankind but with many different visual variations within our kind. We’ve bred dogs to be very different from one another in a very short period of time. The early animal kinds as they repopulated the earth could have displayed variation quickly as they traveled to survive. But a bear doesn’t change into a tiger. In Genesis all animals were herbivores. Once man sins by disobeying God it brought death to all things. After sin animals began killing each other. The New Testament explains how the whole earth along with all the animals groan like birth pains waiting for man kinds redemption. The predictor animals on the ark could have easily eaten plants and then once the earth has repopulated they could have easily reverted back to killing and eating meat. If you don’t believe in God and the Bible it will be impossible to believe anything the Ark Encounter is presenting.

Don't being science and obvious fact into this discussion!

Their standard answer here.......MAGIC! lol

"How does she figure aquatic animals wouldn't need to be on the ark" Well since there was already plenty of water outside the Ark ...I guess those creatures would have enough to survive on their own. By the way, fossils of entire whales and many other aquatic creatures have found perfectly preserved in coal seems and rock strata....so yes, many, not all of them were buried during the flood.

@@alantasman8273 you didn‘t understand his comment at all. fish are specialised to live in waters with salt levels that match in what kind of water they evolved. fresh water fish die in salt water and vice versa

The bible only states fowl, creeping and beasts. No aquatic animals are mentioned.

Lol

I don’t know anything about the Ark, but I do know that mitochondrial dna showed a world-wide bottleneck about 150,000 years ago. Stoeckle and Thaler data.

Life really is diverse and changes rapidly! I let a domesticated pink pig out into the wild and within weeks it had changed colors to brown and it’s face started to look like a boar more than a pig! I’ve seen the same thing happen to a domesticated rabbit that got released into the wild, it’s coat changed color and it’s ears began to sit differently on its head. THESE TWO EVENTS TOOK A COUPLE WEEKS! IT DIDNT TAKE MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF YEARS! I have many more examples that thwart the uniformitarianist doctrine that was made up by a 14 year old Charles Darwin. Imagine the theories I could come up with as a 14 year old. He was making the theory up late in the enlightenment period. His neighbors were the Jeffersons (Thomas Jeffersons family) and the Bartrams (William Bartrams family) And today we use a 14 year olds theory as our truth of truths in regards to the age of the earth, Charles Darwin thought the world looked old, therefore it must be old. This was a 14 year olds theory you are using as your truth of truths. The Bible already warns you about false idols, looks like you missed the message. Why come on here to be a naive smart aleck?

@@sliglusamelius8578 do you have a link to a video or something, I want to know more about what your talking about

@@Asmokedetector Look up Stoeckle and Thaler mitochondrial dna study online. Nobody quite knows how to interpret the result lol. I sure don’t, but apparently all extant fauna can be traced to ancestors no earlier than about 150,000 or so years ago. Since the study authors believe that life arose much earlier than that (they are committed to the standard evolution paradigm), they posit a world-wide bottleneck from some unknown cause or catastrophe.

let allone that it took them 3 times as long to rebuild the ark if you count years in manpower. while the had all kind of heavy machinery

All jokes aside this is the same age that all the ancient pyramids around the world were made obviously humans had harnessed some sort of technology that is supressed from us today

I've never understood how cameramen in wars never get shot.

Let's not forget the plumbing needed for all those toilets and urinals. This had to have been the most important technology that was lost to mankind.

@@ryleighloughty3307 they do

Dinos are birds...laughable....By the way. full sized dinos weren't needed on the Ark. God probably brought younger more fertile dinosaurs to repopulate the Earth.

@@alantasman8273 What is laughable about it? There were no "dinosaurs" during the time of Noah, except for avian descendants of dinosaurs. Have you ever seen a cassowary? Tell me that is not a dino. They have legs and feet like a raptor with a raptor claw.

They had pairs of baby dinosaurs

@@Disciplekidsministry What were those dinosaurs called in the bible? Give me the Greek and Hebrew.

Read Job chapter 40 verses 15-24 and all of chapter 41. They are called “behemoth” and “leviathan”. Read the description. The term “dinosaur” wasn’t coined until 1841. It was another word for dragon.

Took Noah roughly 100 years to build the ark so plenty of time for all things considered

In their story someone can live to be 600 years old, mm so, maybe . . .

Read the Bible.

@@JCnumber1 so he build such a boat on his own and harvested 400 tons of food too in the same time? Have you ever talked to a farmer? What do you think? That farmers don’t have to do a lot of work to produce their crops, so they have time for a little sideproject like constructing a giant boat? And how old did Noah get then if he already Needed 100 years for his boat?

@@redpoppy3569 you know people wrote the bible? It is not as if god handed down the first copy to us. No, people wrote it, and in all the centuries that followed, people rewrote it countless of times before the printingpress. And you still think that thing is the actual word of god that needs to be interpreted to the letter? You guys are funny 😄

Stop trying to make sense of this nonsense. They don't want to answer your legit questions, they just want your money!

The freshwater from the rain remained on top of the denser saltwater, creating a layer where some fish could survive.

What are you talking about?

I was skeptical about fish growing legs at first. But then I saw the artists renditions, and it all made sense.

Fish are fish and dinosaurs are dinosaurs- the definition of dinosaur is even in the video!

@@cc3636tech I don't think it's a coincidence the word God was mentioned 7 times in the movie Jurassic Park.

you do know that Jorrasic park was a fiction book loosly based on dinosaur facts, many paleontologists have been vocal about the inaccuracies and they understand that the movies are for mainly entertainment purposes

Being a great speaker does not mean that what she says is the truth.

@@douglaidlaw740 Yes you're right. I clearly just mentioned she was a great speaker. Take care.

@@douglaidlaw740 what did she say that wasn't true?

@@jroddy1 he meant: what she said doesnt line up with the propaganda hes chosen to believe:)

@@douglaidlaw740 nope the dinosaurs were not on the ark. They were in the first earth age before the over throw of Satan. If they were on the ark, they would still be here today. People do not realize how huge these animals were. That’s why people need to read about the 3 earth and heaven ages in the Bible. Many are ignorant of the 3 ages, simple bc they weren’t taught the truth.

Why is that ? You do get poodles from wolfs lol

@@tened8530 not in 3000 years you dont Also that is called evolution funny how you cant seem to run away from it

@@rickojay7536 I don’t get what you mean by 3000 years it took a lot less than that to get poodles lol

@@tened8530 Don't waste your time trying to have a Logical discussion with atheists; they believe life came from rocks. LOL

Proof?

in ur hypothetical did she kick off the other 7 adults documented to be there?

@@brandonchaney1640 lol 😂 I’m hypothetical, and the arc of Noah is a documented fact 🤣😂🤡. But ok 8 people, the girl in the video talks about almost 7000 animals on this ship. Well then let me rephrase, can she on her own take care of 900 animals on her own for an entire year, waste-manegemant, food, let’s not forget maintenance, because a lot of animals have for instance nails or claws of some kind that naturally are maintained by extensive walking. Are they going to treat those on wild animals? And medical care? And giving birth? I see those animals are kept together, so since there’s nothing else to do they will breed like crazy and most don’t have a pregnancy longer then a years, so a lot of animals giving birth on that boat 🫣. Pretty doubtful 8 people could handle all that. Not to mention the maintenance of the ship self, those animals will break doors or something in there cage, which will need reparations to keep them safe or to keep them locked up. Besides large animals for a year in such a small environment? You think that would cause problems with their joints and muscles. This story is so far fetched that it’s ridiculous people actually believe it happened (not to mention that if all ice melts, that there still isn’t enough water to submerge the entire land.)

Ask her to explain how the kangaroos got off the ark and hopped to Australia, taking with them all traces of evidence including bones of dead. She's completely clueless to reality. Tell me I'm wrong lol

After her lame answer on kangaroos, ask her how fresh water fishes are around today when the saltwater was everywhere according to the flood. Even salt water fish could perish from too much fresh water. I feel sorry for ANY animal in their care let alone a human being seeking knowledge from them.

do some more research and it is possible for eight people to handle this many. consider hibernation practices of some animals and the idea that many animals would not have to be in separate cages as shown. How many people have to work on a dairy farm with 500 head? They have feedings and three a day milking. But even with modern equipping, they all have to be assisted one at a time into the pen and set up to the machines? But just keeping 500 herbivores alive is only about feeding and mucking the area a couple times a week. An entire third of the lower level could have been set up with 31,800 tons of hay and the animals allowed to eat into the wall themselves. This is enough for 500 full grown elephants for 425 days. The care would only have to be watering and mucking. The watering system could have permitted them to simply turn on a gravity fed system.

Christians:" atheists not gonna like this " Atheists: watching cats videos God: What did you do with the oportunities I even visibily showed you: Athiest: Uh.... watch Cat videos God: Depart from me, I never knew you...go to the place prepared for the Devil and his angels.

@@eijentwun5509 L comment

@@eijentwun5509 Christians: " atheists not gonna like this" Atheists: watching cats videos Someone impersonating his God: what did you do with .... Blah blah ( too long mate) Atheists: still watching cats videos

Salt water isn't good for them .

@@shirleybradshaw1288 MODERN seeds are proven to survive FOR YEARS in the open ocean. YEARS.

Don't worry. New trees can be planted and they will grow back. They ALWAYS do. God's creative power is AWESOME!

@@blackcanaryable how do you know god made the trees?

Not to mention how a 600 year old man moved the trees to the building location? And how he can use untreated wood to build a boat? The story as more holes in it than swiss cheese. LOL

@@blackcanaryable 🤣🤣🤣 stop that's hilarious

@@blackcanaryable Yes but I bet the people who built that display didn't replant trees, and even if they did it would take many many years to get to the size of some of those beams I see that were used to build the Ark.

Rodents would not have existed with synapsids because synapsids evolved into rodents anyways

Umm, yes flyes still do that and we are not over populated with flys right now, I wonder how the insect population has been kept at bay all these years 🤔

@@jubileeYAVEL yes because a fly being stuck on one boat is the same as a fly being stuck on earth which is significantly bigger then Noah boat.

@@jubileeYAVEL I started with flies, then mentioned rodents. Think of the scenario: many types of animals, insects, mammals whatever breed quickly in life, and often. Pigs can breed before a year old. All these animals and insects would be mass mating... I mean, this is just so ridiculous to a lot of us.

@@dgeneric7518 the ark has alien technology that is beyond our comprehension its pretty obvious.

so... there weren't fish on the Ark, because they were all in the water already...🙃 oh and there were dinosaurs too.😳

You win the Darwin Award!

Christians and Jews believe the land was divided later and the land was originally on continent just like scientists do. We just disagree with the timeline.

DNA bank according to Ancient Aliens. I call it well a miracle! Whether it be of the supernatural or the scientic sorcery it's still amazing.

Checkmate, atheists!

Kangaroos aren't real. Neither are Platypuses. Source: I am Australian

True. Although a modern construction crew means 30 people working, 270 standing around making sure the 30 are safe 😜

@@thux2828 and 15 of the 30 are apprentices 😏

Maybe 75 years plus he had family help

@ with an advanced supply chain for the materials needed

Your comment just emphasizes how impossible this is

I’m happy to see this. How much money did these religious fanatics waste on it? Just means less money the extremists have to influence politics

@@gavindy_Sv2 if its just fanaticism, why did they find teh ark? the real ark has been found and verified using latest ultrasound tech. tube serch "noah ark evidence for location" and "noah ark in plain sight"

Amen what’s impossible for man to do, it’s all possible with God.

@@jennifergonzalez9129 Could God make A equal A, and not A at the same time?

My question is just, why didn't god just snap his fingers and kill every sinner instantly evaporating Thier bodies. I mean god could do anything right? Making this intire ark thing completely useless and a waste of time?

So many things I wouldn’t have made through alone, God was with me too. That’s why I believe it.

It's not that we think it's impossible, it's that there is no real proof, and therefore, it cannot be stated as fact, there very well could be a God or gods, however, because there is no evidence, we can't reasonably say this is a default, especially when there is more proof backing other theories.

Try taking them to a science centre. They may learn something

Wheres this at?

@ Riku Koskela What makes you think they didn’t learn anything here?

@@rikukoskela2791 Yea, but that a hard thing to do for a xian.... they believe science is of the devil.

This is a bot like comment

Ken has stated in other videos they used modern tools to make the ark and there are alot of features they has to put in. The size is the only thing that's accurate. Everything else is how it could of worked in Noah's time. For example they have to put a concrete barrier as the floor for fire code, there are other examples too mentioned. The exhibits are just how things could of worked back they the aren't saying everything is exact.

@@codystephens5939 Did the videos provide any information on the person- hours required to build it?

@@davekearney1944 noah and his sons took 100 odd years to build it and who sais they never had help from paid emplyees/contractors etc

@@brettmciver432 I didn't offer an opinion regarding outside help in building the ark. However, I can imagine the conversation when he asked for help - "Hey Noah - what's with the big boat?". "Well neighbor..It's not a boat, it's an ark. I'm building it because there's a big flood coming, and you're gonna drown. Wanna help me with it?". You see....everyone but Noah and his kin was evil at that time, and required drowning. The first rule of ark-building is - never ask an evil person to help. They will mess it up, and when you're all done, they'll kill you and steal your ark.

@@brettmciver432 ....and more importantly, if you examine the syntax of my original post - I was first wondering how many person-hours were required to build the replica.

@@gongbong1 so you think that in the time period when this was written to be in, a man lived to be 50 years old AND he built an entire ark? We know that life expectancy is greatly lowered in historical times, and in the first century people lived an average of 25-40 years old because of lack of healthcare and many other factors. So again, you think it is reasonable to think that someone who lived hundreds of years before even that, lived to be PAST 50 years old and had the strength and stamina to build an ark? Ridiculous. Even if it is 600 months, it still makes no logical sense.

This was edited recently? Was there something even more far fetched that was cut out?

God will not be mocked.

@@aimtrue918 Exodus 20:5 "You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me." This is a very important verse as it proves that the Bible lies. We have the statistics, loving, hating or ignoring Yahweh has no effect. Health, accidents, pregnancy, luck or any measure you name religion makes no difference. More science often helps but not prayer or religion. So yes we can mock your deity or any other and the deity does NOTHING.

@@chrisyoung5929 Exodus 20:6 "but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments."

@@chrisyoung5929 First, dont just grab a verse (out of context) to attempt to show yourself correct. Rightly divide, who is the writer speaking to in Exodus? Prayer has significantly changed my life and "science" wouldn't be possible without Him. No need to attempt to explain away my Lord and my God to me. Thats impossible. I have seen science be proven incorrect in my life down to the 8th generation. It is true. God is real, the Bible is real, TRUTH, and He is coming. Every knee will bow, every tongue will confess Jesus Christ is Lord, and sir that's not going to taste very good when it's too late. Which will be so very soon. I don't put Him in a box. His power is limitless. He won't be mocked. As for me and mine, we choose our Lord. I say none of this as an attack on you, If I kneew you and we could sit face to face, I'd give you my full testimony and show you through the Bible where fact cant be denied. No need to further this conversation. Good day.

From where did all the water is the oceans come? What efffect would a lot of water coming and flooding a planet have on a planet? When did science tell us about oceanic trenches and ridges? Psalm 104:6 Thou coveredst it with the deep as with a garment: the waters stood above the mountains. 7 At thy rebuke they fled; at the voice of thy thunder they hasted away.8 They go up by the mountains; they go down by the valleys unto the place which thou hast founded for them. 9 Thou hast set a bound that they may not pass over; that they turn not again to cover the earth.

Water evaporates. Weak argument

@@emekaossai5485 uhhh, yeah, it evaporates into the sky where it becomes clouds and then rains back down. Soo where did it all go??

answersingenesis.org/the-flood/feedback-where-did-all-floodwater-go/

Matter can not be created, nor destroyed. Another great point.

The hundreds of thousands of species of beetles

Not sure why Jesus couldn't help, he was a "Master" carpenter who couldn't produce a single birdhouse or toothpick, so masterfull

At 6500 ft elevation in Turkey, they are 3D scanning the ark which show conventioal structure. Minor excavations have dug up nails, rivets, fossilized animal dung, fur, a horn. KZfaq search 3D ark scans.

they found original ark - metal nails, rivets, bulkhead, ribs, and upon shallow excavation they found animal fur, fossil dung, and a horn. tube serch 3D ark scans

You forgot the manual pumps that had to pump the water out because it wouldn’t have been water tight.🤪

@@jeanyan7738 lol shhh Jean just shhhhh

😂😂😂

You'll regret that

Should just rename it the comedy channel and be done with it 🤣🤣🤣

@@silentghost751 Why's that?

@@silentghost751No he won't, why should he regret having a good at a fairytale. You've got to be kidding. All that money wasted. Wake up.

Your ignorance is profound. You either can't or won't fathom how completely different the Earth and its inhabitants were prior to The Flood, and before that The Fall. Watch Kent Hovind's Creation Seminar if you dare to have your paradigm rocked. I doubt you have the stones to watch and learn with an open mind. You go ahead and keep believing in your Darwinian fantasy.

I also found it amusing when she mentioned a Shark that eats grass. Maybe there is one. However, that doesn’t really help explain the utter bullshit she’s saying.

indeed compared to average theist everyone else is a genious i wonder why we call them theists and not idiots would be more fiting i think

Polar bears eat vegetables, occasionally, yes. That's accurate. I also think you're a genius.

polar bears came later because the poles were not there before the flood. the entire earth was tropical before the flood.

Ark Encounters produced historically accurate bronze age air conditioning. Checkmate Atheist!

Surely it had AC.

Surely it had AC.

They had ice cream machines and xbox 360's, didn't you read the bible?

@@C4rnee It's in GenSys 3/60

Lol

Ignorance is a badge of honor to some. Supposedly, man's first sin was gaining knowledge.

@@robertraab supposedly

😂😂😂😂lol

LOL.... Haha.... Yet with ALL your education and wisdom that is the best comment you can muster..... yes friend I am laughing as well, keep it coming!

Warsaw Poland used to have one of those as well

Sounds more like a dragon lol

phosphorous does not burn in water, just oxygen. The Kimodo "dragon" a large monitor lizard (man killer) has a long red flickering tongue that seems to be fire coming from its mouth. .Possible origin of the Dragon myth....

Dragons were actually out before they made the Dinosaur up. Not saying either we’re real but if I had to pick it would be the Dragon

There were "dragons", yes. And there are still dinosaurs most likely still alive if the legend of Loch Ness has any truth to it.

Not mythology 😂

@@silentghost751 pretty sure is mythology

@Slavery is Freedom, War is Peace what if the highest mountain was not Mt. Everest at this time? The Bibel say this in Psalm 104 , 6-8 so it could be the highest mountain was a lot smaller. What is the Problem with the Poop? They put it in to the water ?

Fish didn't need to go on the ark as they could survive in the water.

The Fish survive in water... there was a lot of water ;), the water is in the ocean and underground.. Psalm 104 6-8 the world was probably not the same before the sintflut. Genesis 6, 21 tells something about food, the ship survived with swimming ;)

Oh that’s easy, it never happened.

It is hardly worth the bother of asking those kinds of sensible questions.

You’ve been there twice and you want a third🤦🤭. Are you a glutton for punishment. This will fry your brain 🤯.

Karina certainly doesn’t have a grasp of paleontological science ! She’s formulating her own version…….totally disregarding the scientific method! She needs to actually engage with some knowledgeable paleontologists, not Ken who is sadly misinformed, but most likely will never see the actual truth of the scientific method as it has been exercised to give us a true picture of the geological eras and their fossil histories !

@@lynnasche5147 It does make me wonder if these stories weren’t in the bible would they still be believed 🤷‍♂️. I doubt it but they go along with it to justify there bible.

@@lynnasche5147 There's evidence of Noah's flood all around the world. Dinosaurs were killed because of a catastrophic flood and the fossil record and the earth's geology proves this.

​@@lynnasche5147 that is hilarious.... secular paleontology is philosophy, there are ZERO transitional fossils. Darwins theory is evil, racist and full of such gaping holes, you'd need masses of blind tust in fallible dishonest man, to believe it. The Biblical record of history is confirmed again and again by archeology, history, personal testimony.. The bible is full of fulfilled prophecy and prophecy not fulfilled yet. Judgement is coming, choose Jesus, He's your way to peace, joy, hope, life. Darwins theory is just that......guesswork, dont stake your eternity on flimsy ideas.

Wait til there's another flood.

@@jensandersen7011 Yes. Because there’s millions of floods happening all the time. Don’t see one completely swallowing the land right now.

in scandinavia somewhere, there is another slightly smaller ark - maybe norway?

yes its called disney

@The why would they bring marine life on the boat? It was for land animals or else God would have told him to build a floating aquarium . The active word in polar bear is "bear" . Just like grizzly " bear " .brown " bear" . Any rudimentary knowledge of genetics refutes what you're saying . It takes MORE faith to believe a frog turned into a human than to have faith that a guy built a boat . Which has been documented all over the world . China is one of the oldest civilizations still existing . It's writing is one of the oldest in existence . Older than Egypt. It's old.old old old . And there writing characters are based on that flood story . You'd have to be out to lunch to call a frog your ancestor . And the missing link doesn't exist . There is no missing link. And skeletal remains that old are hodge podged from different findings. Hell , they used bits of bone to reconstruct skulls . A FrankenLucy . They conveniently keep that part of their theory out of their faith based " theory of evolution " The operative word being theory . Because that's all that it is . A theory . Darwin was smart enough to be able to recognize adaptation with minor mutations. But he wasn't smart enough to reslize You can't mutate a living organism that way and expect it to live and thrive. No matter how long it took . That crazy stuff only happens in movies like the FLY or altered states . That leap of faith makes a bible thumper's faith look sane and normal comparatively

According to scripture God brought the animals to Noah.

@Slavery is Freedom, War is Peace Actually there are cave paintings in India which could be representative of kangaroos. The explanation is that kangaroos and the like migrated from the ark to a location where they could eventually thrive. Only the population in Australia survived. All other populations died out. The first two kangaroos didn't hop all the way to Australia. More likely it was a group of their descendants several hundred years later.

@Slavery is Freedom, War is Peace Fossils require a catastrophic burial event to form, therefore fossils of kangaroos might not form. Why would it take thousands of years to migrate that far? Populations under pressure often move much faster. The Chinese have written records going back to about 1250 BC, which is only 3250 years ago, not 5000. The Australian aboriginals have no artifacts of any kind which can be reliably dated, using either luminescence dating or carbon dating. Even then scholars disagree, some putting it as recently as 10,000 years and others going as far to say 70,000 years. Carbon dating does not take the flood into account. This would have buried most of the available carbon effectively resetting the C14/12 clock. By the way did you know that the person who invented carbon dating assumed that the amount of C14 in the atmosphere was stable? New measurements prove it isn't.

Even the flat earthers find these people comedy gold

Most laugh at this😂

All the money, they've made out of this arc is amazing. Greedy sods.

@@toni4729 It loses money.

I find this like a train wreck that I simply can’t look away .

@Royal S biomolecules spontaneously Form. We know this.

@Royal S not out of nothing, out of molecules under heat. Thats it. Also, the last paragraph of your message is just buzzwords. Give me the peer reviewed studies.

@Royal S yes! I do! Or other studies, if you cant find peer reviewed ones! Just saying that people have disproven it doesnt mean they actually have.

@Royal S then give me the studies!

The kinds model beats something? Other than Ken Ham Eggs? I actually prefer the Russell Crowe version of the myth best - Genocide, and then kill the baby. Fits the character of Yahweh from the rest of the storybook.

Wrong

Grifters gunna grift

@@silentghost751 what am I wrong about?

@@tobymax10 it's not a myth

Really? There’s no evidence at all to prove that.

Yes, like Richard Dawkins

Read Darwin’s Doubt.

@@truewordz777 Richard Dawkins gives evidence for his claims. Sorry try again!

@@tomfoolery1967 so the man had doubts. Thats how people with scientific understanding think unlike religious people especially Christian’s that values never having doubt about any particular topic.

That's literally everyone on earth at some point. And stop acting as if genetics/characteristics can't be dormant or hidden until an outside stimulus is felt. If you tried to turn on every single feature of your car at the same time, chances are it would stop working really fast, namely the accelerator and brakes, or even all the lights. There are reasons why those features have 'on/off' switches and valves. Same idea for DNA: If a dog that had both the short hair gene and the long haired gene moved to a colder climate, then the short-hair gene regressed. What else did the need - Larger nostrils because colder climates could also mean higher elevations. Thicker pads on their paws, and other things. So I must throw your last statement back at you. If you don't catch it, that's fine. You can train to catch things until your brain hardwires the new protocols - using the different genetics and characteristics that were already present.

Careful, you are going to force these people to think. They don't want that. Just answer your own questions about the ark with their standard answer to all difficult questions......"it was god magic". LOL

Ask the same question about the 310 pigeons variation or dogs.

Evolution natural selection

@@rashadmalice312 Natural selection can`t add new information. No new information, no evolution.

@@alexanderstephen1567 Bears are the youngest of the carnivore families, they come from doglike ancestors called Miacids during the Eocene Epoch 55 million to 38 million years ago and For example Polar bears have white fur due to natural selection. I'm just trying to answer the question from a evolution stand point.we know natural selection had to come in at some point.

I've got a pet newt. I call him Tiny, since he's my newt.

@@CravingBeer It took me a worryingly long time to get that joke. But then again, I'm a salamander and can barely read.

@@RTD553 I’m a gay dinosaur. My friends call me Megasoreass.

@@thefanficdinosaur7621 I'm sure there's a flag for you and a march to go on.

🤣🤣

And don't forget the little insects god created whos sole purpose in life is to bore thru the eyes of children for food and nourishment..those horrible creatures. Noah saved them. I hope noah had some baby eye balls they could feed on for a year. LOL

If you look on the Chines calendar all the animals are real, or do you not see the dragon as real? Why? It's not because of historic evidence but modern cartoons. In the same way you put out a pink haired unicorn when the descriptions through history are of a hairy rhino that we now know was real, but died out. Christian scientists believe animals go extinctic, I know you agree. But do we agree that the Bible has value as written history even if it goes against assumed secular teachings taught as fact when the secular teachings lack the evidence for what they claim? The word Dragon is an old word, the word Dinosaur is fewer than 200 years old. The word might be new, but the beast lived and seemed to have lived according to written history of every culture alongside humans. From Job 40- Ask yourself what beast eats plants, lives in a swamp, has a massive tree like tail, strong legs, and belly this strong? Most picture a long tailed and long necked dinosaur, this scripture is over 4000 years old, if you read the whole book it also talks about ice, remember this book is from the middle East, funny how it talks about ice in the land in supporting ice age history that others claim is never written about as others are allowed to PUSH and promote what they assume and refuse written history as fact and that's allowed and encouraged. Why? Because this is spiritual. Pray that God shows you the truth, you don't want to be wrong. “Look at Behemoth, which I made along with you and which feeds on grass like an ox. 16 What strength it has in its loins, what power in the muscles of its belly! 17 Its tail sways like a cedar; the sinews of its thighs are close-knit. 18 Its bones are tubes of bronze, its limbs like rods of iron. 19 It ranks first among the works of God, yet its Maker can approach it with his sword. 20 The hills bring it their produce, and all the wild animals play nearby. 21 Under the lotus plants it lies, hidden among the reeds in the marsh. 22 The lotuses conceal it in their shadow; the poplars by the stream surround it. 23 A raging river does not alarm it; it is secure, though the Jordan should surge against its mouth. 24 Can anyone capture it by the eyes, or trap it and pierce its nose?

@@SRose-vp6ew Easy. The archeological/geological records prove you wrong. I do not have to prove there never have been any fire breathing dragons years ago. That is the default position. If you claim there were, then you need to provide evidence and publish a paper to be reviewed by the experts in the field and if your evidence is testable, verifiable and repeatable then we will discuss dragons. Until then they are mythical. Lots of people say Aliens from other planets are real. More of them than people who claim dragons are real. That doesn't mean they are real. The time to believe it is when it has been demonstrated. Oh and we have no reason to believe anything your book says. That doesn't make anything true either.

"And pierced its NOSE" now I wonder why the ancient Storytellers would finish with that description. Now I wonder what animal has been described as a Behemoth and also has a very prominent proboscis. Lives in both Africa and Asia so would have been known to the people from where the bible fables come from. Do you need any help. ELEPHANTS

Yet you forgot the size of the boat and the size of the waves, it would bend and twist and therefore leak.

There were no lions yet. They evolved from the goat "kind"...and then moose kind...etc. It's really quite simple.

@@bobbyrice seriously?

The bodies of drowned sinners..

What did predators eat on the ark? In Eden all animals and man ate plants so when the flood came shortly after Eden, they were omnivores. This is why Noah was told to eat meat only after the flood, not during or before the flood.

Noah's Ark Found: Underground imaging scans in 2019 PROVE Turkey's Durupinar Formation near Ararat is an ancient SHIP. Located at 6500 ft elevation near the largest anchor stones ever found, 3D scans revealed a preserved hull, internal compartments, bulkheads, uniform vertical ribs, and same Biblical specs (300 x 50 x 30 cubits with 3 decks). Partially petrified wood planks laminated together with organic cement, coated with bitumen, iron nails, and aluminum-titanium alloy rivets inserted into holes - similar to modern methods. Also contained fossilized animal dung, animal fur, and a single horn. Located on a mountain translated as "Doomsday Mountain" next to village historically called "Village of the Eight" (8 in Noah's family). . tube serch "noah ark evidence for location" and "noah ark in plain sight". The Durupinar site was previously dismissed as a natural formation decades ago but that was before the advent of the high tech. ultrasound scanning came along - this is why they went back to take another look since machine excavation would have ruined the site.

You don't see sails or paddles in it don't you?? Noah was wise and had a pair of V8 Rolls Royce motors that were heavily modified to have an intake of 80%methane 20%seawater, check-mate global warning

@@davida3283 Nah nah, you got it all wrong. He cooled and compressed it to liquid methane, stored it in clay jars. Then he captured lightning to crack water, got the oxygen from it, cooled compressed stored. Then he mixed them in a chamber at the back of the Ark and there ya go, he beat Elon to the Raptor engine.

@@nasonguy rocket propulsion for an ancient Ark?? Now that is what I call innovation! Your move NASA

Rational Satanist; Good question, ask God himself. I was once involved in Unitariarism. God doesn't have to answer any of our questions but when honestly challenged will answer.

@@jimchumley7907 Which god are you talking about ? There are thousands of man made gods including the god of the bible.

The Bible says there is nothing new under the sun. So never think you were the first to enjoy any amenity.

You wanted to say something...

@@humanbeing1052 what a lame excuse

@@alexanderstephen1567 you couldn’t refute it 😂

It's in the fine print. So fine you just glance over it and never realize.

Ark buffet available on all decks.

It was explained very well at the Ark Encounter and the Creation Museum!

@@duanethieme4186 You mean it was explained to your satisfaction? Thus proving that you are not much of a thinker, and that you are willing to believe anything that agrees with the beliefs you already have. Bless you.

@@amosluyk So, just immediately run to insulting someone because they felt it was explained? While claiming you're the thinker? What are you willing to believe that fits your belief? That nothing created everything? And then took that everything that was created from nothing and ordered it? You look at a book and know it had an author. You look at a building and know it had a builder. Yet you look at creation and say, "Nope! No creator. It all just spontaneously evolved itself into complexity that cannot create itself. Logic." If you're the thinker you claim, maybe try reading Darwin's Doubt.

@@tomfoolery1967 Not insults, just provable fact. Any person capable of clear reasoning, and open thinking, will immediately see that this parable is just that, and that attempting to 'prove' that its real is ludicrous. Just because you don't believe the other explanations that science offers, that does not make the story any more believable. I need no proofs or explanations for anything to disprove your parable. The inablility to understand this distinction is a wonderful proof of my assertiion; If you believe the absolute truth of the Bible, you have not learned to think. QED. But... its not too late! You can begin to learn any time you choose. The Bible is a wonderful, powerful work, full of profound wisdom and ancient knowledge. But it is deep. Read it on the surface only, and you will end up building a folly like this. Read it on its deeper levels, and you might just change the world for the better. The choice, as the Bible says, is yours ;) x

@@tomfoolery1967 By the way, you are about a hundred years out of date with current evolution science. Darwin died a long time ago, and his initial musings have been developed considerably. MIght I suggest you learn about the scientific method? After you have read about that, please learn about statistics and statistical analysis. Without a good understanding of both of these, you are easily fooled by weak arguments, and unable to understand the modern world we live in. I say this several times a week to anyone who will listen. Without that knowledge we can't have a real discussion. Its all wasted words.

The religious will try all the tactics to justify the myth’s that are in the bible. Even bringing in a creationist zoo keeper 🤪

You're an optimist. I like that.

yes, xtians are so foolish, that's why the real Noah's Ark has been found: Underground imaging scans in 2019 PROVE Turkey's Durupinar Formation near Ararat is an ancient SHIP. Located at 6500 ft elevation near the largest anchor stones ever found, 3D scans revealed a preserved hull, internal compartments, bulkheads, uniform vertical ribs, and same Biblical specs (300 x 50 x 30 cubits with 3 decks). Partially petrified wood planks laminated together with organic cement, coated with bitumen, iron nails, and aluminum-titanium alloy rivets inserted into holes - similar to modern methods. Also contained fossilized animal dung, animal fur, and a single horn. Located on a mountain translated as "Doomsday Mountain" next to village historically called "Village of the Eight" (8 in Noah's family). . tube serch "noah ark evidence for location" and "noah ark in plain sight". The Durupinar site was previously dismissed as a natural formation decades ago but that was before the advent of the high tech. ultrasound scanning came along - this is why they went back to take another look since machine excavation would have ruined the site.

I hope you can study comparative literature one day. you will see that Noahs ark is actually the story of Matsya Avatar of Vishnu, who is the one true god. Jesus is an avatar of vishnu.

Russian misinformation

@@areascoda2912 Jesus is God. May Jesus bless you.

@@unionjackjohn i thought jesus was the son of god ?

Lmaooo wow i don’t believe that at all

@Letticia Morgan: It is literally a boat. 😊

The Australian animals very likely migrated to the continent from where the ark touched down as population groups over several hundred years. There is a theory that there was an ice age directly after the flood which would have made it possible to get there. After the ice retreated any populations of koalas and the like would have died out elsewhere. Eucalypts do exist in other parts of the world besides Australia and koalas can eat other kinds of leaves, they simply prefer gum leaves.

@@jefferygoldthorpe919 And so where did Noah find those animals BEFORE the flood. No mention ANYWHERE of our extremely different animals. And the eucalypts, here is Australia, are far more poisonous than any found else where. It is these poisonous ones that the koalas survive on. And NO they can't eat other kinds of leaves. It is their main, and only, diet.

Cognitive dissonance

Macro-evolution does not fit the bible or true science. I.E. fish to reptile and reptile to bird is pure fiction. Micro-evolution is fine such as making corn grow bigger but its still corn. The farm and agricultural sciences prove animals/plants have hard limits when it comes to change. They even try artificial genetic modification and corn will still be corn, and wheat will still be wheat, and cow will still be cows. Maybe a bit larger but still the same basic thing.

@@jeanyan7738 why a hard limit? What would determine that?

@@jeanyan7738 but micro becomes macro after enough time

Difference between evolution and natural selection

🤣and your comment proves him right...

@@hoperules8874 Not really. It isn't atheists that don't like what he's saying, it is realists and people who prefer facts to fudged nonsense. The only way they could explain away some of the undeniable issues with the Ark is by adopting evolution as factual. "We didn't have a variety of bears, just one bear that evolved into all other species". If they don't adopt evolution then the whole Ark argument collapses.

@@jamesleate I'm sorry. I should've deleted the post. I have the feeling he is a super-nice man in a world where (as a scientist) all "scientific facts" have been influenced, controlled and straight-up bought in the research level, at least. It's so freaky political and so non-objective...*sigh. It's easy to see how someone could go down his path. I also do not agree with some of his hypothesis., but the scientific profession is not trustworthy to objectivity.

Yes we don't like! We wake up everyday thinking there is a man that made an non functional Ark in Kentucky, and all he wants of his multimillion dollar project is to attract some foolish visitors so he can cash in, please visit Noah Ark in Kentucky, before we atheists get even madder or sadder , we need good jokes, please help this man or go to his patreon , before we get really mad

​@@hoperules8874 Well, sort of Hope. Ken wants to convince his devotees that everyone who doesn't agree with him must be an atheist. He's very lazy and manipulative that way. His intellectual dishonesty is indeed irritating but we've all gotten so used to his, "one trick pony" show that it's more amusing than anything, as I implied. The thing is, when he uses that, "Atheists don't like" phrase, he's convinced himself that, once again, he has information which non-literalist Christians and unbelievers, will find threatening to scientific consensus. He never does and so he basically invites observers to marvel at his deluded tenacity. Best wishes & thanks for writing!

😂 perfect response

Great! I’m not alone 😁🤪

🗿🗿🗿

Lame!

You'll regret that