Besties with Saville, Andy with Epstein, naked boys escaping off curtains from palace windows, Charlie with big foot carbon Klaus, secret squirrel societies, what could go wrong with Charlie as King! You have to laugh at these psychopaths!

Nope, he is protected.

No

And nobody knows or cares about Ireland’s head of state. The entire world knows of Australia’s.

If it works they way it does now, whose to say it wouldn’t work even better? If the one who wears the crown doesn’t actually govern than what do they do for Australia?

Correct

@@SydneyMoo And when has that assent been withheld?

Charles won't need to be voted in. Nor did Biden need to be voted in. He was "chosen".

The worst president ever and one which constantly makes up things and says nothing but broken promises and wanted too in the 1980's to take away senior citizens social security.

@@russellparratt9859 Yep, the people of this world are being controlled by a elite group of rich and wealthy depraved entity's.

Mummy gave them to him

Some come with his titles.

Fraud

Served in the Royal Navy.

Probably bought them in a pawn shop

Nope, because we'll get the one the corrupt pollies want. It won't benefit the people at all. After all, Beazley said, "we have a mandate from the UN, to own all farms, business etc, _when we become a republic_

Politicised head of state? No thanks.

Fuck that

Not lost on them, it's just they are protected and allowed to pollute the planet. There seems to be a scenario which if all of human kind can't have transportation that things would not be as toxic then the elite could traverse all over the globe with all kind of craft and believe they are not polluting the planet. Hollywood is doing the same thing while telling the people who pay they're salary that to stop using things that are toxic these sandbox players do the opposite...which a shameful and sad thing to do.

The elites wont disappear with the Repubblic!

ELizardbeth the slippery

True Australians don't want your ridiculous system in America. You betrayed your own. We never did.

Australia has long since surpassed England in quality of life. That is the irony.

@Johnny Alucard Not really. Only just over 150k convicts were sent to Oz. Many of them for benign things like stealing food because they were hungry. Majority of the people living here are descendants of those who came to supervise them and the migrants who came after. The convict gene pool is pretty negligible.

The GG is not Australia's Head of State.

You say GG is head of state. Yet the GG answers ultimately to Queen. Since when does a head of state have someone above them. The Queen is Australia's head of state.

How do you know the royals have no power? You honestly think many of the politicians aren't controlled by the crown? Puppets and figureheads are the weapon of choice to rule an empire while appearing powerless.

​@@kellynestegard5208 fyi...the queen is dead

​@@archiebald4717 The GG is the de facto head of state. Same with the state governors.

america really.

Hahaha yeah what a great example.

Australia needs to stay a monarchy.

If it ani't broke. Don't fix it

non

Zero

Yeah, cos a series of political Presidents would be so much cheaper, right?

@@TheTraveller20081 you are not thinking clearly. how many governors you think there are in Australia? And how many presidents one country needs?

@@lukei6255 Presidents end up with security for life at public expense. Over time you end up with a bunch of them, running up the bills. Governors General retire into obscurity.

No it's not, he lied. gg isn't our head of state, a foreign monarch is, and there isn't a good argument for that to remain.

@@falconmclenny7284 As an American, I take most information as propaganda. I find it interesting how different populations react to circumstances.

@@MtnBoar I would take a head of state that has little power to a president like Biden any day.

@@Prognosis__ I’m glad he’s got the football, hopefully even the dimmest of people will learn a lesson from the incompetence and destruction that they supposedly voted for.

@@Prognosis__ a foreign one?

Served us well for 250 years. No civil war, rebellion or revolution.

Aborigines?

Funny you should say that you old cabbage but it's actually 2 or 3 generations of inbreeding in Charles's case since his mother and father were completely non-inbred, it's just they were 3rd cousins and as such produced inbred offspring

Pretty disgusting you claim Aus never had slavery

Prior to Australian Federation.

Firstly, it was also in northern NSW. Secondly it wasn't slavery - not a single person was bought, sold or traded. It was indentured labour, & was practised throughout the Empire, overwhelmingly using Indians (waaaay more than kanakas), & even some white people too (mostly Scots-Irish, so if you think Kanakas were slaves, then so were those whit people). The vast majority of indentured labourers from Pacific islands used in the sugar industry came on limited term contracts, usually negotiated with, & agreed to by, their village or chief. At the end of that contract they were given the option of extending for a further term, or returning home (paid for by the employer). "Blackbirding" (ie. the illegal kidnapping of islanders without permission or an agreed contract) accounted for less than 3% of all indentured labour (& even they were paid wages while in Australia). Was it pleasant? Of course not - conditions on the ships were pretty crowded & unhygienic, they were paid a pittance compared to white workers, they often received inadequate amounts of food, were rarely given proper medical attention (even though they had little immunity to Western diseases), & their accommodation was frequently dilapidated hovels. But again, you can't generalise - many employers were like this, but there were notable exceptions, as evidenced by some villages in Vanuatu agreeing "exclusivity" clauses with particular plantations where their men had been well treated (by the standards of the time). And finally, nobody OWNED them - they were not PROPERTY (of the plantation owner or anyone else). They were employees (often exploited, but that doesn't make them slaves in a legal or any other sense). So sorry, but no, it wasn't slavery - doesn't even come close to meeting the definition. The meaning of a word still matters, even in times as confused as these.

He's not anybody's king at the moment.

🙄🙄

Edward abdicated. Charles was never divorced. He will still be king but Camilla will not be queen.

@@CouncilOfWolves talking shit again. Edward was forced to abdicate and Charles did divorce in 1996.

Proven wrong!

@@Matt-YT hypocrites and pervert supplanters.

Why have we got it in England.

@@mikemines2931 True!!

There are no extra taxes you fool.

@@advanceaustralia3513 My mistake.....but you could have been a little nicer on the answer... no need for name calling...

Canada,new Zealand,Australia,Bahamas ETC.

Because The monarchy belong individually to each nation that has them as head of state. There isn't an "English" monarchy, there's a British one, a Canadian, new Zealand, Australian Jamaican ect ... It facilitates a non political head of state that generates much more stability that republics do, including America.

As an Australian we will depend our democratic system the best system