I agree if I pay for something I want to be able to hold it or touch it with my own hands.

It never will, I guarantee it. Streaming however will go away in the near future.

stanfordite lol you’re delusional

toad he

@@MaximusTheChosenOne You're the one who's delusional. Physical will be only legal way to watch movies at home in the future and streaming will be illegal. Netflix will be shut down by the government and Blockbuster Video and other rental chains will rise from the ashes like a phoenix.

Yeah and song of the south has never officially seen dvd or blu ray release. Sjws ruin everything

@@chadbrick67 Come on now.I would consider myself to be liberal and I definitely want to see Gone with the Wind in 4 k.

@@chadbrick67 😨😨

@@chadbrick67 You're a sick pup. Seek professional help.

that be amazing

Good info! Thanks for adding that

The HDR makes all the difference, rather than the saturated bluray or luminance squeezed DVD version, the 4k version looks like it was shot yesterday, the skin tones are spot on as are the wonderful 1930s cellulose plants on the set. The film grain is epic, not surprising given that it is three negatives combined, but on the plus side, the level of detail is amazing too, even down to the weave of Dorothy's dress or the hairs of the Lion's costume.

@@davidhunt240 I'd say the Dolby Vision version is total Boss. Dolby Vision shows 68.7 billion colours whereas HDR10 is limited to and 1.07 billion colours

Like from the tape I hade in 89? That one was better than tv for sure.

The only other film with 70mm Super Pannavision is 2001: A Space Oddesy Iv watched that 4 times already 50th Anniversary Edition and that absolutely totally blew my mind I don't believe their is a 4K restoration that will beat that!!!. I mean 70mm Super Pannavision for 1968 was super expensive but thank god they used the absolute best tech at the time.

Marc Davis Yes!!! 2001 : A Space Odyssey was amazing, with these older films on 4K really are stunning. I watched it with my grandma and she couldn’t believe how good it looked.

Noah Fogarty Id love for that, when i got ghost busters 1&2 i was kinda bummed how must noise it had

@@SamBueno the detials were just draw dropping like ov never seen anything like it before. The sheer amount of attention to detials were incredible. Up untill the 4K 50th Anniversary Edition Id only ever watched it a handful of times over the years but this was something else. Yes definitely in fact I can say holdhertly that 80-90% of films made from the 60' up untill the 90's seems to benifit the most and look way water than most of the current films. But I stand my ground I dought any films will beat or even surpass 2001: Space Oddesy for the sheer amount of work that went into that restoration. Its the amount of attention to details throughout in my belief I'm 40 years old now and that is my all time 1st ony sifi list apart from Star Trek as I'm a big treky 😎. Peace ✌️ out from London, UK 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧

Marc Davis Ben Hur was not shot in Super Panavision, but *Ultra* Panavision, which has an even wider frame. And 2001 is hardly the only film shot in Super Panavision. Other examples are Lawrence of Arabia, My fair Lady, West Side Story, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, Tron or most recently, 2017's Murder on the Orient Express.

It is, from Kino Lorber. They're using the same transfers, but they'll be "fixing" the colors, apparently.

Those were shot in Techniscope, which is all the width but half the height of 35mm, 16mm, so, unless the Kino Lorber transfers were DNR-ed, those should look grainy but interesting in 4K.

I just got a boner reading this.

@@me-sy4um I'm glad to hear that! I'd love to see those in 4k!

@@marcuswilliams6840 Kino Lorber actually updated saying that it's not happening now.

There is a 4k of Lawrence of Arabia which is a great transfer. It's not available in physical, only digital.

Coming in 2020!!!

@@kidneythief91 physical media?

TonyZi YEP! Date TBA but hold off on those digital purchases, bc it’s coming!

Existing Blu-rays of Ben-Hur and Lawrence comes from 4K masters. They just need HDR pass.

Brian Miller great choices! I just watched Young Frankenstein this evening on Blu Ray!

Brian Miller. TOP GUN 1 on UHD is planned at 2020!

TOP GUN 4K Dolby Atmos remix is a must

What’s your opinion about The Godfather trilogy getting a 4K release with atmos

@@MrJgonz2009 ATMOS on those movies (1+3 mono) doesn't make any sense

Hope they upgrade the audio to Atmos...

perry nestel yeah that would be awesome!

Wolfman. Well the original was/is booooooring i will wait for Spielberg remake version

Jim Cameron No way!! Absolutely disagree..it displays the life of the streets of those days. It’s such a perfectly beautiful movie for that time with true art that I honestly don’t see in today’s movies and the story is so well told that people like myself can identify. But you’re entitled to your opinion one that I surely don’t agree with it.

@@chadbrick67 F...y...t.... Sir bye bye

You’re not the only one who thought exactly that.

This dude is delusional

@@t1g3r8mj2 No, people, he's not delusional! This is one of the problems of displaying such images on You Tube. The 2K can actually LOOK WORSE than the 4K. So, his verbal descriptions are more accurate than the image comparison.

yeah, i was confused af

@@dpastor6631 the other way around? The 4K can look worse than the 2K?

3D BLU RAY IS BEST VERSION I WAS AMAZED WHEN WATCHED IN 3d on a 1939 movie wow

Omg yes!! I love how they gave depth to the background matter painting to make it feel real.

3D 🤢

I didn't even know there was a 3D version! I definitely need to check this out! Thank you for bringing this up!

The Ten Commandments looks fantastic on blu-ray. If properly upscaled to 4k, I think it would look absolutely amazing!

Spartacus is coming to 4k actually

Both these movies have come out now... Spartacus is simply amazing

Ten Commandments 4K is incredible. Certain shots look like they were filmed in the late 90s. It looks as good as it ever has

I believe that movie was restored many years back from a 35mm negative to 4k scan. The very reason the dvd looked fantastic, I do not think its a question of if, but more when... As a lot of people have been requesting it sir.

John Patrick Fay I do agree with your opinion sir. I bought the Blu Ray release ten years ago! It is exemplary, especially played on a 4K player and displayed on a UHD TV! I do hope what you state does happen

@@johnpatrickfay5288 that doesn’t make sense. They would’ve scaled it down for the dvd format.

@@SuckMyJohnson Both the blue ray and dvd where remastered from a HD cut. The master I believe, had an even higher cut, possibly 4k straight to the vault for preservation. The dvd is a much cleaner cut than earlier renditions But it still stems from a 33 print..

That's awesome! 😄

Definitely

Mine too.

BLACK NARCISSUS is currently carried by Criterion, which won't be doing UHD any time soon. Same with COLONEL BLIMP.

I am from the future. Yes lol back in 2021

Criterion probably wouldn't let you. It ruins the precedent they've set so far.

Shout! Factory has STREETS OF FIRE at the moment, so it'll be a while methinks.

Oh man, you are so right about RAN.

That is not true. You won't have to install entire games on the PS5. You only have to install parts of the game that you want. For example if you only want to play Multiplayer then you can install only that. Or if you only want to install a single player campaign then you can do that.

I prefer film as well. I have an IB Technicolor print of "The Wizard Of Oz". But then again the print was 2.5K in cost. I pick up video releases because they are so inexpensive. I collect both and with the less expensive video formats I can own more titles but I still prefer projected film prints.

@@tompennock6369 is your copy of the wizard of oz 35mm or 16mm? IB Technicolor prints are $$$ but that is what I would expect from the greatest film ever made. Most I ever spent on a print was $250 and almost spent $125 on a 16mm trailer for Star wars The Force Awakens. But LPP film is good enough for me and movies are a few hundred not a few thousand. But I also collect BluRay movies along with LaserDiscs. But film is my one true love, the others I just like and as you said, they are a lot cheaper.

@@andrewbarnum5040 Hi Andy: My Tech print of "The Wizard Of Oz" is in the 16mm format. When Technicolor closed up in Burbank a film editor friend of mine found many brand new Technicolor films that had been in storage for many many years. They had not even been assembled yet. I bought a lab mint print of "Thunderball" in Technicolor and Scope for close to 3K. Also I have a print of "The Sound Of Music" in Scope. It's a beautiful print. At the time that was 1.5K which is not bad at all for this type of print. Also I have many other IB Tech prints of favorite Jerry Lewis films I like so much. Film is indeed the best. The color is really Technicolor and not "electronic" color. I like low fade stocks too like Kodak LPP. I am trying to locate a low fade print of "On Golden Pond" . The 35mm and 16mm theatricals were struck on Kodak SP and the color has shifted. Kodak SP is a slight bit better than eastmanolor film stock. But I want either an LPP print of "On Golden Pond" or Agfa 1S or 2S or later Fuji 'low fade" film stock. I collect video since it is so inexpensive. I collected laservision years back. All Best, Tom (tapennock@aol.com ) Battle Creek, Michigan

Great choice i bought the steelbook blu ray S is for snakesss

I dunno man...the Blu-ray almost melted my eyes man, I don't think my brain can handle that movie in full 4K.

Criterion has the Colors trilogy, and they aren't doing UHD yet.

@OotzybOotzy MJ Mixes true, but not impossible.

Blu ray looked better to me as well

I just upload in 1080p because it’s an easier file size to deal with. Uploading in 4K takes hours

@@JeffRauseo Oh I see how that would be a problem.

Films At Home what kind of camera are you using? Mine never take hours. I have a good 25 4K vids and they are equally as long as yours. Some longer. Maybe a 45-1 hour wait. The real problem is keeping the raw video native and hard drive space. I have chewed up 5 terabytes in a couple of short years.

Yeah I just don’t have that sort of storage space

Yes! The blu-ray looks great, but the 4K with HDR would kill. We can only hope. Cheers.

Wait till we have 16k TVs and finally the hat will be totally purple. Hahahaha

What’s your profession? Transferring movies to physical media?

I think you mean Frank Capra, not Franz Kafka!

Kafka 😂

@@iakona23 Indeed!

This is 35mm, so it was technically filmed at much higher than 4K. You should watch my video on why older movies look better on 4K

@@JeffRauseo I'll give it a watch, but the problem with upscaling is that you can't add extra detail to the picture, most people won't see any actual difference between 1080 vs upscaled to 4k. Maybe a bit of overall smoothness to the picture but it's incredibly hard to notice anything unless your vision is phenomenal. I'm all for 4k content, but I don't see enough of a difference to invest in upgrading my blu ray collection to 4k.

@@richardskelding4528 Or your 4K (REAL 4K JVC/Sony) homecinema screen image size is 3 meters/120 inch wide like mine/Shane SpareChange ....

@@richardskelding4528 For the record, this movie had the Negative rescanned at 8K, and then scaled down for the 4K UHD. This new release is a wonder to behold for fans, esp. if you can view on a big screen to absorb all the detail 4K has to offer on this title.

I preorder mine a few days ago. I cant wait!

Same here bro