Barthes, Semiotics and the Revolt Against Structuralism

  Рет қаралды 100,933

Michael Sugrue

Michael Sugrue

Күн бұрын

You can find Barthes here amzn.to/3dunE74
This is the official KZfaq channel of Dr. Michael Sugrue.
Please consider subscribing to be notified of future videos, as we upload Dr. Sugrue's vast archive of lectures.
Dr. Michael Sugrue earned his BA at the University of Chicago and PhD at Columbia University.

Пікірлер: 240
@ryleexiii1252
@ryleexiii1252 Жыл бұрын
Sugrue has an amazing sense of humor. I’m addicted to these lectures.
@bosman1988
@bosman1988 2 жыл бұрын
You can tell Sugrue had fun with this one. His enthusiasm is infectious!
@michaeltape8282
@michaeltape8282 Жыл бұрын
Yes, he is not a dry presenter.
@daroze6963
@daroze6963 2 жыл бұрын
Watching this was one of the closest things to tripping on mushrooms without eating mushrooms or seeing visuals. I'd recommend this to anyone who can understand any part of it; A++
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
I saw visuals while watching this. It is a moving image of a guy in a professorial tan jacket, striped tie, and eye glasses. He’s standing at a podium and giving a lecture. So I think you’re wrong that one can watch this without visuals, but maybe I dropped too much acid in the 80s and early 90s. Acid is a lot better for Barthes. Mushrooms are suited to Levi-Strauss. Mescaline for Baudrillard, although some like the party psychedelics for him. Both mescaline and Baudrillard give me the sensation of momentum and velocity while standing still, racing toward a horizon that is ever receding. You’ve probably seen walls move or melt? It’s like that, but on the Z-axis. It’s been almost thirty years since the last time I did mind altering chemicals or post modernism.
@kieran7727
@kieran7727 Жыл бұрын
I know exactly what you mean!! It is like philosophy trying to understand that universal sensation which mushrooms help you tap into
@tomwhaley3335
@tomwhaley3335 Жыл бұрын
The fuck did I just read 🦆
@manicmandownup
@manicmandownup Жыл бұрын
Mega eye roll to this stupid thread
@pearz420
@pearz420 10 ай бұрын
Both psychedelics and philosophy: pearls before swine
@MictheEagle
@MictheEagle 29 күн бұрын
So, there was someone who thought like me. Thank you, Mr. Sugrue. Wish you endless pleasure, if that means anything to you.
@sumdumbmick
@sumdumbmick 13 күн бұрын
he died in January
@r3toun
@r3toun Жыл бұрын
This saved my head from spinning in circles from reading too many research papers on this topic with a short and well versed presentation of what semiotics is. Timeless, thank you.
@aksumit4217
@aksumit4217 3 жыл бұрын
"Every limitation on human freedom is ultimately a myth!" As amusing as any of your lectures! Barthes' work seems to sway a fine mood.
@thattimestampguy
@thattimestampguy 2 жыл бұрын
0:27 Barthes 2:33 Sensitive reading of Mass Culture, De-Mythologizing 3:38 Lonely Ego Liberation 5:25 Meta-Myth, Unmasking Masks all the way down 6:43 Free Play and Complete Control Morbid Sarcastic Whit 7:48 _Mythologies_ 8:34 _Myth Today_ 9:16 Semiotics, Science of Signs 9:48 Internal Coherence 10:39 Non-Euclidean Geometry 11:24 Mass Culture Dress - Form of Speech, Sign, Signals 12:51 Sense of Humor 13:56 Professional Wrestling; The Joy of The Community Spectacle 14:58 Drama started as Ancient/Classic Popular Art 16:17 Detergents Consumer Goods are Fetishized/Iconized/Myth-Filled 18:48 De-Sexualization 19:26 Knowledge Formula in A Box 19:56 Plastic - Infinite Transformation, Infinite Freedom 20:29 Myth misleads, Disguises message Deception steps in to mess with Signs Level 1: Surface Level 22:10 Level 2: Primary Message 22:52 Rambo - American Invincibility in Battle 25:34 Clarity is Self-Delusion, Myth is Substituted for another Myth 26:47 Politicized Speech, De-Mythology is Re-Mythology The Critic Is A Poet 30:45 "How can I maximize my pleasure with regards to the text?" Will To Pleasure over Will To Power over Will To Truth 32:52 33:36 34:46 Secret Algebra is a Myth, We Negated What Made Criticism Possible Criticism Destroys Itself over time + Free Play - Hopeless attempt to Avoid The External World 36:30 Takes the project as far as it can possibly go 37:06 Breakdown of Reality, Self becomes Fragment, Delusion We end up talking to ourselves 38:36 There is No Out 40:12 WE ARE ALL PROFOUNDLY LONELY, IN OUR OWN INDIVIDUAL WORLDS 40:54 Artist/Critic as Dilettante 42:07 Irony until the end, Indulge Pleasure through Full Freedom 43:03 Descartes
@stuarthicks2696
@stuarthicks2696 2 жыл бұрын
Love the nerds that do time stamps. Thank you for doing the lord’s work.
@ifgwelf
@ifgwelf Жыл бұрын
Hero
@Tuber-sama
@Tuber-sama Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your services, fellow knowledge enthusiast.
@Krotas_DeityofConflicts
@Krotas_DeityofConflicts Жыл бұрын
@Gminor7
@Gminor7 2 жыл бұрын
Outstanding presentation from the dynamic Dr Sugrue. Barthes was perhaps the hottest thing in the liberal arts departments when I finished my undergrad philosophy degree in 1979.
@JoseSanchez-zo5tb
@JoseSanchez-zo5tb 2 жыл бұрын
Where did you study?
@Gminor7
@Gminor7 2 жыл бұрын
@@JoseSanchez-zo5tb Emory University, Atlanta GA
@DominicMotuka
@DominicMotuka 3 жыл бұрын
Feeling appreciative!! Thanks for uploading.
@marshalmcdonald7476
@marshalmcdonald7476 3 ай бұрын
I had to stop the video at 3:19 cuz my heart was pounding like I was at a rock concert. This man is amazing. He exudes balanced intelligence but also personal warmth, a rare combination. I stopped it also so I can go get paper and pencil to take notes. Wow.
@jancsibacsi9979
@jancsibacsi9979 3 жыл бұрын
New Sugrue drop. Now...my day just got better!
@BrooklynLuke
@BrooklynLuke 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks again Michael! These are very inspiring
@temitope6830
@temitope6830 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much dr sugrue and the team
@jasoncherry3404
@jasoncherry3404 3 жыл бұрын
This just put the final touch on my day as Senica would suggest. Thank you Prof Sugrue.
@trippy6183
@trippy6183 2 жыл бұрын
Very glad to have discovered this channel. Excellent.
@xxx6555
@xxx6555 2 жыл бұрын
It's just brilliant, for both the thoughts of Barthes and the presentation by Sugrue.
@nocturne8916
@nocturne8916 Жыл бұрын
Have been reading and actually quite fascinated by Barthes’ A Lover’s Discourse. Professor Sugrue’s explanation and interpretation is a great supplement to the reading.
@samloutalbotmusic
@samloutalbotmusic 9 ай бұрын
I’m obsessed with these lectures! Watching one a day !
@marcobrambilla2439
@marcobrambilla2439 2 жыл бұрын
You make us really enjoy Philosophy. Thanks
@yosephsolomon7905
@yosephsolomon7905 2 жыл бұрын
Oh..my..my. this guy keep slepping with my mind without a condom, mennn!!!. Specially the harmony of the flow of his points
@st9919
@st9919 3 жыл бұрын
thanks for posting this - one of my fav sugrue lectures
@nicholasfox966
@nicholasfox966 2 жыл бұрын
Great lecture. Also, it's fun to listen to this lecture, and every time he says "Barthes", to imagine that he's talking about Bart Simpson.
@yotamschmidt570
@yotamschmidt570 2 жыл бұрын
Listen sir, what a presenter and orator you are! Thank you for the lesson.
@levisnir
@levisnir 3 ай бұрын
לגמרי!
@JamieEHILLS
@JamieEHILLS 3 жыл бұрын
The mastery... you've done it again Sugrue, thank you!
@khalidababaali2583
@khalidababaali2583 2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant Lecture !
@Rakaamlil
@Rakaamlil 9 ай бұрын
Hey Michael, been listening on TTC for years. Glad it's up on KZfaq. I am a fellow lecturer and I have always been impressed at how tight all of your lectures are. Anyways the point....... I am a philosophical historian, maybe I dunno......... I also studied a lot of aikido, zen, tai chi, Taoism, western mysticism to the extent that I know that guys used to sit on poles for years at a time ,blah, blah, blah. Anything I have experienced since Nietzsche always sounds like an echo. Modernism, structuralism, post modernism, meta modernism...... It all reminds me of 500BC when their was a Hindu fundamentalist they came along an said identical stuff about the internal and external experience, the nature of reality and gave us our first intellectual mind map for quantum physics. Every hundred years, someone comes along and takes big shots at the old structures and we have to clap and pretend we hadn't heard it before. Who was Buddha ripping off, there was someone
@marcomiranda9476
@marcomiranda9476 Жыл бұрын
This reading is a description of a true artist-one that is beyond cultural constructions, commodifications and myths and focuses on a radical personal aesthetic.
@davepearen8954
@davepearen8954 Жыл бұрын
Amazing lecture so much intelligent sustenance
@russhouldin5774
@russhouldin5774 Ай бұрын
He is truly a brilliant teacher. One of the specific aspects of his talks that I love is his frequent allusions to the influence of Kant.
@michaeltape8282
@michaeltape8282 Жыл бұрын
At times, the main point being come to feels almost like a punchline grounded in truth. I can laugh at the epiphanies. Damn I love these lectures. Thanks again, Dr. Sugrue.
@traviswadezinn
@traviswadezinn 8 ай бұрын
Very interesting - always enjoy his insightful lectures - powerful energy
@lau-guerreiro
@lau-guerreiro 2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant. This puts a lot of Postmodernism in perspective for me.
@M_K171
@M_K171 Жыл бұрын
What an interesting lecture! 😮 TY
@hamburgertrain6
@hamburgertrain6 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@reviveramesh
@reviveramesh 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks 👍 mucho. Lovely lecture....everytime I listen to this - I gain more - one more "mask" or myth dissolved - loved the idea of Pleasure Aesthete and the living in the labyrinth...THIS IS IT...stuggled for years to locate Barthes and this one hour - liberated my mind - thanks again...totally de-mythologised
@ryans3001
@ryans3001 2 жыл бұрын
Thank You!
@blairhakamies4132
@blairhakamies4132 2 жыл бұрын
Fascinating 🌹
@chloefourte3413
@chloefourte3413 Жыл бұрын
This man is doing the lord's work 🙏🏾 thank you for this video, thank you Barthes, and THANK you Dr. Sugrue
@burtmanly5208
@burtmanly5208 2 жыл бұрын
I really enjoyed it. I will watch more of his. When I stumble across some lectures.. I watch one i know a lot about (Roldand Baths) , see if they are on the money ..If they are, I watch more. This guy is on the money
@malvikapant7622
@malvikapant7622 4 ай бұрын
insightful at it's core
@faridachishti35
@faridachishti35 2 жыл бұрын
Superbe as always.
@michaelprenez-isbell8672
@michaelprenez-isbell8672 3 жыл бұрын
thank you. i love this lecture.
@lemilemi5385
@lemilemi5385 Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@kacperbilozor
@kacperbilozor 2 жыл бұрын
If the pleasure principle replaces the reality principle, then we are ultimately talking about narcissistic personality disorder (me, me, me, and my freedom to pleasure myself with all the activities that I find pleasurable). And whenever a narcissist withdraws from the external world, he quickly learns that there is no "me, myself, and I", that without the external and the social, the human being is empty, fragmented. And right after that, he is reminded that you can't wish reality away, no matter how good you are at criticizing it.
@DarkAngelEU
@DarkAngelEU 2 жыл бұрын
Narcissism indicates someone that has found a way to make the world serve them and appeal to their pleasures, so a narcissist cannot be reminded that reality cannot be wished away, because they have bended reality to their desires and to make it function according to their will. This is the beautiful discovery of postmodern: reality is what you make of it. There is no Reality with a capital R, there is no Truth with a capital T, because reality and truth are equally plastic as our imagination. Sure, there is science, there are hard facts in life, a narcissist won't deny that, but they will find a way to make those work to their advantage. Look at the people who created high risers and have thousands of people working under them so they can get rich doing nothing. You think they are in denial? In my opinion, they're smarter, because they are performing some kind of magic. They know how to make the world bend to please them, not the other way around. You should pay more attention to what you're watching instead of trying to counter it with your ideology.
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
Do you know this experientially or did you reason to reach this conclusion? I think you are wrong that the pleasure principle is linked to narcissistic personality disorder. First of all, you’ve mischaracterized or misunderstood the disorder. Second of all, I think you are confusing the reality principle with reality. Embracing the reality principle doesn’t automatically lead to knowledge of reality. In fact, “embracing the reality principle” can be a form of delusion itself that is called “the will to power”. Watch the video again (or however many times you need). It’s complex and subtle material, and you might miss a lot on your first pass with the material.
@kacperbilozor
@kacperbilozor 2 жыл бұрын
@@MarcosElMalo2Is this you, friend? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o9Ckl5l02Ja0no0.html
@Swagroth
@Swagroth Жыл бұрын
You should read Eros and civilization
@johnchavez6293
@johnchavez6293 3 жыл бұрын
Such a great lecture! Now I’ve got to read all of Roland Barthes’ books
@chicagofineart9546
@chicagofineart9546 Жыл бұрын
save yourself the effort. If you've read one Barthes book you've read them all.
@GangdangleOfficialChannel
@GangdangleOfficialChannel Жыл бұрын
@@chicagofineart9546 I understand you mean as the process is the same, just applied to differing topics. As someone who had never read one at all, what one would you recommend?
@Mai-Gninwod
@Mai-Gninwod Күн бұрын
I just cannot believe that he did this without notes. Rest in peace.
@CrackheadOwen
@CrackheadOwen Жыл бұрын
I can tell he really likes Barthes. It's great to see
@lily-jane5308
@lily-jane5308 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Such an amazing lecture it really helped me understand deconstructionism
@Ionic457
@Ionic457 Жыл бұрын
Incredible
@debasmitanayak3455
@debasmitanayak3455 9 ай бұрын
Barthes in brief- Everything has too many meanings to be interpreted with clarity. In fact clarity is non-existent. So, I choose to create my own meaning. If I wish to see black as white, so I will. That makes me happy! Therefore, to be happy, one must be free- free to define and interpret sadness as happiness, criminal as a victim, solid as liquid, science as myth, reason as superstition, love as hate, death as birth, end as beginning, anything. How does it matter so long as it makes oneself happy?
@arterial
@arterial 2 жыл бұрын
I believe it was Daedalus that designed the Labyrinth & Theseus who found his way out of it guided by Ariadne's thread.
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, but it was Daedalus that told Ariadne the trick of using the thread. King Minos punished Daedalus for this by imprisoning him in the labyrinth, and Daedalus escaped with his son Icarus using wings formed from feathers and wax. So Daedalus did escape from the labyrinth by flying over the walls (and not by trying to figure out a path through the maze). This is an early example of what we today call “thinking out-of-the-box”.
@TheJamesNigra
@TheJamesNigra 2 жыл бұрын
“Time is the moving picture of reality “
@davidfost5777
@davidfost5777 2 жыл бұрын
I'm always looking for new interesting lectures on Psychology/Philosophy, please let me know if you guys have any recommendations, would be highly appreciated
@andytaylor4138
@andytaylor4138 2 жыл бұрын
Have you seen the AMAZING lectures by Rick Roderick? They are all here in YT
@whoever79
@whoever79 2 жыл бұрын
I want to second Rick Roderick!
@michaelcrouch8783
@michaelcrouch8783 2 жыл бұрын
Julian James "The Evolution of Coñev
@user-ce2le8ml9y
@user-ce2le8ml9y 2 жыл бұрын
Carl Schmitt
@EulogyfortheAngels
@EulogyfortheAngels 2 жыл бұрын
Is it weird that I totally hear Jeff Goldblum's voice sometimes while listening to these?
@andreasj2429
@andreasj2429 2 жыл бұрын
One might with good cause refer the introductory phrase “The Great Minds of the Western Intellectual Tradition” to Dr. Sugrue.
@DarkAngelEU
@DarkAngelEU 2 жыл бұрын
This reminded me of my Bachelor Project as a student photographer. I made photographs of basically everything that interested me and made me point my camera to it: plastic, advertising, snapshots from being on the road, textures,... It became a visual diary without a clear narrative. My teachers would ask me why I took a cropped picture of a tree trunk, or a facade, why they were all so greyish, and at the time I felt very nihilistic, depressed, and I answered I really didn't care because they would adhere their own meaning to them anyways, regardless of what I had to say. Even more, I had nothing to say. It was an acceptance of defeat that I couldn't understand the world through art, because art is merely a representation of my reflection upon the world. They didn't accept that, because nowadays (2010-...), art is romantic again. So I failed and never got a degree. However, I was taught by those same teachers that Barthes was someone very important to art theory, so seeing this makes me wonder if they failed themselves, by failing me.
@offworldlive
@offworldlive 2 жыл бұрын
Love it - you were obviously way ahead of them.
@DarkAngelEU
@DarkAngelEU 2 жыл бұрын
@@offworldlive I dunno, I feel like I used to be very pretentious back then. If your comment is meant sarcastically, touché!
@offworldlive
@offworldlive 2 жыл бұрын
@@DarkAngelEU no sarcasm. Just found your story funny about tutors teaching Barthes but ignoring it in their critiques.
@DarkAngelEU
@DarkAngelEU 2 жыл бұрын
@@offworldlive Yeah, they were pretty stuck up their own asses themselves. Some of them never heard of Helmut Newton for example.
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
@@DarkAngelEU I think the issue you had that prevented your work’s acceptance is that you didn’t have the vocabulary to justify it (which is ironic in its own way, but thus is the way of academia). Put more cynically, if you had studied Barthes and other post-modernists, you could have spun out a good line of bullshit to convince your instructors that your project was valid. The irony is that the post structuralist word view says that your intentionality as creator is unimportant, and the work should be examined on its own terms. However, the loophole is that your “statement of purpose” becomes part of the text/project. Anyway, sorry you didn’t have the theoretical underpinnings to “support” your work. It kinda sucks. But the problem wasn’t that you were pretentious, it was that you weren’t pretentious enough. 😄🤷🏻‍♀️
@drbonesshow1
@drbonesshow1 2 жыл бұрын
Barthes who wrote about laundry detergent was hit by a laundry truck while walking home and later dying from his injuries.
@gspurlock1118
@gspurlock1118 2 жыл бұрын
Is this an early incarnation of critical theory which honors the critic as equal to the artist or doer? Teddy Roosevelt: "It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whos face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat."
@berendkooiker3538
@berendkooiker3538 2 жыл бұрын
Roosevelt is talking about an entirely different critic than Barthes
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
Yes and no. Critical theory grew out of literary criticism and hermeneutics. That is to say, interpretation. I feel Teddy was talking about a difference kind of criticism. It’s not quite right to say that the critic is elevating himself to the same level as the writer of the work he is “criticizing” (that is, analyzing and interpreting). He is elevating the text and negating the author’s intention. But by doing so, he also negates himself and his intention, because he and his intention are superfluous to his own critical text. When a creator offers his creation, he doesn’t get any special privileges over us with regard to how we should understand his creation. The creation has to be engaged with on its own terms. No special pleadings.
@thesignifiedssignifier7010
@thesignifiedssignifier7010 2 жыл бұрын
11:35 semiotic analysis 19:52 postmodernism
@reviveramesh
@reviveramesh 2 жыл бұрын
Clifford geertz, Lou's althusser, Stuart hall, Birmingham school...please
@SaxonRanger94
@SaxonRanger94 20 күн бұрын
“We are all under influence by a sort of disguised coercion.” 100% accurate This concept it actually hilarious at surface level, yet very stimulating intellectually with a lot of truth at its core. Talk about thinking outside of the box.. wait a minute 🤔 what does that *mean* ?
@longcastle4863
@longcastle4863 2 жыл бұрын
Actually helped me figure out where Derrida was coming from
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
Oh, god yes. Derrida is impenetrable without Barthes. But you need de Saussure and Levi-Strauss, too, to figure out where Barthes is coming from. I think you need exposure to Barthes before you can engage with Baudrillard, as well.
@kaustubhsabnis6071
@kaustubhsabnis6071 3 ай бұрын
I would like to know, in which year was this lecture given?
@Thesilverthunder777
@Thesilverthunder777 Жыл бұрын
Does Sugrue have any lectures on Derrida?
@FrankBlazquez
@FrankBlazquez 9 ай бұрын
17:39 this *
@walkercatenaccio
@walkercatenaccio Жыл бұрын
Dr. Sugrue does a beautiful job, very smart, well organized, engaging. I will indulge myself here, nevertheless, and suggest that pretty much all these thinkers are triumphing over very stupid opponents, i.e, Organized Religion, The Patriotic State, Mass Ideologies, Status Hierarchies, Capitalism and Advertising, and so forth. Most intelligent and honest people can see the truth without the discourse of philosophy. And yet stupidity wins in the long run, doesn't it?
@OverOnTheWildSide
@OverOnTheWildSide 2 ай бұрын
Is there a part two or do all the videos end abruptly?
@txikitofandango
@txikitofandango 5 ай бұрын
I understand Badiou better now, because it's clear what problem he's trying to solve. The author is dead, there are bodies and languages and texts, but still there is truth which erupts in the real world and determines the validity of interpretations
@kurtaikido2889
@kurtaikido2889 2 жыл бұрын
I think a part of us always considers a deeper meaning but we’ve learned to ignore it and go with the advertising.
@HandleGF
@HandleGF 2 жыл бұрын
"No French intellectual would leave a clique except to join another clique" - Mary McCarthy
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
Barthes might be the exception-he formed his own clique and allowed no one else to join it. 😄
@saraswatisky3119
@saraswatisky3119 Жыл бұрын
Any object, any idea, anything, can mean absolutely anything else. That sentence changed my life. That's all you to know about philosophy.
@SaxonRanger94
@SaxonRanger94 20 күн бұрын
I could watch a whole video of him saying “mmkay, *sips water*, alright, noww..” 😂 Thank you so much Mr.Sugrue, you ARE a great man, may you rest in peace. 🙏🏼
@j.k.cascade2057
@j.k.cascade2057 3 ай бұрын
Professor Sugrues passing is a tragedy. I feel now that the world has become a lesser place.
@optimusprimum
@optimusprimum Жыл бұрын
This reminds me of the show Mad Men
@optimusprimum
@optimusprimum Жыл бұрын
Ties into Edward L Bernes book on propaganda
@shannonm.townsend1232
@shannonm.townsend1232 9 ай бұрын
Wheres the lecture on Deleuze
@drbonesshow1
@drbonesshow1 2 жыл бұрын
In the end, it's just Me and My Shadow.
@jayxavier6930
@jayxavier6930 2 жыл бұрын
13:37 "from surface structure to deep structure..." Golly, I would have never taken Barthes for a covert Chomskyan (esp. given Chomsky's hostility to structuralism and also semiotics)!
@DarkAngelEU
@DarkAngelEU 2 жыл бұрын
Chomsky is smart, but his grudge against postmodernism is an error which only goes to show how far up his own ass he is. Alot of American philosophy sounds like bla bla bla from a European perspective. Hardly interesting, nothing science can't do, so what's the point of even having a debate? There's no imagination whatsoever!
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
This is a common sentiment among those Chomsky fans that were introduced to Chomsky’s writings before having tackled structuralism/poststructuralism. If one approaches Chomsky without having been exposed to the waves of structuralism and post structuralism, one might think Chomsky came up with his ideas out of whole cloth. You need the references to understand his reaction, or you end up with merely “Chomsky thinks structuralism is bad” or (even worse) “structuralism is bad”. I’m not saying you are one of those slavish students of Chomsky. Far from it. I’m just saying that some of his biggest fans have the most superficial grasp of his work-they’ve almost made him into a left wing Jordan Petersen.
@samloutalbotmusic
@samloutalbotmusic 9 ай бұрын
“Plastic is infinite freedom, infinite transformation”.
@K_F_fox
@K_F_fox 20 күн бұрын
This being a lecture on Semiotics with a Gryffindor prominently displayed, I really want to know what year this is from.
@jacksonballinger5802
@jacksonballinger5802 2 жыл бұрын
It’s crazy how un-revolutionary and familiar this whole lecture sounds today
@benoplustee
@benoplustee 2 жыл бұрын
I mean it is a laymans summary which is a few decades old, talking about a philosopher another few decades old
@benoplustee
@benoplustee 2 жыл бұрын
Barthes was perhaps attempting to bring into formal philosophy Godel's incompleteness theorem
@pieterzegers7788
@pieterzegers7788 Жыл бұрын
@@benoplustee I don’t think that’s right. Gödel’s incompleteness theorem tells us about how some arguments are just unprovable. What Barthes tries to do, is tell us more about notation in a way. As there are many ways to prove the pythagorean theorem, even with maths unrelated to classical geometry, there are uncountably many ways one can arrive at a sign from a myth and its signifiers.
@benoplustee
@benoplustee Жыл бұрын
@@pieterzegers7788 I took it more at am attempt to do away with the idea of platonic ideals, or some universal set/system of signs and signifiers that underly everything we experience. The connection to Godel for me is the similarity in which for Barthes, systems of ontology related to signs and signifiers will always end up being either incomplete or inconsistent, much like Godels incompleteness theorem predicts about logical mathematical systems. It might be a loose association but it's an aesthetically pleasing one to me.
@murn3229
@murn3229 Жыл бұрын
What does he mean when he says "Cartesian principle"?
@chrissyward5539
@chrissyward5539 6 ай бұрын
DesCartes lecture
@benquinneyiii7941
@benquinneyiii7941 Жыл бұрын
Reasoning
@crepituss9381
@crepituss9381 2 жыл бұрын
These comments on Plastic are pretty much identical to Advaita Vedanta analogies like gold being able to be made in to anything but still being gold or a wave still being part of the ocean.
@Rolfe1984
@Rolfe1984 Жыл бұрын
Are these back to back lectures or does Sugrue only have one outfit?
@bartacristian
@bartacristian 11 ай бұрын
Why are you like this, Gary ?
@johnrose4572
@johnrose4572 2 жыл бұрын
Technically, America did not "lose" the Vietnam War, in the sense of suffering decisive defeat in the field; rather, the intuition of Ho Chi Minh and his followers was vindicated: once enough blood had been exacted, the American will to fight was broken, and she gave up.
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
I both agree and disagree with your statement. There was no decision on the battlefield for either side that could be called victory. Indeed, the closest we have was the Tet Offensive, which the communists utterly lost militarily. Yet I don’t think Tet was decisive or the North would have collapsed. What happened instead? The Communists/Nationalists achieved their goals. The U.S. did not. If we harken to Clausewitz, “War is diplomacy by other means”, the use lost, technically if not militarily. An interesting footnote to Tet: it did have long term ramifications wrt to the balance of power between the Southern communists and the Northern ones. The VC were so depleted by Tet that they never really recovered, so by the time we left and the NVA began their campaign against SVN, it was by their own efforts with little contribution by VC irregulars. When the NVA swept into Saigon, it was the northern commies that took over the functions of government.
@johnrose4572
@johnrose4572 2 жыл бұрын
@@MarcosElMalo2 You are correct. The problem with U.S. strategy was its reliance upon deterrence: the goal was not the defeat of the Communist North, but only to turn back its aggression towards the South. Ho and his followers understood this, and gambled that once the U.S. saw that their will to conquest made simple deterrence impossible, she would abandon the effort - as did happen. Thus yes, the Communists won a Clausewitzian victory, in that they demonstrated the superior political willfulness.
@HandleGF
@HandleGF 2 жыл бұрын
The laundry van is the key.
@pauljung3623
@pauljung3623 Жыл бұрын
who is this "gotomer" referred to at 25:16 ??
@dr.michaelsugrue
@dr.michaelsugrue Жыл бұрын
Gadamer
@pauljung3623
@pauljung3623 Жыл бұрын
@@dr.michaelsugrue thank you!
@SM-mx1it
@SM-mx1it Жыл бұрын
Maybe.
@kelvinkj7074
@kelvinkj7074 2 жыл бұрын
42:00
@politics4270
@politics4270 Жыл бұрын
@DBSpeakers
@DBSpeakers 2 жыл бұрын
35 minutes into this talk, when I realized I own that same jacket.
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
How embarrassing! Unless you wear it ironically. In that case, OK. 😉
@elel2608
@elel2608 10 ай бұрын
30:01
@hamsummer964
@hamsummer964 6 ай бұрын
Nietzsche was not ‘anti-semite’; instead, he was a strong ‘anti-anti-semite’ to the extent that he severed his ties and friendship with the composer Richard Wagner who was a fervent anti-semite. With Schopenhauer, Wagner was one the ‘idols’ of Nietzsche, but because of the antisemitism of Wagner, Nietzsche moved away from Wagner, and this painful ending of his relationship with Wagner would become one of the pillars of the foundations of the existential turmoil that underlines his philosophical theory. The accusation of Nietzsche as antisemite stems from the unfortunate handling of his entire work after his death by his sister Elizabeth, a German nationalist and antisemite who edited and manipulated most of Nietzsche’s texts and made them available to the Nazis ( see Sue Prideaux’s book “I Am Dynamite: A life of Nietzsche” and “Nietzsche: A Philosophical Biography” by Rudiger Safranski). Hence, ironically Nietzsche became victim of one of the fundamental concept and idea of his own theory: “the fundamental power of ‘interpretation’.”
@brentjohnson4212
@brentjohnson4212 Жыл бұрын
18:36 big don drap energy here
@ziggityfriggity
@ziggityfriggity 2 жыл бұрын
19:52 "Destroy the brain and break the box, that's postmodernism".. what a terrifying observation!
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
But fetishization of the brain like it’s the finger bone of saint (or some other holy relic) is not also terrifying? I suppose the destruction of either one could be terrifying if you believed these artifacts contain knowledge or God, but the underlying idea is to free oneself of superstition.
@mohammedchang
@mohammedchang 2 жыл бұрын
To be superficial, when were these videos made?
@yr-qb4hu
@yr-qb4hu 2 жыл бұрын
11:26 MTV is extremely powerful semiotics system
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
It was once, when it primarily played music videos. Currently, it is a signifier of a once powerful semiotics system that no longer really exists outside of pop culture history. MTV is no longer relevant outside its use as a signifier.
@Sunfried1
@Sunfried1 2 жыл бұрын
Good lectures and very informative, but I'm guessing they were made no later than the early Nineties. His pop culture references are quite dated.
@donaldcarpenter8142
@donaldcarpenter8142 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, you can tell the video quality is a little poor. His references are a little dated, but most of what he says is still applicable today.
@hkumar7340
@hkumar7340 2 жыл бұрын
Prof. Sugrue is about 70 now (maybe a little more than 70). These lectures are probably from the early 90s.
@MarcosElMalo2
@MarcosElMalo2 2 жыл бұрын
Not to mention the aspect ratio. 😆 How’s that for a frame of reference?
@PhilanderingBastard
@PhilanderingBastard Жыл бұрын
Daedalus constructed the labyrinth, Ariadne + Theseus found a way out.
@corentincarne9364
@corentincarne9364 Жыл бұрын
37.51 , dr sugrue paused and looked for a word 😂
Foucault: Power, Knowledge and Post-structuralism
46:13
Michael Sugrue
Рет қаралды 358 М.
Jean-Francois Lyotard: The Post-modern Condition
45:44
Michael Sugrue
Рет қаралды 151 М.
[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny
00:53
0% Respect Moments 😥
00:27
LE FOOT EN VIDÉO
Рет қаралды 45 МЛН
Зомби Апокалипсис  часть 1 🤯#shorts
00:29
INNA SERG
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Can You Draw The PERFECT Circle?
00:57
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 50 МЛН
The Bible and Western Culture - Part 1 - Job and the Problem of Evil
43:33
Levi-Strauss and Structuralism
45:31
Michael Sugrue
Рет қаралды 74 М.
Frege on Thought
49:26
Daniel Bonevac
Рет қаралды 24 М.
Rick Roderick on Heidegger - The Rejection of Humanism [full length]
44:52
The Partially Examined Life
Рет қаралды 252 М.
Smith's Wealth of Nations
40:16
Michael Sugrue
Рет қаралды 138 М.
Arthur Schopenhauer's Philosophy - Bryan Magee & Frederick Copleston (1987)
43:28
Gadamer: Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences
45:22
Michael Sugrue
Рет қаралды 87 М.
Dr. Darren Staloff, Post Structuralism and the Linguistic Turn
46:46
Michael Sugrue
Рет қаралды 19 М.
Jacques Derrida on Deconstruction (Makers of the Modern World)
1:00:20
Dr. Jordan B Cooper
Рет қаралды 5 М.
[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny
00:53