Batteriser / Batteroo Boost Test (Part 1)

Batteriser / Batteroo Boost Test (Part 1) - Ec-Projects

Рет қаралды 6,093

7 жыл бұрын

¤¤¤¤ -- SUPPORT Ec-Projects -- ¤¤¤¤
By using my Amazon affiliate links (No extra cost for you!)
Amazon US - amzn.to/1kNT3RM
Amazon UK - amzn.to/1OnZ2aX
Amazon DE - amzn.to/1Vt6zqg
By becoming a Patreon for as little as $1 per month
Patreon - / ecprojects
¤¤¤¤ ----------------------------------------- ¤¤¤¤

Пікірлер: 38

@Max27653 7 жыл бұрын

Even I find the product not useful, I appreciated your test. It's unlike Dave's test which is full of laughing a neutral test what you expect from an engineer.

@gl5301 7 жыл бұрын

he laughs because he has been vindicated, after nearly two years of campaigning by Batteriser/oo to try to discredit him. There was never, ever, any doubt about Batteriser/oo's claims being anything other than wishful thinking

@Indiskret1 7 жыл бұрын

Well, it's very unprofessional either way. I'm no fan of batteriser but if you're going to debunk it as an engineer, be serious about it, otherwise it just looks bad and can have the opposite effect. EcProjects approach is superior.

@nictamer 7 жыл бұрын

Indiskret1 It's a fucking boost converter presented as an "innovation." It's laughable. Therefore it's ok to laugh about it.

@zackthebongripper7274 7 жыл бұрын

eevlog's test was rigged. It's amazing no one picked up on the the fact that the toy train he used had CONSTANT VOLTAGE CIRCUITRY. It says on the Batteroo manual NOT to use the sleeves with electronic boosters, which is common sense. eevlog is a fucking fraud, and I unsubbed from him as soon as someone pointed the toy train out. The reason these sleeves work is no mystery, just look at all the high quality single AA LED flashlights on the market, same principle.

@zackthebongripper7274 7 жыл бұрын

It's okay eevlog fanboy.

@SuperBrainAK 6 жыл бұрын

for that radio synced clock I bet if you salvaged a voltage converter from a wireless mouse you could just open up the clock and put that inline, then you can modify the voltage since there is probably a voltage divider that is accessible, so like the batteroo but in the clock it self instead of each cell.

@pa4tim 7 жыл бұрын

Do you have a SA ? Maybe the switching of the batteroo is causing EMI problems for the receiver.

@morbo3000 7 жыл бұрын

Would be interesting to see it under a DC electronic load (like the Agilent 6060B) and measure the total energy at various loads until the Batteriser shuts off. So far, I haven't seen anyone do this. It's all been qualitative tests using flashlights, motors, and the like.

@radarmusen 7 жыл бұрын

It could be interesting to see the current when the voltage is lower and the regulator has to work. And what about rippel, is it short protected?.

@1978jra 7 жыл бұрын

Is it also possible that batteriser is too noisy for that clock? DCF77 uses 77,5kHz and I would not surprise if batteriser uses frequency near that.

@7markhunter 7 жыл бұрын

yes indeed it's pretty certain that it's not a voltage issue at 3.0 volts boosted, it's noisy switching from crappy filtering in the Batteriser.

@EcProjects 7 жыл бұрын

It might be, but the clock doesn't work at 3v clean DC either..

@Bodragon 7 жыл бұрын

Is that a watch or a clock?

@JimTMcDaniels1 7 жыл бұрын

I got mine in the mail too recently.Who would I or anyone else want them know.....modern snake oil, doesn't work enough for any use but works just enough to keep from being sued?

@sheadjohn 7 жыл бұрын

so with all these people testing it, i guess batteroo is making some money.

@felixdPL 7 жыл бұрын

It's not amount of people that will make this business profitable ;) No worries.

@Bodragon 7 жыл бұрын

"Number" of people. "Amount" of interest. Dimwit.

@brice9613 7 жыл бұрын

they should ha at least added a lower voltage mode it goes into before it just shuts down so battery gauges would at least kinda work if you think about it's not useless but their claim's are miles away from reality

@xl000 7 жыл бұрын

Hi ! Just an empty comment to show my "engagement", as per new KZfaq algorithm.

@toysareforboys1 7 жыл бұрын

lol :(

@NatureAndTech 7 жыл бұрын

Some toys are for girls :P

@jacoblarsen93 7 жыл бұрын

are you danish ?

@7markhunter 7 жыл бұрын

your conversion losses test was invalid as you used a fresh battery which the batterizer passes through the voltage (unboosted) therefore the device isn't really operational, it's just passively checking the voltage 5 times per second as you described. You needed to drain the battery to below 1.5 volts under load and then check a low current drain device such as a watch. Boost converters have TERRIBLE efficiency under ultra low current operation, so yeah redo your test and you'll see a dramatic difference. Pass-through is NOT operational boost conversion.

@EcProjects 7 жыл бұрын

Your comment is invalid, as I did not use a fresh battery ;) The test was to find the "stand-by" current of the batteriser. The rest is just to get a rough idea how that would affect the run time of a typical clock. The boost converter was operating, but it is still not an efficiency test since I only looked at the current.. The efficiency tests will come in the next episode.. I can tell you that it is around 66% in that clock with an almost dead battery. The test you saw in this video equates to 71%, just looking at the current, which of course is not what you want to do.

@NeuronalAxon 7 жыл бұрын

YT algos like comments these days apparently, so - have a comment! :D

@xl000 7 жыл бұрын

So, people should just put crap in the comments section just to make it look like it has a lot of "engagement" ? ... This is BS..

@NeuronalAxon 7 жыл бұрын

Ah - I see that you decided to contribute, too! :D

@daverussell123 7 жыл бұрын

$$$$$

@ArtyomGalstyan 2 жыл бұрын

Basically this batteriser is a useless product. Its just easier and cheaper to buy new batteries.

@billycook8124 4 жыл бұрын

A Person can fall asleep watching this Video "Boring".

@KennethRosenstroem 7 жыл бұрын

EEVBlog already covered thus, and then some...

@thebeststooge 7 жыл бұрын

He said that in his opening but you showed you didn't watch the video else you would have known that. No need to be stupidly redundant.

@KennethRosenstroem 7 жыл бұрын

I watched the first 5 min, then lost interrest. Does not matter what he said, it's still a redundant video. Men klem bare paa, de andre video'er er interresante nok!! Godt Nytaar.

@NeuronalAxon 7 жыл бұрын

It's still nice to have 2nd and 3rd party confirmation, no? You know that people can be bought off, sponsored or just plain fooled, don't you? I enjoyed these videos, and Dave's and watched them all, so.....

@tHaH4x0r 7 жыл бұрын

You guys are both acting childish. Just because a topic has been covered before, does not mean that a video is suddenly useless. Secondly, there is no need to insult dave jones or his viewers for no reason at all. He makes plenty of informative videos. Grow up you two.

@Enzaie 7 жыл бұрын

Husk nu at det er idioterne der gør at vi andre har det godt..