😂😂😂😂

IT'S ALL BS. MAKING YOU THINK THAT IT WAS MIXED IN THE BOX WITH A BUNCH OF PLUGINS AND NOT WITH THE BIG MIXER IN FRONT OF HIM

@@crazyfoxxx how u gonna mix digital drums with that big mixer?? Lol wtf

LMAO

@@gusdee4844 using softwares trying to emulate the real things in his studio? are you that stupid?

VESHZA he is super chill. Doesnt drink though 😂

VESHZA Facts

That man high af 😂😂

Same for real.

Agree, life goes on and good music will shine regardless of the mixing: what I mean is there is more than one way to mix a good song and make it shine. Then again if the music is mediocre, there´s not too much you can do about it.

Another thing is referencing, constantly switch from your mix to a professional mix which will help you make those tough decisions.

@@peakingmantis5331 lmao no actually that causes u to want to throw the song in the garbage because a kid in his room typically not going to get comparable mix/masters to the pros.

Congrats man!

Oh cool never heard about you happy to checked, I subbed your active youtube channel

He probably didn't mean it in a good way. You never know with him. He's a very blunt person, so I'm sure he meant it how he said it. Watch his Full Sail videos, he never hesitates to say what he think without a fuck giving.

Lol it means that it's just coasting from here. Like if you were going for a bike ride or a hike. When it's "all downhill from here" it means its easy

probably meant downhill as in pretty easy. as to say "the ball is rolling"

@@davidpearson6346 lmao I think the puncture would would be considered uphill in an isolated environment, but since we have to combine it with the actual downhill, we are now just at a level playing field. However since we do not have water nor the ability to find or repair the puncture, we'd finally end up with a negative gradient of tan^-1(x) = puncture setback level * gradient of hill.

but he isnt lol

This is exactly what's killing any form of art and creativity in the industry. This is why there will never be albums/cd's/downloads that sound as good, or are as mixed as well as those of the past. It's become a cookie cutter, crank it out as fast as possible, compress the utter life out of it world of stale, lifeless, and unoriginal music. While I'm sure he's technically "right" about it being the way to stay happily employed, it's dead wrong for the music industry as a whole, and what used to be an art of mixing.

@@brianjones8432 agreed

@@brianjones8432 yeah but the faster you can work physically the less good ideas escape your grasp

@@brianjones8432 He's speaking to only one aspect of the art though (a small piece at that) and I think you are taking what he is saying for granted. Also, to say that there are albums that will never be mixed as well as it was in the past is very homer-ish and senile of you. Technology literally improves every moment. Negating the fact that people are doing what folks did in the past at a faster clip because of the quality of gear and tools is not smart.

Precisely.

He's actually a gamer! maybe a live twitch with him playing RDR?

@@mixwiththemasters go for it! (Full episodes tho, not only snippets ^^)

ahahah stoooopid ⚰️

Can you drop the link or explain a little what you mean by “annoying frequency”

Famous Twins sounds buzzy on the ears. Scratchy.

I learned how to do it by working with dialogue Mixers and editors who always had ringing in dialogue or etc. they’d simply find the frequency and completely remove it from the file with audio suite.

@@famoustwins2x I mean... did you watch the video??? He found an annoying frequency. Just use your ears.

@@famoustwins2x Use an EQ that gives you an FFT analysis. You might simply be able to see exactly where the annoying frequency is.

Awesome :)

Glad to hear. If you simply went through your mixes and got rid of things you didn’t like Vs adding frequencies.... your mixes will be better.

Right? Obviously it works lol. I don’t usually go as narrow as he does, at least not at first. I use a wider band and sweep around till I find something annoying, then narrow the band until I have a good idea of where the issue is, and then go from there.

Heihachi Honda yeah people change all the time.

I mean it all depends on the style, what you're going for and the sample/recording. You dont always want to use the same blueprint for every hi hat

4:40

He said specifically "mixing drums"... not recording them and so on. He's a mixing engineer, which means he's only doing the mix. Besides, a well-recorded acoustic kit is very easy to mix, and usually requires less work than electronic drums which sound you need to carve and modify a lot with EQ to get it right.

@@jas_bataille, I have been to quite a few studios, and know a lot of engineers and I don't think any of them would agree with this generalization. If you have drums recorded at a top notch studio by a top notch studio drummer, it still takes substantially more work to mix than electronic drums

True, but it still shouldn’t be taking 8 hours. What I do to maximize my efficiency on drums is send each track to a subbuss, so I have one subbuss for all the kick mics, one for all the snares, etc. Then I go through the individual instruments and make sure there’s no phase issues, ie the kick in and kick out mics. Once the individual tracks are in phase, I do the same thing with the entire kit, and then check phase with the other instruments. Honestly, depending on the kit, that might take up to 30 minutes. After that, it becomes just eqing and compressing the different subbusses. That definitely shouldn’t be taking 8 hours or whatever. Maybe 2 if it’s crazy complex, but if you’re treating the kit as a single instrument instead of a million little tracks, it goes faster, at least for me. Also, if the recording engineer knows what she’s doing, then the only phase issues that would need fixing are the bass guitar lol.

Lmao. I’ve replayed this like 10 times haha

Yeah It's a 30 inch, and they go for $1k. You could get a nice 55inch and have money leftover.

i feel that lmao

Blue Matrix does it matter? Would the video be more effective with just the laptop? I sum on the 4K. Like most of us. Not entirely impractical to be in this room even if yur using 8 faders. Most f these guys are hybrid mixing these days

I guess to look professional

The room is acoustically treated for mixing and he more than likely has several different monitors to test the track on. Also it's probably just where he works?

@@himeshhewawasam I think his room is other, I remember as all white, with Focal Speakers www.soundonsound.com/people/inside-track-pharrell-williams-happy unless he chage....but ll videos of audio products are in HUGE Consoles, besides Maserati that keep it real without hype....and sure is not leslie...are the companies behind...

@@davidpearson6346 I work out of a studio on occasion but it's a digital console. In that case you're right it is more of a controller for sure. I personally find it easier to mix on a console when you have physical faders instead of scrolling around your digital mixer. It's a lot more of an intuitive feel and you can focus more on listening as opposed to making small movements with the mouse. With great software modelling like that of Steven Slate and Waves etc, using a console for sound is pretty irrelevant. I know a lot of people say that consoles sound better/different, but several double blind tests show that even engineers can't tell the difference between the console and it's modelled software counterpart.

Lmaooo stupid

Protools