can this actually happen, for the sake of us!!

+kingogkingswoodz Exactly

+Ian Phoenix Then vote for Cruz!!!!!

What does being 35 have to do about it? From England

Ann Lebens 45 is but whatever.

GingerBagels Its not that they understand, they don't want to accept it.

Agree. I was talking with someone on youtube and they tried to say that "I believe White or anglo - saxon people are the most Violent people in the World ...all of the European Empires throughout History Have killed more people than any Race ever...And if I'm not mistaken... who invented GUNS and WEAPONS of Mass Destruction...certainly not Blacks or Latinos...Come on MAN ...get some real education." This is his comment word for word copied. See the argument he is trying to make? He is saying that the violence going on right now is somehow sanction because white people have always been violent towards everyone else. He also says that white people created guns and WMD which means there use in violence is also sanctioned. This is the kind of false information that is spewed about and thought of as fact.

GingerBagels Denial isn't just the longest river in the world...

Because anything that doesnt agree with their opinion, is wrong

Doesn't that apply to every race?

He has to be 35 and he's only 32 😔

ik

ikr he totally is a better choice then Hillary and Trump

He has to be 35 or older.

He has to be 3 foot 5 inches or taller.

+Tim RedSkinLord You're the only imbecile that's so stupid.

+Andrew Jackson Shapiro bases his arguments and facts and statistics instead of appealing to emotion and using shame tactics. I can't really see him as a subverter when all he does is speak the truth.

Almost all Orthodox Jews hold these views.

Tim RedSkinLord You do know he is an Orthodox Jew right?

+Andrew Jackson yeah exactly, he was vehemently opposed against the state, which is an institution built for Jewish elites. Further proving that Jews are not politically monogamous.

+UnixXnova Go watch Alan Grayson.

@@phuckewe178 any videos or websites you recommend?

@@phuckewe178 Alan Grayson is an idiot who repeatedly spews lies and strawmen about the right. His kind of angry, bombastic rhetoric is what helped normalize Donald Trump.

I wish…I think Anti-Jewish bias is still too strong. I admire Ben immensely.

This video proves that Shapiro holds BLM to a different standard than Trump. What am I talking about, you ask? Let me explain. In an interview with Joe Rogan, Shapiro says, "why assume Trump is doing something with malicious intent when his actions could just as easily be explained as incompetence". That's not a bad idea. However he doesn't apply the same logic to the Black Lives Matter movement in this video. In this video, he says Michael Brown case shows that Brown was a thug (and deserves death). He then goes on to say that this proves that Black Lives Matter doesn't care about black lives. He assumes that they have malicious intent, even though it could just as easily be explained by incompetence. I think it's much more likely that BLM members DO care about black lives. Even if you don't agree with their methods, it's dishonest to say they don't care when all evidence suggests they do.

TactiCalifornia 👍

The protesters do care about black lives, ​however, the people on top, like Hilary and Bernie don't.

Hey There He never said Brown deserved death. Also, Trump's actions are not comparable to large groups of rioters, murderers of police, and gangsters who are trying to undermine the entire justice department in their local areas. You think that it's reasonable to say that it's just incompetence that makes them do that?

not so flawless when you remember that the Democrats used to be the Right-wingers and Republicans were the Left-wingers. It's nice that Shapiro is finally applauding the left, even if he's been dead for at least 100 years.

+Jeremiah R. that's islamphobic and sexist we all know female Muslims are all that matter now

+Andrew22 because black people are disproportionately killed more than white people. The black lives matter movement isn't advocating that black lives matter more than whites, they're advocating that all lives are equal and that black lives should be viewed within the context of "all lives matter". The idea that the black lives matter movement is irrelevant because "all lives matter" is ridiculous, because they're advocating for that.

+Luke Thomson "Black Lives Matter" insinuates that black lives matter more. Not to mention that the movement was quite literally based off of a lie. There's absolutely no reason to take that movement serious what so ever. Black people definitely are disproportionately murdered but that is definitely not indicative of systemic racism. There's absolutely no evidence of intentional racism or even unintentional racism for that matter. Like Shapiro said, and you can look this up, victim reports match arrests. There's absolutely no way victim reporting can have a big enough margin of error to debunk the point unless their was a nation wide collusion involving hundreds of millions of Americans of every color.

AJAX B Then how do you explain the large portion of UNARMED black people killed by cops? Not armed or dangerous black people, but unarmed? Also what about cops who have come up and said "oh yeah, there's definitely a problem with police allowing their cultural biases getting in the way and that there needs to be programs to help combat that"? So how isn't there a problem with racism again? The Black Lives Matter movement is fighting for things that would keep the community safer, not just black people. At the top of my head, I can think of demilitarization; cops don't need to be that heavily armed and it's uneasy seeing them like that and the structuring of training so cops are more educated in deescalation and not so heavily in firearm training. So yeah, remind me, how is the black matter movement bad? Even if they were based on a lie (Which they're not) they're advocating for positive change.

AJAX B So you're against demilitarizing the police force then? You like that police stations get tanks? And high powered assault rifles which the military get to use? If you're against that then you should support black lives matter. Are you against further deescalation training? You know, the thing that makes it so situations don't get any worse than what they already are? If you're for deescalating training then you should support the black lives matter movement. You're saying that white people get shot more than blacks? That's why we say "disproportionately" because the level of black population is way smaller than whites, but blacks still get imprisoned and shot heaps. Also, how dare you go to the "black on black crime is so much worse defence" Yeah black on black crime is hugely problematic and I think it should be discussed and more funding should be funneled into programs to combat that, such as education programs. BUT! We're talking about gangs killing people, not state funded police officers who's job it is to protect the community, not kill people. The fact is the black lives matter movement is fighting for something important and the wider community will benefit from it.

Sounds like a dumb, incoherent statment on your part. Care to elaborate? From where I stand, BLM seems to advocate that blacks be treated by the law enforcement community in a manner similar to whites. But that doesnt seem to be happening.

Arturo Martes it actually should be the opposite since whites are much more likely to be killed by cops in similar situations due to fear of being called a racist. Also BLM is worse for black people than current day KKK considering that they burn down black neighborhoods and get many cops killed.

He had a white man's lies to keep blacks in their place!

+EmceeLorder Great movement until it was infiltrated.

+DjTIMEJD Can you clarify?

edding8400 Black Panthers were infiltrated with agents through COINTELPRO to dissipate positive traction and divide and conquer. BLM may have been compromised from the jump. Is it a true grassroots ORG?? Some believe it is not. George Soros has funded Black Lives Matter. Many question the true motives of BLM outside of surface level attention seeking.

***** So Huey and other BPP should of just bowed down to capitalists and white supremacy. They had white America shook. Reagan was quick to sign that Mulford Act. Whether you agree with their ideologies or not they were for justice by any means.

***** It wasn't about integration it was about protecting black communities from white supremacy. Civil Rights Movement people were trying to integrate. No problems?? Lynchings, castrations, burnings, rapes, murders, bombings of Black men, women and children. Black Wall St Massacre happened during that period because they had no protection from white supremacy. Black people had the financial means to protect themselves but they had to stand up for themselves. You are giving communists and their ideologies way to much credit. Black and white people have always been around each other...all we did was integrate our money. So we lost what ownership we had in black communities. That wasn't because of the Black Panthers or their so called ties with socialism. That was on the Civil Rights movement and those who fell for Feminisim.

Shapiro-sama, please.

LMAO!

No, correctly it would be Shapiro-san.

***** Did you not read my comment? I said it was in his interview with Dave Rubin on the Rubin Report. You should watch it. It is for sure in the full interview and im guessing (though not 100%) you can find it in the shorter one titled "Ben Shapiro on donald trump, bernie sanders and hillary clinton." If you cant find it there then watch the full interview. I like Ben, but he can be a hypocrite.

***** No.

+Random Viewer that does not make his argument invalid. the evidence exists, yet you refuse to look at it. you sound like a moron. good day.

+Random Viewer lol good one bro you were totally trolling the entire time /s

Does that invalidate any of the rational or empirical points he's made?? I'm perplexed as to what your point with this comment is. I bet if you were important enough to several people where you did lots of interviews over several years, at some point you would have a statement that contradicted another one of your statements. We're human, we contradict ourselves sometimes. We know politicians do it all the time. Ben seems to be pretty solid in his views and statements though. Certainly you couldn't call him a flip flopper. So if your intent was to invalidate this video, you failed. If not, then what was the point?

Look around you or do you live under a rock.

Me: "Please tell me where you're getting this information." You: "We need show no evidence because we're clearly right, and if you disagree you're just stupid." Bigotry at it's finest.

+xThatOneDude What information are you looking for?

bn2mar2div2 Entitled bitch, if you want to know something, research yourself. Dude said the names of studies. No wonder that people from US are considered to be lazy, uneducated morons.

Frank Sanders Lol how would i be able to do that

+justelvin #Trump2016

Shay Cannon it will be too op

+Srikanth Boddapati No the history and present day policies of the Democratic Party are TOTALLY RACIST. The facts do not support your assertion.

Well, democrats create the issue, bring up the issues and blames someone, convinces the taxpayers to agree to paying more in taxes, then misappropriate the funds to their checking account. Nothing is actually done and crime is still the same or worse. And anybody who disagrees with their policies are racist.

thats what he said

In psychology we consider you to be at the "Contemplation Stage" of change. You have probably been in denial up until now, but now that you have been presented with solid rationalism, you are beginning to accept the fact that you have denied good, credible information up until now. You've begun your journey to join reality, good job.

I would imagine the national crime victimization survey has numbers on murder perpetrators and murder victims by race. Hope that helps.

+Scott Shelbs And that makes Bernie racist? Bernie is making an observational point, and he's technically right. A large majority of white folk don't get harassed as badly as black folk, nor do we as a majority know what it's like to be poverished. I do, and you know what? The majority of the people that were poverished on my street were black families. We are priveledged as white folk, we do get better treatment in the south... By far great treatment. Compared to black people. I only started watching this guys videos because I hated the BLM group, but found out that not all BLM supporters are fucking stupid racist bigots, some are actually genuine kindhearted people trying to point out that there's a racial problem in America that was taught.

+Scott Shelbs obviously someone hasn't lived in the ghetto. I'm sure he wasn't talking about the vast majority of whites like you like to believe. Because finding everything you can to throw a nominee under the bus is the correct answer in every situation right?

I know what you mean, its kind of like when I say;, I have eaten the apple, I only mean, i simply took a bite out of the apple. So when someone goes "white people dont know" they might as well mean "some white people dont know": The words you use to express yourself are hardly important, its about the message, you fail to communicate. We shouldnt respond to what people say, we should respond to what we think they meant when they said it. We cant expect people to talk for themselves, now can we? Especially not a politicians, they are so inexperienced with public speaking.

Where does he call Bernie racist?

LMFAO...OK...so white poor people is a falsehood?? That's news to me!

Sure I'll help u out

ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-2018/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6.xls from 2018, there’s more recent reports but I couldn’t find them

+Mitch Nance Stop pushing that lie called the Southern Strategy. A lie that was instigated by some unknown journalist and an editor who failed to do his job. The southern strategy was a mythical program that nixon supposedly used to convert racist democrats into Republicans, problem is there never was a southern strategy program from the Nixon camp. Search "The Southern Strategy myth"

It wasn't a thing

Basically black lives matter shouldn't only care about police brutality, black on black crime is a thing, and so is police brutality but why pretty much ignore one thing when there both problems, if black lives matter then why doesn't it matter when a black person kills another black person. As for police brutality I'm aware it exist I'm sure everyone does, but doesn't it seem hypocritical when a protest against violence towards one race is acted on with violence to another race?

Aj Ortiz On their website they do recognize black on black crime in America. And they want to stop it. But using black on black crime against the blm movement is basically telling black people that since black people kill black people more than police kill black people, you have no right to get upset. i mean white people kill white people more than ISIS kills white people. but white people are still more scared of ISIS than whites. It is still a major topic among white Americans. And people are very upset when ISIS murders their people. But no one brings up well why aren't you upset when this white man kills this white man. So really the whole well black people kill black more than police kill black people is kind of irrelevant to the Black lives matter movement that right now is trying to change police brutality. P.S. don't take offence to any of this. .

lol yes

Kaysha-Leigh McBurnie but black lives matter recognizes that there is black on black crime. and want to change that but they also need police help. and if police kill more unarmed blacks than unarmed whites, how can the African American community trust them? how can the African American community just care about black on black crime and not be outraged and feel sicken? do you understand what i'm saying? i understand that we have to fix black on black crime but that doesn't make police brutality less worse to the African american community. and also Police killed at least 102 unarmed black people in 2015

police kill more unarmed whites than blacks, get your facts straight before commenting

If you're a Jew, you're either a beat leftist like ADL or an ultra-conservative like Ben. There's no in between.

Not racist to compliment people bud, you’re perfectly fine. Sad that you even thought you had to apologize

7117hpr7117 I'm gonna sound dumb but aren't Jews just people who believe in the religion Judaism

Anthony Ta I understand that you put the disclaimer but I'ma have to correct you anyways. Jews are an ethnic group, and it's is rare for you to convert to being a Jew since you are usually born into that religion.

+Nate C. They know EXACTLY what they are doing.

Ben Woo The "racism" is in their policies. Like pushing for things that "help" black people." who are you talking about. are you talking about polices like a universal education system that would help everyone. are you talking about polices like a universal healthcare system that would help everyone. are you talking about polices like a universal daycare system that would help everyone. "When in reality it babies them and degrades them by saying "here we'll lower the standards so you have a fair chance against everyone else." wrong again. in reality it does help. that is why whenever a program is stopped it actually harm white people the most then they want it back but it is too late. when the standards are too high for the people who need the help the most, you do not blame and attack them for not meeting the standards when there are outside things they have no control over. I always find it funny that when people say the exact same thing as you but do not see how racist it is.

+darkstalkerknight63 where are you getting your sources. The universal healthcare system set in place is shit. Nobody likes and it has cost families more than their original plan, families lose their doctors and pay more out of pocket for a failing system. Universal education does not work. Look at what our education system ranks in the world. Common Core learning is by far the worst thing that could've happened to the education system. I've never heard of a universal daycare system. These "progressive" aka socialist policies tax the system with little to no benefit at all. The "help" I'm talking about is the social policy that the democrats push instead of family policy that republicans push. Democrats push laws that trap kids in schools without choice, give more lenient sentences to criminals, and push for more welfare. Which in the longer term negatively effects the communities in which it was supposed to help.

+darkstalkerknight63 these outside things were created through Democratic party policy

Ben Woo "where are you getting your sources. The universal healthcare system set in place is shit. Nobody likes and it has cost families more than their original plan, families lose their doctors and pay more out of pocket for a failing system." what are you talking about. we do not have a universal healthcare system. Obamacare is not a universal healthcare system. also wrong. people like you seem to forget a thing called inflation so the prices was going to go up anyway but it went up less thanks to the PPACA. "Universal education does not work. Look at what our education system ranks in the world. Common Core learning is by far the worst thing that could've happened to the education system." wrong again. that is not do to Universal education. I looked at our education system ranks in the world and it is that way thinks to conservatives. they oppressing it and making things worse. that is why conservatives and republicans states are at the bottom of all the lists and liberal states are at the system but over all thanks to conservatives they are pulling our ranks down. actually Common Core have shown to improve our overall ranks but again thanks to conservatives who did not put it in place we did not have a big growth overall. "I've never heard of a universal daycare system. These "progressive" aka socialist policies tax the system with little to no benefit at all." all of this shows how little to nothing you actually know. finland have things system called Maternity package which starts from well before born with a universal healthcare system. at birth, they give everything the parents would need in a box called a "'Baby Box' which have been shown to reduce baby mortality rate by more than 90%. they also give both parents a year leave off to take care of their child or children and that leads into a universal daycare system that take care of the kids while the parents work which leads into universal education system all the way though colleges. and in all of them Finland rates near the top in everything dealing with them. "The "help" I'm talking about is the social policy that the democrats push instead of family policy that republicans push." wrong again. the democrats push family policies and the republicans push shame and attack policies. "Democrats push laws that trap kids in schools without choice," wrong again. a universal education system would allow kids to go to any school they choice and be able to change schools as needed without any trouble. "give more lenient sentences to criminals," wrong. the sentences to crimes actually cause more problems and creates a system of dependents. in fact, the crimes system that have the best outcomes all over the world are liberal system where people are actually reformed. "and push for more welfare." wrong. they are pushing to get more people off of welfare by rising the minimum wage to a living wage and keep it there which would take more than 10 million to 20 millions people off of welfare programs and only left the disable, the sick, and the elderly on those programs. "Which in the longer term negatively effects the communities in which it was supposed to help." wrong. it have been proven that those programs actually benefits more. before medicare, the elderly poverty rate was around 40%. 10 years after medicare, it went down to 10%. food stamps actually been shown to create more jobs. for everyone 1 billion is spent on food stamps, 1.8 billion in benefits are created. what negatively effects the communities is when big government republicans and conservatives make laws and put things in place to make it harder for those people to get the help they need. when they put into place drug testing people who get welfare, it actually cost the states anywhere form 10 times to 100 times more money then they got back. thinkprogress.org/economy/2016/02/19/3747139/states-drug-testing-welfare-recipients/ www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2016/03/28/drug-testing-welfare-recipients-costs-outweigh-benefits-and-questions-about-treatment and that is not talking about the back pay they had to give out for the people who had to wait months before getting benefits which cost the states even more.

+SJW “EGB” SJW I love how the bitches complain that the video doesn't use sources even though you can directly find official sources on the web to which the video was referring to.

Vince W. too long didn't read.

+SJW “EGB” SJW wait "The good thing about youtube though is I can easily find you and your employer and just link this forward to them." you want to get someone fired for having an opinion you dislike? look, i agree that he's being a bit of a racist fuck (though he does have some good points), but holy shit, this oversensitive over-reactive bullshit is part of the reason why people don't want to be sjws

(͠≖ ͜ʖ͠≖)BecauseICan( ͡º ͜ʖ ͡º) then maybe don't be a racist fuck and you won't get fired...

SJW SJW Translation: "Yo, this guy's being a dick on the internet? HE DESERVES TO HAVE HIS ENTIRE LIFE RUINED WIEURWJRWOU" It's like if someone went up to me and said "Asians are cancer", and in response I went "Yo, this guy just said Asians are cancer, maybe I should BURN HIS FUCKING HOUSE DOWN". It's...just... No. It's time to *STOP.*

Look them up yourself, bro.

Kiba Fox No. Your message, your arguments, your sources. Otherwise, everything you say can be dismissed out of hand. Expecting everyone to validate information themselves is how campus feminism established itself. If you want to present a message, you can provide the evidence to back it up, or your claims are as good as bogus.

Art Gil Thing is, asking for people to find sources for themselves is simply impractical. People simply won't, because they don't care enough, or because they don't have time. There's also a difference between reasonable expectation of information provided, vs having everything spoon fed. Having the sources a presentation was written based on is a reasonable expectation for anyone looking to critically examine the presentation. Spoon feeding would be going over the sources and explaining each point in detail until the examiner understands. You like to harp on liberal SJW types for ignoring reality? Expecting every single person who watches a video like this to go out and find sources of their own is ignoring reality. That also ignores the fact that multiple conflicting sources might exist, and most people aren't trained enough in the scientific process to sort the wheat from the chaff. Determining the validity of sources should be something the presenter does - not that I would trust a political activist to do so, liberal or conservative. Pretending that these things, that everyone will check the sources of a video they watch, and that everyone knows how to reliably judge the validity of sources, is the reason why lies and misinformation proliferate on both sides of the debate.

He literally cited all sources

Try the FBI website

same here i wish he'd share his sources

its in the video lol "according to statistician nate.." and etc

Google