I consider this comment as the dislike button

@@le_ptitsuisse2618 not at all. Liked the video it’s just the title states “US Army tests its new super vehicle to replace the Bradley.” I just thought the video would be a highlight of that vehicle - its development, performance and whatever else. That’s all. So no, I did not dislike the video. Just confused.

The Lynx is the only remaining contender now. So that narrows it down.🤨

@@danwimberly1450 really? That one? Not that I really needed to do this but I’ve been trying to do some research on what the Army is considering but I haven’t found anything. Again not that it matters. But thanks for the info!! Oh and if I came across as rating the video as a “negative” in my original post that wasn’t the case. Enjoyed the video and seeing what’s being produced by other countries just confused about the title.

Potentially an under armored orange and white taxi 4 door sedan last seen near a farm. Capable of driving quickly on improved roads and surviving multiple horn blasts. Can carry one to many fighting age ones at once. Typically armed with pair of arms per each fighting age ones. These arms typically are located on both sides of the fighting age one’s upper hull/body. Truth.

I agree!!!!

and gun range of 30mm? very short ranged gun hummm.

It looks similar to PARS 4 8X8

It is about air mobility and deployment.

@@mirrormonstere113 Let's take your point an analysis. A wheeled vehicle deployable by air isn't much different than a tracked one deployed by air. Why you ask? A C-5 can transport the Abrams and so can a C-17. No matter its wheeled or tracked about the same number of them can be transported to a war zone. Second point that makes the argument inconsequential is air transportability take hours or at most 2 days yet the vehicle's function on the battlefield can last for years. The third point is the United States can't move a significant number of Armored vehicle's via air wheeled or tracked. The Stryker (wheeled) isn't as "deployable" as they thought. Each Stryker Brigade has nearly 300 of them of various types. IF, the Airforce used all (which is impossible) its capable transport planes, it would take weeks to transport a single brigade's Strykers, not to mention their wheeled soft vehlcles and tons of equipment. The army stations pre-assembled unit equipment and vehicles on board ships already anchored near potential trouble spots! The myth of large number of Armored vehicle being transported by air still persists among the ignorant. A track is better than a wheel vehicle when it comes to mobility and survival.

@@muzikizfun you missed the point. I meant airborne

@@mirrormonstere113 they did have the M-577 Sheridan, but while it was air dropable, it was so light it's gun was always off target after shooting it once. The now defunct Tank Bn of the 82nd Airborne Division had trouble moving more than a company of tanks at a time. I stationed at Fort Bragg so I know what problems they have even with wheeled vehicles.

track = too much maintance and lack of mobility.

Depending on the design it could be a boon…. Now, I’ve never seen a design that was good…. But it isn’t impossible.

You want infantryman to walk miles to the battle?

one thing is for sure, their life is short so you better have a lot of them.

In the end you still need some protection for these boots on the ground ....

будало, будалооо......:)

yes all the rusia garbage has been destroyed for javelins and nlaws kornet is trash and rpg is diahrrea

No that’s Russia…. Comrade ……….Putinshit going to send you to the front