See my final scope picks at backfire.tv/1000 That is a blog post where I review my final picks for each category.
Пікірлер: 415
@backfire8 ай бұрын
Thanks all for the support! I contacted many other companies who chose not to participate or failed to respond. I can really only review what's in front of me. Also, some companies like Arken make awesome scopes and I will definitely be reviewing them, BUT their scopes are much less expensive than these so I didn't think it'd be a fair comparison. Tried to keep everything in the $750 to $1,000 range and as close to 3-18 FFP as possible.
@BigShotsEric8 ай бұрын
im curious do any of the Arken or other cheaper scopes compete with these? or is it really a "you get what you pay for" kinda deal?
@jirifrybort58778 ай бұрын
What you think about Meopta optika6 3-18 ffp it should be under 1000 also
@GetMeThere18 ай бұрын
Just purchased the Tract Toric 3-15 x 44 FFP scope and it's AWESOME at $800-$900, Awhile back I found the Athlon Ares BTR Gen 2 4.5-27 x 50 for $600! It's super awesome!
@wisco_guy8 ай бұрын
I own two of the PA GLX FFP scopes and they have been excellent so far. Love the ACSS reticle!
@brandonquintero57108 ай бұрын
You should do another cheap rifle test, and do different rifles compared to the ones that you have already done. Like do a cheap browning or other known brands
@francoisbm67858 ай бұрын
that drop test hurts to watch
@Flinting_and_gaming8 ай бұрын
Fr
@C_oprator898 ай бұрын
How the heck isn’t athlon in this race?
@PRSKris8 ай бұрын
So bad, I cringed everytime one was dropped
@Mills1418 ай бұрын
@architekt8937 no locking turrets
@C_oprator897 ай бұрын
@@Mills141 most athlon have locking turrets. The helos gen2 btr does for sure
@hlranch7 ай бұрын
I'm curious if you reported the water failure to Burris and if yes, what was the response? This was an awesome test, thank you
@herpingmad1458 ай бұрын
Good test. I would be interested in the scopes ability to track and hold zero pre and post drop. That seems to be a bigger issue than out of the box. If a scope doesn’t track out of the box that seems to be a non starter.
@afdetailing81048 ай бұрын
Thanks for doing these tests for us Jim. Keep up the good work!
@tyrelhunter65298 ай бұрын
The fact that you arent allowed to show us the turret being twisted is just wild. I would love for youtube to explain the reasoning just to humor me. Awesome vid as always!
@taylorcleblanc7 ай бұрын
You can, he is just being super cautious
@reabralop7 ай бұрын
He said he’s been demonetized for that in the past. Just shows how much YT loves the year 84 from the 20th century
@Isaacmantx4 ай бұрын
@@reabralop It took me a second.... But I see what you did there!
@MrMadeinthe80s8 ай бұрын
Primary arms has been making so good scopes as of late. I have one on my 6.5 (PLx) and it looks so nice. I just couldnt justify going Razor HD price over it.
@micaellnstrup46028 ай бұрын
Absolutely fantastic review! I would love to see the same review, for top tier scopes from the top manufacturers.
@overkill01498 ай бұрын
For first focal plane scopes, do you check that the reticle subtensions line up with the calibrated equipment throughout the magnification range?
@romanrussian89897 ай бұрын
I appreciate your time, your work, your skills.
@ingelri28 ай бұрын
Did you contact Burris regarding the failure of the waterproof test? I'd be curious to know what their response was. I'm considering buying a couple of those Veracity PH scopes.
@choomanfoo1578 ай бұрын
Thank you for your research and doing the community a service by keeping us informed. My jaw dropped along with that scope drop test! haha. You sir have my respect! (and sub and like)
@kellyreid82304 ай бұрын
Excellent video as always Jim, thank you for all your hard work. I am that much wiser after takin in your videos. Thanks from Canada
@awsomedude91117 ай бұрын
I thought Trijicon Accupoint should maybe be in your tests. Cool to see primary arms in the top, I think when doing the drop test it should be done 3-10 times to have consistency possibly.
@jimfunchess8 ай бұрын
You need to include Vortex and Leupold Scopes in this. Thanks!
@philschaefer46517 ай бұрын
We know they're good, why would they donate a scope for things they've already tested?
@920fist47 ай бұрын
Well vortex's only optic that really lines up here is the Strike Eagle 3-18ffp... Leupold doesn't really have anything. Closest would be vx3hd 4.5-14 sub 1k... technically a non side adjust, non fire dot, and non cds vx5hd 3-15, but both of those are SFP
@taylortisaac6 ай бұрын
He literally says why they’re not in here. In addition to Nikon, I might add.
@paulmoss79405 ай бұрын
Nikon no makee scopes no mo. I like the older ones.@@taylortisaac
@EthosAtheos7 ай бұрын
For where I hunt a 4x is not low enough. Most shots in my area are under 100yd and many are under 100ft. Hunting in the woods is really very different than on grassland or mountains.
@jpaul1232h8 ай бұрын
Please please do the best scopes regardless of price. I’d love to hear what you have to say! Thank you for such amazing content!
@fook-joby-den61728 ай бұрын
Ive Never used the Arken Optics, but, LOVE the PA GLx4 2.5-10x/4-16x. Great turrets and reticle along with glass thats
@scbane7 ай бұрын
This video is a prime example of "I love your content, even though it does not apply to me." Most of my scopes are 1-6x, or 2-7x24mm. I love the Athlon BTR series. You should see the looks I get from techno hunters out in the sage or up in the mountains, with their 3lb 6-24x50mm scopes. I am ethically the "fair chase only" type. I do not hunt from blinds, or sit on water or food. I despise road hunters, unless they are genuinely physically disabled. Spot and stalk. Thus, weight is important to me. Also, since I do not shoot over 450 yards, 99% of my big game kills have been at 4x mag. Just works for me. I also do not share your love of chassis rifles, composites, Cerakote, etc. Give me a Win 70 Supergrade in maple any day. I love your content, keep it up. Side note: last year out Mulie hunting in our big, wide sage canyons, I came upon a guy who was lugging a 28" Palma barrel UberLoudenBoomer, that had to 13lbs if it was an ounce. Giant scope, like 3 sun shades on it, a tacticool green chassis of some kind, chambered in 30 Nosler. He took one look at my Tikka T3x Hunter 243 Win, 20" barrel, with an Athlon BTR 2-7X24 it, asked to handle it. He laughed at first when I told him 243, until I showed him a vid of that rifle knocking down a mulie at 373 yards. He offered to trade me on the spot. We were up high, and could see where we were parked, about 3 miles away. Last I saw of him, he had his rifle tied to his giant pack, sweating balls while I cruised on by. Bet this year he has a different rifle/optic.
@KenBlackRifleAmerica8 ай бұрын
Thanks Jim and Crew...Awesome information and on my way to the blog post!! 👍👍
@kellyrick43658 ай бұрын
Thanks for your hard work and videos!!!
@maxcoatlhunter43227 ай бұрын
Your reviews are so great..that now we need a review on scopes under $2,000.
@Quality_Guru8 ай бұрын
Great video. How about a LPVO run off for those of us interested in getting an optic for a semi auto rifle using .223 or 5.56.
@juanherrera26728 ай бұрын
I’d like to see a Meopta óptica6 3-18x50 added to your testing. Where did you acquire the colomiator ?
@armeddiver7 ай бұрын
Thank for the review. I am looking to buy a new scope for a semi-precision rifle and I am looking at scopes in all price ranges. This was a great review and I learned a lot.
@michaelbakowski51438 ай бұрын
Would love to see the same but for PRS scopes. Great video!
@tannervanasten8 ай бұрын
hugely appreciate the work here, great video. Really wish the big guys would have participated as I'm not really willing to step outside of the big 3-4
@dirklabuschagne4738 ай бұрын
Hi. Great to the point comparison. Where did you buy those collimators? Please tell me..been searching forever🙇🏼♂️
@davidlaney82548 ай бұрын
Excellent video and review that demonstrates why KZfaq can be so valuable in making the most of your hard- earned money.
@TheMotorcycleBoss7 ай бұрын
I own the Element Titan 5-25x56 FFP and have for about a year now. It's heavy but lighter than the Vortex Razor HD. Comes with a free optional throw lever, parallax down to 15yds, 34mm main tube, reticle illumination with an off setting between brightness adjustments and it tracks PERFECTLY as what was shown in this video. Glass quality is excellent for the price. I only have 2 minor gripes; turret clicks are a little mushy but do get better with use, and the glass quality isn't good enough to easily see mirage. Aside from that, I would 100% buy this again if I had to make the decision again. It was initially advertised as an airsoft optic because the owner is an airsoft fan but it is 100% designed for real guns. They actually test their optics on a .50 BMG. I use the optic for competition long range shooting and it has performed better than I could have hoped. If I ever replace it in the future, it would only be so I can see mirage better; but the glass quality is exceptional and very bright for such a great price. I absolutely recommend it for anyone wanting to get into long range. They have a hassle-free lifetime warranty as any reputable brand should and it is a VERY feature-rich choice. Highly recommended.
@reedehinger2636Ай бұрын
what is "mirage"? Like, what do you mean by that?
@TheMotorcycleBossАй бұрын
@reedehinger2636 mirage is the heat waves coming off the ground that make distant objects blurry. You can read the mirage to see how strong and what direction the wind is blowing
@SamEpperson938 ай бұрын
Huge bummer about the Veracity PH. I'm stoked to pick one up soon, I don't think I'll have issues with late season snowy hunts but hopefully they figure out the waterproofing issues!
@lasthit18908 ай бұрын
i put a veracity PH on my 7mm PRC and you are going to love just being able to range, dial to that range and then pew ( mines been through a fair amount of downpours and no water issues as of yet)
@charltonlwalker3 ай бұрын
@@lasthit1890how’s the glass clarity? Burris has a next gen PH with ED glass so you can get last year’s version on sale.
@travisemory13884 ай бұрын
I have loved your videos. You helped me pick my wives cva and my new Ruger gen 2. Spearfishing, we got dialed in, but long range shooting, we are still learning. Was wondering what you do with the used scopes when you're done? Some of us newer shooters would not mind a High end scope with a few nicks and scrapes if you sold them when you were done. You know the old saying, Losers cant be choosers 😅. Thanks for all the info and great videos!
@eriksforestryvision87517 ай бұрын
Were these tests done in the order displayed? If so seems very fair. Great video!
@karlsailor8 ай бұрын
In the price range: Arken EP4L for hunting, EP5 for targets
@brandonquesenberry82918 ай бұрын
SH4 is 300 great scope for the price
@paulmoss79405 ай бұрын
Arken not really waterproof. Fail.
@gold_38 ай бұрын
Great job as always 👍🏼👍🏼
@chrisgunsandguitars14038 ай бұрын
Tracking test right out of the box is one thing, and a good test. Testing long term tracking to see if the scope acquires lag would require heavy manipulation of the turrets that these “deer hunting” scopes likely won’t experience. I was hoping to see a TRACT scope, and would like to know who declined being part of the test. I personally am fine with American assembled with Japanese glass and a scope tube machined in China to certain specs. The whole scope made in China not so much.
@steffentysnes53028 ай бұрын
You should try to include some of the bigger European scopes as well, I really enjoy Zeiss scopes for example, but also there are other premium brands like Leica or Swarovski are also popular among the higher end scopes, I's love to see a comparison including these which i and many other Europeans know and love.
@hxl61628 ай бұрын
Jim, fantastic content as usual, best wishes from Brazil 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷 Have you tried ATN X-sight pro 4K with ABL (Balistic Calculator)?
@Bubblyhiccups8 ай бұрын
Arken EP5 would be my choice.
@CiviTac8 ай бұрын
My buddy put one on his Barrett as a joke. And it has stayed there because it’s great. We all thought it would die
@Chit_1262 ай бұрын
I’ve had 6 Arkens. All 6 have been sent back.
@scottbennett76767 ай бұрын
I watched both your Best Scopes under $500, and under $1,000 videos and appreciate you detailed reviews. I was especially interested to see that the Primary Arms 3-18 SLx & 4x16 GLx scopes did well in your test. Have you tested any of Primary Arms scopes with their ACSS Apollo 6.5 Creedmoor bullet drop compensating reticle? As the 6.5 CM is one of the top selling rifle calibers today; I'm sure there are many like me who would like to see you test & compare their 4.5-27x56 GLx & their 6-30x56 PLx rifle scopes with the ACSS Apollo reticle. I would like to see you review how well you think these scopes would work for both hunting & target shooting with the 6.5 CM. Keep up the good work!
@user-wp5gr5wc6p8 ай бұрын
I would like to hear more about the Burris. But after seeing the water test and not passing I’m not sure now. Burris has no problem with warranty, I know they will replace it.
@MEDICIERIC8 ай бұрын
What about the new strike eagle 3-18? Its heavy, but I’d imagine it would be competitive with the options in this video
@bww19708 ай бұрын
I would have liked to have seen the results of the tracking test after the drop test.
@KretinD8 ай бұрын
The pa glx 4-16x50 is my favorite scope
@MrCclime2 ай бұрын
Great episode / test! Great questions / comments from the community. I'm a huge fan of the growing segment of built-in electronics😎 not sure how deep the pool is, but I think it's less than one atmosphere ; with that said immersion and rain are different. I wonder if a dose of silicone spray would help 🤔 Thanks again and please do more 🤙
@TurboJakebrakeKingpin1697 ай бұрын
I wish you did the drop test before the crosshair adjustment test. Seems it would have been more real world applicable for scope value and durability.
@codyblack14987 ай бұрын
I think you need to do a video on electronic scopes, ATN, Burris, Sig BDX line
@josefpdx18 ай бұрын
Quick question: could you please include the the ARKEN EP5 5-25x56 in the next review. Kind regards and happy shooting
@davidsalsedo67657 ай бұрын
ELP 6-24 30mm Jap glass
@Ron-ni8uu4 ай бұрын
Not in same price class 750_1000 range
@Ron-ni8uu4 ай бұрын
That's the 500 price review
@justsnuggle8 ай бұрын
Recommend confirmatory turret tracking after torture testing. Also torture testing should be done after all the other tests are concluded to not skew results.
@Aqulia10008 ай бұрын
What about ARKEN optics? Would be awesome to see how it would compare!
@fattigla8 ай бұрын
That's crazy that any of those scopes survived that drop test. Its great to see they are that durable, I would not have expected any of them to survive that.
@buzby807 ай бұрын
Did they survive though? The drop test should have been performed before the tracking test. Ideally they should have been checked for zero.
@backfire7 ай бұрын
@@buzby80 We actually did test tracking before AND after the drop test. No notable change, which is why it wasn't mentioned.
@Ron-ni8uu4 ай бұрын
@@backfireI wondered the same thing
@shawngrays90878 ай бұрын
Personally,, I like the primary arms optics, even the 3 hundy range works well, for me
@DougBenji7 ай бұрын
How was the box test tracking after dropping the scopes on concrete ?
@treyg18088 ай бұрын
What’re the odds that last night I asking myself why you haven’t made a video of 1000$ scopes! So badass
@ajd.8047 ай бұрын
2 review requests if possible. 1 for rangefinding binos, 2 for higher end scopes: leupold, March ,NF, swaro, Ziess, etc. Thx
@kingdave9055 ай бұрын
Awesome video. Your content is always greatly appreciated. Have you thought about doing a review on the Meopta brand scopes? i have heard alot of good things about their quality and clarity.
@worrdogg8 ай бұрын
Great review..!!!
@brom2267 ай бұрын
Can you do this with the day/ night vision scopes 🤙
@trumpet1128 ай бұрын
I see you picked up an Arken EPL after the pool test at 0:57 but I understand you didn't include them for pricing fairness. Can you say if the Arken survived the water at least? Great video by the way!
@backfire8 ай бұрын
Totally by accident I grabbed that one during that test because it was sitting near the other scopes I was testing. I’m not sure if it went into the pool or not. I didn’t use it in the rest of the test.
@trumpet1128 ай бұрын
@@backfire ah makes sense! Thanks for the reply
@SamuelBerryhill8 ай бұрын
Thanks for video man. I was wondering why no Arken or meaopta scopes in the test I’d like to see what you come up with on there scopes? Thanks again God bless
@backfire8 ай бұрын
Arken makes a great scope but they are half this cost so I didn't think it'd be fair to review them in this category. I will, however, be reviewing them in future videos. Meopta was contacted about being in this review but didn't respond.
@SamuelBerryhill8 ай бұрын
@@backfire okay just wondering. I’m guessing nightforce bailed out as well
@williamhood50625 ай бұрын
Appreciate your review. Just got a Bergara Crest squared in 7 PRCand ordered your new recoil pad for it. I’ve been looking at the Burris illuminates 4. What is your thoughts?
@slpeteyAZ6 ай бұрын
Great work Jim.
@rymoy49238 ай бұрын
I’d love to see Tract, Meopta and GPO in the lineup!
@southerncountryboy88 ай бұрын
Same. I've handled some of those brands in person, and they are very clear. Wish they got more coverage.
@toddmartin39628 ай бұрын
also toss in the Athlon Ares G2 BTR 4.5-27, the Crimson Trace Hardline Pro 4-16, Trijicon Credo HX 2.5-15, and the Vortex Strike Eagle 3-18. All FFP, all with lifetime warranties.
@stanleysanders90997 ай бұрын
@@toddmartin3962 the credo hx is sfp
@avondale088 ай бұрын
Although more difficult to compare, you should do drop testing on rifle to check zero retention. Or figure out a way to check that the zero hasn't shifted by using your tracking test lab equip with a repeatable mounting point for each optic. Zero retention should be the most important thing when assessing a rifle scope
@m4rvinmartian8 ай бұрын
Wheeler makes a scope mounting kit that contains a REALLY, REALLY NICE muzzle alignment laser. That's the best way to check for zero movement.
@avondale088 ай бұрын
Yeah, if the boresighting laser is that repeatable, then that would be a solution. The guys over at rokslide have been doing zero retention drop testing and it's amazing how few optics truly hold zero under minor impacts to scope.
@backfire8 ай бұрын
I didn't show that in the video, but I actually did test that. I zeroed the scopes on the lab test rig, and then gave the scopes a VIOLENT blow against the ground. None of the scopes had an issue retaining zero in that test.
@avondale088 ай бұрын
Thanks for clarifying :) Love the videos
@peterlowyk20566 ай бұрын
We were especially impressed with the Burris Veracity PH, which has quite a lot of electronics inside, and still passed the waterproofing test with flying colors.
@stevenwalker90135 ай бұрын
It didn’t pass the water test
@Saintalexander7978 ай бұрын
I've been waiting on this video and didn't even know it
@sithbadboy8 ай бұрын
Can we get a similar video with $1000-$1500 range
@AdamSmith-cb3dn7 ай бұрын
Would love to see review on Wilson combat Nula rifle
@Neb2457 ай бұрын
Where is the arken scopes? Would have liked to the the epl4 compared to the primary arms as lighter weight hunting option
@romansdzalbs8 ай бұрын
Would be interesting to see turret tests after drop test
@backfire8 ай бұрын
I actually did do that, but didn't see any changes so I didn't show it in the review. The drop test didn't seem to affect any of the scopes other than possibly the Riton.
@romansdzalbs8 ай бұрын
@@backfire thank you for information, despite pool test, still in love with PH, gonna put that on 7PRC rifle, when finally will get one in europe, hopefully from bergara or tikka
@jeremiahcoles23788 ай бұрын
I think id still strongly consider the burris. Its also a great option for anyone trying to get into the practice of dialing for your ranges instead of hold overs.
@backfire8 ай бұрын
Agreed. If you look at my written review on the website, I still like the Burris.
@yo2stix8 ай бұрын
You need to check tracking and see if the scope lost zero post the drop test. That’s the most important test you run. You will find SWFA, Nightforce and Trijicon will be the only to pass.
@MrTacklebury8 ай бұрын
You all get so tweaked on the FFP, but for long range, you are typically using top magnification and that's what the reticles have typically been set up for when you buy a SFP scope. I literally use only two settings. All the way down for close in shots and all the way out for further shots. If you do that, you don't need the FFP. THe other nice thing is that the reticle doesn't shrink down to the itty bitty size that many of the FFP's do. For old eyes and deer hunting at least in most places, you don't need FFP or the added expense.
@Tyanmax998 ай бұрын
Very true
@backfire8 ай бұрын
I actually would almost never use max magnification when shooting long range. If you zoom in too much when shooting long range, the recoil shakes you off the target and you can't spot your impact. Top competitors in many long range disciplines are usually shooting around 12x.
@DjLongshotxX17 ай бұрын
Very much disagree, shot my antelope this year at 400 yards on 8x with an FFP optic (Kahles K312i so 3x - 12x mag range), wind holds were needed and the field of view from a lower mag kept me on target. A well designed hunting FFP reticle (of which there are frankly not that many currently in market, but marketing features people don't need sells scopes) will be usable across the magnification range.
@BooDamnHoo7 ай бұрын
I would agree if the SFP scope reticle was setup to be accurate at max magnification. Typically they are setup for some mag level below max so when you go full mag you don't have accurate holdover or windage marks, or ranging marks.
@yam8315 ай бұрын
@@BooDamnHoo I'm not familiar with an SFP scope where the subtensions aren't set up for max magnification only. Not that I'm a scope expert, but all SFP scopes I've looked at, reticles were designed around max magnification.
@dtmelanson8 ай бұрын
Great content.
@francoisbm67858 ай бұрын
very few scopes are actually rated for underwater pressure, plunging scopes in a bucket of water would have suffice. as a suggestion to complete the test would be to verify turret function etc/electronics after a 2-3 hours in the freezer
@backfire8 ай бұрын
Agreed. The test was way overkill, but when there are this many companies all wanting your money, we gotta be brutal in the test to find the very best.
@mikemellon808 ай бұрын
where do you even find a Huskemaw 2-16x44? they dont have on the website. I've searched the interwebs for this scope. is it a new sub $1000 offering from them? I dont see them selling anything for under $1000
@eyandetmer19258 ай бұрын
When are you revisiting the 783 with new remarms
@njgrplr20076 ай бұрын
I just picked up a Leupold VX-3HD 4-14x50 for $500. The quality is amazing.
@BlueManatee8 ай бұрын
Please do this but for prs scopes
@TeensierPython8 ай бұрын
I want to see the $1000-2000 price range
@bruinsfan85228 ай бұрын
Why no vortex options? Edit: I watched the end of the video and I understand
@FalconslugsPakistan5 ай бұрын
Really Appreciate And honest Review But i didn't see any MTC scope in collection or any test what you say about MTC viper pro
@dylanhurst34493 ай бұрын
The one thing I would've loved to see...how well did they track after the drop test, and did they hold zero after the drop test? Loved the water test 🤣that's commitment
@Mjprutz447 ай бұрын
Any suggestions on a scope for a lever action? I am an east coast white tail hunter and looking for something new on my old marlin lever action. Not going to be shooting more than 150 yards but want something to replace an old scope that just hasn’t held up.
@pedropistolas84976 ай бұрын
Diamondback 1.75-5x
@spacepathfinder18 ай бұрын
Delta optical titanium HD SF 2.5-15x56
@superseries70078 ай бұрын
No Vortex. 😭 It's ok. I just through my 3-18 Vortex Strike Eagle FFP into my pool attached to a Tikka 6.5 Arctic. Well... The gun is not waterproof. FYI.
@firstglass18 ай бұрын
Man, iv just bought two of those Hawke scopes.
@garyscheer80178 ай бұрын
I would like to see a Trijicon Credo added to this group
@sk8snwmx8 ай бұрын
No Vortex Viper PST 2 , Strike Eagle or Athlon MIdas Tac 5-25s?????
@chrisdewet43848 ай бұрын
Did Meopta 4,5 -27 x 50 not make the $1000-00 cut?
@davidmartin74797 ай бұрын
Leupold wasn't included?
@user-bw6uh4ss4z8 ай бұрын
Have you considered doing a review of Arken Optics? I just picked up an EPL4 and would be curious for your opinions/results on this one as well.
@SamuelBerryhill8 ай бұрын
I’ll second that I have the ep5 and it’s awesome would like to see a review on there new lighter Weight model for sure
@backfire8 ай бұрын
I have a couple Arken scopes and will certainly be reviewing them. I only didn't include them here because they are in a MUCH lower price category and I didn't think that'd be very fair.
@brad_neal8 ай бұрын
I have a couple Arken scopes as well and would be very interested in your feedback.@@backfire
@kevinraymondmontgomery62622 ай бұрын
Dang! Best videos ever!
@mrcu81768 ай бұрын
I'm thinking , what about Vortex ?
@Chris4II7 ай бұрын
Hi great video! It would be nice to see some optics from brands like Kahles, Svarowski, Zeiss, Leica or Schmidt & Bender, as we here in Europe, tend to own optics from these manufactures as they are better quality than many of the scope manufactures I see used in the US. I’ve seen and used scopes from Hawke, Burris, Leupold, Vortex and so on and I was not impressed. I myself use Zeiss, Schmidt & Bender and Svarowski scopes on my different rifles.
@MattGoodman-vl7thАй бұрын
Can you tell us what collimator you are using?Maybe I missed another video where you discuss this? I have seen a similar device used by NightForce. I do a lot of scope work, sighting, calibrating, making dope charts, etc for people. This would be a very handy tool for me.
@rafaeltavizon96297 ай бұрын
CAN YOU MIKE A VIDEO TO HOW TO PROGRAM THE BORRIS VERACITY I buy that scope but I m having problems programing upload all the information thru Bluetooth
@MillerTime-4068 ай бұрын
I get that you can only test what you were sent, but a Vortex PST2 not in this test is a major player missing. They are readily available online for 699-899 and would compete directly against all of these. having said that, epic review. great job!
@sk8snwmx8 ай бұрын
Even the Strike Eagle...
@marvinbrock9608 ай бұрын
They have a great warranty! You’ll probably need it. Yes, I have several.
@Thatbcyota8 ай бұрын
I agree. Wish there was a few different vortex scopes in this
@robturner27098 ай бұрын
The vortex venom scope would have been a great choice as well
@sk8snwmx8 ай бұрын
@@marvinbrock960 Odd, I have 3x Vortex scopes at the moment with no issues, and the last scopes that I sent for Warranty were 2x Bushnell, an Athlon and a Leupold...
@CodyVinson5 ай бұрын
I'm looking at getting my first quality scope, I'm looking at the leupold vx3-hd 4.5 x 14 and burris signature Hd which would you reccomend and why?
@jimmlinar2967 ай бұрын
Needed to test tracking after the drop that’s what really matters on the drop test