Would you kindly review Bioshock Infinite? 😆

Totally agree, now if they could just combine the 2 games... :P

So that maybe why ive heard infinite was a let down when it came out

@@teeman7137 oh the opposite, Infinite was touted as a masterpiece when it came out cause it was ‘so smart for a video game’ and all that artsy fartsy stuff, but over time people started thinking maybe they were just easily impressed by a story that was pulling pool over their eyes.

@@mr.mammuthusafricanavus8299 There is one section were they actually "combine" those 2 games ;)

My thoughts exactly. I like all games in the series, but just watching this video makes me want to reinstall Bioshock 2 and play it for the umpteenth time. :)

I'd watch Mort vs Korok Seeds.

It's the best of the games for me definitely. I'm not sure why it doesn't have more of a stellar reputation like it should.

💯💯💯. Have platiunumed this game and done dozens of challenge runs for BioShock 2

I disagree. Both can be equally great. I like very much certain novels and essays, but after playing games I feel, think and cry a lot more when living videogames world/stories and think a lot more about em when compared to books. I felt strong emotions while reading 1984, but less when compared to the first Bioshock. That probably has something to do with the fact that you 1) INTERACT and LIVE in that world 2) you can SEE every corner of it Books in general have obviosly better writing, because that's their purpouse. But that don't mean always better story.

@@TiomesTheOne Well, you essentially preempted my response with the second part of your comment. It depends on what you consider part of the quality of a story. Just because you interact and live in the world, doesn't make the story itself better, it makes your connection to the story better. I've read hundreds of books, I'd go out on a limb and say 80% of them have, to me, better stories than any of the hundreds of games I played. That doesn't mean I wasn't more invested in some games, but story wise, they're all very derivative and formulaic.

@@jesperburns everything is derivative and formulaic. We're already at that point in time where 99% of things are a remix of something old. It's just that some authors are very good at hiding it. Videogames as a medium are inherently and internally castrated in the lack of offering extensive dialogues: because most players nowadays consider reading a slog. But does dialogue and writing = story? Not always. I consider The Wizard of Oz a masterpiece and it does not feature deep dialogue, it's just "how" well something is told. Everything already exists. It's the "how" you combine the elements. And some games are unbelievable creative in combining player actions and good story. Name me 3 totally original and completely not derivative books of the last 5 years. I'll wait.

@@TiomesTheOne I believe there's games that center completely or largely around dialogue, I think TellTale games are some, but again, I play games for the gameplay, I read books for the stories. Why should I limit myself to the books I read or mention? Last book I finished (a few days ago) was Glenn Cook's The White Rose from 1985. Only recent books I read (last year) were Joe Abercrombie's second trilogy The Madness of Crowds. Either writer is not generic or tropey. Another recent book I recently read is the Three Body problem, published in English in 2014. It's not very good but it's not derivative at all. Or the Witcher books, not very well written (imo, or perhaps badly translated), but quite "subversive". Let's flip it around, what makes you think books are derivative? Name 5 books that made you roll your eyes at the tropes or devices or events/characters. EDIT: I have one. Brandon Sanderson, very formulaic writer in the sequence/paragraph/event sense, but seems to at least be aware of a lot of the fantasy tropes and is quite inventive when it comes to his magic systems and characters (settings), which somewhat makes up for it. Not my cup of tea though.

Wish you a full recovery.

@@A_Bird23 thank you 🙏🏾 I’m already feeling better

They're in the description for some reason KZfaq isn't marking them correctly

To explain for people who have never uploaded a KZfaq video before - KZfaq usually parses the time stamps from the description and then makes the timeline tags automatically. For some reason that didn’t work here.

💯💯. Minerva's den is legendary imo

Man plays and reviews game full-time and beyond, he is insane

YES

Havent messed with staglands, but I did a launch review for mechajammer but haven't gotten around to getting 100% on it

The second can be done recording a video while fighting, not taking pictures

Don`t know if it still works but in bioshock 2 freezing the enemy and using a mini-turret at the same time worked wonders.

I thought it was odd he didn't address the picture aspect whatsoever in this video. Easily my least fav part in both games. 2 improved it, but still wasn't a fan.

Exactly, my main problem with this game. Way too repetitive. In the original all you did was kill 2-3 big daddies and that was it. Now they add 2 more side objectives for no reason other than artificial game length. Don't get me wrong the gameplay is good, but it's not that good and those infamous "defend the area" objectives overstay their welcome in almost any game.

Probably not, but it looks pretty good

I plan on covering the upcoming remake for sure, no plan on the originals currently

@@MortismalGaming well, I'd say you'd be missing on good games =) Which are playable today with no problem I might add.

I'd say kill him, he's on limited time anyway given he's stuck in that chamber and clearly at a point where just being 'alive' is probably torturous.

@@MortismalGaming According to the dialogue he can get out of there...somehow. That said, yeah, I feel it's probably best to not let him live, since he's clearly insane by this point, and ADAM has deleterious effects on the flesh, as we see, so it's almost like he's rotting from the inside out.

Eventually

I pretty much just cover whatever I want, so nothing really shows up on the channel that I didn't make the effort to choose. Generally I'm having a blast outside of some tedium here and there.

There's definitely more than one, last boss fight so to speak is against two of them

I wish infinite had better sights on some of the weapons like the carbine lol

I talk about that in the video I point people too at the beginning, but simple answer is most people don't care about that in a review which means I'd have a significant portion of the video that people aren't watching. The 100% before the review is more about establishing some trust that I've played the game to it's fullest in a landscape where reviewers barely touch a game before coming in with absolutist takes like what happened with Redfall recently for instance.

@@MortismalGaming I see. Could I suggest you talk about notable achievements instead? I don't mean a rundown of all of them just "this game has some really tough achievements like completing all hidden content in one max difficulty run, I especially liked this one" or "this game doesn't have any notable achievements most of them being complete X or kill X of Y". Just something quick on something you liked but not quite quick enough to just be "achievements on this one are hard/easy".

Yes

Not being rude but what did you get stuck on? And what difficulty?

@@saltycomet Beats me, that was 6 years ago and I don't remember the details, only that I got stuck and wandered and wandered and never found a way to move on, and it greatly pissed me off. I didn't change the difficulty at all, so whatever the default is.

@@nicodimus2222 I gotcha. I play these all the time so if it was a current situation of being stuck I was gonna give a detailed explanation 😂

@@saltycomet Thanks anyhow.

Initial research tells me two playthroughs plus the DLC puts 100% at around 30-50 hours so we shall see

It was fine, it was just that this game came out during Call of Duty's explosion of Modern Warfare's 1 & 2 so MP in a lot of other games were just an afterthought.