Bombardier Global 6500 - winged limousine

Рет қаралды 101,100

Күн бұрын

The Bombardier Global 5500 and Global 6500 are jet aircraft of business aviation in the class of large business jets created by the Canadian company Bombardier Aerospace. They are the latest versions of the Global aircraft family, second only to the 7500 model.
The 5500 model accommodates up to 16 passengers and has a range of up to 10,927 km. The model 6500 is larger, accommodates up to 17 passengers and has a range of 12.223 km.
Today we will get acquainted with these planes, examine the brand new Global 6500 and study its capabilities as an aircraft and as a limousine.
Welcome aboard!
If you want to support Skyships and our work, welcome to our Patreon. We will create some special content for you there: / skyships
Our Facebook: / skyshipscom
Our Instagram: / skyships_world
00:00 - History
04:30 - Aircraft description
07:25 - Power plant
09:56 - Cabin
14:55 - Cockpit
17:31 - Modifications and market

Пікірлер: 114

@hansenkho3835 2 жыл бұрын

Welcome back Sky sir. Its been a while since your last video. Be well there at your place and lets hope peace can be reached in this hard time

@air-headedaviator1805 2 жыл бұрын

I get to see these planes up close at work somewhat often. Their design is quite nice, and statue so impressive

@Glen.Danielsen 2 жыл бұрын

Yah, Air, and the sophistication of the wings. Yet I wonder about weapons carrying capability-being a Bombardier. 😄

@WolfandCatUnite 2 жыл бұрын

yes

@miketeeveedub5779 2 жыл бұрын

The prototype of this fantastic airplane is called the Challenger 600, and is currently on display at the Air Force Heritage Museum and Air Park in Winnipeg Manitoba. What I found fascinating is it was originally a concept design by Bill Lear, of LearJet fame who collabed with Canadair to create a new fleet of business class jets. Eventually that design was eventually stretched, modified and upgraded to become the Bombardier CRJ and Global Express series of aircraft. Both LearJet and Canadair were absorbed by Bombardier in the mid 90s, and this year in 2022 the last LearJet was built. Great to see that Bill Lear's vision is alive and well after almost 50 years from concept to production and shows no signs of slowing!

@frankgaleon5124 2 жыл бұрын

12:21 Love this sliding door

@jsvno 2 жыл бұрын

Good presentation as always, i will start saving up some money.....

@a.a.p3254 2 жыл бұрын

This aircraft is truly a Canadian engineering marvel. Cheers 🇨🇦

@EstorilEm 2 жыл бұрын

Definitely my favorite biz jet family.

@Glen.Danielsen 2 жыл бұрын

Yes Alex, and the sophistication of those wings!

@jfmezei 2 жыл бұрын

The Challenger actually has its roots in mid 1970s. Bombardier Business Jets is all that is left. The main head office was closed and what remains has some offices in a small building at the Dorval assembly plant. All the rest was liquidated (and half of the C-Series was litterally donated to Airbus for $0). CRJ programme shut and rights sold to Mitsibuishi, and all the deHavilland products progressively sold to a BC company which has recreated de Havilland Canada to house the products (including teh Canadiar water bombers). All of these transations left Bombardeir holding the debts from each programme, so what is left of Bombardier today holds a LOT of debt and will have to sell its business jets if it can't meet debt payments. Ironically, not the first trouble. A couple years afrer 9-11, when Bombardier didn't think it woudl be affected and continued producing CRJ-200s by the dozen at Dorval, the company neared failure. At this time, the Beaudoin family (descendants of Armand Bombardier) injected new cash into company by buying the original part of Bombardier, the recreational products. The ironiy they aren't allowed to use the name "Bombardier" despite being the family it came from. So their are called BRP and focus instead of the various brands they purchased ovewr the years. However, their logo is the original Bombardeir logo ( wheel with cogs for tracked vehicles such as snowmobiles and sidewalk ploughs). During its liquidation, Bombardier sold the Downview (former de Havilland site) with limited time lease so a developper could build condos on the former airport site. So when Bombardeir sold the Dash-8 and all remaining de Havilland patents to Longview Aviation, (de Havilland Canada), the later inherited a Dash-8 production facility that already had an eviction notice. Due to COVID, they managed to extend it and recently restarted production to finish the last few of Dash-8s on order book, after which they need to find a new production site. (and the union in Ontario is very unhappy due to likelyhood that the Dash-8 will be moved to western Canada where longview is based). Bombardier had written off the Dash-8 in the alst decade and hadn't improved production to lower costs and didn't push for new sales. It had done same with the CL415 water bomber. Also interesting: Bombardeir had inherited the twin otter when it bought deHavilland and never did anything with it. When the rights were sold to Longview, (then operating as Viking air) started to draw plans for the Twin Otter 400 and the plane has started to sell quite well for small markets and specialized missions. (can be fitted with skis, wheels, floats). It is still unclear who will buy the Challenger and Gobal 7500 from what is left from Bombardier and if BRP will inherits itw own name back. Us investors in the company lost a lot of money in what is essentially a controlled bankruptcy.

@Jay_the_AV8R 2 жыл бұрын

This channel is just the gift that keeps on giving

@steven2212 2 жыл бұрын

Fantastic vid as per usual. Hope you're well and weathering the current unpleasantness. Cheers

@16jocko 2 жыл бұрын

Unpleasantness? Don’t you mean death n destruction?

@jimcabezola3051 2 жыл бұрын

Wonderful to see new videos from you. Take care.

@nelson2095 2 жыл бұрын

Ok..I'm going to start saving now and in ten years time, I should be able to afford to buy....one of the landing gear tires. 🤣

@ivoryjohnson4662 2 жыл бұрын

Good to hear from you SKY

@James-oo1yq 2 жыл бұрын

Okay okay you’ve convinced me, I’ll take 3!

@Duprasnicolas 2 жыл бұрын

Excellent review and technically accurate. Also a good presentation of our new Bombardier Defense unit’s products !

@kiwi2xs 2 жыл бұрын

Another class video 👍 interesting history of the company too.

@getube9 Жыл бұрын

Another fantastic video my friend! Loved your tour of the TU-114!

@tiberiustavares2734 2 жыл бұрын

thank you

@jonathanadderley2444 2 жыл бұрын

I loved fueling towing and marshelling these babies💯💯

@arkasingha6111 Жыл бұрын

Awesome review....

@Yourejusatube 2 жыл бұрын

The cockpit though :O

@covert0overt_810 2 жыл бұрын

the yoke is a piece of art

@parimal7528 2 жыл бұрын

It was a good video, thanks. Would be interesting to see how it compares with 8X.

@ugoernest3790 Жыл бұрын

thanks ❤️

@masch2 2 жыл бұрын

nice vid.

@Glen.Danielsen 2 жыл бұрын

Sky, so nice to see you are alive and well in current political chaos. I wonder if this Bombardier has full weapons carrying capability as name indicates. 🤔

@SkyshipsEng 2 жыл бұрын

hope this chaos won't last long

@COIcultist 2 жыл бұрын

Don't we all. Nice to keep seeing content from you.

@Colaholiker 2 жыл бұрын

@@SkyshipsEng Just please don't be tempted to say anything in public that you could regret... I mean, just be careful, so we can enjoy your great videos for a long time to come! ;-)

@mukhtarovsergey 2 жыл бұрын

@@Colaholiker nobody born yet to make him regret anything

@gregalbert4033 2 жыл бұрын

I need one... Powerball is tonight!!

@pilotnico 2 жыл бұрын

Hey there. If you need any info on the Global 7500 let me know! Love your channel :)

@SkyshipsEng 2 жыл бұрын

Oh, that can be useful. Thank you)

@Perktube1 Жыл бұрын

Such success. We need Bombardier to start designing a new prime minister.

@aldeje92 2 жыл бұрын

One beautiful sexy plane!!!

@skylineXpert 2 жыл бұрын

My dream Is a Hondajet 2600 with 15% extra range. Enough for Billund flying - Ponta Delgada - St Maarten With one pilot flying...

@christianbayerstein5243 2 жыл бұрын

Almost the perfect long range privat jet, but Bombardier should have taken the more modern sidestick cockpit from the global 7500 and put it into the global 6500 and 5500. Gulfstream uses the sidestick cockpit in all large private jets like the G500, G600 and G700.

@rcairflr 2 жыл бұрын

The cost of developement and Flight testing would have been too high.

@SkyshipsEng 2 жыл бұрын

The 6500 and 5500 are in fact, modifications of tge older Globals. The 7500 is a brand new plane

@ledauphindebourbon6956 Жыл бұрын

Can you make an informative video for ultralight airplanes, VFR, VEV ?

@leonawdisho6609 2 жыл бұрын

Leon from Toronto Canada .. can you please make a video about Burma space shuttle Thank you Sky.

@kuwaitcinema 2 жыл бұрын

Make a video regarding the Falcon 10X

@SkyshipsEng 2 жыл бұрын

I’ll make a few Falcons soon

@tihspidtherekciltilc5469 2 жыл бұрын

Actually early for once. Maybe just lucky. Thanks Sky.

@SkyshipsEng 2 жыл бұрын

Hope you'll love it)

@verttikoo2052 2 жыл бұрын

Perfect timing 🥳

@stephenlobo3585 2 жыл бұрын

Nice planes

@aubsta1 2 жыл бұрын

I used to live near the Bombardier plant

@PavlosPapageorgiou 2 жыл бұрын

8:28 Fly!

@MadMadCommando 2 жыл бұрын

Considering that the CRJ program was sold to Mitsubishi, do you think the Globals can be modified into a successful regional jet design?

@SkyshipsEng 2 жыл бұрын

I think they've desided to concentrate on the business aviation for now

@ohutchie 2 жыл бұрын

A regional airliner based on the Global platform would be a CRJ. The main difference between the CRJ and Global models are the wings and engines, because the business jet market demands much higher performance and longer range than regional flights.

@Colaholiker 2 жыл бұрын

@@ohutchie True, and I don't want to see them squeeze out anything with such a long range, but a typical regional airliner cabin. My longest CRJ flight was fom Detroit to San Antonio in 2019, and even though I really like those small planes, that was already pushing the limit of staying comfortable for long enough. I sure wouldn't mind hours of flying if an aircraft has such a luxurious business jet cabin, but on a regional airliner/flying sardine can? Hell no!

@MadMadCommando 2 жыл бұрын

@@ohutchie I know that bombardier's regional offering was the CRJ but they've since gotten rid of all of their commercial aircraft and are now a business jet only manufacturer. I was wondering if they could get back into the regional (or long and skinny long haul) jet game by converting Globals.

@RevJim-qc2ry 2 жыл бұрын

Yuge !

@RasheedKhan-he6xx 2 жыл бұрын

No jacuzzi? Pffff. :P

@PtrkHrnk 2 жыл бұрын

10:58 What if there's need for third pilot on long flight? Where do they stay?

@hughrmedia 2 жыл бұрын

Not ideal for an ultra long flight but there is a jumpseat

@Ljet600 2 жыл бұрын

the third pilot can (and will) stay in the rest area behind cockpit on left side. 10:46

@PtrkHrnk 2 жыл бұрын

@@Ljet600 Where will you put the flight attendant then?

@whitemailprivilege2830 2 жыл бұрын

@@PtrkHrnk on the pilot’s lap

@Markle2k 2 жыл бұрын

@@hughrmedia The big guys have some seriously long legs if you keep the cabin light.

@Rbg1542 Жыл бұрын

Skip to 4:36 to start the actual review

@darkgalaxy5548 Жыл бұрын

Is it bom-bard-dee-A, or bomb-ah-deer?

@PtrkHrnk 2 жыл бұрын

I don't like the old fuselage. Bombardier should've just use make the Global 8000 with less range, which would've got the larger windows and larger inner diameter.

@SkyshipsEng 2 жыл бұрын

Yes, that's compromise. They've developed the Global 7000/7500 more advanced. The 8000 will be it's brother

@PtrkHrnk 2 жыл бұрын

@@SkyshipsEng Do you have any further info about the 8000? It seems there isn't even a prototype yet, even though it was unveiled years ago.

@SkyshipsEng 2 жыл бұрын

@@PtrkHrnk In the current situation with the economy and transport, I guess that there is no point in rushing with this plane

@frankdatteln-westhausen3093 Жыл бұрын

OK, so if you chose the 6500 over the 5500 you pay an additional 10 million bucks for 80 cm in length and 1200 km more range. The cabins are of equal size, since the additional 80 cm in the Global 6500 are occupied by the additional crew rest. Furthermore you need to pay a third pilot if you want to use the additional range of the 6500. I would say the 5500 is the much better buy. I can see future updates to the 6500 and 5500 by adding the larger windows of the 7500 and also the side stick cockpit of the 7500. I don't see room and need for improvement beyond.

@stephenlobo3585 2 жыл бұрын

I'm seeing this but I'm only 10 years old

@RodrigoFCh 8 ай бұрын

wish is better 6500 or 7500 im thinking 7500

@flyerkiller5073 2 жыл бұрын

There’s no fly-by-wire? Ah, shame

@SkyshipsEng 2 жыл бұрын

Don't worry, the've developed it for the Global 7500)

@flyerkiller5073 2 жыл бұрын

@@SkyshipsEng So the 7500 is more advanced. Will you make a video about it?

@SkyshipsEng 2 жыл бұрын

@@flyerkiller5073 Maybe

@erictremblay4940 2 жыл бұрын

The 7500 uses the CSeries fly by wire appoach.

@stug77 Жыл бұрын

It kinda seems like they could've folded the winglets back down to be part of the wing again and still stay in the same airplane design group. What gives?

@tonylam9548 2 жыл бұрын

One of the things I often noticed deleted is the lack of some flexibility of these jets. People complained about media censorship, but it is alive and well in advertising. The airlines with their big long range jets are still the king in long range travel, but even their jet give no speed advantage. It is more freedom in the air in a biz jet, you can smoke if you feel like it, and you can skip dumb airline regulation about luggage max and vaccination etc.Those few hours of comfort cost a whopping $75 million and maybe $12 million annually for operating cost. But everywhere you go, you are dragging along 2 pilots and a flt attendant, whose personal schedule not likely the same as mine, that is if I even have a schedule, even if you pay them to stay by the plane. So actually , the max freedom is a medium size turbo prop, rated for single pilot. With a big rubber fuel cell in the back to cross oceans. Something I can fly myself registered in a country that have very slack medical and tax for airplanes.

@GaneshPatil-yc8fh 2 жыл бұрын

It's look like big Honda jet that means Honda inspired by this😛

@Ljet600 2 жыл бұрын

HondaJet was developed much later than Global and Challenger families.

@mybumbrash 2 жыл бұрын

I hate working on these pieces of crap. Not to worry bombardier, your engineers aren't as useless as Dassult's

@johnscott6083 Жыл бұрын

Is it pronounced "wing-duh" or "wing-ed" limousine?

@Saml01 2 жыл бұрын

Ха ха я заметил заставили туфли снять.

@peribe438 2 жыл бұрын

No shower?

@ML-vy8xo 2 жыл бұрын

Are you Russian? What is your understanding of the situation in Ukraine?

@srogamina 2 жыл бұрын

You mean what is your oppinion about bandit invasion and war crimes commited by Russians in Ukraine?

@blur3253 Жыл бұрын

Why? i don't get why people think EVERY russian HAS to speak out on issues like this, some hate the situation and would be uncomfortable talking about it.

@JWFalsetta 2 жыл бұрын

Seriously, there was not an English speaking person to narrate.

@uwanttono4012 2 жыл бұрын

This was an excellent opportunity - sadly missed - to break away from the stereotype of a white male as pilot while the hostess was a white female. If we are ever to increase minority representation in the airline industry, it would have been great to have a female pilot (of any race) and a male steward imho. Otherwise this was a great vlog.

@Eternal_Tech 2 жыл бұрын

If females are interested in becoming pilots, then they are free to pursue this career, just as males can do. The fact is, as of this writing, males are generally more interested in becoming pilots than females. Conversely, females tend to show greater interest in becoming nurses than males. As long as nobody is being discriminated against, having the sexes being interested in different things is not bad. "infinite diversity in infinite combinations."

@uwanttono4012 2 жыл бұрын

@@Eternal_Tech As a general proposition "infinite diversity in infinite combinations" is a good thing. However, your implication in suggesting that (a) females are not as interested in flying as males is open to serious doubt if only because (b) they have not historically been given the same opportunities to fly as men because flying has been considered a historically a "man's job". No reasonable person can deny the validity of that proposition I would suggest.

@Eternal_Tech 2 жыл бұрын

@@uwanttono4012 It is not just piloting aircraft that show a greater interest from one sex versus the other. In the United States today, approximately 60% of college students are female, while about 40% are male. In fact, women have comprised the majority of college students since 1979. Therefore, this shows that females are generally not discriminated against when it comes to college admissions. However, when it comes to choosing a college major, there are some majors that show a sex-based preference. For example, engineering and computer science majors tend to be dominated by men, while psychology, sociology, and social work majors tend to be dominated by women. In addition, there was a study that came out a few years ago that showed that when women have a choice, they tend to prefer certain professions over others. It showed that in countries known for their gender equality, such as the Scandinavian countries, women tend to choose more stereotypical female positions than in nations with less gender equality. Sex-based preferences extend beyond careers to encompass everyday life. For example, while men can wear makeup, the majority of men choose not to wear this. However, there is generally strong interest among women and girls to wear makeup. The makeup manufacturers would love to expand their market to include males, but males for the most part do not show an interest in wearing cosmetics. If you want to encourage females to be engineers, computer scientists, and pilots, and encourage males to be nurses, daycare workers, and kindergarten teachers, be my guest. However, you may be disappointed in the results in societies in which people are free to make their own choices. Sex-based preferences may be influenced by societal expectations, but they may also be influenced by biology. Men and women literally have different concentrations of hormones flowing throughout their bodies. All this being said, there should be no sex-based discrimination. However, it should be recognized that even without discrimination, sex-based preferences may exist.

@uwanttono4012 2 жыл бұрын

@@Eternal_Tech I agree with everything you said but that does not negate my original comment that this vlog missed an opportunity to breakaway from stereotypes.

@Eternal_Tech 2 жыл бұрын

@@uwanttono4012 I understand what you are saying. This video appears to use a mixture of footage: Video recorded by this KZfaqr himself (Skyships Eng) or his team at the airshow he attended, video provided by Bombardier, and stock footage. At 1:34, an Asian female flight attendant is shown. This video may have been provided by Bombardier or may be stock footage. At 10:51, there appears to be a white female flight attendant, although we cannot see her face. This video footage appears to have been recorded by Skyships Eng or his team. If so, then this flight attendant would have been employed by Bombardier, not Skyships. At 14:56, there is a white male pilot. This video appears to be from Skyships himself, meaning that the pilot is employed by Bombardier. At 16:23, there is video of a white male flight attendant and white female executive. This appears to be stock footage or footage provided by Bombardier. Please note that you wanted a male flight attendant shown and here it is. At 16:36, there is video of a white male pilot, which appears to be provided by Bombardier itself. There is sex and racial diversity provided in this video, although the video creator was limited in what was provided to him. If Bombardier employed a white male pilot and white female flight attendant at the airshow that Skyships attended, then that is what he will show. If Bombardier provided video of a white male pilot operating the models of aircraft described in this video, then this is the video that Skyships can use. This channel is reality-based, so if Skyships used CGI to place a female pilot in the cockpit of these models of aircraft, then his viewers would rightfully call him out. I understand your objective of wanting to end stereotypes. However, forcing the issue by using inauthentic video would probably not be the best way to do it. There are female pilots and some of them have KZfaq channels. You may wish to check out Pilot Emilie and Dutch Pilot Girl.

@BewilderedBird 2 жыл бұрын

My cat is gay.

@whitemailprivilege2830 2 жыл бұрын

Have you tried prayer?

@agcons 2 жыл бұрын

Weird. He must have been grooming himself.

@whitemailprivilege2830 2 жыл бұрын

@@agcons just what we need. More cats grooming others. What a pervert.

@anasevi9456 2 жыл бұрын

@@agcons lmao, we do live in the internet era

@user-ql2ce5tx5c 2 жыл бұрын

An airplane for oligarchs and billionaires. Does Bombardier pay anything for this free advertising? Gross.

@coreyandnathanielchartier3749 2 жыл бұрын

And the vulgar-rich who can afford this, likely have a yacht and mansion(s) to match. And they are probably working on stealing your tiny savings and retirement fund.

@shakiMiki 2 жыл бұрын

It's weird you're pretending what's happening regarding Russia ia not happening, There are plenty of aviation aspects you could be covering,.

@Markle2k 2 жыл бұрын

He’s on the inside. He’s going to be kind of limited in what he can address.

@hanger1800 2 жыл бұрын

I had the same thought. Can't watch without thinking about how backwards and evil russia is and anyone on the inside who supports any part of it

@Colaholiker 2 жыл бұрын

Even if he focused on aviation aspects of what is going on there, he would be at a high risk. Anything besides stating obvious facts like the destruction of AN-225 in his last video, puts him in the danger of getting in trouble for spreading "fake news". If you live in Russia, you are in the wrong spot to publicly make any statement about current events there and in Ukraine, unless you say what your government wants you to say. And regardless if that aligns with his personal opinion or not (no speculation here), you would not want to have that on this channel. I rather have him concentrate on "safe" topics and be able to continue enjoying his great videos. So it is not weird at all that he does what he does. It is totally understandable and the best choice for both him and us.

@buckshot704 2 жыл бұрын

Is there no place anymore to enjoy a simple aviation video that the poison of politics must rear its ugly head, simply because the channel creator is Russian?