Brahms: Piano Concerto No. 1, Gould & Bernstein (1962) ブラームスピアノ協奏曲第1番グールド＆バーンスタイン

Рет қаралды 26,056

6 жыл бұрын

ohannes Brahms (1833-1897)
Piano Concerto No. 1 in D minor, Op. 15
(00:05) Bernstein's Speech
(04:14) 1. Maestoso
(29:28) 2. Adagio
(43:43) 3. Rondo: Allegro non troppo
(57:31) Radio Interview with Gould
Glenn Herbert Gould (1932-1982), Piano
Leonard Bernstein (1918-1990), Conductor
New York Philharmonic
Rec. 6 April 1962, at Carnegie Hall, in New York (Live Recording)
Interview: 2 February 1963
ヨハネス・ブラームス
ピアノ協奏曲第1番ニ短調作品15
ピアノ：グレン・ハーバート・グールド
指揮：レナード・バーンスタイン
ニューヨーク・フィルハーモニック
録音：1962年4月6日カーネギー・ホール (ニューヨーク、実況録音)
インタヴュー：1963年2月2日

Пікірлер: 29

@ivanmani1460 3 жыл бұрын

I came here thanks to “It’s all about music” by Murakami, such a lovely way of mixing literature and music.

@user-ou5xj9oz8d 3 жыл бұрын

I came here for the same reason :)

@mariadocarmovorcaro2703 6 ай бұрын

same

@racheloliver17 3 жыл бұрын

I just started to hear it again after 58 years, and had to stop shortly after Gould started his solo....

@johntravena119 3 жыл бұрын

The audio quality of this video is better than the other one I been listening to.

@elvisaviv 2 ай бұрын

Que buen trabajo recopilatorio, felicitaciones desde El Salvador

@ParsifalChannel 3 жыл бұрын

This is my favorite performance of this concerto. I think the tempos are right on. I also love Horowitz/Toscanini 1932 doing this. They do it twice as fast as this and it's very exciting. But Glenn Gould is still my favorite performance of this. It has great depth and spirit and all of the melodies are sung to the max.

@gabrielpardo1 4 жыл бұрын

My favorite is Emil Gilel’s interpretation of this concert, but reading Murakami’s “absolutely on music” and listening the subject of the book’s first pages is like living it. Surreal. And, I still love this performance.

@ParsifalChannel 3 жыл бұрын

I checked out the Gilel's performance. One of the best! Thanks.

@johntravena119 3 жыл бұрын

It’s a great conversation between Murakami & Ozawa - great gossip! Love Barenboim’s version with Celibidache conducting - it falls somewhere between Gould & Gilels, nearer Gould I’d say.

@marialuisapisasimonini7026 3 жыл бұрын

Scoprire questo concerto - e non solo- leggendo un autore giapponese: Murakami Haruki. Che piacere.

@lsmart 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much for this historic upload. I personally understand why Bernstein felt the need to disassociate himself from the approach they took, because I too found it way too drawn out, causing it to lose so much of its energy, excitement and drive. The only thing that puzzles me is that Lenny implied that this was Gould's preference, and the reason for their disagreement, whereas Gould seemed to suggest that he was actually the one who sought less extreme contrasts in tempi than Lenny. I'd appreciate an explanation of this seeming discrepancy.

@georgesmelki1 4 жыл бұрын

What a strange performance! But, I enjoyed it very much...

@douglasmcdouglason9461 3 жыл бұрын

I personally feel that Bernstein's opening remarks are entirely in good taste and simple fun. The audience's derision of Gould's interpretation, and more so, Berstein's commentary of it, are completely inappropriate in the intentionally evolving world of music.

@fraybart 2 ай бұрын

There was a tuberculosis pandemic in New York at this time.

@user-pj3it2ws7p 2 жыл бұрын

「小澤征爾さんと、音楽について話をする」という村上春樹、小澤征爾の対談本があり、その冒頭がこの演奏の話題で始まる。レナード・バーンスタインが指揮の前にステージで『これは私が本来やりたいスタイルの演奏ではない。ミスター・グールドの意思でこうなった』と、異様にテンポが遅い言い訳のようなことを言っている。

@user-og6gt7zm6z 5 жыл бұрын

後年ツィマーマンとの演奏と時間的にはほぼ変わらないとか。記憶が少々あいまいだが、前日の演奏？が遥かにテンポが遅かったと聞いたことがある。

@quite1enough Жыл бұрын

8:45

@Paulofibonelli 2 жыл бұрын

30:00 2nd mvm

@jefolson6989 3 жыл бұрын

The trill at the close of the 2nd movement lose their magic at this tempo. But other than that, I love the tempo! Its a movement I like to savor, but THE COUGHING! Shit.

@alessandrodallago8164 3 жыл бұрын

Tempi troppo lenti per questo Bernstein non collaborò più con Gould.Saluti.

@iitenki8091 5 жыл бұрын

テンポは明らかに遅いし、ブラームスが指示した強弱から外れている部分も多々ある。バーンスタインは，それは自分が意図したことではなくグールドが決めたことだと釈明している。しかし、それなのになぜ演奏するのか、彼は三つの理由を挙げている。１９６２年４月６日、カーネギー・ホールでの演奏(ライヴ録音がラジオ放送された)に寄せたレナード・バーンスタインの前口上。

@greatfelino 3 жыл бұрын

Cough cough

@racheloliver17 3 жыл бұрын

As a concert pianist who loves this concerto and played it , I agree 100% w/Lenny's speech and remarks!. Also, some of my colleagues in the orchestra told me at that time that they suffer needing to play it under the tempo. It really does not sound like Brahms but maybe Bach or Beethoven.....Boring!!!!

@jefolson6989 3 жыл бұрын

I agree its pretty dull, but really doesn't seem that strange an interpretation. Some moments are especially good. The end of the first movement. I guess Bernstein wanted to make a preemptive strike for the sake of the reviews. And it did make the performance more famous that it ever would have been.

@andreassummerer597 3 жыл бұрын

Shame on you! This Performance is the best of the best!

@GuddySmith Ай бұрын

I grew up with baroque and renaissance music. So the interpretation by Glenn Gould is for me the key to understand Brahms.

@RoyBrener 3 жыл бұрын

The speech is pathetic and redundant. The music is beautiful.

@lsmart 2 жыл бұрын

Beg to disagree. Anyone who has listened to or seen videos of Bernstein's rehearsals knows how stubborn and adamant he was regarding his approach to a piece, even with world-famous soloists or singers. That he capitulated and submitted to Gould's extreme preference is a sign of his true respect for him. But as an all-time giant, he had a perfect right to publicize the fact that this was Gould's interpretation and not his, as most listeners would otherwise assume. It also honored, rather than disrespected Gould.