I cant give any specific tips, but this old Tony made a video series about rotary broaches some years ago. He bought a comercial rotary broach with included hex broaches, and also managed to grind a working square broach from an old end mill. He also used the same broach in the lathe and on the mill, so this should not make a difference.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the info! I must have watched that video and forgotten about it. Will watch it again.
@Beef4Dinner2210 ай бұрын
From a physics perspective, whether the workpiece or tool is rotating is all just a matter of where your frame of reference is located. If your reference frame on the lathe is the workpiece, then the "stationary" tool on the lathe would look like it is the rotating object and the "rotating" workpiece would be stationary. And similarly if your reference frame on a mill is the cutter, then the cutter would look stationary and the workpiece would look to be rotating. As far as their relative movement between cutter and workpiece, there really shouldn't be any difference between a mill and lathe.
@dfgaJK10 ай бұрын
@@Beef4Dinner22 Thanks for saving me the typing 😆
@jster196310 ай бұрын
Some parts look homemade, and some parts look factory made. Hmmmm. And I love the self-trimming planes the most!
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
That was a 767 stab. I hear they were a nice plane to fly.
@jster196310 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMP The 767 is just a Sweetheart of a jet! I flew it for 10 years.....
@emanggitulah431910 ай бұрын
The inherent machine shop cleaning video was really inspiring
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
It really was good, as they always are.
@peterhadfield87310 ай бұрын
It doesn't matter weather the job is still and the tool rotates or vice versa, its just a change or reference plane. The tool stickout from the broach holder is critical - if it sticks out past the point where the two axies intersect then the tool tip experiences some radial movement into the work piece as it cuts (stick it out way to far and you can see this movement) - guaranteed to chip the tips of the tool. This may not be your problem but it just might... cheers
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks Peter. That is a good tip. I only roughly set that length within about a mm.
@Narwaro10 ай бұрын
That thing doesnt look badly made, but man does it look banged up
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
The locking pins are really nice , hardened, ground, an air release groove. The latching body still has the mill scale on it. Wired.
@ptonpc10 ай бұрын
I like the look of that old indexer.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks. It is pretty cool.
@Dellpodder10 ай бұрын
The lighting in that last shot of the lathe is great!
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks for noticing.
@switch247210 ай бұрын
That was built out of a hexagon 5C collet block and some welding, plus a collet adaptor style insert. Pretty cool!
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Oh right. That big shaft is 5C. I didn't pick up on that.
@Henning_S.10 ай бұрын
You can try to broach the square holes in 2 steps to reduce the load on the broach. The first broach with chamfered edges to remove the majority of the material and the second broach with regular square edges to just cut the corners of the square hole. You can grind the broach for the first step out of the slightly damaged broach, just grind the damaged corners off.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks. That is an excellent tip.
@MikelNaUsaCom10 ай бұрын
Happy Sunday. Dunno why I'm up at 3am, but here I am... watching this video. =D
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks for that Michael. Sleep well!
@steveggca10 ай бұрын
Hi Mark rotary broaches absolutely work that way on lathes. I have been involved in setting them up on cnc lathes (long ago and far away). If you have not already done so, spend some time looking at the slater tools videos and documents lots of information there. there are other manufacturers as well (edit) just a thought, are you certain that the tool is set to exactly the right length? if its off it will orbit the centerline and that could cause breakage.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks Steve. I measured that focal point on the last video, but only set it to within 1mm or so with a ruler. I guess that needs more precision :)
@bchdsailor10 ай бұрын
Inheritance Machining is an absolute must to watch, just like your channel
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Glad you think so!
@somebodyelse667310 ай бұрын
Don't rest your ultrasonic cleaner basket on the bottom of the tank, suspend it. It's common to have some hooks on the basket handles that fit over the tank sides. The transducers are fastened to the bottom, and anything sitting on the tank bottom makes it harder for them to vibrate the tank bottom as well as they should.
@steamfan714710 ай бұрын
I never knew that, thanks for the tip!
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks. That is an excellent tip.
@squelchstuff10 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMP Another tip you might try, is to fill the bath with tap or distilled water, and then place the components into ziplock plastic bags containg the cleaning solution. It saves clenup after, and reduces the amount of cleaning solution.
@notabagel10 ай бұрын
@@squelchstuffI do this all the time at work with ipa to clean flux residue :)
@willemvantsant510510 ай бұрын
Made my camlocks using allen bolts, built up the threads with weld and machined. The only downside you have to make a chuck key to suit. My rotary broach is in the cabinet gathering dust.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Hi Willem, I like that approach, but I was gifted the rotary broach, so it better get used :)
@Finding_K_Factor10 ай бұрын
I made one of this same style. As far as the actual broach goes the tip length is very important! When I designed mine out in cad I worked from the cutting tips back and designed the rest of the tool off that specific length. That way when the cutting tips are rotating they are “on center” at the cutting plane to avoid the tips going “over center”. You probably need to either ask the tool maker what the tip length he designed the tool to or grind a tool then measure the tip “action” at center and cut the shank back until you get the tips rotating at 0.001” TIR or less. This style tool works better when the body is rotating and the cutting tip is “stationary” in the work piece. To use mine in the lathe I had to Chuck the tool in the lathe Chuck and clamp the work piece in the tail stock. This style works really well in a mill though!
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
I did measure to find the "focal point" in the last video, and there is an adjustment crew behind the bit to adjust it's length, but I didn't realise I had to set it that accurately. That could be the problem. I was just using a ruler to set about 21mm stick out.
@Finding_K_Factor10 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMP I just recorded a 3 minute video demonstrating how the rotary broach works and why your style needs to have the body of the tool rotate relative to the work piece. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a5qcqJuiyrHTo4k.htmlsi=y4xHRh_IE-W8tpgl
@steamfan714710 ай бұрын
Ya, if the bearing set and broach holder are bored in on an angle to the broach body, then its a rotating type meant for a mill. You could prove this by reversing your setup. Chuck the RB in the lathe chuck and hold your work piece stationary in the tool turret. That's a neat little indexer, good example of never judge a book by it's cover. I have an old Hardinge 5c indexer that looks like it was ran over by a Tank, but it still functions flawlessly.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
I still dont really understand why this type wont work with a rotating part? It is the same relative motion.
@steamfan714710 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMP If it's built the way you describe, the broach cutter is just rotating on it's axis and not wobbling with the tool stationary. Here a couple videos from Slater tools to illustrate- Rotary Broaching in the Mill, notice the tool is wobbling and not the cutter kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hJ9jeNKQzqqodIU.html Rotary Broaching in the Lathe, notice the tool is stationary and the cutter is wobbling kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jNuipJh3zMy1j58.html The other thing I noticed about the cutters you made, is the face of the cutter wasn't concave enough, if at all. Looking at a close up in another of Slater's videos, gives an idea of just how much of a concave profile is needed. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hdR6ZrCGq67Vp6c.htmlfeature=shared&t=113
@martinwhelan244510 ай бұрын
The stickout on the broaching tool matters. There is a sweetspot for the broaching tool if it is too near the the square will not be centered with the workpeice and same if it is too far. If it is too near and far it will ficght the bearings and the chuck to bent the tool over and over again and chip the end of the broach
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
I measured that focus point, but only eyeballed the stick out with a ruler. Does that stick out length need 0.01mm tolerance?
@ChrisBNisbet10 ай бұрын
NZer here - I don't say it with a hard g. We NZers make a few funny sounds, but I don't think that's one of them (lol). I think it's more to do with the vowel that follows the g. When a y follows the g you use the soft sound - so gyrate has the same sound as gymnastics.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks Chris, then it is my german contaminated engrish :)
@taunusmechanics312110 ай бұрын
Molybdenium Disulphate Grease may not be the best choice for the plain bearing indexer. I would recommend installing a zerk fitting and use way oil to flush dirt out when you use it on the Clarkson.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Good point. I normally use the indexer on the mill, and was thinking more about keeping coolant out.
@Felix_Wiedemann10 ай бұрын
The axial position of your broaching tool may not be set correctly. It needs to be spot on at the position of 0 runout, since otherwise the cutting edges experience very high side loads (meaning radially), they are not able to withstand. You already sort of demonstrated that setup in you last video.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks Felix. I did measure it, and I set this one, but only with a ruler to within about 1mm. I'll do it more accurately next time.
@LongnoseRob10 ай бұрын
I vaguely remember Stefan or TOT using a similar broaching tool in the lathe as well.. but can’t pinpoint the video yet
@@RotarySMP ToT #1 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fb2pe62HtN6ve2g.htmlsi=FA4QhT9sJS81sIjJ and ToT #2 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/apNjmrOI0Zzblok.htmlsi=lNQ2cJ8JgfL_5T6i
@ericfeatherstone10 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMPand Stefan kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hZiXn7mqupbDc2Q.htmlsi=VQ22_uYI5Pc2XnOu
@TheDistur10 ай бұрын
I don't know anything about broaching so I'm just wishing you luck!
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks for that.
@niklashumberg6910 ай бұрын
I think ToT made a Video with rotary broaches, there he used the same tool in the mill and the lathe. So i believe it should work eather way
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Good point, I'll check their videos.
@staviq10 ай бұрын
I'd try broaching something really soft like lead, to see what kind of deformation you get. It should be easier to see if something is rubbing or banging, or whether broach edges dig in too deep or to shallow maybe.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Good idea. I was going to do a test in Al.
@mazchen9 ай бұрын
Inheritance Machining has just posted a clip on broaching, including building a metric (!) tool holder. Not totally without encountering some challenges, though...
@RotarySMP9 ай бұрын
I noted it, but haven't found time to watch it yet.
@WekaWindows10 ай бұрын
Hi Mr. SMP, a couple of things that you may find helpful is drilling out the corners first undersize, then the bulk of the material in the center. The other one would be an internal groove to help with chip compaction at the bottom, which will do an absolute number on your cutter.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the tips!
@aaronsilas702410 ай бұрын
Im pretty certain those feeds and speeds were way off. I have a rotary broach from Hoffmann Group and have used it quite a bit also with selfmade silver steel cutters. The Hoffmann people actually advice on going fairly slow (maxbe 150 RPM) at the beginning with a really high feed for the first millimeter because otherwise the tool doesnt really seem to bite instead it drags across the workpiece surface a whole lot which breaks down the edgeds. After the first millimeter i usually speed up to about 500 RPM and slow down the feed. Cant give mm/min as Im using the tailstock unfortunately.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the tips.
@bulletproofpepper210 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching.
@rexmundi815410 ай бұрын
I thought about making a video about my quick shop fixtures and special purpose tools but looking at them I realized I’d be embarrassed to show them to anyone. The other day I made a follower rest for the lathe by supergluing a piece of oak to the carriage.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
You know it is only a temporary solution... unless it works :)
@LCalleja10 ай бұрын
Can’t wait, that indexer looks nice
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Hi Luke, it is a cool design, but poor finishing
@LCalleja10 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMPyou did a good job of explaining how it works. Maybe try with a flat front as might help create a stronger edge just a thought but worth a try I guess
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
@@LCalleja Isn't a flat face a 1 degree negative clearance angle? I thought this would need a bit of a dished front to lower the cutting forces.
@LCalleja10 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMPsorry didn’t mean totally flat just a bit flatter I ground my tool face on the corner of a 100mm wheel and it work good.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
@@LCalleja Oh, that is very flat. I used about a 40mm wheel this time. Bigger than the dremel wheel last time
@dgthomas22210 ай бұрын
Hi Mark. Check the other comments about broach length, it has to be correct for your broach holder. This may be your problem with chipped cutting edges.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
I checked the focal point on the previous video, but thought a mm or there abouts is close enough. That lack of precision could be the issue. Thanks.
@Kyran3110 ай бұрын
I believe the size of hole really matters and it needs to be a certain amount bigger than the flats of your broach, and the amount that you dish the front of the broach is important too, feeds and speeds I’m sure need to be right but I don’t know where to start with that
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks for tips
@besenyeim10 ай бұрын
I only watched videos about this, but your pilot hole seemed too small. Similar broached holes I saw often have cylindrical surfaces between the corners. I think you just overload the tool with an excessive DoC.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
@@besenyeim Good point. It was a 7.5mm pilot for a 7mm broach. But it seems you need 1.1x the width across flats.
@spikeypineapple55210 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMP There's your issue. Thats way too small. Start easy, 8mm, then work down.
@624Dudley10 ай бұрын
Just right for Sunday coffee ☕️! I plan to return to the comments later, after they’ve accumulated, to try to gain comprehension of this lathe/mill broaching situation. I hope someone can elaborate…🤔
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Hi Doric. Could be that I am not setting the tool length with enough care.
@philipzielinski10 ай бұрын
Looks like a hex collet block welded to a mount and indexer. Bolt hole pattern made on a mill maybe?
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Yeah, others have pointed out it is a recycled 5C collet block.
@0ADVISOR010 ай бұрын
Yaaay awesome! I love your videos!
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks for you kind comment
@henrychan72010 ай бұрын
Thank you for the airplanes
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
You are welcome Henry
@The.Talent10 ай бұрын
9:30 in Australia, it's definitely JYE-RATING. That said, I lived in NZ for a year and can confirm, they do say a lot of things weirdly.
@wizrom304610 ай бұрын
Yes. They confuse sex and six. Which can cause problems when you ask the barmaid for six
@grahamspinks480110 ай бұрын
And of course we have the word "Gib." A Gib is not one of the Bee Gees. It's pronounced "JIB."
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Okay, so it is my german corrupting my Cringrisch.
@The.Talent10 ай бұрын
Not necessarily. There is a GIB on my lathe and milling machine, and a JIB on my crane or boat.@@grahamspinks4801
@MrLampbus10 ай бұрын
Perhaps the back angle taper needs to be larger...could be stress on the withdrawal phase of the rotation that flakes the front face off. OR perhaps the "corners" need to be relieved a bit more before the final cut ... eg drill round, broach octagonal, broach square. Definitely "Jai-rate" in the UK.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks, all good inputs. I guess my English is mutating to Denglisch :)
@maximelenfer628010 ай бұрын
hi about the feeds and speeds, i'm "often" broaching at 1000rmp with 0.01mm per rotation in stainless steel but it's with a tool from garant so not the same as an home made tool. Have a nice day.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks for that reference point. What diameter broach, four point or six?
@maximelenfer628010 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMP it's 6 points 5mm
@Neonomicon110 ай бұрын
I think i would understand it so that if you drive the holder the broach are always concentric with the holder but if you drive the part you can introduce shear forces into the broach if the center of the holder and the center of the part are not exactly aligned. maybe thats the case
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
I measured the focal point, in the last video to ensure against that.
@Neonomicon110 ай бұрын
@RotarySMP i dont mean the focal point. i mean the center axis of the holder (holder), uh sorry my english sucks :D
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
@@Neonomicon1 The tool body was right on center height, and set correctly across. take a look in my last video, as I showed finding the right tool length to get the cutter to be turning concentrically. But I might not have then set it with enough accuracy.
@craigbossard39910 ай бұрын
Corner breakage indicates dragging. Have you thought about trying a different gage length? Originally you set up for the focal length, but that means zero stroke (I think). Maybe the tool needs projection to take advantage of the clearance and get more action.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
The cutting stroke is generated by the offset angle. I suspect I was not accurate enough setting the tool stick out.
@jimurrata678510 ай бұрын
I never clicked so fast! 👍👍👍
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Hi Jim. Thanks for watching.
@jimurrata678510 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMPI really like shop made tools and fixtures. The additional light over the lathe might make shots easier. Didn't Brandon just give up and mill the pockets out? I think IH is taking clues from your channel this week, with Paige laughing at (somewhat ridiculing) Brandon's "Pornstar mustache" It's great when your wife makes a cameo. 😂
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
@@jimurrata6785 They do really top videos. I think she comes from the video industry.
@jimurrata678510 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMP She had her own channel (Farmhouse Vernacular) until she gave birth. I think she has helped Brandon a lot with his production.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
@@jimurrata6785 That explains how he was able to hit the ground running with the perfect lighting, editing, filming, storyboarding etc. Good on them.
@jimsvideos720110 ай бұрын
I thought it was the J sound in gyrate, but it is a matter of preference.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks Jim. Could be US v UK and commonwealth english.
@wizrom304610 ай бұрын
Is the workpiece in the lathe subject to work-hardening? Either way looks a lot like workpiece too hard and cutter too soft. Maybe it needs a sharper cutter (ie; more end-concave giving more rake angle). Interesting project, thanks for sharing.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
The steel is finest scrapbinium, but given it's mill scale, I am suspecting a building industry and not tool making alloy.
@lesliesoutham739610 ай бұрын
Hi mark was just wondering if the two locking pins were one for each indexing assembly as you only have the eight pin mechanism. Hope that makes sense as you wouldn’t want to disassemble it to change from eight to six .
@squelchstuff10 ай бұрын
That's my take too. {edit} WAIT!On second thoughts, that won't work. There's nothing to push the second pin in.
@wizrom304610 ай бұрын
@@squelchstuff agreed, it must be rebuilt to change from 6 to 8. It is an unusual design, and the only real reason I can think of for 8 detent pins is to give very strong security against rotation. I think it might have been made as a factory tool for an indexing production job that needed to withstand a lot of leverage. It is a quick change mechanism with high security. Then, for hobby use later, it was probably binding or stiff etc with all 8 pins so he took some out.
@lesliesoutham739610 ай бұрын
@@squelchstuffgood point , maybe the six pin may have fitted with the eight .
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Yep, that summarises my thoughts as well. If you only used one pin per pattern, you would not need all the holes, and you would need a double pattern plunger ring thingy.
@timogross819110 ай бұрын
The rotary broach I made after watching some youtube videos has slots, to move the rotating part to center. (I guess the design makes it easier to get the cutter on center) The tool does not care if the workpiece or the tool rotates. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hZiXn7mqupbDc2Q.html I think the starting hole size might be a big influence kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jM1nhqaJtM6Re40.html
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Thanks Tim. I am starting to suspect I was not careful enough about getting the tip exactly at the right stick out for it to be perfectly centered.
@helmutzollner549610 ай бұрын
I wonder if a carbide insert on top of your cutting tool could solve your breakout problem? Did you or Mr. Gotteswinter show how to grind Carbide bits? If it was you, you should be able to bring an insert and mount it on your cutting bit. However, I think a slower rotation speed should help too. Good luck!
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
I would suspect that carbide will likely chip even easier than HSS, and the Slater website has a chart suggesting 1500RPM for a 7mm broach. www.slatertools.com/support/recommended-speeds-and-feeds
@helmutzollner549610 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMPhave a look at this flic of cutting a hardened interrupted surface with a carbide bit. kzfaq.infor6BulVOcpOU?si=X41A1XzJiaGn2MFL If that can stand the stresses then it can withstand the wiggle motion of your broach.
@treadaar10 ай бұрын
There seems to be a fundamental difference between the tool being driven and the work being driven. Isn't the loading on the tool edge going to be different if the work is 'pushing it around' as opposed to the tool 'pushing' into the work? (Full disclosure, i'm an idiot.)
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Nope, that is the same, as the part always drags the cutting bit (it is mounted in bearings. In both cases the tool is advanced into the hole the same.
@Andrew_Fernie10 ай бұрын
Someone must have got out of bed early this Sunday
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
The game was at 2100 here in Vienna. Sure was a nail biter!
@jackfirst265110 ай бұрын
Havd you tried using a larger pilot hole?
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
I coulding find one between 7.5mm and 8mm, but looks like I need 7.8. I'll try with 8 next.
@aaronhammond729710 ай бұрын
If the broach just needed to be cocked at an angle, then the eccentric tooling would be unnecessary, just rotate the compound a bit with a parallel/concentric tool...?
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
That is done isn’t it?
@aaronhammond729710 ай бұрын
So it is. Which makes me think that the wobble type broach is necessary for milling, but not necessary for the lathe. Re speeds. They're usually surface speed dependent right, but the surface speed of the oscillating corners is basically zero since they're moving so little with respect to the work - turn the rpm up as fast as she'll run
@somebodyelse667310 ай бұрын
The effective feed rate per revolution, is set by the angle PLUS the axial advance of the tool, yes? Pick a corner on the broach, and in one revolution, it moves in the Z axis by the sine of the offset angle, I think? It's a little weird for me to visualize, how much the rotation advances the tool point, in conjunction with the Z axis tool feed. So, I think the net feed rate is higher than the feed rate of the tool?
@andypughtube10 ай бұрын
That's a really good point!
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
@@aaronhammond7297 Good point Aaron.
@Rustinox10 ай бұрын
Just like you, I don't see the differance between spinning the work or spinning the tool. It should work just the same and give the same results. Or maybe I'm missing something here.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
That is what I an unsure about. :) How is that lovely Celtic 14 progressing? Whoever mangled that tailstock should have it dropped on their foot!
@Rustinox10 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMP Or wearing it on a chain as a necklace for a few weeks.
@andypughtube10 ай бұрын
Speaking as a physicist it makes no difference if the broach is rotating or the work is rotating, it's all a matter of reference frame. If you want to get exotic: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ipqha8p01cu9YXU.html (But I think that tool clearance would be difficult with a square)
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Hi Andy, I think the comment on my last video missed the offset built into the tool. My Schaublin spindle motor is not a servo. Cool what you did.
@andypughtube10 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMP It works on the spindle encoder. In the video I am turning the spindle by hand with a handle in the spindle end.
@somebodyelse667310 ай бұрын
Hey, how did you manage to make a post with a link in it? Every time I do that, the post gets 'disappeared'.
@andypughtube10 ай бұрын
@@somebodyelse6673 I think that you can always link to other KZfaq videos, but not necessarily to external sites. Otherwise it depends on a setting that the content creator sets, and in many cases they have to manually approve the comment if there is a link in it.
@somebodyelse667310 ай бұрын
@@andypughtube - I had no idea that a manual approval was even a thing for KZfaq comments. I learned another new thing today, thanks!
@Andrew_Fernie10 ай бұрын
Are you able to mount it in the tailstock on the Bolly so you can 'feel' what's happening? It might give you a chance to try out various feeds and speeds before the cutter is ruined.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Unfortunately not. The Schaublin Tool have holder shank of 25mm is bigger than I can mount in the tailstock, or the Maho spindle
@Andrew_Fernie10 ай бұрын
😞@@RotarySMP
@undergroundpanda280610 ай бұрын
Your tool looks flat bottomed, you need to grind some relief into the face that approaches the work piece. The face approaching the work needs to be concave so the corners are more like points. It should work then. Slow the spindle down too, 1000rpm is a bit on the quick side.
@ferrumignis10 ай бұрын
You can see the spiral grinding marks in the end where he's ground the radius, and he showed how he did this on his HSS tool last week.
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Yes, It did have a concave face, although less concave than last week. There is a speed chart from Slater I found. Looks like they recommend more like 1500 rpm for a 7mm broach.
@undergroundpanda280610 ай бұрын
Ok, time to get my eyes tested again, could have sworn that broach looked flat on the bottom. Interesting point on the speed, I did a bit of poking around on the inter webs and found sites saying anything between 600 and 1800 for a broach that size, so your guess is as good as mine.
@tcratius174810 ай бұрын
Speaking of one minute jobs. Why didn't you take the horrible finish off the indexer body? That's why we have lathes 😂
@RotarySMP10 ай бұрын
Excuses: - there is not enough edge distance to the holes - I couldn't mount the main body securely - I couldn't be bothered you choose :)
@tcratius174810 ай бұрын
@@RotarySMP sounds like the machinist version of "choose your own adventure". 🤘