BECAUSE IT'S SO MUCH MORE FUN THAT WAY

@@biolayne1 you are just running out of content. So everything will do for now right🤡🤡

@@almir4768 Yeah such a lack of content...

You must be new here.....

@@almir4768 he's been doing this segment for a long time now, and even had a pre-cursor to it (Fuckery Friday). And that's not even close to all he posts. We need more Laynes out there debunking bad info and calling out the people who pass it.

Friday up guys, it's whatsup

let's hope so

IT FUCKING KILLED ME TOO LOL

That's 3 yrs,how are they numbers looking since then?

Every time I go off diet, those damn calories put me in caloric surplus. Outrage

@@adambeer1171 Intolerable. Thankfully, you can put butter in your coffee to avoid getting fat, because it does not spike insulin. That's science. Or something...

@@everydamndayobesityobsessi3137 Impossible and nutrition don't mix well usually. More than that, impossible and biology don't mix well usually. I'm not going to argue. You're assuming the satiety mechanism is fail safe, research points otherwise. You're assuming a lot of things actually, referring to it as a single mechanism when it's a complex psychobiological system. Even just anecdotally, it's not uncommon that people report continuing to binge far after their physically feel full. Oh, yeah, I suppose it's the carbs fault (and I'm being sarcastic)...anyway, as long as your diet works for you, I'm happy. Stay healthy and happy!

@@everydamndayobesityobsessi3137 I perceived you said the exact opposite: that the satiety systems would necessarily stop healthy people from overeating on butter in a low carb diet model. I am contending that as it is all but fail safe, and as such is not a guarantee people following the diet you mention will indeed stop before reaching a notable caloric surplus. In simpler words: low carb/keto diets are not magic insofar as they would prevent you from getting into a caloric surplus. And neither will they prevent you from accruing fat in said situation.

@@everydamndayobesityobsessi3137 if you say so. Again, using extremes such as "impossible, never, always" etc. is something I try to avoid as much as possible as a biologist. "Too full" doesn't mean anything. Ask anyone who's been on a binge. I'll concede that you can retort "how often do you hear about low carb/keto binges?" and anecdotally I'll have to give this one to you for the sake of integrity. But to be frank, while I thank you for your responses, I'm not interested in discussing low carb/keto diets any further when I feel they are painted as that magic trick that will somehow hack your system into perfect intuitive nutrition. My overall analysis of the nutrition literature as a biochem/cell bio PhD and former clinician has been telling me otherwise for a decent time now (I'm not making an argument of authority here, however I do claim with confidence that I am better equipped to analyze and contextualize a corpus of research than the regular person who thinks they nailed it because they read an abstract from a study that seems to go their way). Again, in the end, what matters is that you find the diet model that works for you and your lifestyle. But none will work for everyone all the time. And in this I did speak in absolute, but I'm confident enough about this statement to do so :-)

Fr, they keep going where i don't want them, lol

Thanks!

@@biolayne1 You were comparing a slab of meat to a little lollipop. You should compare it weight for weight. Even if the meat contains fat, a 100g meat will still have much higher tef than a 100g sugar. I noticed you always do this when your subject is about calories.

Thanks, will do!

he's a straight up huckster

lmao

but he recommends a high fat diet. And that diet is not keto

Yes, you are just holding on to more water thus the weight gain

@@joaolopes3029 agreed and holding water in better places (the muscles)

actually everything is math & physics bro... you just aren't smart enough

@@biolayne1 my comment doesn't refer to you Lol but to this Dave that doesn't trust "calories theory" but speaks about Thermic Effect of Food (i.e. calculations based on calories) I am a Physics MSc student, of course I trust thermodynamics 😅

LMFAO

@@biolayne1 love your content man! Hilarious and seriously informative AF.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Better Life PT Studio If you believe in calorie counting, thermic effect is a big deal. In a 100 calorie comparison, carb net calorie is 90 while protein net calorie is 70. That's 20 calorie difference in just 100 calories.

because eliminating food groups isn't OCD

@@biolayne1 no it doesn't require repetitious steps and in extreme cases a computer in your pocket to assist with making those calculations. Wash your hands over and over is an obsessive behaviour. Weight yourself often, same idea. Don't eat sugar is a rule to follow. It requires no additional repetitious rituals, it requires modification of existing ones.

F L Layne's math is wrong. A 100 calorie lollipop has more net calorie than a 100 calorie rib eye.

@@net-flix yes on micro nutrient level foods interact differently in the body but in order to loose weight the body needs to be in a caloric deficit period. so it’s not the macros or Keto or intermittent fasting that’s making u lose weight even if u use these you are losing weight because u are in a caloric deficit while using these diets

@@fl676 You believed in the math done for you by Layne which assumed there is no big difference. Now that I told you there is big difference, you backtrack on your words.

@@net-flix 🤦🏻‍♂️ u still need to be in a deficit to lose weight even with the different interaction with macros food in the body. Layne went over this . Watch his video again .

@@net-flix that’s like me saying protein has a higher thermic effect so I’ll just eat protein U will still gain weight if I eat to much of it and lose weight if u eat to little calories . At the end of the day u gain or lose weight based on the calorie intake . Surplus or deficit . Now to be healthy obviously u don’t eat all the calories In candy , eat balanced diet