I have two issues with the x-t4 which might make me switch to the R7. One is the autofocus. I shoot many school programs and sports and it just can't keep up. My old 7D Mark II does a better job, but I went away from it to the x-t4 because I wanted something lighter among all the other reasons, like touch screen, flippy screen etc. But I find myself in certain situations grabbing the 7D II as much or more often which makes me wonder why I got the x-t4 in the first place. If there's lots going on and the scene is busy or there is stuff in between myself and the subject, the x-t4 doesn't handle it well. The other reason and maybe this is a flaw in my camera, but the dang thing overheats alot. If I'm busy at a sports event and shooting frequently, it gets dang hot and gives me the warning. Sometimes it doesn't make it through the whole game. I do shoot a lot of bursts to get the entire sequence or play. I can shoot over 1000 pics with the 7D ii and no heating issues. The x-t4 gets to 500 and I'm pretty much done. Maybe I just shoot way too many pictures at games and stuff, who knows.

I think I will probably pay extra and get an xh-2. Possibly see What upgrades xt5 brings? Thanks for the comparrison!

Thank you for your analysis of the R7 and X-T4. I have a lot of Canon gear, including the 7DII as well as a couple of X-T4's. I am a stills-only photographer and I would prefer to see a camera of this type concentrate on being the best APS-C photo camera to replace my 7DII. Initially, I was quite keen on this camera, but after delving more into it, my enthusiasm has somewhat tempered... If the intent was to continue the theme of a pro-level crop sensor body, with top-end sensor, great buffer and weather proofing. I would have paid for a stacked/backlit sensor, faster cards and better buffer. This is a great camera at a certain level, but not a replacement for a 7DII as a professional-quality APS-C camera. I wanted a R7 to build on the legacy for the 7DII as a pro wildlife camera, this is a cheapened down version, Canon Australia have even classed it as an enthusiast body, so in that vein I would have called this an R9, equivalent to a 90D (enthusiast) perhaps, with the R10 being equivalent to a XXXD (consumer) body, with a XXXXD (basic) body to come at some stage. The lack of BSI and stacking on the sensor is a lost opportunity IMHO for a camera in a market at the high end - where I was expecting it to be placed. More cameras, (esp. Sony, a big rival) are bringing those in. My Sony Rx-10MkIV, vintage 2017 has a stacked sensor already! Also, when Canon said that the R7 has LESS weather sealing than the R5 and R6, that seems counter-intuitive, considering it is likely to be subjected to the element by pro users. Then we get to the buffer and cards. Certainly, considering the frame rate, and the benefits of shooting RAW, it needs a serious buffer, and I'm not convinced it actually has that. I think that for the function of this camera, a pair of dual CF Express Type A card slots, with backward compatibility to SD cards (like Nikon has used), would have been a winner, and might have put less stress on the buffer. In terms of ergonomics, I would have liked the ON/OFF switch on the left, like the R6 and R5, and I DO like the distinct switch from video to stills. Like you, I hope that the menus and settings remain separate for each mode - like the Fuji X-T4. I too would like to see the return of the ISO wheel on the right. The movement of the rear control wheel I am undecided about; however, I am disappointed that the back buttons for focus and exposure locks have been moved: moving them just adds another level of change when moving between bodies. I have less issue with the loss of the top EVF, but a higher-resolution EVF and LCD for shooting would be very welcome. Finally, no sign of a battery grip yet, given the way that one is likely to go through batteries, and the light weight of the camera body, with a heavy super telephoto attached, the improvement in balance would be welcome...

So which one you recommend me to buy apecially for video shoot ?

This video didn’t age well with the release of the X-H2S. In Photo mode they seem close. But, video specs on the X-H2S are far better than the R7. The H2S has a stacked BSI sensor. 40 FPS with electronic shutter with no rolling shutter.

Good comparison. What camera do you use ?

New sub here . Gotta support my fellow small youtuber especially when we come from the Fujifilm community.

r7 has two 4k 60p modes. one is no crop 4k 60 but line skipped, another is the cropped 4k 60 no line skipped.

Really makes me appreciate the Lumix s series :P

The Canon R7 is really nice 👍

Fujifilm is the King of APSC and no other brand will Beat it in APSc coz of Conflict of interest

Even if the R mount Canon were the king of aps-c it is a king without many clothes unless large oversized ones are borrowed from his cousin. The 18-45mm dress you can get is pretty skimpy not covering much at 18mm and slow. Every one keeps telling us photography is all about the lenses so very early days yet. Nowadays it is all about the list of video specs for the blog reviewers I suppose but not much interest to photographers. I am finding it really hard to get my head around what they were thinking about with this throwback kit lens. m43 has its tiny but splendid 12-32mm and Fuji the very capable 15-45mm so what is this narrow view short reach 18-45mm mm creature all about?

It’s not weather sealed not even as much as r6 r5 which isn’t much

1 card slot in the R10

this video is made too early :) Wait on 31st of May for new X-H2 and X-H2S

The real king has arrived xh2s

canon apsc is smaller than fujis (1.6 vs 1.5 crop) - canon has no good lenses for apsc - if u use adapter, why not use cheaper dslr? 70d 80d 90d 7d and so on. canons good glas is for full frame only - so most people will be happier with eos r or rp and 1-2 really good rf lenses.

Already outdated. The new fuji xh2 S is the clear winner of the king of the apsc cameras. 6k video, raw black magic and pro res. AF just as good as Sony and canon finally. Fuji is the clear winner. There will also be a second xh2 with 40mp this fall. And a xt5 probably next year.

go check the xh2s lol

mmm I gave it a dislike because you make quite some mistakes. The fuji does 30 fps too. The higher megapixels is not an advantage because so far non of the aps-c lenses were sharp enough to make use of that. Also lens selection: native for aps-c they have three now vs. dozens of native lenses for fuji. And you can use canon lenses for fuji as well, so if you adapt it's equal. Also the bitrate for video is quite a bit higher for Fuji....

Annoying noisy intro ... NO LIKE