Thanks thats the goal

pass it through a plate

My pleasure

thanks, yes making mistakes is how I learn

Thanks for the tip!

@@MasterIvo could u check putting a graphite or even a pencil inside a secondary Tesla coil to check as it already produces voltage and frequency and check at the top what voltage and current it will produce graphite being diamagnetic nd a conductor and as it acts like a anode it shd though its not a DC current would like ur experience though and if u can make a circuit without touching the coil whose inside it is so placed,

@@MasterIvo another thing as William beaty explained would u do an experiment to c how Tesla made 1000 times the voltage with just 100 turns on the secondary as compared to 10 turns on the primary and explain the process

Sorry to hear that. KZfaq doesn't work perfectly. Refreshing the page sometimes helps

It's OK, I watch it now. Thank you.

I ordered some tungsten tips but for another experiment. To show the difference between positive and negative voltage discharges

@@MasterIvo looking forward to your results!

Seeing the current of L3 amplified from the coil capacitor discharge. I want to see what happens in a traditional tesla coil setup with this methodology. Also working on some spark experiments to show the difference between positive and negative voltage

@@MasterIvo wonderful . I would suggest to see how this works on electrolysis . U can try hooking up to some HHO kit and check the gas output.

@@MasterIvo So you can see what radiant effects manifest at the output of the tesla coil? Is that right? Where will you be when you turn it on for the first time?

Electric Radiant effects are hard to "see". I can see the current amplification. but you can also feel the fields. So I will stay at least a meter away when I will turn the high voltage system on.

Yes, except it is not output. With resonance the energy is transformed back and forth between magnetic and dielectric field (current and voltage)

@@MasterIvo wouldn’t that translate to maximum power output?

Not necessarily. Power is depended on voltage and current. But it makes sense the power is maximum when the resonant voltage is maximum

@@MasterIvo yes well that is power I actually mean but in this instance of reading from the oscilloscopes voltage spikes i can only refer to them at this point but once we have a load i guess adjustments for resonance will have to be made again for peak output power. I guess that will depend on what is driven by this power be it resistive load or something other!

yes, pure resistive load is easier to calculate power (rectified to DC). with resonance the positive and negative power are normally in balance and result in a total zero power. But you can disturb this resonant power balance, which results in real power.

Yes, max 3.5kV impulses. Mostly limited by the gate driver IC. But I know how to get higher.

@@MasterIvo alright!

Intersting I'll have yi take a look. The Aether is there. But what it is? I can only guess: Spirit Conciousness Inertia

Hello. Is it not the structure of the universe, at the Plank length? or Planck, Max ?

I would surmise that since the word has been used as an umbrella term for unseen forces ,. anything unseen like cosmic rays , particles, plasma etc . would be aether in physics . The word aether is also used in a spiritual sense but once again meaning the unseen/ unknown

@@azarahwagner2749 nah not particles

@@chrisrosenkreuz23 particles are as far as I can work out are emergent phenomena of aether that are given form through field interactions and then still only become particles when measured at a singular point in time. I would say that the use of the word aether is probably a little general as we don't know how many fields exist that we have not measured or even reliably detected so far, so I suppose the original comment is fairly accurate in that it seems to be a label for unknown more fundamental levels of reality. Particle is only a term to describe a measured energetic reaction of the universe to certain field activitiy at a specific moment, in my opinion, not fundamental at all, fields seem to be a fundamental 'force' but what the fields are and what substrate they act on seems to be the question. Particle physics seems to only measure what pops out of the universe when bits of itself vibrate with other bits. Does this sound about right to you? I am not a physicist by any stretch but have a bit of an interest.

Thanks :)

yoyo

Electroboom is fake, he is a good actor, he just blows up small capacitors. Very entertaining until you know the truth