"Case Analysis and Briefing," with Molly Shadel and Anne Coughlin

Рет қаралды 99,634

University of Virginia School of Law

10 жыл бұрын

University of Virginia School of Law professors Molly Shadel and Anne Coughlin instruct new law students on how to analyze and understand cases during a fall 2014 event.

Пікірлер: 51

@user-eo4sb2nr5d 3 жыл бұрын

"There is no such thing as a perfect brief" is now a sticky note on my computer monitor. I needed that. Love this channel.

@robbiem4624 3 жыл бұрын

This is how law professor should be instead of just expected to know everything when you walk into your first day of law school.

@michaelangileo2760 4 жыл бұрын

Remarkable teachers.. such diligence, care and clarity. Thank you!

@Sarahhlynn1995 2 жыл бұрын

Professor Shadel is amazing. She makes things so easy to understand

@missjennablejen 6 жыл бұрын

I studied this case for my introduction law class, and I enjoy the case briefings. I wish I knew these tips before I took the class!

@Oleander4G 9 жыл бұрын

Would be beneficial if a link to a pdf of the handout referenced for the case brief example was in the video description.

@cmatrix4761 5 жыл бұрын

Again, great work, UVa. Really appreciate these videos.

@shaydean9478 Жыл бұрын

I’ve watched you more than 4 times. You’re awesome. Very detailed, informative and awesome.

@rashellsey2934 4 жыл бұрын

I want it both, jogging in a jug and brief in a bottle! I love this video and how you ladies explain briefing! Thank you!

@richardrosenthal4056 Жыл бұрын

I am an expert witness and I find this approach extremely useful to help me frame (not bias) my opinion.

@byrnegrrl 3 жыл бұрын

This is excellent and much appreciated.

@Frank_Cohen 9 жыл бұрын

Will you please post the projected handouts? Thank you.

@romee-elise 2 жыл бұрын

Hi. Thank you for your wonderful explanations. I have a question. How about Matthews v Baxter 1873? If one party knew the other party was intoxicated, the contract is voidable. When the party was sober, he or she can choose to repudiate the contract or enforce the contract. Is it because in Lucy v Zehmer, the party was not intoxicated enough so the contract is enforceable?

@Noname72105 2 жыл бұрын

That triangle is a capital delta. The abbreviations are basically a D and P.

@davidsoto4394 Жыл бұрын

Please do a video like this one for Prroperty.

@osalas36 2 жыл бұрын

Law is so fascinating!

@parakeetsparakeets3972 5 жыл бұрын

Thank you

@skillmanlaw2 3 жыл бұрын

THINKING THE CASE THROUGH, FOR SELF

@davidsoto4394 Жыл бұрын

Excellent video.

@fridaydaniel2644 Жыл бұрын

wow I really enjoyed this class.

@SuperKriekie 2 ай бұрын

Thank you, thank you, thank you!

@emyh4659 6 ай бұрын

Wish someone would have told me this when i was in law school. Woaa would have made a huge difference.

@qlnguyen301 2 жыл бұрын

it's not too late (at least in my career) to watch this video.

@soulwayband1830 Жыл бұрын

How about to fix sound problems?

@msxmurda2385 4 жыл бұрын

Funny...I guess *every* law school starts out with Lucy.

@sairamkethavath5232 4 жыл бұрын

name of the case?

@petertu7359 4 жыл бұрын

Lucy v Zehmer

@tusan20 3 жыл бұрын

❤

@nagendratiwari3394 Жыл бұрын

Good

@bougee4967 Жыл бұрын

A judge doesn’t ‘make’ law, they apply the law, correct?

@jaisaljohn1500 Жыл бұрын

indeed, advocates apply the law in their respective cases looking at the fact and evidence. Once judge in satisfied that yes apply of law relevant to material fact, he gives his decision or judgement. JUDGE IS ONLY UPHOLD THE LAW OR NO MISUSE OF LAW. SO, YOUR ANSWER LIES TO ADVOCATES POINT OF VIEW , NOTE: THATS WAHT I UNDERSTTOD OR INTERPRETED.

@barefootjakejake7765 2 жыл бұрын

Lol dude who brought the whiskey did so deliberately and with intent to defraud the other guy out of real property. Did he get away with that?? I hope not.

@simperingham Жыл бұрын

He did. Also sounds like he was predatory in his practices too. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_v._Zehmer

@user-jk7ln8ef1t Жыл бұрын

Understanding the case requires a timeline or chronology: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qa-ArbWGndy1fXk.html

@private8773 2 жыл бұрын

No he was drunk at the time so can not make the agreement as he had no capacity to do so. Why take a half hour when one minute sums that up.

@Chrisbearden656 Жыл бұрын

It's a restraining order. From alto. 2017

@Chrisbearden656 Жыл бұрын

Issued Nov 15

@manuvns Жыл бұрын

Good one but why would you pay 200K to learn this ?

@sandeephansdak314 3 жыл бұрын

....and!....😃

@evansjohnarek2271 4 ай бұрын

The woman is nice.

@rajendrasinghcharan4721 3 жыл бұрын

Tell me topics of bread of criminal case file All Topic and point Advocate R charan

@LealofimuaLemusuKuresa Жыл бұрын

Seki

@evaindayjay366 5 жыл бұрын

This is soo good sample but the Teache is very fast,. She is so excited to teach, Pls be slowly speaking,, IT would be nicer Thank you

@athee3569 5 жыл бұрын

Yup..lolzz

@petertu7359 4 жыл бұрын

I thought the pace was fine. Of course, I am an attorney and teach Lawyering at a law school. So the material was not entirely new. I also personally hate speakers who speak to slowly. It’s hard for me to pay attention when the speaker speaks too slowly. I will usually play the video at 1.5 x or 2x speed.

@janina873 3 жыл бұрын

You can adjust the playback speed :)