China's Type 094A SSBN Sub Brief
Рет қаралды 47,102
Жыл бұрынSponsored by Blinkist: Use my special link to start your free 7 day trial with Blinkist and get 25% off a Premium membership www.blinkist.com/subbrief
The design, construction and operation of China's second generation nuclear ballistic submarine; PLAN's Type 094A Jin.
#china #ssbn #taiwan
Join OnlySubs KZfaq Channel for Cold Waters gameplay and much more
/ @jiveturkeylive
📫 Contact Gene Dayhaw gene@solaromgmt.com for paid promotion.
🤩 twitch.tv/subbrief
😎 Patreon ► patreon.com/subbrief
🏴☠️► SubBrief.com
💣The WarZone ► thedrive.com/author/aaron-amick
🤐 Not for Hire ► Aaron linkedin.com/in/aaron-amick-9538a4171/
🔥 / subbrief
💌 Contact Aaron ► Aaron@subbrief.com
Aaron's PC Spec
------------------------
CPU: Intel i9-9900k @4.7 GHz
RAM: 32GB
GPU: NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB GDDR6
Accelsior 4M2 16.0TB PCIe M.2 NVMe SSD
sub brief
jive turkey
subbrief
aaron amick
sonar
sonarman
sme
subject matter expert
navy
naval
games
news
history, jin, xia,ssbn,china plan, china navy,
Chinese navy, US navy, USN, chinese carrier, 055 destroyer, Burke destroyer, Ford carrier,People’s Republic of China, PRC, COIN, Large Scale Combat Operations, LSCO, Xi Jinping, Mao, People’s Liberation Army, PLA, Chinese Civil War, Chang Kai-shek, Sino-Japanese War, Republic of China, Sun Yat-sen, Red Army, Taiwan, Deng Xiaoping, Ronald Reagan, Chinese Communist Party, Nine-Dash Line, Belt and Road Initiative, Active Defense, First Island Chain, Second Island Chain, Anti-Access Area Denial, A2/AD,
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
Sponsored by Blinkist: Use my special link to start your free 7 day trial with Blinkist and get 25% off a Premium membership blinkist.com/subbrief
@gulogulo7636 Жыл бұрын
Pushing unconscious bias? Shame.
@Ahmazzan Жыл бұрын
@@gulogulo7636 That and, maybe it's just me, but Blinkist smacks of corporate dystopian thinking; hell even the marketing "you're in a rat race and you have so little time! get ahead of your shmuck corpo colleagues with this neat trick!". Processed food, processed literature; I don't want either. I understand he needs sponsorships, but I hope it's a more cheerful one next time!
@5unrise11 Жыл бұрын
You actually just make stuff up about PLAN submarines. There is no such thing as the Type 98 (6:13) - this class does not exist except in your imagination, or whatever faulty source you happen to be using. There is also no such thing as JL-2C - there is the JL-2, JL-2A, and JL-3. The Yu-3 torpedo is not used anymore on Chinese submarines - they have all shifted to the Yu-6. This video reminds me of the time when you claimed to your audience that claims that China has AESA radars is just Chinese propaganda. I like to hear about actual weaknesses (and strengths) of the PLAN, but to actually give accurate info you really need to do some legitimate research. I am not interested in factually fuzzy or just outright wrong content.
@DOWNUNDER. Жыл бұрын
Great you gave the ship yards co-ordinates, iam going to the garage and spin up the old ICBM
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
Have fun!
@DOWNUNDER. Жыл бұрын
@@SubBrief aye aye skipper 😃
@D3xt3rity Жыл бұрын
Hey Sub Brief, I love the content! Would you consider doing a general "China navy" video talking about how they would stack up against perhaps US and UK navys? Thanks and I love the content!!!
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
yes.
@D3xt3rity Жыл бұрын
@@SubBrief Awsome! Thank you!!!!!!
@brianstrandberg9346 Жыл бұрын
Indian navy would be interesting as well. They have a lot going on.
@georgemcbride7857 6 ай бұрын
@@SubBrief if you do this remember to include the real posdibility - due to fact USA military are inS. Korea,Philippines,Japan and I would predict (maybe) Indonesian involvement -Natuna! And Malacca Straight!! Surely China would attack US Military bases wherever they are and even if they are not naval targets. Which then adds what North Korea does - anyone who thinks that NK will sit on the sidelines and do nothing is crazy. If Russia enters the fray you can rest assured they will attempt to take back the contested part of S. Island. Which would bring in the Japanese to the war for sure. And then what does the USA do about that. But I suspect the Japanese would crush the Russians. Any Russian naval maneuvers out of would run the USA submarine barricade. I could go on a lot more. The point is not to a half a job. Like USA vs CHINA. That’s just downright ridiculous and stupid simultaneously. And if I knew a battle is near with China I would have my “teams” in China with the necessary wherewithal to assist me in reducing the risk from sub base in Hainan, Liao Ning HQ, Xiamen and other strategic naval bases. Aside from that it is obvious to a number of experts China needs maybe 5 years to even consider attacking Taiwan let alone USA. So I will be highly critical of a seriously flawed attempt.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman Жыл бұрын
*_Great_** video, Aaron!*
@picardtseng Жыл бұрын
BTW, The 2009 ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence) noise level comparison in 27:30 included Type 095, the PLAN 3rd generation SSN, and predicted it would commissioned around 2015. 7 years after, the first Type 095 is still far from hitting water, the schedule is much slower than foreign predict. It is highly possible that PLAN had changed the requirements of Type 095.
@vincegallego2813 9 ай бұрын
the copy paste capital of the world change sub brief to sub panty.
@zhubajie6940 Жыл бұрын
Xia and Jin are pronounced Sshyah and Jeen.
@DOWNUNDER. Жыл бұрын
I pronounce Xi Jinping - dirt bag
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
Thank you. I am working on my pronunciation
@mikecyanide7492 Жыл бұрын
@Jay Risner other guys a clown lol. The 60s= a moon landing,muscle cars, unbelievable music... The list goes on. If you are stuck there I'm pretty jealous.
@fresatx Жыл бұрын
Ok let's hear YOU pronounce Chevrolet Luxury Lumina 🤣🤣
@picardtseng Жыл бұрын
Based on the photos of models by CSSC(manufactures of Chinese submarines) and the satellite images within a year, the Bravo version of Type093/094 are coming (the first Type 093B was launched around April 2022). Both featured pump jet which is unprecedented for PLAN, and Type 093B featured VLS tubes. It might still take years to see their third generation SSN/SSBN (Type 095/096) come out.
@jamesmandahl444 Жыл бұрын
Like in many other fields they have learned what they could from others and are now branching out into totally new, in house designs. The new "rim driven propulsor" is fascinating. Reminds me somewhat of the auxiliary power units on ruskie subs but much more powerful and silent.
@TyLockton Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great content Aaron.
@bigdevine Жыл бұрын
Really interesting sub brief. There is a whole lot of fire power under the seas around the world at any one time.
@MrTylerStricker Жыл бұрын
Chinese SSBNs are endlessly fascinating. Thanks as always, Capt. Jive!!
@bigsarge2085 Жыл бұрын
Always interesting.
@philorkill Жыл бұрын
Interesting Video. Thank you for sharing!
@NiceRoadTrucker Жыл бұрын
Superb brief sir thanks for sharing it
@picardtseng Жыл бұрын
Hello! The noise level compariosn of submarines in 27:30 was from the ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence) report in November 2009, which represents the intelligence USN gathered earlier in 2000s. This graph should be right about the noise level of earliest version of Type 093/094, but this was a bit outdated by now; not sure whether they have updated version. And Yu-3 is really an museum piece; what are mostly mentioned are models later than Yu-6, powered by combustion engine like MK-48.
@ironichumorist Жыл бұрын
Both France and England have commissioned new attack subs in the last 2 weeks. Good topic for naval news.
@R.-. Жыл бұрын
The UK. The nuclear sub base is in Scotland.
@MrTangolizard Жыл бұрын
@@R.-. yeah but the nut cases in charge in Scotland don’t believe in nuclear subs
@uconnjames Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing. Would be great if you can cover more recent submarines.
@red.5475 Жыл бұрын
You should do a Sub Brief on the Type 051 Ming class boats. They've always fascinated me.
@Stinger522 Жыл бұрын
Deadly but not silent is the best description for Chinese nuclear subs. I once read an article on Strategy Page many years ago and it mentioned how the Chinese government does not trust its sailors with nukes. Keeping their boomers close to home could also be a way of making sure they behave themselves.
@BlackHawkBallistic Жыл бұрын
Makes sense, china also keeps its armed forces as the PEOPLES liberation arm rather than the Chinese army so it's a party controlled military
@gelinrefira 9 ай бұрын
I think the US should be behaving themselves first.
@NorthForkFisherman Жыл бұрын
Aaron, since you bring up ROK ASW and Sub operations, I'd love to get your opinions on their existing AIP and home-grown AIP boats. The Type 214 seems to have had some teething problems.
@Chironex_Fleckeri Жыл бұрын
This will be very interesting. What are downsides to automation in subs, in general. Autoloader in Soviet tanks, automation in submarines. We didn't do that as much. Complicated question i suppose but it's a curious thing. Is it primarily driven by personnel management ... err, you know what I mean. Like the training of large numbers of extremely technical specialists like submariners was less of an issue for the Western navies (USN especially). You've talked about it before in other videos. It may not be worth your time to make a full video on it but I think average Westerners would expect the exact opposite to be true about our ships/subs. Responding to casualties, preventing casualties by having more personnel on duty at any given time, preventing crew fatigue, damage control during a casualty, but theres trade offs to have more people on a ship. etc. This is me spitballing. Maybe the PLAN would rather have quantity and thus they'd go for smaller crew sizes and more automation?
@russell7852 Жыл бұрын
De magnitising that's something I never thought about. Naval R&D really is like the F1 of military Innovation
@gaiadruid Жыл бұрын
Being a Navy brat of serious submariners and torpedo design fathers, you are the Most on point sir.
@willmorris574 Жыл бұрын
Appreciate the shoutout to H I Sutton. Guess I will be tuning into your channel again!
@babcombob Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
Welcome!
@Strategy_Analysis Жыл бұрын
Excellent briefing. Nuclear-powered submarines are certainly not China's long suit! With 2 patrol areas, likely they are looking at 8 - 10 boats.
@andrewkruchoski7757 Жыл бұрын
Soviet boats likes to have two shafts .. that's what's she said... Boom. Giggity...
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
I approve of this joke.
@MrKKUT1984 Жыл бұрын
Google earth should sponsor your videos bc every time I watch one I'm going to Google earth to try and find these locations on my own lol
@stupidburp Жыл бұрын
What keeps me up at night is the thought of Russia selling their SSBNs to the PLAN. Even transfer of the cold war era Delta III and Delta IV subs would be a vast improvement of China’s noise levels for their ballistic missile submarines. With enough cash, perhaps Russia would even eventually sell the early 955 Borei class submarines so they could standardize on the 955A for their own fleets. The PLA having late Deltas and early Boreis would allow them to approach close enough to the US coasts to strike everywhere in North America. After that, even inferior copies of 955 Borei class submarines could potentially be quiet enough to give them free movement throughout the Pacific and Atlantic.
@Ironpancakemoose Жыл бұрын
Chinese Oscar II's would be scary asf. As the PLAN would need to break out of the island belts, and im sure the Chinese could install some faster Granits.
@AJ-ql9kr Жыл бұрын
This reminds me of the Tom Clancy book SSN when Russia started selling their subs fully armed
@GintaPPE1000 Жыл бұрын
Russia isn't that stupid or desperate. Siberia's minerals and oil deposits are China's key to self-sufficiency, and both Putin and the CCP know this - the only reason the Chinese want Taiwan first is because Taiwan can't nuke them if they get invaded. A war for Siberia also plays heavily into why the PLA is investing in capabilities that are of little to no use in a war to take Taiwan, such as nuclear second strike capabilities and stealth bombers.
@rkjessop Жыл бұрын
Is there an inconsistency between the building identified as "Submarine construction hall" at time 6:39 (40°43'6.84"N, 120°59'12.18"E) and the building identified as "Huludao Nuclear Submarine Assembly Hall" identified at time 6:25 (40°42'46.26"N, 121° 1'45.54"E)?
@jagdpanther2224 Жыл бұрын
The 094 SSBNs were assisted by Russian technology in 1990s that was for sure. The JL2 & JL3 were roughly equivalent to Trident C4 & D5 in range but not the payload. But the massive hump was really an inconvenient for stealth.
@matthewjesko9923 Жыл бұрын
Can you do a Yasen class Brief with albeit the limited information available ?
@chraffis Жыл бұрын
Nice job!! Oh how I wish you were aloud to use your knowledge for US (and allied) sub briefs!!!🤔🤔 🤔
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
... I do birthday parties.
@chraffis Жыл бұрын
Noted!
@1roadrage1 Жыл бұрын
BAD SOVIET SPY, BAD. Thou shall not lead the sonarman to a court marshal; then what would we watch.
@BigTArmada Жыл бұрын
Yea!
@jonathanhenson9091 3 ай бұрын
How good is the silencing and technical systems ?
@donnysmith946 Жыл бұрын
Demag wasn't all that bad with the BQS-13 system. Just our tapes from sonar.
@bendafyddgillard Жыл бұрын
When you said "the federation of american scientists have blown that up", for a second I was horrified, until I realised you meant they blew up the photo, not the actual cave. Interesting stuff though, thank you.
@leomann22 Жыл бұрын
That is an amazing thought right there. You can just imagine an alternate universe FAS where years of pent-up frustration at watching and not doing anything lead to ... rash and unexpected actions.
@RippinBmore Жыл бұрын
The parade of imaginary horribles
@lukedougherty7078 Жыл бұрын
Degaussing I think was the term you were looking for
@backseatgamer7367 Жыл бұрын
Hey Jive just wanted to tell you I got great dane.shes one and brilliant.
@tylerrose4416 Жыл бұрын
This may be a dumb question, but is this named the type 94 because development started in 1994? Japan has/had a similar naming scheme where they name a vehicle based off the gear it was built
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
yes. 94 refers to the year.
@warmstrong5612 Жыл бұрын
The YU-3 isn't a stealthy first strike type of weapon IMO. It seems to be more of a reactionary or last ditch effort type of weapon. If a Chinese SSBN has to fire the YU-3 then it's probably because it was detected firing its missiles and was fired at upon doing so. It's a "if I'm going down I'll take you with me" kind of thing.
@NorthForkFisherman Жыл бұрын
Well, a missile launch is a very detailed and specific operation. If an SSBN has been engaged and has to evade, it's not going to be able to launch. Further, if an SSBN has suddenly gone to a "hover" at a shallow depth, any trailing boat will probably assume that is in preparation to fire. At that point, any ROE will come into play.
@solarc4667 Жыл бұрын
Is it just me or does it look like the sail is getting longer?
@richarddouglas688 Жыл бұрын
I think the "yu" (魚)for the torpedo designation is shorthand for "yulei" (魚雷) which means torpedo, though the characters do translate to "fish thunder."
@zmcmgsg Жыл бұрын
Actually “fish bomb” while 雷 certainly represents thunder, another inferred meaning would be “a device that goes boom” like how thunder cracks.
@richarddouglas688 Жыл бұрын
@@zmcmgsg the literal translation of the characters is more amusing than the figurative.
@MrKayn333 Жыл бұрын
In the context it is means a” fish like bomb” thus torpedo.
@ruiwenchai5654 9 ай бұрын
@@MrKayn333Torpedo first appeared in late 19th century. It originally defined as self-propelled water mine by Chinese understanding. It sail underwater like fish, then Chinese called (yu lei).
@ramal5708 Жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on USN SUBSAFE program or system?
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
I am limited in what I can discuss, even simple things like SUBSAFE.
@_Alfa.Bravo_ Жыл бұрын
A+
@CheapSushi Жыл бұрын
How often do subs have the be demagnetized?
@iuryfranca8793 Жыл бұрын
Hey, what's your source? I need to develop my study on it
@RealFluse Жыл бұрын
Yay!
@R.-. Жыл бұрын
What if these subs are actually super silent but the Chinese install noise generators as a deception? At 120db do they have to stop the sub when they want to get some sleep?
@johngarrison4228 Жыл бұрын
Where do I get a sub brief shirt?
@randywise5241 Жыл бұрын
Not sure I would want to go in a sub that has made in China on it.
@JohnSmith-eu3ql Жыл бұрын
Is this re-upped??
@zeroxzt Жыл бұрын
Anyone know if he’s done a brief on the Russian Hotel class? Really interested in the HENS, but I’m having issues finding reliable information on the Hotels.
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
I"ve not done the Hotel class yet.
@zeroxzt Жыл бұрын
@@SubBrief Understood, thank you for your time and for replying sir!
@jacobsparry8525 Жыл бұрын
Police sirens are 100 decibels so that thing must really be noisy!
@felixpellerin7741 10 ай бұрын
Mon: we have delta IV at home
@BenShepley Жыл бұрын
for the algorithm
@thelemming54 Жыл бұрын
What is considered quiet vs 120 dB that this beast generates?
@2WhiskeySour Жыл бұрын
it's quite quiet🙃
@raysun5889 Жыл бұрын
Is Type098 a thing?
@Daryl465 Жыл бұрын
The ccp won't like you telling every one about there sub's
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
oh no... :-)
@chraffis Жыл бұрын
At least he'll hear them coming if they come looking for him! 💥📣📣📣
@corvuscorax8459 Жыл бұрын
@@SubBrief *social credit score decreases by 500 points*
@jtough7499 Жыл бұрын
@@chraffis Hahaha that is top notch humor there...
@idolhanz9842 Жыл бұрын
Send it to Davey Jones locker...
@py439 Жыл бұрын
YU-3 torpedo? "Yu" is pinyin for the word translated as "fish". See what they did there?!
@1roadrage1 Жыл бұрын
Like a dr seus poem. one fish two fish three fish BOOM
@paddlingfool8116 Жыл бұрын
Are you sure about the noise figure? 120 db is REALLY loud!!! If One is working In an working space with sound exceeding 80db, hearing protection is mandatory. At 120db I think the crew cannot hear to think straight!??
@Saberjet1950 Жыл бұрын
Most of the noise comes from the propeller and it's only really an issue at the back of the boat.
@johnxina2849 Жыл бұрын
Why there is 2 reactors? Instead of bigger just 1.
@NorthForkFisherman Жыл бұрын
Redundancy in the case of systems that aren't 100% dependable.
@noth606 Жыл бұрын
quite is one thing, quiet is another.. 13:00
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
good catch.
@davidtetard5781 Жыл бұрын
I don't get my head around the difference in speed submerged and on the surface. Submerged has to displace more water that is more viscous than air. So intuitively, I was expecting it to be slower submerged. Why is it that it is always faster in modern submarines? Someone educate me please.
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
modern submarine design has less drag submerged.
@over9000andback Жыл бұрын
Subs are built with a bow that reduces skin drag underwater, this bow causes higher wave drag above water. Cavitation risk is much higher. Finally some subs have asymmetrical yaw steering when above water so they have to be more careful. Mind you I am not a sub expert, I just googled this.
@stevepirie8130 Жыл бұрын
The old WW1 and 2 era subs were designed to travel far surfaced and were awful designs for submerged speed so we’re opposite to modern hills.
@lucasart328 Жыл бұрын
Interesting
@ericvimeney2241 Жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir for your very relevant video. It's big business. Hope that some nations subs would track them at sea. Si vis pacem parabellum. Peace on earth. Submariner forever. Very respectfuly
@2WhiskeySour Жыл бұрын
120 Db is quite quiet 🦓
@JRock3091 Жыл бұрын
The United States is 50 years ahead in naval technology.
@jimbe01 Жыл бұрын
Um, 11:11 - Should be Thirty thousand SHP, not Three thousand.🤔
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
i probably mis-spoke. It happens on my recordings.
@marechalsaintcyr7946 Жыл бұрын
How do we say: Comrade - in Mandarin 😀
@LifeofCharles Жыл бұрын
Tong zhi in pinyin, more like “tong jer” but the o in tong is an upward tone that doesn’t quite have an English equivalent
@marechalsaintcyr7946 Жыл бұрын
@@LifeofCharles Many thanks 👍 now I see why I couldn't find it. I was looking for a single word!
@Syndr1 Жыл бұрын
Hi Sub, i guess i could cheat and just re-watch a Rustkie sub video 📹.
@etkjnasepiltn Жыл бұрын
Can ROKN new KSS-III track this thing?
@1roadrage1 Жыл бұрын
Yes. It requires sonar oil but yes they can.
@stupidburp Жыл бұрын
Yes, easily but getting close to them could be problematic depending on where they are operating. If they are in the Yellow Sea West of Dalian then the ROK sub would have to pass through waters patrolled by the DPRK and the PLA underwater, on the surface, and in the air.
@ruiwenchai5654 9 ай бұрын
@@stupidburpActually, Yellow Sea and East China Sea are too shallow to operate subs.
@UpNfamish2 4 ай бұрын
Exactly what parts of China's Type 094A SSBN were assited by Russia's Rubin? Assisting a foregin country to design a SSBN, like helping them to design a sybmarine nuclear reactor, is tentament to suicide.
@Knubbers24_Ryan_Van_Riper Жыл бұрын
Sub Brief! 🤘⚓🔱
@Ironpancakemoose Жыл бұрын
Chinese weaponry information is EXTREMLY restrictive compared to US weaponry and even Russian/Soviet weaponry.
@meskalin64 Жыл бұрын
Blubb blugg, blobbedly blobb?
@misteranderson3104 Жыл бұрын
Damn ads!
@jmd1743 Жыл бұрын
If Mainland China were to be invaded like we did to Iraq then would they mess around with conventional war or would they jump straight to WMDs?
@hughmungus2760 Жыл бұрын
I can't immagine anyone attempting a land invasion of china in the modern era. Just too many people and too much industrial power.
@jmd1743 Жыл бұрын
@@hughmungus2760 I hear the plan is to blockade China and starve potentially millions of their people to death. I've never heard of plans of actually putting soldiers on main land china though.
@Zhujac Жыл бұрын
Russian help build nuclear submarines lol. Mao asked for help but Russian refused.China got inspired by a unclear submarine mock-up toy from USA
@PatrickBatefan Жыл бұрын
Do a video on indian SSBN Sub noise level
@behroozkhaleghirad Жыл бұрын
As far as I know (I might be terrible wrong), submarines are much more complex than normal surface warships. China's surface fleet (the ships themselves, not sure about the weapons) are considerable threat to US and its allies in Pacific and maybe Indian oceans in future, but their submarine force has a loooong way to catch up, if they do catch up. Good thing is that Russia is not a naive ally of China or a desperate country anymore, and they are not gonna help the Chinese (their certain future rivals) with state of the art technology anymore.
@conzmoleman Жыл бұрын
China is not a threat to anyone. They do however need to be prepared to defend themselves from the USA. You know - the nation that has 80 overseas bases, has invaded countless nations unprovoked since WW2, and constantly patrols the water and air bordering China? That one? I don’t see Chinese jets and subs patrolling our coastline. Why? Because they are not a threat. And you’d have to be both insane and insanely brainwashed to actually consider them a threat, instead of the other way around.
@behroozkhaleghirad Жыл бұрын
@@conzmoleman I'm Iranian. I know very well what America has done. If you're Chinese, you must thank US because they helped you when your government went to war with Soviet Union. US gave you all sorts of technology, industrial assistance and support. Meanwhile my country's democracy and freedom has been robbed by US coups and sanctions.
@uschurch 11 ай бұрын
@@behroozkhaleghiradyour countrys freedom has been robbed by the fascist shia clergy. The US has no patience for bloodthirsty Muslim extremists. Rightly so.
@uschurch 11 ай бұрын
Russia is completely depending on China now with its disastrous war against Ukraine. They will give China almost all of their mediocre tech in exchange for a few repurposed washing machine chips for rocket production.
@churblefurbles Жыл бұрын
csis lol oh no.
@Yusuf13100 Жыл бұрын
It‘s so amazing how far the Chinese are falling behind in the submarinetechnologie compared to the American Ohio-Class or Los Angeles Class…
@tumultuoustenets1228 Жыл бұрын
That's what they want you to think... lol
@Yusuf13100 Жыл бұрын
@@tumultuoustenets1228 I‘m not so sure, about that. When a sonar officer a.d of an SSN tells us that it was extremely hard to find good sources and that this seems to be near to the truth, I‘d believe it more, than the idea that China has achieved to trick us all and step up to the technological state the US needed decades. In all ends, we see the Problems in the Chinese military The quality is not on the level as the US.
@joelau2383 Жыл бұрын
I am not saying this video is all wrong but China is definitely not stupid and they surely know they must make their submarine quiet enough to survive. So it is either some internet information are wrong or they have a certain operation mode to make it very silent under water while they wait for the doomsday. P.s. China has already officially said 039A/B/C, 093A/G and 094A are all false internet naming variants. China only officially name them modified 039, modified 093 and modified 094, because each batch of submarine is modified from earlier submarine batch, and there are no pennant number on their submarines. Therefore others can only recognise their new submarine of the same class when there is visual change or significant noise signature difference.
@whiteshark450 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, of course. America has way more experience when it comes to submarines. Especially after they took in nazi warcriminals and stole german technology.
@bradz9413 Жыл бұрын
What? Falling behind!? Classic American complacency!!
@jefferyr.powell5214 Жыл бұрын
to me it looks like a delta 3 maby a delta 4 design stolen from the ussr.
@joebullwinkle5099 10 ай бұрын
For the most part, I still feel that the whole Chinese military is little more than a pumped up effigy of a credible military force. Communist propaganda should not be underestimated in its effectiveness to intimidate Western observers who are used to a more realistic picture of the World due to a still for the most part a free press. The one area of the Chinese military effort that I feel is enormously underestimated is their ability to essentially steal any secret that they wish to, this is where the Chinese have shown again and again to the complete bafflement of Western intelligence how they can obtain the plans and maybe even physical specimens it appears of anything they want. Western militaries should be aware that most likely the Chinese have decrypted any and all Western signal intelligence communications. A new approach is required that takes into account this inability to shield state secrets from the Chinese!
@tomw86 Жыл бұрын
First!
@SubBrief Жыл бұрын
I want you to add that to your resume. That would be great.
@dont259 Жыл бұрын
"It's not great." - Something that can be said for 100% of Chinese products.
@worthymartin4008 Жыл бұрын
bet you dimes to dollars the israelis sold on the mk48 like they did so much else
@Saberjet1950 Жыл бұрын
I read somewhere they got their hands on a training shot in the 80s or 90s. They also have technical documents on the ADCAPs and used that in the YU-9.
@saurabhdang7307 Жыл бұрын
Chinese building ships and subs like virus
@conzmoleman Жыл бұрын
what
@1roadrage1 Жыл бұрын
he said the chinese building ships and subs like virus.
@1roadrage1 Жыл бұрын
its a reference to the location of their research facility. you can roto till the research complex with a b52 and hit both the virus lab and the marine research lab. the more you know. :heart:
@conzmoleman Жыл бұрын
@@1roadrage1 … … … …
@1roadrage1 Жыл бұрын
@conzmoleman Yes my dude?
@mdb831 Жыл бұрын
CIA and NSA too busy watching Republicans and not watching real enemies. "Sorry guys we missed that the CCP was building a SSBN!"
@craigaust3306 Жыл бұрын
Nonsense
@highbrass3749 Жыл бұрын
True.
@vincegallego2813 9 ай бұрын
china sub brief is no match to sub panty.
@stang2291 Жыл бұрын
If you would say these subs are not capable at certain level, I would not really agree. Back to the history of Chairman Mao, even till late 90s, subs development got way more attention than warships or carriers. Such a country with the technology and the capability of building modern blue water navy. They would not be happy to count on some "not so capable" balist missile sub. If they have been keep building the 094 before anyone would see the 096 in some future. There must be a good enough reason.