You've never read the Bible.

Nobody was ever forced to marry their rapist. A rapst who took a betrothed women would face capital punishment, as would the man who had an 'affair' With a willing married woman. The key is that it's not just fornication but the violation of a covenant. The single woman in Exodus 21 is not lesser, she is just not in covenant with someone, so it is left to the father's discretion to judge whether or not she's Romeo to his Juliet, or of course refuse to give her to the man if he greyped her. Because it's possible for her to want to be with him even after the fact and it's also possible that she's a harlot who needs to be passed off to a man who's legally forced to provide for her , to get her out of dad's household for the protection of his other children. It simply isn't black and white. The text in 21 is ambivalent about consent or lack of consent, and of her or the man wanting or not wanting to marry. It leaves it to the father's discretion. Nothing in the passage mandates marriage in a sweeping way for all victims. Personally i think that's because the Author thinks ALL fornication entails some degree of deception and force, so there is not a difference in quality, only degree.

Looks like they can blaspheme but i can't explain a passage, yt censors me

@@Yesica1993 oh I have it's in Deuteronomy. Maybe you should try reading it before throwing your false and pointless accusations like you know me. So many stories in the Bible that people question from a point of knowledge and wanting to understand if you can't contribute to it just keep it to yourself coz they add nothing to the conversation.

@@teeteee4065 Oh, my apologies. You have read it, but you choose to intentionally misrepresent it. Thanks for the clarification.