Love the idea of that Makeup remover/exfoliating thing. That’s another tool to add to the comic cleaning arsenal. 👍👍👍
@raymondnoah639410 ай бұрын
You're the doctor of comic book conditioning. 👍👍
@davidwarren68010 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for sharing your vast wealth of knowledge with us! Very helpful and appreciated.
@TopComicsPressing10 ай бұрын
Welcome
@jstruss19 ай бұрын
great video - so happy to have found you channel!
@TopComicsPressing9 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching
@malus91110 ай бұрын
Awesome job. Interesting product. Hmmm, might have to order some....
@RPRsChannel10 ай бұрын
*_Hm, I would have thought adding a sheet of paper behind the cover while ComicCleaning and buffing would have been a good choice._*
@TopComicsPressing10 ай бұрын
give it a try. I have not tried it.
@jimw125710 ай бұрын
I do, but it's not necessary. This shouldn't be applied heavy enough to soak through.
@davidschnebly381810 ай бұрын
Thanks for another great video.
@TopComicsPressing10 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching
@restivedesigns777110 ай бұрын
Looks better
@joechlystun79795 ай бұрын
WOW THATS GLOSSY!
@TopComicsPressing5 ай бұрын
Works great
@murrayc961510 ай бұрын
I apologize if I missed it, but did you do a dry-cleaning process first, or, does ComiQclean replace that step?
@TopComicsPressing10 ай бұрын
I dry clean first
@stevemeyer660910 ай бұрын
Safe to assume if you’re going straight to press after comiqclean there wouldn’t be any need to humidify cover? I would think there would be residual moisture left over from the cleaning.
@TopComicsPressing10 ай бұрын
I often have to wait 12-24h to get in press. So, I do my standard humidification.
@stuartmorrell63718 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for all that you do. Have you tried Immacuclean? If so, how would you compare?
@TopComicsPressing8 ай бұрын
I recommend this instead.
@sbonagofАй бұрын
I have used both and Comiq Clean is much better. Immacuclean leaves streaks and eats gloss. Comic Clean will damage gloss on Silver Age books, but works well on 1973 and later books without damaging gloss. Immacuclean does a better job of cleaning, but the loss of gloss and streaking are not worth it. Comic Clean is all I use now.
@jeffquigley99685 ай бұрын
Really interesting watch. Have you heard or experienced anything about grades being effected when comiqclean is used. Not sure how it differs from immacuclean.
@TopComicsPressing5 ай бұрын
I only use this on 1976-1995 ish comics. Have not seen any poor results in that era. It’s very dif from the other product
@jeffquigley99685 ай бұрын
@@TopComicsPressing thanks for the insight!
@jonr26910 ай бұрын
Just to get an idea, how have you damaged books with this process and would you recommend doing this on books even if they don’t have water spots just to give the gloss a better look?
@TopComicsPressing10 ай бұрын
I am a minimalist and try to not over do anything - so answer to the latter is no, I would not. To the former - don’t rub and don’t leave it on the comic before wipe
@jimw125710 ай бұрын
Joe, I hope you don't mind if I chime in here. ComiQClean isn't for every book every time. Yes, you can use it to give a book some extra oompf. I personally use it most to help with deep cleaning,