This basicaly the same as a PID controller, but without the I and the D. but not really neessary for this simple application

dunno mate as it does count change from where it is from were it was.. In this example if he put it lower in boat the tilt would be a diffrent number also arrow indicator is telling you what way tilt works so maybe 3y ago that was the case but for last 2years it is bulllshit what you wrote

@@RappelzWikiaPolska Have you checked yet?

Ohh... ! I love to build those too.... my fastes one was going 180 from the speed sensor... that is somehow the limit.... (afterburner didnt help D: )

@@Warzone151097 I've only noticed afterburners making a difference after you've maxed the speed of the engine at the throttle setting. After that, it'll give an extra, it seems like, 2~10% more speed after a straight run, but yeah. Afterburners are a little disappointing. Kind of like the wheel grip system currently in place. That needs to improve a lot as well.

Steeljaw XXI then don’t use the compact ones, use larger ones in my other tutorials

@@MrNJersey I think you read me wrong on this one. I was completely joking. I usually build things in excess. If it has an engine in it, better put 3 more just in case. If it's reaching 40 kts at it's peak, what can adding a few rockets do? I've totally used this setup on my smaller boats after you've posted it, and it certainly is less effective on larger builds. I use your weights on rail system on those. But I wasn't taking a swing at this at all. I was just joking at the ridiculousness of jet powered boats and how much "a little more throttle" can make things go so magnificen-I mean horribly wrong. . . . Half the time I'm in creative mode, I'm testing the limitations of the game. So those jet boats are more or less speed tests or even "will this work" tests. That being said, would either stabilization system work reliably at 200+ kts? I'm not questioning your systems at all, but they're meant for more realistic speeds and conditions. I'm just wondering if simply ramping up the equations in them would do the trick or adding more rudders or weights and sliders (for the interior hull rail-based Mr NJersey stabilizer) would do that as well? Got something new to test. . . Also, side note. I finally went and dove down to inspect the MRN Jersey wreckage. . . .Is there a back story they've provided or is it just named after you for your community contribution. That thing just is mangled and it looks like it has a story behind it. Again sorry if there was some kind of misunderstanding of this joke.

@@steeljawX I think you over reacted. He only responded with a little sentence, you could just put a "I was jk" xdd

no chicken

Or just use -x

@@MrNJersey or use x*-1 if you are making it for a 2nd grader

thanks for the help really needed it

Make sure to add weight in the bottom as much as possible, maybe even make a 1 or 2 layer keel of weight blocks if you can still stay afloat. This stabilizer system also helped mine

Threshold gate to only let electric go through when boat is going more then 1mps etc

Yes that could also work

@@MrNJersey Actually, it couldn't - you don't invert your pitch. Rolled my boat ower two times to figure this out

You can do it both ways, this setup is the same as I have on my jet ski and it’s the most stable one on the workshop for its size

depends on the size of the creation though

Water jets are also amazing at keeping depth in a submarine because their shells work so fast. Especially when sitting still.

Use a numerical switch box so when you’re in reverse it sends no signal

it means your boat is too light for the amount of speed you're giving it.-

Yeah sometimes it does not work but tinker with the pid controller

Endoskull have microprocessor on his Steam workshop, one of his oldest creations But it is actually very simple Input: rps,gas (numerical); key switch (bool) Output: Number(gas) boolean(engine) Key will simply switch numerical switchbox between ZERO and INPUT, so when it is ON it will simply pass gas value, otherwise send 0 to shut engine down If RPS are lower than 5 AND key is ON output signal to start engine I hope it helps :D

Jakub Pollák thank You so much for helping answer!

@@jakubpollak2067 does it work though? i have tried messing with the amount of rps to start and it never seems to work

@@redpug5042 Yes. His logic is sound. If engine is off, and key is off: 0 is supplied as throttle, No signal is sent to the starter. If engine is off(RPS below 5) and key is on: Throttle value is sent to throttle, on signal is sent to the starter. If engine RPS is above 5, and key is off: 0 is supplied to throttle, none transmitted to the starter. if engine RPS is above 5 and key is on: Throttle value is sent to throttle, but no signal is sent to the starter. The thing is, the throttle HAS to be ENOUGH to make the engine turn stable at, but preferably ABOVE 5 RPS.

Nevermind. I can see the parts you used.

@@ah-64attackhelicopter94 What blocks?

I would assume more stable because the travel time of the fins is much faster and has more impact directly on the vessel WHILE moving, which would also mean that the weight system doesn't have to do as much travel ( keeping closer to center). An advantage of mixing these is that you also have stabilization while not moving.

Have you checked out his gearbox tutorial yet?

@@aJacksonHoleguy Yeah, I understand the basics but I'm after more advanced ways to bring a land vehicle to life. The workshop vehicles have quite a polish to them that I can't seem to replicate

Did what you said and it worked perfectly! Thanks!

you just have to find the point where the submarine doesnt dive

for any large creation, i have found that a hybrid(engine and motors) works the best, the electric motors help get the initial rps up to get you going and the engine can charge the batteries, the motors also give more torque when you need it, and start/stop as fast as you need, they never stall either

Speed sensor

And if it’s in or not

But how did it turn off ? Because its not manual

Just use large control surface to make it super efficient

In having the same problem

I build them for creations I need them in and then share them with the community

MrNJersey huh, awesome!

@@ballistexx7864 You need to think like computer a.k.a. in binary :P Actually it is pretty easy, you start with simple task and then just put those simple task together, even autopilots etc. are just simple tasks together making complex system Start small, for ex. friend wanted tank controls for turret so I made him one, but I wouldn't make that just because I CAN do that but because there was a NEED for that So challenge yourself and keep practicing!