It in fact is God caught on camera. As soon as the words of consecration, “Hoc est enim Corpus Meum” is said , the host transubstantiates and becomes the body, soul, and divinity of Jesus Christ, who is God.

Hocus pocus 🤔really? ​@@MetroMania-go6gy

Educate yourself: "Hoc est Enim Corpus Meum" is Latin for "This is my body."

@@MetroMania-go6gy I know

​@@annapaulineogrady9184heretic.

Bob nagel I know after seeing what the Latin mass looks like I think so too. It’s sad many Catholic Churches are almost Protestant. They like their bands and the other day when I was at mass and our priest was preparing for Eucharist I felt like I was at a circus when they had this group having a sing along with they drums and over done singing...

@@nicolestarkoniski5674 I Prefer to say this is the truth, actually the Latin Novus Ordo Mass is same good as Latin Tridentine Mass, but peoples just breaking the Holiness of Mass, its already BEAUTIFUL but why did they BROKE it?

@Carthago Delenda Est Celebration of Eucharist

Latin novus ordo mass is just a protestant rite in latin.

Do whatever suits you. But make it clearly Roman Catholic . Historicity Roman Apostolic Church.

This is in response to one using my name asking permission for video , so my response is what suits you so long as it is Roman Latin Catholic church's benefit.

No problem.

Hi, can you help me here? I don't understand why the prayer of consecration is said in a whisper? Is that how it was done before the 16th century codifying of the Mass? Thank you, from an Anglican, who loves liturgy.

It was always done like this in the West, yes. It was done so because this is the most mysterious and Sacred part of the Holy Mass.

@@johnking5174 as an Anglican myself, I feel that the best way to explain it is because the priest (or bishop) is acting as a mediator between God and man, and speaks to God on our behalf. There's a Catholic parish near me where I attend sometimes and I've noticed one of the priests there has recently said the prayer of consecration in a lower voice than normal (though still audible). Mind you I have attended the Latin Mass a number of times simply because the reverence is so unlike what we have at my Anglican parish, even thinking of moving to another one nearby but that's a whole different matter.

@@johnking5174 I know there was a specific Pope, but I also think it was more, that would have a "curtain" brought around the altar front that blocked him, the altar, and deacons from being seen or heard during the Roman Canon. Once it was finished, the "curtain" would be removed and the Mass would continue as normal. This is to invoke the imagery of the Jewish Priests (Levitical Priests) going into the Holy of Holies in the Temple in Jerusalem to over sacrifice and prayer to God. Today, the priest is to use a whisper, because of this and because he is acting "In Persona Christi" and being the direct mediator between the people and God.

Impeach #WolodymyrZelensky

I think all the faithful, clergy and laity, need a renewal in understanding and reverence for the liturgy. New guidelines, etc. The New Latin Rite of the mass we have today is absolutely beautiful, even restoring and incorporating traditions from old and from the Eastern Catholic rites, and accommodating local Catholic traditions around the world. If it we're celebrated more reverently, we would be able to love God more fervently. And we would avoid the problems the Church had for centuries with the Tridentine mass and its culture.

@@ipso-kk3ft what problems ?

@@ipso-kk3ft sorry my brother, but I can say that is naive idea. I personally think that the idea of new mass wasn't a bad idea at all. We need vernacular too. But, the new mass we have today, unfortunately for me personally, is lack of "rigidity". Why? Because as a layman, I never see any instruction from the Holy See to celebrate it in a reverent way. What I only see are just the instructions that are not "forcing" the presbyters to celebrate it in the very-very-very-very reverent way. But correct me if I'm wrong.

@@ipso-kk3ft and yeah, same as @Brian Delaney said, what problems?

2:16 * 3:06

Orthodox is actually the faith that left Rome due to the disagreement of the authority of the Bishop of Rome... The authority of Peters chair is stated in the bible and is made very clear

@@CopperheadAirsoft No, it was Peters confession, not Peter himself. The Church fathers are clear and it's scripturally accurate. Rome is responsible and broke away from the True Faith. Orthodoxy alone contains the true Christian Faith, in its integrity and purity. The Papel Protestants have no such claim to the preconceived authority you think it does. They went behind the backs of the ecumenical patriarchs and council, they were also the first to deliver a notice of excommunication not the East. So you have inaccurate depiction of Rome, it was the confession of Faith that is the bedrock of the Church; the confession of Trust, Belief and Repentance. All of these things are encapsulated on what Christ Built the foundation of His Holy Temple. The Papal Authority was a usurpation and complete act of arrogance and is not consistent with the first thousand years and some of Christianity. With Love In Christ, forgive me a sinner.

@@abrahamthepoor3633 The Ecumenical councils state that the Church of Rome is free from error based on the promise of our lord Jesus

Return to what Orthodox faith? Brother, don't you see that your church is fragmented into autocephalous temples with clear differences from each other? Unity, brotherhood, fraternity, are in Rome. The church that was not divided into various factions, within which there are no theological differences, nor egos. The Romans knew how to accept the primacy that Jesus left to Peter and his successors, and before that they were obedient out of love for the church and for Christ.

@@archievolunteerThe unity or brotherhood of the Church has always been a wish, not a reality. It’s like the unity of a nation, a family or any congregation of human being: an ideological slogan. 1 + 1 never makes 1. There are agreements; but partial, only, and temporary.

I do. Is that a problem?

Hello there, are you eastern orthodox?

@@anyaforger8409 i'm late antique historian

the Roman Rite is the trentine mass Council of Trent

@@paxdomini9714 the Roman rite was born in the IV a.c. and it wasn't the tridentine... It has iconostasios for example. Then they were changes, the tridentine was one of these changes and the one made by the pope Giovani XXIII the last one. Tridentine mass just has five centuries.

the roman rite never had an iconostasis. iconostasis was a development from the original curtains which surrounded the basilica altar. the curtain was replaced by a rood screen in the 7th and 8th century which later was decorated with icons in the late medieval era byzantine rite in 10th century. this development never happened in the western church. only in england and north scandinavia they had rood screens in many churches. and the roman rite is the same from tridentine to at least early medieval era under pope Gregory I in its prayer structure exept for the agnus dei which was added by the syrian pope sergius I in the late 7th century. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i7qDfZp91sCwiYU.html like this is the medieval mass in sweden and its the same as the tridentine mass.