Lmao, it’s the Finnegan and Andre Johnson fight with college uniforms photoshopped 😂

​@@Jasmine-jl9kb It's so funny man. This channel does that a lot, one of their other thumbnails was the Kazee hit on Pittman but photoshopped.

He said “ S my C” 😂

lol I was thinking the exact same

"College Football"🤣🤣

"Mostly Bad Targeting Ejections."

Spearing, more like.

Lmaooo the ref wasn’t having it.

Stop complaining

@@Kings0424 buddy obviously its not just me complaining. No one wants to see the conference that has only won the natty like 3 times in the past 25 years😂

Especially in college where there are 100+ guys on the sideline. Who even notices when there's an ejection?

What a GREAT idea! So cool!

It's only 5 minutes though, right?

@@Bsquaredplus2 In soccer and rugby, a red card is out for the whole game. Yellow cards in rugby send someone to a 10 minute penalty box (sin bin).

Jesus loves everyone ❤

That's likely why there are multiple guidelines that dictate what constitutes a targeting penalty and how severe the penalty is. Ultimately, though, the original call is a judgment call (which is why prospective targeting calls get automatically reviewed)...and then the call can either be confirmed (leading to deciding which penalty to assess) or overturned (which still could end up as a basic penalty). Most of these calls are made before the player is considered "not defenseless," though...which people will continue to argue incessantly. This compilation actually has a targeting call made when the offensive player would be considered "not defenseless," actually...the Tennessee vs. Carolina clip where the Tennessee player comes through the middle of the pack and Emmanwori (#21) lowers his head to contact the facemask of the Tennessee player. I'm sure that whoever ends up reviewing the targeting calls (if I'm not mistaken, it's coming down from a more central location where top officials look at the play from multiple angles) takes all the actions of players into account (offensive player lowering their head, a player slipping, etc.) and yields their judgment from there...the refs are just the messengers in that instance.

Ong I heard that 2

nah i heard it i started busting out laughing 😭😭

Fr😂😂

It’s football regardless

My problem is the judgment calls needed to determine a personal foul vs a targeting call and the inevitable impact on the game. Given the role of judgment in making these calls, two officiating crews could have significant different views of what constitutes targeting, making it difficult for players to know the rules too. For example, a defensive player lowering their head before a hit could be seen as targeting while an offensive player doing the same is fine. Couple that with the player being ejected and you could have a call that massively affects the game that is solely based on the view of the officiating crew with rules that are very difficult to understand given the differences in enforcement. I am all for increasing the safety of the game, but I think they went a bit far with targeting.

The fight was in the NFL, but those aren't their NFL jerseys...I figure it's to show that the teams they're wearing have a rivalry similar to the one between the two NFL players (say that The Rock and Steve Austin once came out wearing Red Sox/Yankees gear (with their names on the back)).

Jesus loves everyone

No it wasn't

spent like five minutes in these comments tryna find someone else who heard that💀

I think the CTE has affected your thinking a bit too much. Saying something wouldn't be a penalty 15 years ago is not even an argument. That makes no damn sense at all

@@fizzmoe9846 it’s my argument: it wasn’t a rule, it’s a stupid rule, so why have the rule. My guy it sounds like you’re the band geek who’s mad someone played enough sports to have cte. The dude with the tuba in the stands in high school and college, yeah him. The guy who keeps a grudge for no reason.

​@@saltycanadian6190 Lol no. I played football for 9 years. Started on defensive line in high school. It was fun. I'm glad I did it, but I'm also very lucky not to have gotten injured in any serious way. Ad hominem attacks are not an argument either, btw. Especially when they're not true. Then you start to look like a fool with no composure. It's not at all a stupid rule. When American Football started, they wore tiny leather helmets. Do you think it's stupid to wear the ones we do now? Let's just wear no helmets. You sound far more bitter than I do which makes sense because CTE disproportionately affects the frontal lobe of the brain. The area responsible for emotional regulation and logical thinking. You can spit anger the rest of your life about 'back in my day!' or you can grow up, recognize that the way it was wasn't correct because we have new information, and change your mind. A real man can change his mind. Only weak men hold on so tightly

He was wrenching an opponent's leg himself...but what drew the foul was the second kick. The first one almost fully freed him from the situation (he scooted back a bit), so the second kick was unnecessary.

Primary point of contact was the crown of the helmet to the chin of the facemask at almost the same time as the arm/hand contact. When the timing is that close, the officials tend to err on the side of caution for player safety. He still was likely to get a roughing penalty anyway for going to the head with the arm (had he driven the shoulder to the body, it would've been unlikely to draw any call).

Whistle was blown well before the hit. Not clean. That's DQ even before targeting became a thing

@@fizzmoe9846 head on a swivel. Anybody can catch a body shot

@@1111170287 Head on a swivel between the whistles, not after. Stop victim blaming.

@@1111170287 After the Whistle, so its late. You dont hit people after the whistle simple enough.

Myles Garrett was just trying to put Mason Rudolph's helmet back on🤣🤣

I'm not sure I see him "trying to take the helmet"...#54's hand does go near #10's helmet during the hit and just before the "punch" (admittedly, it is a weak shot, but throwing punches is gonna get you tossed) but I feel as though #54 said something that #10 took offense with and he tried to get away with a cheap shot.

They take it on a case-by-case basis. Take a look at the Tennessee vs. Carolina clip where Emmanwori (Carolina #21) blocks #88 on Tennessee...the Tennessee player does lower his head some (and he's not considered defenseless), but Emmanwori still would've made helmet contact on the hit (which is why Emmanwori drew the foul...had he not lowered his head, the play would've ended there and he'd still have been in the game). Say a running back lowers his head and doesn't try to avoid the contact with the opposing player's helmet/actively tries to provoke a targeting call...I could see some sort of unsportsmanlike call being levied at the running back (are there "enticement" penalties in football anyway?).

That's clearly targeting

@@Kings0424 The one with Kentucky was shoulder to shoulder. The only flag there was he hit him when the returner called fair catch. The one with Miami and Texas A&M is closer, but with what vantage point that was given, it looks like it was plain shoulder to shoulder contact. It would be nice if the one with Miami and Texas A&M showed different vantage points so we could really see if it was targeting or not.

Not in that clip...but earlier in the game (if I recall), a penalty was called on the opposing team because Julius actually did flop; I guess they just wanted to make sure they deserved the penalty the next time (and to give a message to Penn State/Joey Julius: "We know what you're up to.").

Yes, but if you hit a "defenseless reciever" anywhere above the shoelaces the stripey-shirt team will call targeting. You have to let the offensive player make a "football move", which is very poorly defined. But, the refs also have trouble figuring out when a pass is actually caught versus incomplete. Ciach: "He tucked the ball under his arm, ran 27 yards, broke two tackles, then dropped the ball, and that's an incomplete pass to you?" Ref: "Yes. He didn't use his turn signal when changing lanes." Coach: "Wha???"

The dude got his leg stuck you casual

1. He was wrenching an opposing player's leg himself, but let go when the player was down. 2. He had freed himself with the first push (notice that he scooted back a bit)...the second kick was what was drew the foul (it's similar to Suh drawing the foul for stomping on an opponent...they didn't call the pushing just prior, but got the extra shot).

Depends on the severity. Some targeting does need to end in disqualification. Like that one hit in the video that the tackler just launched with his helmet. That should be done away with because no way is that a football move.

A glancing blow to the temple (stunning) or a swipe across the eyes (blinding) can cause someone to "flop" from a hit that seems weak.

It's a sport not a war. These kids have lives to live in the future. CTE is very real. Your want for violence falls on deaf ears. Grow up

@@fizzmoe9846 It's a physical sport, it should be kept as physical as it originally was. "these kids" are adults who know what theyre getting into. CTE is a risk that they accepted as a possibility. Football was created as a violent sport, and obviously people loved it. i dont need to grow up, im not the one babyproofing a sport.

@@DancePeripheryDance Neither am I, but these people didn't just start playing, you know? People start contact football as early as 2nd grade for some, 3rd for most. They're taught to go all out and sacrifice the body for the good of the team. You can't remove the context from the entire picture. That's not fair. Do 3rd graders have the capacity to consent? If not, then these people are operating on principles and ideologies they had no idea about and now it's their entire life. Are you also trying to say that people wouldn't choose differently if they had foresight of the outcome? When they turn 58 years old and start to have severe cognitive decline, will they be glad that at least they played 'real' football? Or will that suddenly not matter anymore?

Welcome to youtube. People make bs thumbnails as click bait to get more views

3:13 Regardless, the quarterback was down by contact with the field and the play was finished...there was no reason to throw the hit.

@@Alsebra yea

He was a great kicker who flopped in response to a cheap shot.

If I remember other parts of the game, he flopped on an earlier play (or it's based on his reputation for doing so in other games) and got the foul called against the opposing team...they made sure to deserve the foul the second time.

He did flop. He was known for it when he played. Most teams will just do a light formality block on a kicker if at all. On the first kick or two of a game he would act just like a normal kicker and then on the next one he'd intentionally try and blow up the guy blocking him as hard as possible, often right as the play is finishing. Then when he'd actually get blocked like someone attempting to tackle he'd flop to the ground and try and draw a flag. The fact that this was not the only incident during his time, and far from it, of someone just leveling him shows that.

They actually are

Yeah traumatic brain injury proves you’re a ReAL MaN

Two different terms. "Disqualification" allows you to stay with your team on the sidelines; "ejection" is gone from the field completely.

Jesus died for us

@@Babylion2311 Nope. We're not that important. Your egotistical and narcissistic for thinking so. Or too stupid to question the way you were raised.