Jayoma if your on death row

gonna note it down incase isekai is real and been transferred to marvel universe

Phoenix Wright if the detective is incompetent.

I'd kinda like to see him with a guilty client. Representing a client doesn't always mean getting them out of a charge. Sometimes it means presenting evidence of guilt in the best manner possible to reduce a sentence.

​@@sinisternorimakiOr if the Prosecution is cheating or the witness has supernatural powers

Well at least not in the context of this issue of the law, but given this is the SHRA days, the entire time Spider-Man is there he should have been dodging cops and bailiffs left and right. That said I think the general compromise in both Marvel and DC is that so long as they don't get involved in actual wars and aren't wanted for any crimes beyond assault and B&E, superheroes are just free to slap around Gods, aliens, and goofballs in costumes all day.

@@johnsayles8032 The whole Marvel Civil War storyline explored the consequences of trying to actually restrict superheroes to much more serious levels. Marvel did look at that.

@@nctpti2073 well it's a give and take on how the stupid amount of power these individuals hold should be dealt with while being an allegory for government reach into civilian lives with real world policies like The Patriot Act. And to be fair trying to police such people is better than just bowing down and hoping whichever living weapon of mass destruction wins the fist fight is friendly even after toppling a few buildings.

@@johnsayles8032 There is a legitimate debate there. The problem is that there is no easy way to simply disarm them, at least not without outright incapacitating or killing them.

@@nctpti2073 not just that, but I know that if I were just born with the ability to crush cars with my mind but just work selling real estate in Idaho, I know I would have some feelings about being tagged and drafted to get into a fist fight with Mephisto. Feels a bit unfair.

It’s definitely a more interesting way of handling this case then the other one were Spider-Man has to settle do to the guy going after Peter Parker. In this case we get to see how just because someone wore a Spider-Man costume doesn’t mean Spider-Man is the one responsible.

It's crazy how he's so loved in-universe and out of it but the writers give him like literally one timeline worth of happiness. I hate people making characters suffer excessively for "plot" or "development." You've made your point. He's lost it all, a hundred times over, give him a break. Given they did a comic where Miles was tortured by Assessor and then Iron Man fucked him up, they're likely going to keep up the trend with him. Really sucks.

That's why he's called your "friendly" neighborhood Spiderman.

Did we watch the same Netflix daredevil series?

@@MCLSD_ The Netflix daredevil series where he was constantly missing court dates and having to be covered for by Foggy, despite that being something that Matt could be sanctioned or even disbarred for?

@@nctpti2073actually true. But when he was in court they showed him as untouchable. He was just never there 💀💀

@@MCLSD_ I have never lost a case as a lawyer, either. Of course I am not, nor have I ever been a lawyer, let alone represented anyone in court, but I am undefeated lol

​@@nctpti2073 He was missing court dates because he was busy literally saving people

Well, that’s sort of the whole point. Innocent until proven guilty

hell of a lawyer

And because they cannot prove it was Vin Diesel at that scene and at that time, unmasking him is unconstitutional and a violation of privacy. I expect Vin Diesel would demand a few million dollars as damages

*10 Spider Men enter the courtroom* Matt: I'm not racist these people really do look all alike

Not until he covers how tf did sukuna live through that one guy's DE

Couple of billionaires owe him a solid, Reed whatever and some bald guy in a wheelchair.

@@johnsayles8032 "Reed whatever", "some bald guy in a wheelchair" *I'M WHEEZING*

Spider-Man got that homie discount

true, Spider-man dont have money, but a lot of rich people owes him big favors

In the 90s animated series, they did a similar story. But the plotwist in the end it was Mr Jameson, who paid for Mr Murdoch to represent Peter Parker. He just wanted to keep it a secret because he didn't want to think that Mr Jameson like Peter.

I agree

Matt Murdock: I am a really good lawyer.

Yes. No way home was such a dumb plot.

But his identity is still out because in the beginning he made it obvious that he is peter parker

​​@@erikfigueroa6390back watch it again

Robin: 👁👄👁

The only issue narrative wise is there's only one Death Stroke.

@@unusualusername8847There’s only one Deathstroke however the court couldn’t prove that is was actually Slade who was in the suit and not just some other guy whose wearing it to frame him.

Night Crawler on top (Left to Right) 3:15 Ronin aka Clint Barton Patriot aka Elijah Bradley = has super soldier serum Araña/Spider-Girl aka Anya Corazon = has spider man's powers Black Cat aka Felicia Hardy Iron Fist aka Danny Rand Shang-Chi I'm sorry if this comes off a bit blunt, but I just wanted to respond to this comment to share the names of everyone at that timestamp.

@@argenticle thanks for the update and the info.

Despite writers liking to write other heroes either scoff or be anoyed at Peter in the comics every hero genrally has a good opinion on the Web Head (especially fellow street lvl heroes) because all he does is save people every single day. No agenda, no drama and no backup just every day jumping into the fire to make the world better and safer.

I think it just means they need to prove who it was at the scene of the crime, if they caught him and arrested him at the crime scene, they would have evidence that the masked man at the scene was guilty and be able to unmask him legally, obviously catching Spider-Man would be another thing entirely but not more so then any other super villain and would just require a sufficiently strong hero to aid law enforcement.

@@lemming3001 That makes sense :) What I'm worried about is what identifying features about Spider Man vs. other people would indicate that it's him. In the comic it looks super fakeable😂. It's so difficult, because either the cops have to risk being wrong by assuming, or Spider-Man is almost free from accoubtability by just being moderately difficult to identify.

@@BorganBorgan don’t forget clones exist

@@vincentlucario5450 Holy shit you're right! And other dimensions! And Venom! And mind control!

@@BorganBorgan I’m pretty sure blind superheroes also exists, but don’t quote me on that.

Diplomatic immunity. Just like Doctor Doom.

@@DarthEquus No, he does not have Diplomatic Immunity. Diplomatic Immunity applies to diplomats, their families, and certain staff members. Furthermore, diplomatic immunity is revokable/waivable by the nation that sent the diplomat. Black Panther is the head of state. As such, he enjoys the much more robust sovereign immunity. Sovereign Immunity cannot be waived or revoked.

It actually happened in the comics version of Civil War In the comics, Civil War was about whether or not heroes should be forced to tell the government their secret identity. Since Spidey was on Ironman's side, he publicly revealed his identity to show support This resulted in Kingpin sending an assassin to kill him, but missing and killing Aunt May, instead. Spiderman had to make a deal with the demon Mephisto to make it so he never revealed his identity and bring Aunt May back. MCU seriously watered down the Marvel Civil War Also, while we're at it, in the comics every time Spiderman reveals to Jonah that he's Peter Parker, Jonah changes his tune and becomes an ally.

@@PyroGothNerd still it doesn’t make up for the slander Jonah has done. Also i feel as though heroes should have a right to their secret identity. It protects those who they care about. They expose their identity, villains will use it against them. Something people don’t understand or want to understand.

Hmmm. Depending if that room was filmed, they could work it out. Also none of them could speak leading to the court compelling the other Spider-Men to speak to see if it matches the voice of the Spider-Man on trial. As they are in a criminal case, refusing to comply to find the actual Spider-Man could be I’m sure some legal issue. Also Spider-Man would never want to be still in the courts bad graces as hems been tolerated, but not accepted in the eyes of the law.

Just reply with "He already is. I'm not actually sure who this one is."

his point is requiring spider man to unmask here is irrelevant because that doesn't prove the man wearing the spiderman costume at the crime was this one. The only thing that was supposed to prove was that spider man doesn't need to unmask

Because it would incriminate them of whatever crimes come with vigilantism?

@@goggles8691 There weren't any specifics given, but I'd imagine that would be part of the logic.

No. She-Hulk specialises in Civil Litigation while Matt Murdock specialises in Legal Defense.

He literally named the court case that set the right bud, thats a real thing

​​@@rjframe4410ourt cases have been known to state things that arent actually in the consitution. *cough* Roe v Wade *cough* Section 1 All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Section 2 Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State. Section 3 No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. Section 4 The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. Section 5 The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Tell me, where do you find the right to privacy in this? Because i cant see it anywhere

@@Vaultyboi22 Go get a legal degree and argue your position in court. Until then, Roe vs Wade is not the only court decision that has upheld a right to privacy.

@@VividBoricua never said roe v wade was. Can you read? I gave roe v wade as an example of court cases being wrong, not that it was the only case to ever talk about the mysterious invisible ink "right of privacy"

@@Vaultyboi22 you bring up Roe in this fucking fallacy, you better be ready and willing to go tell soldiers who signed up to die for this nation they dont have the right to bodily autonomy. I'll give you a hint. Alabama just lost the US Space Force Command HQ and untold billions in economic activity because Oh Fucking Wait Yes The Fuck You Do. have a seat, guy.

KKKKKKKKKK do nada

Web shooters, since Spidey has to stay in a lockup and he was being targeted by some of the inmates. Spidey lost his spider-sense at this time

Araña/Spider-Girl aka Anya Corazon. She is Spider-Man's protege. Her powers is similar to Spidey but hers is more magical than science, since the God of Spiders Anansi blessed her with those powers

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h66SgZmftsydqoE.htmlsi=I_9j9VKB3A0Fj835&t=192 It shows them in the video.

It wasn't a multiverse thing, if I saw the image correctly. Matt Murdock simply got several superheroes with similar builds and / or powers to Spidey into identical Spider-Man costumes. They didn't *all* need Spider-Man's full set of powers, mind you, each one just needed to be capable of doing one similar thing to Spider-Man on their own. Nightcrawler, for example was one of the friends - and aside from his demonic appearance and teleportation, he's a trained circus acrobat capable of swinging from ropes and lines quite easily. Iron Fist was there, and he has great physical strength on par with Spider-Man's. Then there's Araña in there, that girl in the spider t-shirt, whom I just learned about in this comment section. Apparently she was collateral damage in a turf war between two insect-spirit worshipping clans, the Spider Society vs the Sisterhood of the Wasp, and one of the Spider shamans gave her a magical tattoo of Anansi, the African spider trickster god, and with it, powers similar to Spider-Man.

Why? Spidey is an old lefty. He hates guns, hates wars, supports the LGBTQ, supports civil rights, supports universal healthcare, supports immigrants and regularly donates to charity