The .50 cal sound for ak630 and the 76.2mm Auto canon is worse to me

Nah, that sounded like a sig to me.

😂 So misleading.

the flag was not NZ, we only have 4 stars

@@zeromii3234 im Australian i dont need to Google it... i have one in my shed.

@@zeromii3234 Pretty sure we know what our flag looks like champ, and it doesn't have red stars on it.

No way, lose those guns and put in a jacuzzi .

@@emanym is it too much to ask for both

Hey brussel639, If you get one let me know. I'll bring some beer and we will go fishing. Plus if I can shoot your guns...I'll buy you dinner. 😶🤗

It is a sexy booger.

Once the US gets the railguns or some other high-tech weaponry on the three Zumwalts, those things are going to be deadly. The Arleigh-Burke flight 3A is another thing to look at

@@aintnobodycare6193 we canceled the rail guns, too high maintenance.

@@spartangoku7610 boo

You are truly a hero. So glad you pointed this out instead of just watching the video like everyone else, equally as stunning as brave.

'Yeah. I cringed too.

What is New Zealand?

Anything you say, Mr. C[ur]S[e]words

Welcome to the marine nationale

Designed to protect their fishing boats while plundering post Brexit UK waters.

My thought exactly.

@@alfredneuman6488 blame your politicians

The looks is probably the only thing that works.

@@jassimaltoki3580 They don't plunder the waters where I live

Or simply a photo of the USS Cole with a giant bomb hole in its hull... what, too soon ? :-D

So true it looks the coolest and i like how it's complement is as well as such diverse capabilities but I also like the one from Germany,

i don't know much about the design, but i can say that is not getting built. CMN isn't in a good financial state at all, and nobody ordrered a C SWORD 90 since 2014. I have doubts, maybe an african country bought some for anti piracy purposes, but i can't find any trace of it on the internet. CMN is eating dust right now, and i'm pretty sure the C sword 90 doesn't belong on the list with the others, while it does look cool.

Technically the dutchman is a frigate, so send a destroyer and its done for

@andy zhang thats a movie, the flying dutchman was a legend for hundreds of years before the movie

@@sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 One small Dutch sub sank a US carrier, a cruiser, two destroyers and 3 frigates in one training mission (JTFEX / TMDI99). I'm sure the flying dutchie could deal with a random destroyer.

@andy zhang Djeee, you actually believe in fairytal...oh wait, nvm!

@@janvanvroonhoven3278 dude, that sub was swedish and was able to do what it did because it was old. Anyway the flying dutchman isn't actually dutch, davy Jones was scottish

You mean vazal states because the US has no real friends any more....

@@Triggernlfrl Yes. That, unfortunately.

It looks awesome but there are no orders for it and it is doubtfull that shipyard could built them. It probably will stay as a mere cool render.

And the multiverse??? 😀

Wait for UK ships, the MOD's favourite phrase is "fitted for but not with"

@@tomsmith2209 i heard that the new air carriers were almost defenceless. Did they get rid of some AA defence?

Once built type 26 will be the best war vessel in the world. For now that place is occupied by the type 055.

Hahaha, I bet Argentinians would say otherwise.

Yep, i second that thought. The idea that you can fit that thing with different mission modules,store the ones you not currently need and upgrade them with the newest tech, makes them the most versatile, cost efficient and in the long run, the ones that can be upgraded with the lowest cost to current standards.

The German is extremely underpowered... 0vls !? Check out the South Korean Sejong the great class. It's roughly the same price at 900M and it's a proper multirole platform.

@@jbmpr If memory serves me right, the Korean ship is a missile destroyer. That's not exactly multirole. The MKS is a replacement for the Brandenburg class, it's main function is ASW. And it does have an MK41 VLS that quad packs 64 ESSM. I believe, the Sejong fits twice that number of some US made interceptors.

​@@jbmpr There is a dilemma today in every military forces: multirole x specialization. Its almost like JoKenPo hand game. I am trying to be easy to understand. Therefore the issue is not the money but the philosophy of each Military Forces.

He accidentally said 84, but the ship only has 48 aft tubes. More in the front than in the back,

@Glenn Bolger No time for retakes, let alone reloads - 48

i'll assume you're just being sarcastic lol.

@@chriswhited Mmmm.... a little bit. I suspect my cat could do better film editing.

@@agwhitaker then we agree.......not sure what they were thinking past just being lazy.

Translation: French ships are the best, long live France

@@pxilant5031 American ships are the best best. But we're always ready to help out France! 🇺🇲🇫🇷

Wow I hate patriotic people stop being proud of something you never helped in creating my god

@@pxilant5031 Maybe you just have nothing to be proud of. What's this about not helping to create America? I'm an American. Nobody else does the job.

Sim!

multiply by 1.60934

@@andyman8630 thank you!

wait, why, what? 150 sailors is 150 sailors

150 sea men

They have smaller speed boats that can go 45 mph and fire missiles and heavy machine gun fire. These smaller speed boats are armored and one could take out dozens of speed boats. The larger ships also are able to fire massive amounts of heavy gun fire. So it is highly doubtful that a 100 enemy small boats would ever get within range to even fire one missile.

@@flfl3969 howabout submarines? are they still a thing or are those systems too powerful detecting and destroying subs in modern battlefield?

@@effexon Submarines are by far the most deadly instrument of war in existence with the possible exception of stealth bombers. To counter this threat, carrier groups are escorted by submarines. The destroyers in the escorts also are very good and destroying enemy submarines. The sensors and various radars that carrier groups use detect threats several hundred miles away. It is very difficult for an enemy to get close enough to attack an aircraft carrier. The greatest threat are new, ultra long range missiles that are said to have a range of over 800 miles. However, these missiles are at best in development and have not been used successfully in battle. It takes multiple coordinated guidance systems to guide a missile accurately that far away.

It sends the warship because of the resources and personel it carries

warship, battleships are a retired ship class

Battleships are unfortunately gone 😔

Old.... if you notice, he say they are talking about the newest ships, that are on the drawing bord.... on side note, a single submarine like for example, the Norwegian Ula class, can easily take out Kirov.... but then Ula class was build for that, to make havoc in a fleet. Kirov's only advantage is it's size... so it can carry many weapons, it is a mobile fortress build to protect home waters with the ability to launch many missiles in a short period of time.... that size is also it biggest weakens.... The reason Kirov class and the other Russian cruisers was build big, was due to Russian (Soviet) missiles during cold war wasn't as good as western missile that could be compact. so to compensate for that, Soviet Navy build ships like the Kirov that could carry enough missiles to overrun a defense system and at least a few of those missile would get trough... But then US-Navy developed Aegis combat system with the SPY-1 radar, that have the capability to detect and track multiple targets (in the hundreds+++), and suddenly Kirov advantage was gone. There is a reason Royal Norwegian Navy use an light version of SPY-1 radar on the frigate's.... for that reason, when you have a small frigate that can detect all your 100+ missile and can engage them all within 10 seconds + - ..... suddenly a big ship like Kirov is ...pointless, and the same frigate can deploy advance stealth anti ship missile in form of NSM/JSM.... and at there are no Navy that have defense against it. When size kills you! There is a reason Russia si building only corvettes and frigates now. And are planing a future Cruiser/destroyer to replace there aging cruiser and destroyers and one day Kirov class!

In navys they tend to use imperial more often than metric

SDS Olympus Mons SWSC-1 Not in the rest of world navies where they have been using metric since the 20th century.

@@grnm2719 well, in terms of weapon diameter atleast

SDS Olympus Mons SWSC-1 I’m a fan of naval vessels civilian and military lots of navies used metric for armaments and vessels dimensions. Only the US navy used the imperial measurement sir. Get your facts right.

Type 45: 4.5inch mk8 USS Arleigh burke: 5inch Mark45 Hms vanguard: BL 15 inch gun KMS Bismark:15in SK C/34 USS zumwalt: 6inch advanced gun system Kms Scharnhorst: 11inch sk c/34 These are the official names for the weapons, notice how they're all in imperial?

Are you guys not the same.

@@Beniamin6665 Ha, ha.

Saab is very much hated in NS they screwed alot of ppls lives when they closed shop and left so I guess ppl should hate GM here too ... Go FORD LOL

Saab still has a role in military development they just quit making cars it was a piss hole

Not the same company.... They split somewhere in the 90s.....

Exactly

Our Swedish army and general is awesome!

Hehe

Decommissioned!

They arent launched yet. The ship class you are talking about is the f125

“Anti aircraft” *shows images of WWII Japanese aircraft being downed*

yes too many basic errors get it right and do your research

no we can have the best social protection system in the world a good standard of living and be able to have the 6th army in the world 😉😉

Just a bit... There were 1st world war battleships that could outrun that

@@davidandmartinealbon3155 Dreadnought could've

nowadays you don't need speed, we have missiles for that, unless the ship is build for carrier escort. In the old days, you need speed, so you could catch up with you'r enemy and get your guns in range

@@davidandmartinealbon3155 Actually no. No line of Battle Battleships of WW1 could exceed 26 kts. A few mid/late war 1 Battle crusiers could near enough but not dreadnought/Battleships.

@@caseylimbert266 Dreadnought had a maximum speed of 21 knots