Don't disrespect sbs

@@paulda4615 This is advice abut a podcast...not sure what you're talking about.

@@snakeeyes007 lmfao ikr

dont disrespect the pizza parlah

Exactly the same selection both do same Ops , one does diving (SBS) they both parachute.

The UK special forces go through the same training and selection process (the hardest in the world), then if out of about 200 individuals who start the only around 8-10% pass. Then, they are branched off into different regiments such as SAS, SBS.... also the UK has the The Royal Gurkha Rifles, not to be tangled with at any cost! Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw ("Sam the brave") chief of staff of the Indian army once said "If a man says he is not afraid of dying, he is either lying or he is a Gurkha." ...

Imagine thinking these stupid pissing matches prove anything. Each unit is setup for their own specific purposes - no one is "competing" against each other.

Absolute nonsense. There is essentially no difference between these dudes except American SOF have higher budgets and therefore better equipment. American SOF have the highest number of HVTs killed/captured, and for the past 20 years it has been American SOF units that have taken down the nr 1 terrorist HVTs in the world, not British ones.

Your tiny island nation has less money, a smaller and less diverse recruiting pool, and less combat experience. Shut up, American SOF blows UKSF out of the water everyday of the week

It’s actually Special Bus Service

Bell end

Not at all. Completely different lineages. Converging evolution, Shrek didn't mispeak.

Back in the day they were separate units, but now they've been amalgamated into a single entity Now you all do selection as a whole, then choose to specialise after acceptance

@@theophrastusbombastus1359 Yeah it makes sense to have both specialists in their own right. Both doing the initial selection stops the " we're better" nonsense. Had a Sgt in my Battery who was ex 29 Commando & he told me his brother was SBS. Was a good bloke.

The main selection itself (6 months) is done together. After that the SAS get badged and join their units whilst the SBS do another 2-3 months of amphibious, diving training.

" ex para reg " ...who cares knobber

Robert Nairac disagrees with you

@@apintofbeer1667 it’s what it says when I look it up

I simply have to disagree. The fact of the matter is that American Special Forces have shown that they are the best in the world. American SF have killed more high value targets than the British, New Zealanders, and the Australians combined. Also, take into account that the Americans have rescued more hostages than the aforementioned countries combined. The fact of the matter is that American SF are the best in the world. FACT.

@@markfullbrighton5070 its not what ive been shown when I’ve searched. Where did you look? Everywhere i look it shows sas one of the best if not the best. And they’ve been around since ww2 and have much more experience

@@giannister No disrespect but please tell me that you don't get paid for your input because you would have starved to death. Secondly, your research has been piss poor. The fact of the matter is that the internet is a terribly unreliable source for information. Lastly, sure the SAS have been around longer than American SF, but that is simply not an objection to anything that I have said. The fact of the matter is that American SF have killed more HVT's and rescued more hostages than many countries combined. In my view, this classifies American SF as the best in the world.

No. The SAS are far above Delta and the SBS are way about Dev Group.

@@CMOT101 LOL, no.

@@johanlassen6448 bless, I know yanks think they are the best at everything but the truth is most NATO forces think Yanks are a joke. My Aussie mate got back from deployment and couldn't slag off the yanks enough for how dumb and useless they were. Aussies kept telling them to put out their cigerettes and the yanks refused " because they were Americans" and of course they constantly gave their positions away. My brother was a Para and he couldn't stand being deployed near yanks. He said there was far more chance of being killed by yank friendly fire than by the enemy. SAS and SBS look down on Yank "special" forces because they are 'special alright' Truth is, if NATO or the Yank military want an impossible mission doing, they don't send Delta. They ask for the SAS.

@@CMOT101 Except that literally never happened.

@@johanlassen6448 it all did. Yanks are utter shit. You've only got numbers going for you.

They KNOW they are

Did they steal your 🐟

Duncan Falconer explained it well. Pre GWOT, SBS was always looked down upon by SAS. They didn’t have a chance to prove themselves, they didn’t receive nearly the same amount of funding. Now however that doesn’t matter, the SBS are as good at the SAS and even better at maritime ops

@@rp4712 SAS has its own amphibious squadron which is great but SBS will win in that department.

@@boxerwayne6660 I know, boat troop

God there's something wrong with the Americans on these KZfaq comment sections regarding SF, they're deluded and so fucked up 😂

Id put money on he doesn't 😉

It's so damn annoying, randos wanting to ride coattails of their country's special forces, as if these units are all competing against each other like a sports league or something.

Seals probably on the same level as royal marines

US Navy Seals are only the 3rd best in the US, the SBS and SAS has never proven to be better than the US Delta Force and US DEVGRU

@@TomGodson95 no Royal Marines are like equal to US Marine Recon and Royal Marine Commandos are like US MARSOC, even the standard Navy Seals are far above that but still not as good as SAS or SBS, Navy Seals are only the 3rd best in the US and the SAS and SBS havent proven to be better than US Delta Force and US DEVGRU

@@UserName-om6ft you all sound like a 14 year old in a " my dad is tougher then your dad fight".. it's pathetic.

@@RANDO4743 try crying more kid

LOL American JSOC has rescued more more hostages in the past 2 decades then Uk, Aussie, NZ and Canada SF (combined)

Thats Russian special forces.

Please don't embarrass yourself again. I would actually say Delta Force and ST6 are superior to the SAS. If you look at which units have taken out more high value targets in the last couple of decades, Delta Force and ST6 are miles ahead. In fact, it was either Delta or ST6 that rescued a bunch of British hostages and David Cameron actually thanked them, so stay in your lane boys.

thats hilarious, in 2015 the Delta Force conducted the biggest hostage rescue near Hawija in Iraq where the Delta Force rescued 70 hostages, where is the SAS with these kinds of numbers? in operation Abalone in 2003 the US Delta Force and British SAS were sent to four compounds in Ramadi to search for a Sudanese jihadist, the Delta Force effectively cleared their two compounds without any issues, however the SAS failed in their last building as they suffered several casualties in which the US Delta Force had to come in and clear the compounds themselves due to SAS failures

@@UserName-om6ft US: joke. They label a force AFTER they've made the acronym up, SWAT, DELTA FORCE. And our forces ALWAYS know where Yanks are; behind, and a bigger risk than the enemy in front. Standing joke. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

never happened, and SAS and SBS arent better than Delta or DEVGRU

@@UserName-om6ft they most certainly are. The whole SF ideal is built from the SAS and SBS. Ask 90% of US SF that served with UKSF and they’ll tell you how good they are.

@@Danaddison1 not even close, your own SAS commanders admit that the US Delta Force is better, SAS and SBS has never proven to be better than Delta or DEVGRU

@@UserName-om6ft There can never be a direct comparison, but UKSF selection is known to be tougher then the American. I mean, US seal selection/training is equivalent to British Marine basic training etc. And I’d like to see where SBS and SAS commanders said Delta are better.

​@@Danaddison1 how is seal training equal to British marine training? i havent heard something so brainIess in my entire life, even US MARSOC and US Marine Recon has longer and harder trainings than Royal Marines, let alone the Seals even your own SAS commander Lieutenant Colonel Richard Williams prefers the Delta over his own SAS soldiers, and i quote directly "A common thread runs throughout Task Force Black that makes it difficult not to come away with the impression that the units’ relationship has since evolved. Today they seem to exist almost like siblings, with Delta - backed by the enormous might and budget of the United States military machine (and JSOC in particular) - playing big brother to the SAS’s little brother. Besides merely wanting in on some of Delta’s action, the SAS’s commanding officer at the time, Lt. Col. Richard Williams, openly admired General McChrystal and was described as an unabashed Americanophile, SAS Commander Lt. Col. Richard Williams stated he would have preferred to have commanded Delta than his own men. He constantly challenged Task Force Black (mockingly referred to as “Task Force Slack” prior to their JSOC integration) to match the pace and intensity of the Americans. And when the SAS was at its most lethal, Urban described it as “operating in the style of Delta.” The units’ assaulters even began to look more and more alike. The SAS is described as transitioning to the practice of wearing their sidearms on the front of their body armor in a similar fashion to the Americans rather than in leg holsters as they typically had previously while also adopting the same Crye Precision MultiCam camouflage gear that was popular with Delta operators - some even complete with Stars and Stripes-adorned ‘Fuck al-Qaeda’ patches even SAS admits that Delta is better "we the SAS have been surpassed by the Delta as the best special forces on the planet" even your own British journalist Mark Urban covers the entire subject

DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANG

Please don't embarrass yourself again. I would actually say Delta Force and ST6 are superior to the SAS. If you look at which units have taken out more high value targets in the last couple of decades, Delta Force and ST6 are miles ahead. In fact, it was either Delta or ST6 that rescued a bunch of British hostages and David Cameron actually thanked them, so stay in your lane boys.

@@markfullbrighton5070yeah right 😂 the SAS have been actively involved in every war to date. Every USSF will tell you that the brits SF are better, Wether they like to admit it or not!

@@markfullbrighton5070and i would like to just remind you that the SBS had osama bin laden in there sights and could have taken him out but high command wouldn’t allow it because the Americans wanted to be the one’s who took him out 😂😂 crying like big baby’s they are lol American military has got nothing on UK military man for man, just more money but money doesn’t buy experience something that the US lacks 😂😂😂😂

@@robocop3961 No disrespect, but you are not very informed on the matter, are you? Firstly, I acknowledge that the British SAS and SBS have been around longer, but in my view, they have been surpassed by American Special Forces. In the recent decades, American Special Forces have taken out more high value targets and hostage rescues than the British and Australians combined. Secondly, even some of your own soldiers have acknowledged that the SAS has been surpassed by Delta Force. Lastly, there was a British officer that worked with American Special Forces, and he said the Americans were so good that he wished he was in command of them rather than his own British unit.

@@markfullbrighton5070 as you say ‘in your view’ 😁👍🏼