Sums it up 😂

His boss, Witchard: FETCH ME THEIR SOULS

Felt like a Nvidia promo 😬

@@mikemuponda1781 You meant to say" Summons it up"

@@duncanself5111 i read nvidia porn

“Wow look at that!” “I’m a little busy circle strafing at 63mph!”

haha funny

well you can always play the original DOOM at 2000fps

@@krizby87 Lol, you CAN NOT. Original doom vsync synchronized to 320x200 70Hz runs on halved 35 fps/ticks, and most source ports also. Only much higher level reworks allows to run any fps, and sprites will be on orinal framerate sure.

@@TheDrQuake DOOM Eternal can run at 1000fps with you lower the settings enough LMAO

yes :-) both the first and third game

@@Busman142 ...and the third

Without a doubt. I wish Arkham Knight would get the RT treatment also. That rain, the neon lights, the shadows...

@@ramonandrajo6348 Back under your bridge.

@@ramonandrajo6348 ?

Of course, it's a linear corridor shooter.

@@Aggrofool hurr durr

Doesn't it even run well on the switch?

Well yeah, idtech does great stuff. We know this.

xDD another dumb kid who thinks frames are everything

That's funny.... Must have a flash mop

They shine the floors and walls the very essence of RBG

They don't have to clean em if there's no dirt or bacteria and shit that exists in the place lol

I guess if they can do intergalactic travel , room cleaning is not a problem for at least couple of thousand years

Ima say robots. We have them and can barely get to the moon.

They're simply the best in the business when it comes to optimisation and squeezing every last drop of possible performance out of any system.

@@fafski1199 I admire developers like id, Insomniac, even Capcom, who produce their own internal engines, embrace all recent graphics tech, and generally offer very nice image quality and performance in results.

Especially when you compare the Series X price to the cost of a mediocre RT capable GPU.

I was just playing on my Series X too, although I gotta say I prefer running at 120fps

I'm playing it on the PS5 and can't agree more amazing that we're getting very good Raytracing on these new consoles so early into their life! Not having to have the faff of going through getting an expensive pc! Love the 120fps too! The haptic are very well implemented, Plus this on an OLED is amazing!

ID have always been good with engines

Same with doom 2016, I have a 5 year old Dell laptop with a trash graphics card and run that on ultra 110fps I was blown away

Decals. Lots and lots of decals.

Hmm, how does a present day corridor shooter outperform all present day open world games? You're basically comparing apples with oranges. It's like asking why Mario Kart 8 can be a smooth 60fps, while Breath of the Wild chugs along often below 30fps.

Yep, they're simply the best in the business when it comes to optimisation and squeezing every last drop of possible performance, out of any system.

Yeah, only spelled wrong :P

@@dildojizzbaggins6969 Maybe you want to look that up before correcting.

Pin this!

Since you said choice, ill assume you just have a console. Better luck next year.

Lol

@@Featheon W⚓️👍🏻

@@Featheon Current consoles are better than most gaming PCs on the market tho. And I say this as a PC player lol

@@Featheon I feel like you were trying to make a point here, it's just such a bad point I have absolutely no idea what it is that you thought you were saying.

Some of it is that Doom's levels are much smaller than the open world games we're comparing to it. But it is nice not to have to worry about settings on the game.

@@DSP_Visuals Yeah when you break it down DOOM Eternal is a series of arenas with corridors in between. Probably easier to get running well than, say, No Man's Sky. That said, some of those arenas are impressively big. The Gore Nest level has a gigantic one.

@@DSP_Visuals much smaller, but also much more detailled. I agree though.

@@DSP_Visuals Yea it's also a completely static environment for the most part. No desctruction, physics, dynamic weather, open world, 100 player/AI on screen, etc. Very simple in comparson, but still runs and looks beautiful.

@@bearpuns5910 Completely agreed. Although No Man's Sky runs pretty dang good nowadays too. With all of the optimization and graphics patches they've done

@Pards S just downloaded it for my ps5 2nd playthrough it is:D

even on my laptop with a 1650, which i have overclocked, i get a near solid 90fps with high/ultra settings... gonna try the texture pool trick as i only hve 4gb

You mean they just made every surface unreasonably glossy and ruined the aesthetic of the game.

@@imadecoy. No, the game looks better with RT & if you don't like them, you don't have to turn them on.

@@nonyabusiness6084 You can play hall of mirrors if that's what you like. I'll just play DOOM.

that when it took it personally

How much does one of those things cost?

i think he meant when it comes to raytracing the 2060 is at the lower end of the power spectrum.

@@kpag3030 my gf bought hers for 300, but that was more than a year ago

Don't be, he was talking RT GPUs.....

That's exactly what they're doing.

As I understand it (barely), in most FPS games the weapon a player hold is rendered completely outside the game world (or something). So it's not really there to be reflected... or something.

It is a completely different model. If they can synchronize the position and animation, then our brain will accept it. However, seeing the different position and animation breaks the illusion and just looks awkward.

Most FPS games including Doom Eternal have what's call a Floating Limb model. It's pair of high detail arms and legs positioned below the camera to give the player a reference to where their body is but it's a completely independent from the character model that's being used in reflections, cut scenes or what another player would see in PVP. You find some videos where they move the camera away from the character and you can see a gigantic pair of limbs with no torso or head moving around.

@@fcukugimmeausername Yeah, something like that. Usually in a separate depth range, so it will never clip through anything in the "real" world, no matter how close get to walls and stuff. It essentially breaks perspective, but is still less distracting that way.

Exactly. Your flat out getting a low end GPU for the cost of a series x in Australia 🇦🇺

Should've went with XSS or Disk edition mate.

@@K.R.X nah I would take a PS5 digital over a xss any day. I would take a xsx over a digital PS5 but ultimately I would take a regular PS5.

@@rockettbuggey5990 You're wrong mate. You're ending up paying way more than you'd have ever paid if you went with XSX. I can explain if you want❤️.

@@K.R.X it turns out people have preferences and are competent enough to know what their individual value levels are.

this I need answers

Af?

Because the tech is dated and under powered at launch

@@frankthecat1660 anisotropic filtering

@@floatinggoose9197 how are they underpowered?? their equivalent hardware is WAY better than what most PC players have

The number of people who have just learned to point out things like trained chimps playing where's waldo without understanding what is going on is too high. He's literally talking about VRS on the Xbox. VRS makes the image softer. That's how it works. It's not rocket science. Of course the PS5 without VRS is sharper.

@@krazyfrog that's why there are monkeys making fun of vrr not available on ps5

@@krazyfrog The only *"chimps"* were the one's who hyped up VRS without knowing what it was like a bunch of morons screaming FULL RDNA 2.0

and because almost noone understand ppi pixel density... the fact 4k 24 inch monitors exist. ppl have 50 inch 1080p still and that is the equivalent of 4 50 inch tvs at 4k for the same ppi... so dont ever buy into 8k has being even slightly worth it, its the tv market trying no to die

@@simlife445 Yeah, even gaming 4k on a 27 / 32 inch monitor is very pointless to me. 3840x1600p on my 38" ultrawide is a fantastic ppi ratio and I don't think I'll ever need to go any higher.

@@MrMrTravman my ps5 is hooked up to a 32" 4k hdr 400 monitor and I think it look pretty good. Switching between performance and quality mode i definitely notice a difference in clarity

@@MegaLPlover Most PS5 games dont display 4k. And thats my point. At 1800p or whatever it looks great. 4K is overkill on smaller screens... Look up the definition of PPI

@@simlife445 I think the people who buy 50 inch 1080p TV's just want a bigger tv and don't know anything about Pixel Density

This is that entire debate about VRAM on GPUs in a nutshell. Are there games out there that can use close to 10GB of VRAM when you examine them in task manager? Yeah, sure. But do those games really _need_ that 10GB of VRAM? Not really. This isn't 2010 anymore, VRAM simply isn't the end-all be-all it once was.

@@KillahMate Precisely, games are streaming textures these days as/when they need them, and you don't need huge memory pools. I have no idea why they more than doubled the texture pool over what is needed it just creates these stupid debates where people say you need to turn down settings for a specific piece of hardware to run the game, but it has zero impact to the visuals as was shown in this video.

The difference between high and ultra on my 3070 is the difference between ultra smooth or stuttery mess. Thanks for the info.

@@KillahMate spot the dudes who own $2000 nvidia vide cards with 8gb ram lol. this game looks old old old, and already cant fit in 10GB. And he specifically points out it DOES make a difference, as it will not load in the high quality textures sometimes without. It may not be a big difference, but nothing on PC is. Hell RAYTRACING isn't a big difference if we're honest. I'm sorry you paid Nvidia for clunker cards again bro. But you know you'll be glad to pay $3000 in a few months again to get an acceptable framebuffer size from nvidia this time. my PHONE has 12GB RAM, I purchased it for 700 in 2018.

@@Frosty-oj6hw huh? the framebuffer has to fit the HQ texures. They cant be "streamed as needed" at all. All you do realize you SSD has 2 GB/s if lucky, and you're card has 800 GB/s for a reason right? or you want to run 1 fps to stream new textures each frame? where do nvidia fanboys come up with this stuff... you paid 2000 for a nvidia card with 6-8 gb, i get it. just pay them 3000 again to get the right size. also dont try to run highest settings even on this old old old looking game, your card cannot hack it. turn the settings down. your card is weak. turn settings down. and wait till stuff like halo infinite comes along lol, good luck with your 8gb nvidia.

I always find this weird too. They probably look at it like they know people tend to sit much further back when playing consoles so any nip and tuck that can be made without seemingly changing things to make games look too poor is fine. I mean, we notice this stuff because Alex is zooming in super far anyway. At normal tv viewing distance, those low quality textures, especially at those weird oblique angles, won't have much of a difference than the higher settings and it might give an extra frame or two during gameplay.

I think it has something to do with the RAM and VRAM being shared memory and it makes AF more expensive, or at least it used to.

On a DF article speaking to Marco Thrush, CTO and owner of Bluepoint Games - "The amount of AF [anisotropic filtering] has a big impact on memory throughput," Thrush says. "On PCs, lots of memory bandwidth is usually available because it's fully isolated to the graphics card. On consoles with shared memory architecture, that isn't quite the case, but the benefits you get from having shared memory architecture far outweigh the drawbacks." (I copied this comment from another thread, original commenter - Scarlet Villain)

I have a feeling the AF is actually a carry over from last gen builds.

consoles are non-numa, unlike PC which are numa, which just means separate banks of memory, its has benefits, one being bandwidth is not shared so even AF16X is not a problem for even a 1050ti, but consoles can't do it cause of shared bandwidth(even some first party games)..

RT on pc is all about dlss at the moment, pc cards have a really bad time to maintain framerate with normal RT unless you have a monster gpu, since Series X and PS5 have an amd gpu they will have to wait for the dlss version of amd but I think for a 400/500$ box they are doing incredibly well without dlss at the moment.

We need to approach things cleverly instead of throwing raw GPU power and DLSS is the exact thing we need. Makes 1080p look better than 1440p and less artifacts.

Yeah, DLSS is becoming and increasingly integral part of not just getting "Raytracing" into your game, but making it a substantial enough part of your render pipeline that the game's visuals are improved drastically while saving performance.

This seems more of a case of really bad optimization on console as it is not just the resolution but rather stuff like low AF that makes the textures look blurry. It also doesn't use any temporal reconstruction method which games like Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart uses to reconstruct 4K image from much lower resolution while looking insanely good.

@@RicochetForce DLSS will never go anywhere if it's just confined to NVIDIA RTX cards which only a small percentage of gamers have. Right now NVIDIA are paying these developers to add DLSS support when we need such solutions to grow organically and be easy to implement to have wider adoption.

And maintains a solid 30 fps to boot. All I play is Nightmare on PC; I've made it to Taras Nabbad on Switch and am only now considering lowering the difficulty to Ultra Violence ~ unlike DOOM (2016), the only reason I consider this is because playing with a controller is *rough* at and after the Taras Nabbad Slayer Gate, but before then it's surprisingly doable. I would fucking love to play on my Switch with a mouse and keyboard and see just how much it can handle, haha!

Switchcraft

@@furry_homunculus To me the visuals in the Switch look just passible. To be fair though playing the game you fly through stuff so fast you'll never notice what you're missing. But man did I double take when DF showed a forklift on Switch vs PC. On Switch I would have never guessed it was a forklift, it looked like a pile of scrap as it literally was just a mound of colors.

The Switch version looks and runs great. I can play Doom wherever I want. As far as controllers go, I honestly have no issues with controllers as opposed to mouse and keyboard. I prefer controllers because they are more comfortable for me. 🤷‍♂️

@@RevinSOR13 to me the Switch version is the last way I would consider playing a shooter. Nintendo's joystick on the Switch are way too small with very little granular control. I like their pro controller but their joycons are god awful. I like the feel of the controllers in the hands but I can say that those joysticks are definitely the least accurate of the modern consoles. Doom I feel does more fit KBM not for comfort but just for the custom layouts and the fact a mouse is both granular and able to flick at the same time while on a controller you have to be much more careful to do such. It definitely is more necessary on Doom on the higher difficulty settings where you need to literally master the gunplay and get a keen grip of your awareness. For me, in general I do prefer a controller to a KBM for comfort as well, but some games are naturally intense or have really spastic controls so KBM tend to be better in that situation. More often though I switch to KBM if a game has lousy sensitivity like Cyberpunk 2077 where you either get granular and slow or fast but inaccurate. Feel it has to do with games that don't allow you to mess with the turning delay or camera acceleration. On KBM zero acceleration feels perfectly 1:1, on a controller, it feels really jarring. But yes, as a whole I use controllers over KBM. Hell I'm much better with gyros and a controller than a KBM. My control scheme of choice. Shame most games still don't use it, and on PC while normally you could now that games are locking you to KBM or controller you can't in those either. Sucks as it feels so good.

Keeps up with with my native 165 Hz too! 1440p. This game has always been amazingly optimized. It already looked stunning, but RTX really puts a cherry on top.

@@Prizrak-hv6qk same, it's insane

I am glad because I have an RTX 3080 as well and a nice OLED display

Well, I can't physically get 4k 120 hz because my tv does not support it, all I can do is 1440p 120 hz, and 3080 is enough to cover it, but I simply prefer 4k with game mode on, it is first game I enabled it for, but still no need for more than 60 fps.

And the blood of Romero's firstborn son probably lol

Black magic was definitly used to get it running on Switch.

is 2060 a very low end Gpu now?

@@insatiateire4784 it's the lowest tier of RTX series but that doesn't make it a 'very low end gpu'

Out of context, Alex is talking RT GPUs.

@@TheT0nedude okay context police.

Forgot Playground

The Coalition, 4A Games, GSC Game World as well

ART, Amazing Ray Tracing

@@Pyroclasm1338 👍😂

Games are art

Technically it is..lowest end available gpu that has Ray tracing capabilities. I suppose some people still think the 1060 / 480 is "mid range"

The RTX 2060 is the extremely low end for ray-tracing. There's no card below it with RT capabilities.

Yeah that statement while factually correct but overall… silly

that's Alex Battaglia for you, he is an elitist

@@cayo3351 I guess. But RT in general is high end to me.

For real, I made a video showcasing it on my channel. I say that because when I posted it on Nvidia subreddit, a "Discord Moderator" of /r/Nvidia removed it without even notifying me (shadowban on the thread) and I can only assume it's for self-promotion, except I just wanted to spread the word and I don't run ads or anything, I don't run a youtube channel, I just uploaded a video... That's it. Jesus. It's hard to let people know about these tweaks.

It was tough to get people onboard at the start but with good work the results are starting to speak for themselves. And now the future of graphics is looking to be fantastic

@@goob8945 DLSS is really making all the difference for me.

@@Volker_A4 good for you

DLSS is the reason RT inclusion isn't as taxing as it used to be...

@@goob8945 it was hard to get people onboard because the only GPUs that supported it in the beginning were underpowered AF (or at least for realtime raytracing), so the only graphical changes devs could make were adding some pointless perfect reflections here and there like in a 90s CGI cause it's the easiest thing to compute. But now the hardware is getting better and AMD also supports it, so it's going to get more and more advanced and complex as time goes on

yep,... every time combat started I ended up switching to 120fps,... after the fight,... back to Raytracing to look at the pretties lol

Exactly. All the minuscule differences Alex pointed between consoles and PC are completely unnoticeable 90% of the time unless you stop to do an in-depth analysis like he did

@@alexsilva28 I hope that makes you feel better about your console lacking behind an rtx 2070. PC has 120fps and ray tracing thanks to dlss something you'll never see

@@theanimerapper6351 dlss? Lol amd is implementing there own version as well which Xbox is getting too,

Also console have a much longer lifespan than pc, try playing a game like red dead redemption 2 with a setup from 2013 or 2015 like Xbox and ps4 can.

I think it's something to do with how consoles share memory, so maybe a bandwidth limitation

On a DF article speaking to Marco Thrush, CTO and owner of Bluepoint Games - "The amount of AF [anisotropic filtering] has a big impact on memory throughput," Thrush says. "On PCs, lots of memory bandwidth is usually available because it's fully isolated to the graphics card. On consoles with shared memory architecture, that isn't quite the case, but the benefits you get from having shared memory architecture far outweigh the drawbacks."

AF is one of those settings that I always manually change to 16X in every game possible because it is so noticeable compared to other settings.

Console memory bandwidth is a bottleneck

@@MediaBrad but doesn't the Xbox Series X/S use a split pool memory system. On the X it's 10 GB for graphics and 6 GB for everything else?

As cool as RT can look from a technical perspective, in a sense it looks pretty weird because metal is never that polished. Everything looks like it has Vaseline on it, and IMO reflections look especially weird when there is no RT-GI. It makes it look like the reflections don't belong when the GI doesn't match. I think games should always prioritize RT-GI over RT reflections.

Same here, I like the look of Ray tracing, but if the game is super fast paced, that super high framerate takes main priority

on pc you can have both; 120 with RT

@@heikoguckes5693 yes, PC is always Better. But you have to Pay twice the price and only to have a rtx 2060 lol

FPS > RT

I think game devs do it cause most people play on consoles with their TVs and sit far away. Its a minimal performance benefit but also something that's hard to notice on even big 4k TVs when you're sitting far away.

It's actually bandwidth heavy when it comes to APUs. Unfortunately

@@nighttimestalker huh, that's interesting. I've always used a dGPU and couldn't even measure a difference with a GTX960M (GTX 750Ti performance). 🙃

@@MLWJ1993 It's still odd yeah. They could at least do 8x. More and more games are doing decent with filtering and Xbox even forced 16x on all back compat games

Consoles have a unified pool of memory that's fast (especially in the new generation of consoles) but not quite _that_ fast - the issue is that the VRAM in PC GPUs is dedicated to texture data and the memory controllers are completely optimized for texture access in a way that makes 16x anisotropic filtering only a moderate load. On the other hand since consoles don't really have VRAM, but instead use a generalized version of VRAM with memory controllers that need to access that memory both in bulk (for the GPU) and granularly (for the CPU), 16x AF represents a real load on the memory bus - a bus that could probably be better used for something else at that moment.

Yes the waiting part is important. I was also having issues initially until I realized it takes some time to sort itself out after changing the texture pool size and then it runs fine.

Similar issue I found in Mechwarrior 5

Thank you 👍

Yes, he is!

he's only zooming in that much because he is trying to focus the camera on what he is talking about and it makes it easier to see on youtube and if you are on a phone watching it

@Lov Mir you said a load of nothing in that whole paragraph. And regardless of what you say to try to make yourself feel better, gpus are actually pretty future-proofed and are better than what a console gives you. A PS5 or Xbox GPU is already outdated compared to a 3080

@@cynthiaandoh9575 they're way better than your gtx 1060 though.

@@GraveUypo Don't have a 1060. That's just the average for a person on Steam, since most people don't care about 4K. But doesn't change the fact that, if you're willing to pay, you can still have a way superior experience than to a console.

@@GraveUypo it doesn't really matter what you think though. Yes, a $500 series X or PS5 will be better than a $500 pc. But it doesn't change the fact that if you're serious about your hobby and invest some money into a PC, it will factually be better than the PS5 and Xbox. No reason to be snarky, just facts. It's not PC players fault that AMD and Nvidia putting out hardware that you can custom choose to put in your PC that's way more powerful than the series X and PS5 already. It's not anything new. The same happened with Xbox One and PS4. By the time they released in 2013, you could still build a PC at that point which was still more powerful than the PS4 Pro. And it isn't going to change anytime soon. Yeah, it's expensive for a Ryzen 7 and a 20 or 30 series card. But guess what, you at least have the option to choose based off the graphics and performance you care about.

If nvidia is able to make dlss run on low power chips they should abuse the fuck out if it and integrate it into their mx lineup of cards which runs at 10w and 25w and are mostly in ultrabooks to render integrated gpu completely obsolete

@@GemayelDaniel Thats on Nintendo for dumbing down the switch its is essentially a sh**ty Nvidia shield

@@KyleScene what no no, i am not talking about how nintendo could not put a better cooling in the switch and therefore had unded up underclocking the shit out of the tegra x1. Am talking about nvidia not having any of their low powered chips family that support dlss yet. Their current lineup of low powered chips are the tegra and the MX. If they actually end up adding dlss to those, it would open up a whole new market for them (nvidia) in the ultrabooks and mobile devices area to sell them in

@@GemayelDaniel i gotcha homie

Ehh, Nintendo tends to lowball the FUCK out of their hardware meanwhile DLSS requires tensor cores, and a decent amount of them at that. Furthermore, the lower native resolution is, the worse DLSS is. It's not magic after all.

same! tried to go back to playing PS4 at 30 FPS... it was a bit rough :D

@@LeoStep93 Doom eternal ran at 60fps on last gen or did you mean another game?

@@Tyranniod yeah, tried different game that runs at 30 (fallen order)

Once in a while RT helps in combat when I see an enemy or a projectile in reflection.

I just stick with the 120fps mode on Series X

@@yeruschmift8422 it really doesn't lol, you should have spatial awareness to know where important enemies are in the first place, a freaking reflection is not going to save you if you position yourself wrong or let a cacodemon roam around for too long.

@@steel5897 you can't deny RT brings in greater awareness. One example of how RT genuinely helped is when I saw a demon out of sight enter staggered state through a reflection after I fired a grenade.

There's downtime between combat encounters, which is when I like to peep at the reflections

So true

Ok not a fair comparison my dude. Cyberpunk is open world and is a lot more comlplex too when talking about the world that is.

lol to this man 👍👌😂😂😂 (Same here)

7%! Look at mister smarty pants over here

@@iplaygamesnude-5683 Hahaha 👍😂

Haha, beat you, understood 9% of the video, had to overclock my cerebral clock speed tho.

@@batnigga2862 lol 👍😂

Alex wears 400% glasses. Because it’s the only time you notice half of what he talks about

Well I play games on a monitor and I definitely see the drop in picture quality.

There is the same amount of pixels on a TV & monitor. However, they are far larger on 70' TV than on a 27' monitor. Plus, you really aren't that much further away (4 to 5 feet more). You actually notice a worse image more on a TV, than on a monitor.

@@V1CT1MIZED The zooms are meant more for those people watching the video in lower resolutions. For example a comparison between two systems at 4K, will look almost exactly the same, if you are watching the video on a 1440p/1080p TV/Monitor or 720p Smart Phone. Even if one was substantially worse than the other. For obvious reasons, you cannot view a 4K image, in all it's glory on a 720p Smart Phone. It would be missing hell a lot of pixel data to be able to tell any differance. So, the only way you can really show them any difference, is too zoom in on both the images.

@@lordobamaridingaunicornwhi7684 Exactly. I can instantly notice the difference in any game, even dropping from Ultra to Very High. Ultra to Medium is usually a world apart.

Sure, but you have to pay for that quality and performance. I could buy a PS5, Series X, a Switch and some games for the price of a PC that can outperform nextgen consoles. I think for the price of consoles you're getting excellent performance and value. I mean you can't even begin to build a PC for $399 that can match a PS5 Digital. The graphics card alone would cost you $399 and that's if you find it for MSRP.

@@03chrisv the cost of consoles are hidden first off they loose hundreds on each console and while you pay more for games you pay to play online you pay you pay you pay the console makers nickel and dime you in the long run you would be surprised how much you really pay on console they ain't loosing hundreds on each console without knowing dam well they can make up for it

@@WASD-MVME That's a tired old argument that doesn't hold any water. Console games can be bought during sales or second hand, not to mention PC games cost just as much as console games when they first come out, like RE Village for example. Paying for online isn't that much ($60 a year for PS Plus) and they regularly include free games. I've downloaded so many free games from PS Plus that it more than made up for the small yearly fee. Also free to play games don't require an online subscription. PC gaming is simply more expensive, there's no sense arguing that it isn't. If you want to say PC gaming offers the best technology and versatility that's fine, but you can't also go around and say that it's cheaper in the long run or offers better value. That's you trying to have your cake and eat it too.

@@03chrisv you pay for it through the games, that's why the Consoles are cheap. PC games are typically significantly cheaper.

@@Saif0412 PC games are not typically way cheaper. All new games are usually the same price as console versions. Maybe you can find deals on Steam or the Epic store after a game has been out for a while but the same holds true for console games, especially if you prefer physical copies many retailers will sell games at discount or you can buy games used for a good price. This narrative of PC games being way cheaper is just misinformation and a straight up lie.

Pretty hilarious how he acts surprised 800+ PC also using DLSS is better than consoles 😂

@@annoyingasshole3324 'This Toyota Camry V6 with Turbo doesn't compete with the Turbo in this Porsche 911 V8 with Turbo!'

You'd be surprised though how many console gamers think current gen consoles are more powerful than the highest of high-end PCs... even if that makes no economic sense. I have no disdain for consoles, I may have a disdain for those people ;-)

I must be honest, I am(maybe was) a console only gamer. I have had PlayStation 2-4 and that's all I played games on. With Sony considering PC release of their exclusives and MS finally making good exclusives, I don't see a reason to choose between a PS5 or a XSX. Why choose when you can play both of their games at better quality and performance? Rather than buying 2 $500 consoles with a $200 external SSD(PS5 will get external SSD at some point) for each, it's better to build a PC for that price. But for now I'll keep my PS4 and build a PC in a couple years.

Alex is lucky the vast majority of viewers don’t watch past the first 20% of the video. If he said this in the beginning, he would be rightfully slammed and ridiculed for making such a dishonest and stupid statement.

It’s still 1800p, 1800p is fine with RT

@@teddyholiday8038 yeah that's still pretty damn crisp (Edit: punctuation)

Even in RT mode on XSX, you’re only losing 360 pixels of a true, native 4K resolution, which is unnoticeable sitting 6-8ft from the tv. id tech is the best tech when it comes to a graphics engine!!! Crazy what they were able to do with this optimization.

@@ZByrdman89 *Insomniac Games enters the chat*

Honestly, the first game to showcase the power of my Series X since November, lol!! Never thought it would have came from a patch on a game that released 8 months before the hardware even released!!!!

Well I mean...technically it is, altho with the gee dee price you wouldn't think so!

and the ps5 is $800 on ebay. What's your point?

What does price have to do with it ? It's still low end

These people are on a different planet lol the 2060 was a mid tier gpu and that won’t change just because is old now

My point is that never before in history a very low end gpu was so expensive, and also nvidia positioned 2060 as a middle end card not low end. Low end in turing lineup is 1650. Which btw also has an insane price atm.

To be honest the consoles already have better solutions then Fidelity FX is offering.

I don't have high hopes from what they've shown so far. FFX didn't look that great on the details

Maybe some more time to mature then but I think when the quality is on par or close with dlss they would be crazy not to use it, would give such a performance buffer for other details, mainly raytracing.

@@93836 not what i've been reading. i've been reading devs saying that at high resolutions they prefer fsr over dlss because it has less artifacts, and that the adoption over time should be massively in favor of fsr. and they're implementing it in the console version of their game. i can't find the quote right now and i don't even remember which game it was, but that's the gist of it.

dude you def notice the difference

Me too!! Man is it just me or is this the best looking game on next gen systems and it's so kick ass and brutal!

DLSS is amazing but real time actual Ray's of light is more impressive to me

@@j_dun4830 I've been waiting for more games to give me a wow factor and impress me for the next gen and this one really hit the mark which is surprising since it's just an upgrade and not made for this engine

@@TGravy-wp4rc yea the lighting really makes a difference I'm playing it on the LG CX and the lighting has me stopping to appreciate it after clearing the area. Usually indifferent on cutscenes but I was wanting a few more here

@@LonghornsLegend haha I have a 55 inch CX too! Amazing as I'm sure you know!

Before they went extinct Msrp for a 3060 founders edition was 399 usd

@@afteritsallsaidanddoneisti9285 actually the 3060ti was 399$ msrp, the 3060 is 329$ msrp.

If the GPU market wasn't crazy right now ,the 2060 would be going for around $200. And consoles are going for around $800 right now so.

Well, if gameplay is all that matters, all visuals that don't serve the game are pointless. Rt is not "needed" In any games out now, but it's cool

It's just you. I appreciate the visual splendor and would rather play it at 60fps with Ray Tracing and marvel at the art and fine detail than at 120fps and being twitchy as hell. This ain't competitive CS:GO.

I think the same. No time for sightseeing and watchin glass refletions

@@piotrl5075 That's so silly. Why did they even bother pushing the graphical boundaries with this game? They could have saved time and money and just used the old ID Tech 4 engine, because as long as PC players can play it at 600fps and pretend that it's Counterstrike, that's all that matters, right?

@@nickmotsarsky4382 so you realy plaing Doom for the views? I don't say its a bad thing that they added this. But you won't even take full advantage of this during game play. Not in such fast game.

@Lov Mir I doubt it

The new Consoles do not have Nvidia GPU’s so they will not get DLSS. They will use FSR or use what every up scaling technology from Sony or Microsoft.

Or git good and dont buy a console

I don't think this exact implementation will happen but something such as FSR will probably be implemented on consoles.

@@y2j1490yahoo name a build in 600$ that can beat Series x or ps5 . Yeah none

@@haloepic3092 include a controller and Blu-ray player too

i have the same issue. Once i left the game alt tabbed for several hours, and when I came back to it, it's as if DLSS and native were both being rendered at the same time. like I had a smaller rectangle with a replica of the game in the corner, and the whole thing was flashing awfully. most of the time, when I launch the game, I have to alt+enter a few times before I get the feeling that DLSS actually kicks in properly. it's very odd.

Have you tried turning off Steam overlay? That fixed performance issues completely for me! It's weird af though. Steam overlay on? 20 fps, consistently terrible. Steam Overlay off? 144+ fps no problem. Though this was an issue for me even before RT was implemented

They also released a driver hot fix for this release. Have you already tried that?

Sounds like vram issues.

Same with me and many nvidia users, i hope they'll solve it very soon cause it's really annoying.

I have always wondered this as well and never found an answer

There is the same question here in comments, and guys answered

Lack of Ram usage..console only have 16GB for GPU and CPU combined.

@@hazmifly FALSE of all falsehood: SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM: Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050Ti (4GB), GTX 1060 (3GB), GTX 1650 (4GB) or AMD Radeon R9 280(3GB), AMD Radeon R9 290 (4GB), RX 470 (4GB) RECOMMENDED: Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB), NVIDIA GeForce 970 (4GB), AMD RX 480 (8GB) WITHOUT JUST USE OF THE PS5 GEOMETRY ENGINE AS WELL AS THE DECOMPRESSION OF TEXTURES WITHOUT LOSS OF QUALITY. Nothing new under the sun with old-gen games ported from PC, NOW.

Alot of console games have 16X also I think it's a developer thing.

Yeah I'm kinda pissed

Graphics evolve though gimmick after gimmick

Uh... the PC Master race people have been going nuts for RTX for years now..

The value is insane

@Hastur Dagon umm ok😀 im sorry my friend but most people will notice barely anything when not watching side by side video. Maybe you do with your magnifier

I was more impressed with the 120fps mode. When there is intense moments going on with Ray tracing on, the frame rate isn't the greatest. Thanks to game pass I was able to give it a go on the series x, but I much prefer the 120fps mode, it's crazy smooth. I have a 2070 Super so I think I will stick to the PC version in this case with Ray tracing on as it looks a lot better and my frame rate is in the 100's at 4K.

More like is just meh when at 144Hz with DLSS and ultra RT settings on PC.

2060(S) gonna be good for a while

@@Jetanium 2070 much longer hold imho

@@Jetanium I don't think so, even when this crypto shit will be over, Nvidia will release the new series, they waiting in the BC. Just see how many gamers sitting on old cards...they never want to buy an overpriced shit, when a new series can come in any moment...Some retards buying cards while it was overpriced, but this isn't normal at all, or not standards... This happened after the FIRST in 2018 december, then they released 16xx cards+2xxx cards after that just small time difference. So, 2060S/5700 is medium card, its like an RX580 at that time.

I couldn't believe how great doom eternal looked and ran on my One X when it came out, and I recently found a Series X so now I gotta jump back in.

@@guybrushthreepwood8174 It looke absolutely incredible on the Series X. I spent a Cpl hours last night just walking around looking at the environment lol

Just wait n see how good the next Doom will look on your ps5!

@@thirtythird985 Mmm... No more Doom on PS 😂 So enjoy this one

@@guybrushthreepwood8174 I had the One X as well and it did look incredible even then. That was such an awesome console, I’m glad I upgraded to it when it came out.

My 2060 is sad. =\

The 2060s is the second lowest rtx card. If you have something not rtx and not amd 6000 you don't care about this video to begin with because you can't run ray tracing.

2060 is pretty slow at RT

Rtx 2060 is a mid tier gpu. It's just the lowest in the rtx family, which doesn't make it a low en gpu.

It's very low when considering ONLY RT capable GPUs. In fact it's the lowest, which is what Alex said.

Enjoy the last Doom title on PlayStation

@@SophisticatedAss :(

@Y94R because Xbox owns Bethesda

@Y94R minecraft is an outlier, look what happened to outerworlds 2 and hellblade 2 😂

@Y94R minecraft was on PlayStation before Xbox bought them use your brain. Starfield is exclusive to Xbox, redfall is exclusive to Xbox and on a recent IGN podcast Ryan said Phil spencer said ES6 will basically be exclusive. You’ve got to be a dumbass to think the next doom won’t be

Instill don't get the 40fps mode when it will cause visible juddering on a 60hz TV.

40fps is not a good option, unless your TV natively supports 120hz. 40 doesn't divide evenly into 60, but it does into 120.

@@nickmotsarsky4382 I know it only benefits people with 120hz displays but just curious because I'm playing the game on my CX and I think the mode is great but I would like to know the specifics on the mode

@@nickmotsarsky4382 Exactly, the 40fps mode exploits 120hz mode displays.

@@nickmotsarsky4382 Thanks, that makes sense.

Facts

@@glenmcl: Myths!

Nah I'd rather play at 240 fps

This game does not need 120fps. It's already super fast and smooth at 60fps.

undoubtedly.

Nope. I have it turned on, and I can't tell the difference unless I stand still.

Nope. Playing on Series X, and I’d rather play the 120fps mode.

Literally all RT games, it's a feature I could care less about and don't understand why it's so hyped especially as it taxes your system and in most cases forces you to sacrifice other graphic settings/performance. I still think the tech is too early to be preferably implemented.

Playing on PS5 with LG B9 OLED and the 120Hz mode is dope. I really didn't notice the RT reflections during gameplay but the high frame rate is much more noticible.

120hz mode is the way to go if you have supported screen on Series X/S/PS5

It's about the best you can expect for a game not designed for it. iD Tech 8 will probably see an overhaul in that direction. Considering how long it took for DE we can expect the sequel to come when RT hardware is a pretty big step up from the current top of the line.

@@mnomadvfx cant say for sure, but developer-wise, I think, idtech is quite an advanced engine. I suspect the renderer is abstracted well enough as well as pipelines and all the stuff for it, considering that they moved to vulkan a long time ago. Adding acceleration structures shouldn’t be that hard so that it took them so long to add RT reflections, also considering that they had already been using physically-based materials… I think they had some all the work within quite small amount of time, like 2-3 months, so since their announcement of the RT addition I really expected them to give it more attention to detail and use as hard as possible. Control from remedy also wasn’t developed specifically for RT, but still it used almost all the benefits from it, and is gorgeous.

Isn't it free on all versions?

Completely misunderstanding the point of these improvements in being that even if they are hard to see they are still there and overall enhancing player experience for those who can afford it

@@NEEDFORSLEEP213 I can afford it but it really doesn't improve jacksquat for me. Doom Eternal is an amazing game, you really don't need raytracing to have a "Great Experience"

Even if you don't "see" it, your brain does.

I have no problem clearing the game at Ultra Nightmare difficulty with 100FPS, no idea why you would need to run the game at higher FPS by sacrificing visuals. If you don't like pretty looking game, just play some 2D games LMAO

@@MaxIronsThird no not really. it's like listening to a CD vs. a high bitrate MP3 with the same headphones.

What? It barely makes a difference, at least I could barely tell it was on in most of the areas I played, and when you're in combat it's completely pointless.

@@DSP_Visuals your supposed to watch the video. Literally shows you what your simple mind couldn’t comprehend