These are the ratings nowadays G - Baby Movies PG - Animated Movies PG - 13 - Action Movies R - Adult Movies NC - 17 - How kids in school talk

Nowadays, a PG-rated film is a G with a fart joke or two. What a joke it's become.

If your teacher forces you to watch a G-rated film just bring Hunchback of Notre Dame ;)

I've never actually seen or heard of the rating NC-17 until now Welp

"It's rated G! So it's only for kids." Disney's Hunchback of Notre Dame, a film that touched upon themes such as lust, genocide, damnation, and aspects of religion is rated G. Yeah, the MPAA really does sucks and its rating system is so confusing.

10:40 Krusty the Clown: Remember kids. You can show as much TV violence as you want, as long as you don't show a nipple. I forget the exact quote.

Movies: **contains child murder, violence, and gore** Movies: **gets PG rating** Other movies: **a character said frick** Other movies: **gets R rating**

Inside Out is PG. Toy Story 4 is G. Why aren’t they both G?!

In Australia, rating's work like this: G: General Audiences, i.e Innocent kids and family movies PG: Parental Guidance, family movies that have some mild violence, themes etc. M: Mature Audiences, movies that older kids/teens *can* watch, but may contain sexual/drug references, swearing (more than just darn or damn) and more 'gritty' violence. MA15+: Mature Audiences 15+, these are very adulterated movies that are too much for M, but not enough for the next option, these are violent, 'colourful' and even sometimes 'saucy' films that are usually action or horror films. R18+: Restricted Age 18+, these are movies that contain Sex, Nudity, Gore and other 'GET YOUR CHILDREN OUT OF THERE' triggers, that says it all. No one will read this comment but thank you if anyone actually cared.

I mean, come on the song "Hellfire" from The Hunchback of Notre dame is about Frollo's sexual attraction towards the much younger Ezmeralda, and culminates in him declaring to god that if she wont be his, he'll Kill her.

G - Toy Story PG - The LEGO Movie PG-13 - Marvel Cinematic Universe and all the new Star Wars movies R - Deadpool

It's a werid thing i noticed is that in kids media is you can do horrible graphic things to non human characters. The more non human the more can be done.

Hunchback of Notre Dame with a G has violence, lust and themes of damnation. Inside Out with a PG has a short clip of Riley's behind. WHAT EVEN.

NC-17 = Nostalgia Critic-17

UK ratings are: U - Anyone PG - Anyone, with parental guidance 12A - Must be accompanied by an adult if under 12 12 - Must be 12 15 - Must be 15 18 - Must be 18 R18 - What you watch in your teens 😉

5:59 He predicted that Disney would be making Deadpool movies

nothing in zootopia seemed out of place to me :/ while the junior ranger scouts and tiger jumpscare did make every kid in the theater start crying, the former seemed very true to life and something a lot of kids myself included have experienced directly.

PG is way too safe today. I’ve seen parents review a movie saying that PG isn’t enough and “this movie should be PG-13 because my four-year-old wasn’t comfortable with it!”

It blows my mind that Frozen is rated PG. Absolutely insane.

Teacher: you have to bring a PG movie Me: *brings BeatleJuice*

The fact that Jaws and the My Little Pony movie are the same rating is what's wrong with our ratings system.

I am the same way about the Hunger Games film. Children get murdered and it's PG-13. Bully, a very important documentary about bullying in schools, was rated R due to a few swears so it can't be shown in schools even though it SHOULD be.

I actually never understood that "foot size" joke in Frozen

G - Movies for little kids PG - Modern Animated Movies PG-13 - Superhero Movies R - Horror Movies NC-17 - NOPE!!!! NOT TALKING ABOUT THIS RATING!

You know what other censoring thing didn't make sense? Is when a character said "Ass hole" but they bleeped "hole" instead of "ass"

Disney bought Fox and now owns Deadpool NOSTALGIA CRITIC CALLED IT

PG-13 ranges from "Just barely not PG" to "How is this not rated R?"

Detective Pikachu: Get me the hell outta here! Christian moms: MY SONS POOR CHRISTIAN EARS!!

All Dogs Go To Heaven had alcohol, murder, smoking, death, and a scene where the main character dreams about Hell. What was it rated? G.

Hunchback of Notre Dame and Pokémon: the first movie: G Frozen and Inside Out: PG??? ._.

I practically did a breakdance when Toy Story 4 got a G rating. I don't think there's been a G-rated film since the Peanuts Movie

Cars 2: Has cars shooting other cars, minor terrorism, espionage, torture and has a basically dead body of a formerly living car. MPAA: G it is!

The American rating system never made any fucking sense: Guns, teens getting killed. "totally fine" Sex mentioned, nipple appears, mention of homosexuality. "OH GOD THE HORROR!!!!"

Instead of having a rating, why not just have a warning label associated with the title? Like, *WARNING! This movie contains blood and gore, profane language, [etc], parents be advised.* Just say what the movie contains as a warning instead of putting a general label over it, like we do with a lot of consumer products.

The secret life of pets 2 is actually rated PG just so they could say THIS line: 'Pickles is pissed!'

Honestly, I feel like the matrix is one of those movies that didn't really deserve an r rating. I could see it perfectly as pg-13, but r is kinda pushing it.

In my country, Moana and Zootopia were rated PG-13 And on television, the Princess and the Frog was rated 18.

It can go even better. There's movie out there with nudity, multiple suicide attempts (one of which is even successful in full view), murder, adultery, and hundreds of people dying slow and horrible deaths, and it's rated PG 13. The best part is that we've all seen it, because it's Titanic.

13:35 - 13:37 Love him or hate him, Nostalgia Critic is spitting straight facts.

""Animation is cinema. Animation is not a genre for kids. It is a medium." - Guillermo del Toro.

One movie that used its PG rating really well was the Incredibles movie.

a lot of stuff labelled "mature," honestly is super immature

Then shouldn't video this be called "Does The Film Rating System Mean Anything Anymore?"

This is how I would make the viewing system. A - Anyone A11 - Anyone, if under 11 need guardian A15 - Anyone, if under 15 need guardian A18 - Anyone at or over 18

"Sex is bad and violence is good." That's honestly how I think content management is being handled right now.

It's ironic when the material called "mature" in this day and age happens to be less mature than the stuff made with children as the targeted audience.

It's crazy that Willy Wonka was rated G for implying that there was a possibility that the kids survived while Charlie and the Chocolate Factory had to show all of them make it out alive in order to get a PG rating.

I remember the rule of my elementary school was that if a student wanted to bring in a film to watch it had to be rated G. I really hope that rule doesn’t still apply with next to no modern films being rated G.

Women on women action with puke = PG 13 Men on men action with kissing = R I guess the P stands for puke.

Title character gets drunk and smokes cigars in Pinocchio: G Title character literally stabbed in the back in Beauty and the Beast: G Villain asks the Virgin Mary to send female lead to Hell if she won't sleep with him in Hunchback: G "Size doesn't matter" in Frozen: PG If there's been any change in the ratings system, I'd say it's becoming stricter.

In Australia PG is parental guidance recommended for persons under fifteen years. So it's suggesting a fourteen year old has an adult with them while watching frozen.... and one episode of Peppa Pig is PG as well. 🤦🏽‍♀️The American system is at least better than that....

In Mexico ratings are: -"AA": For Children. (All Disney and animated films in general, and live-actions based on cartoon characters) -"A": For All ages. (Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Jurassic Park, Back to the Future, Christopher Reeve's Superman, Tim Burton's Batman, Sam Raimi's Spider-Man, Marvel and DC Cinematic Universes, and some light comedies and dramas) -"B": For ages 12 and over. (X-Men movies, Christopher Nolan's Batman, Fast and Furious, in the majority of action movies, comedies and dramas) -"B15": For ages 15 and over. (Deadpool, Logan, the first 2 RoboCop movies, The Hangover, the majority of Horror movies and action movies with more blood, violence and nudity) -"C": For ages 18 and over. (Horror and suspense movies with graphic violence and gore and more explicit sex) -"D": For Adults Only. (i don't know, i think porn)

*"I was just imagining a rope around that pretty neck"* *"I know what you were thinking about"* *"The time has come gypsy. You stand on the brink of the abyss. But even now it's not too late. I can save you from your unholy demise. Choose me or the fire."* *"For justice, for Paris, and for her own salvation, it is my sacred duty to send this unholy demon back where she belongs!"* And EVERY LYRIC IN HELLFIRE; THE WHOLE MOVIE GOT A G RATING. HUNCHBACK WAS DEEMED MORE SUITABLE FOR CHILDREN THAN OLAF

Here’s the way I see it G - *lalala kids movie blahblahblah* PG - A SpongeBob episode’s level of random adult jokes stretched into a movie PG-13 - *_Ow, the edge_* R - *insert Lenny face* NC-17 - Instant demonetization on KZfaq

I’m the UK this is how we rate films U - universal PG - parental guidance 12 - age 12 or over 15 18 I’m sure you get the other two

I remember when I was little and I found out that despicable me was PG, and I told my mom that I was watching a PG movie and I thought a was a rebel.

I got a good one for you. Remember the show Reboot? The animated series done by Mainframe Entertainment. There is an episode when Enzo is having a birthday. When they submitted that episode to be rated/censored. They said Dot's breasts were to large. Even tho they didn't change anything about them from the previous 10 episodes. So they were like "Screw that." and resubmitted the episode 3 more times, each time. Making her breasts bigger. Then finally, on the last submission. They took the breasts down 2 sizes and were OK'd for tv. So in the end. They made them bigger by 1 size and proving how stupid the system is.

G- Preschool movies PG- Literally every single kids movie made today PG-13- Has distinctive adult humor and violence but it’s pretty mild at best R- Ouch, there’s a lot of stuff going on NC-17- Don’t even get me started

I once brought the original Planet of the Apes to watch in my class in middle school because it is rated G.

I don remember half of the gruesome parts of Indiana Jones, tbh I just remember the Lego game version of it

the critics mother passed away so the next review is going to be delayed.

Fox entertainment is now under Disney Disney now has Deadpool, an R rated movie

It’s like inflation but the world gets sensitized like how Netflix is removing a lot of shows with smoking

In 7th grade I went on a bus trip with my band class. The bus had TVs in it. We were told we could bring a movie to watch if it was G or PG. My copy of Spaceballs was old enough to be PG so we watched that. That one F-bomb had the whole bus losing it. Great trip.

I think Disney's "The Hunchback of Notre Dame" is more deserving of a PG rating than "Inside Out."

Planes, Trains, and Automobiles is another example, rated R for just a guy going in a fit and swearing a couple of times. Nothing else.

I think another big part of the problem is deceptive marketing. So often, many studios and filmmakers like to exploit the loopholes of the system to get the most attention for their movies. This was often done by advertising a movie to look a certain way so that the audience thinks they know what to expect, but then something in the movie itself pulls the rug out from under them. While most like to be pleasantly surprised, nobody likes to be deceived or disappointed. So, because too many people got triggered by the deceptive practices of certain studios and filmmakers, the system has to constantly be altered, making it hard for new creators to find an audience.

I kinda agree with the trend that sexual content is more strictly regulated and violence is more lenient

So we can't show nipples in movies without getting an R rating, yet nude paintings are put up on display in art museums? Should we give a rating system to museums too??? Doug made a great point on that. Why should we shield something most people have? Social taboo my ass.

It means what demographic's money you want

Toy story 4 critisied by parents i think it was for having gay couple...

Remember the code that came into films of the 30’s? My favorite film was made before then. And it was thought so “disturbing” that it ruined the ratings of nearly everyone who was involved in the film. The film is “Freaks” (1932)

I'm sorry, The Dark Knight almost got an R-Rating for DRINKING? Pirates of the Caribbean is full of drinking rum and it's PG-13. Alice in Wonderland had all that stuff you said and it was a PG. THERE ARE RELIGIONS WHERE KIDS CAN DRINK. I could get the swearing and sex stuff, but DRINKING?! SERIOUSLY MPAA, GET IT TOGETHER!!!!!!!!!!

Finding Nemo is G, Finding Dory is PG. Finding Nemo was more intense than Finding Dory.

I honestly think that overprotective parents are to blame for the crazy rating system nowadays. I think the MPAA is too scared that parents will cry and complain if there is an adult joke in a child's film. Even though, the adult joke probably went right over the kid's head. You know it's bad when they rerelease old episodes of freaking Sesame Street from the 70s and have a warning that the episodes aren't meant for kids. The oversensitive parents are just waiting by the phone to complain about a crude joke.

I like that the music changed from epic to some sort of children’s lullaby as he went through the PG movies that had the highest to the lowest impact

Middle schools definitely deserve a NC-17 rating. Literally you can't go a day without hearing the F bomb at least 20 times lol 😂

"People knew there'd be some risk going in." Must have been nice to live at a time when people had brains.

Robocop was so over the top. I watched it at 18 and closed my eyes.

The only modern PG movies that I can think of that push the rating are Tron Legacy, Rango, Tintin, Life Of Pi, Wreck It Ralph, How to Train Your Dragon, Secret Life Of Walter Mitty, Spider-Man Into The Spiderverse and Detective Pikachu

What if NC-17 stands for nostalgia critic 2017

You mentioned two face in dark knight being a bit boarderline They were able to get away with it since hes a famous batman villain and his face is supposed to be burnt If he can be in kids cartoons he can be in a PG-13 movie The difference is that hes more realistic in the movie instead of his face turning purple for whatever reason its actually burnt

My friends and I refer to the Disney level G/PG presentation of more intense topics as "Power of the Implied." Well, aspects of it. There are so many (often animated) films that get across that something dark happened without ever showing, only implying it, and often that comes across as more impactful than actually showing it.

That joke at 6:10 just became a hell of a lot more relevant.

I have literally no idea why Finding Dory is PG. There is nothing in there to justify that.

Tom and Jerry and looney toons are PG... thing about for a minute

1:46 To be fair, The Haunting predates the MPAA rating system. It came out in 1963. The MPAA only replaced the Hays Code in 1968. But the other two films are from 1969

I agree. There should not be a parent present while watching *MR. MCGOO.* There should be no one present while watching *MR. MCGOO.*

Parents should be responsible for their kids. Provide a minimum age rule and remove ambiguous ideas.

G-for babies Pg-for kids Pg-13-for teens and kids like me R-for adults and people who are in their late teens Nc-17-for adults

Ratings in the Uk U: Disney, pixar or babys shows PG: some animated films, or some live-action movies 12: Marvel, DC, the simpsons and more 15: A Star Is Born, Deadpool 1 and 2, and more 18: 50 shades of grey, and uhh let's move on

There should be a "will traumatize adults" rating.

I read somewhere (can't recall where) that the scene in The Avengers where Loki stabs Coulson was heavily scrutinized, and had to be re-filmed in a certain way so it wouldn't get the R rating. This makes NO sense if you watch the television series "Supernatural" where humans possessed by demons get beheaded (on-camera) on an almost regular basis. So characters getting beheaded on a TV show is fine..... but someone getting stabbed in a movie has to be scrutinized so it won't give the film an R rating.

That old Thumbelina movie has been acknowledged by someone other than my mom for the first time in my life When I was little I wasn't even sure if anyone bought it besides us

On my church youth trip to Arizona we were only allowed PG-13 movies so we watched Harry Potter and the hunger games. Idk what kind of drugs the pastor's we're on

my parent always taught me that as long as I don't do the things I see on TV I can watch whatever I want

Believe it or not, I think Television has a better rating system than movies... which is *really* saying something. You have the rating, and then a brief summary via a simple letter system that tells you why it got that rating. Example: TV-M-LSV would mean "Mature- Language, sex, violence", that is a lot better than the current movie system. R tells me nothing of your movie. "LSV" tells me exactly what to expect and that it is for mature audiences.

I cannot stress how valid your viewpoints are regarding the rating system and where it's going. Yes it is true that we do need ratings for movies that are for kids and should be kid-friendly but, that being said, I really think nowadays that it's not just a matter of a content that is shown, but also the fact that the people in charge of the ratings are suppressing content that needs to be shown to certain audiences, especially adults (violence, sex, language, drug use, etc.) because of the sensitivities of a few which happen to include the people that are managing the ratings and unfortunately the studios. It's certainly better than the old days when we had the Hayes production code starting in 1934 because you couldn't be allowed to not show everything while telling a good story. Whatever is being shown now or what was shown starting with the emergence of the ratings system can fit the context of the good story because there are members of the audience who see that in the real world and don't just want to go to the movies to escape but rather to see a purely accurate reflection, not a sanitized distortion of what they are witnessing - and I know I am one of those people. However, it has become evident more than ever, that the big league studios are releasing films that try to play it safe not on the basis of their scruples but their wallets. In other words they try to play it safe with the content that is shown in a certain tame nuanced context or subtext and hope that they can get away with it. That unfortunately is wrong, repressive and hypocritical, and above all it will not resonate well with the audience if they do not see a lot of the stuff that is already happening in the real world as what has been happening recently. People are tuning into the internet and seeing things that pretty much fits into the category of an R and NC-17 or XXX... even kids, and adults need to be real adults and explain to their kids that stuff like this happens in the real world. The studios need to realize that they cannot just go by a few sensitive viewers who get turned off by such stuff because this has become a part of life, and people are entitled to see on the screen something that resonates deeply within them because it happens within the world that they are living in. Furthermore, by creating films not R-rated or NC-17 rated, and which are bad enough to begin with before they're even made due to Hollywood laziness, it server shows that what is happening is something criminal called censorship, and NO artist, whether a filmmaker or creator of a television series, should EVER be censored, especially if he wants to use all the adult content to explain to the audience something that would be far more powerful and meaningful by showing the adult content rather than by not showing it just to "play things safe." If anything, I would make the more justified argument that SHOWING it all on the screen rather than NOT showing it all on on the screen would be a far safer move in order to prevent something like this actually happening in the real world. There is of course a risk of desensitization, especially if you keep showing more of one type of adult content far too often instead of a mixture of different adult content at exactly the right moments, but for the most part, I would rather show all that stuff on the screen than see it happening on the streets in a manner that could be harmful, even deadly, to someone alive. That's why I say, if you're going to be a filmmaker, don't make kid-friendly stuff - either go with the "R or nothing" approach. Because you can either show everything or nothing... and believe me, you can't afford to show nothing. If anything, basically it's the same as having no freedom of speech.

Who else saw Toy Story 4's G rating as a breath of fresh air?

If it were up to me: Today’s PG and G would be combined into G. PG-13 would become PG. R would pretty much stay the same but the rules would change a bit.