No video

Does the NKJV teach us FALSE Doctrine about salvation? With Mark Ward

  Рет қаралды 4,479

Dwayne Green

Dwayne Green

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 248
@DennisRegling
@DennisRegling 6 ай бұрын
I am saved, I am being saved and I will be saved.
@4jgarner
@4jgarner 6 ай бұрын
Amen!
@caseybyrd7671
@caseybyrd7671 6 ай бұрын
well-put amen
@ozdoublelife
@ozdoublelife 3 ай бұрын
Nice!
@Nick-wn1xw
@Nick-wn1xw 3 ай бұрын
Exactly!
@buzulakd
@buzulakd 7 күн бұрын
No your not. You're saved. Period. Quickened w/ Christ.
@WisdomIsBetterThanRubies
@WisdomIsBetterThanRubies 6 ай бұрын
It was inspiring to learn that the plural matters and to hear the parallel with "the lepers are being healed and the dead are being raised", one by one over a period of time. I am coming to realise that we Westerners are so individualistic in our interpretation of Scripture, whereas Eastern worldviews value the community as a whole. Thanks for this!
@ThePrisonerNo.6
@ThePrisonerNo.6 6 ай бұрын
Two treasures in the Body of Christ. Thank you Pastor Dwayne and Dr Mark. Always blessed by these conversations.
@deeman524
@deeman524 Ай бұрын
Thanks for this guys, crazy how I was doing a study on this and boom y'all showed up
@keithfuson7694
@keithfuson7694 6 ай бұрын
We were justified in Christs blood, we are now being sanctified in the Spirit, and then ww will be glorified in His presence
@dScribe
@dScribe 6 ай бұрын
Salvation in terms of the course of life is an "already but not yet" situation. The saved are headed to glory but they have not arrived at glory yet.
@4jgarner
@4jgarner 6 ай бұрын
Right! I am definitely saved. Because God has credited Jesus' righteousness to me. But I am *being* saved because I am not in heaven yet. It's not complete but it is assured. So I am both saved and being saved.
@dScribe
@dScribe 6 ай бұрын
The Bible does not teach that Jesus' personal righteousness is credited to us. We are saved by his blood (life is in the blood) through his death on the cross by means of his resurrection (this resurrected life assures my future life through resurrection). His perfect earthly life was necessary so that in death he could be the perfect sacrifice. The imputation of the personal earthly life of Christ to the Christian is a false teaching. #We @@4jgarner
@rosslewchuk9286
@rosslewchuk9286 6 ай бұрын
Most enlightening! The "are perishing" "being saved" parallel makes good sense. Thanks to you both for your hard work!🙏📖
@brotherarn
@brotherarn 6 ай бұрын
most people read the word perishing but can't see that it means death
@deeman524
@deeman524 Ай бұрын
If we're saved at all, we're then still being saved
@tony.biondi
@tony.biondi 6 ай бұрын
Two of my favourite KZfaqrs together! Thank you, brothers 🙂
@anickelsworthbiblereviews
@anickelsworthbiblereviews 6 ай бұрын
Two great dudes, totally nerding out. Love it!
@BrendaBoykin-qz5dj
@BrendaBoykin-qz5dj 6 ай бұрын
Thank you, Brothers.🌹🔥⭐🔥🌹
@keithfuson7694
@keithfuson7694 6 ай бұрын
If yoire not yet perfect then youre still.being saved. Thank God thd modern.versions get it right.
@davidchupp4460
@davidchupp4460 6 күн бұрын
Except it’s a lie. We are perfected forever those who are sanctified.
@jonathanclemens4660
@jonathanclemens4660 6 ай бұрын
My old Ruckmanite church used to push literature, like Riplinger's book, that made a big deal of the "saved vs being saved" issue. Also, I first heard the explanation of "in justification we have been saved from sin's penalty, in sanctification we are BEING SAVED from sin's power" etc.
@IsaiahPatrick0115
@IsaiahPatrick0115 6 ай бұрын
It's so embarrassing when 1 Cor. 1:18 in the NKJV is cited as a progressive salvation, when the AV says the exact same thing in Rom. 5:9-10 and 1 Pet. 1:23.
@brotherarn
@brotherarn 6 ай бұрын
Mark Ward is the only person who happened to be a Calvinist whom I enjoy listening to. Thank you for having Mark on your show.
@rayhchc6451
@rayhchc6451 6 ай бұрын
I doubt he'd want to be referred as a Calvinist. As I understood from previous introductions to himself, I heard him refer to himself as Reformed Baptist, if ever there was such a thing. Frankly, I see him as confused 😇
@brotherarn
@brotherarn 6 ай бұрын
@@rayhchc6451 I've listened to hundreds of his videos I wouldn't say he's confused about the things he shares in his videos.
@freegracerevival
@freegracerevival 6 ай бұрын
Oh he’s a Calvinist? Good to know, I’ll stop taking him seriously.
@rayhchc6451
@rayhchc6451 6 ай бұрын
🗨 Arnold 🗨 Ward believes in the confessions while being a Baptist. He also holds to some of the TULIPS. Besides, he knows Dr Brian Ross and Dr Jeff Riddle would punish him severely in a debate. Why just not debate them?
@rayhchc6451
@rayhchc6451 6 ай бұрын
🗨 gracefoundations 🗨 Exactly! Listening to Mark you can't decide if he's Calvinist or Baptist. When there are no clear distinctions, I call it confusion. That's why some get upset when I say he's confused 😇
@jesuschristbiblebiblestudy
@jesuschristbiblebiblestudy 6 ай бұрын
Helpful insights. A good alternative to KJV, is the NASB, NASB95 and ESV. However, the KJV is and remains a valuable translation. God bless you and keep you. Pastor John
@larryg.overton2951
@larryg.overton2951 6 ай бұрын
Even as I began watching this video, I kept thinking of 1 Peter 1, where the apostle wrote about our inheritance reserved in heaven, a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time, when we will receive the end of our faith, the salvation of our souls. Even so, I very much enjoyed the dialogue you had with brother Mark on this. And I so appreciated his comments at the end about brothers agreeing across international and denominational lines on the very essence of our salvation by grace through faith. That is indeed a precious thing.
@markwardonwords
@markwardonwords 6 ай бұрын
This is a great comment: 1 Peter 1 is absolutely apropos. There are aspects to our salvation that are future!
@fantasynerd8
@fantasynerd8 6 ай бұрын
"Us who are being saved" might be understood in the same way we might understand a missionary giving a report to the church of all of the many people in that foreign mission field who are being saved as the missionary preaches the Word of the Cross
@calcobb442
@calcobb442 6 ай бұрын
We are being saved to the fullest.
@rodneyjackson6181
@rodneyjackson6181 6 ай бұрын
We are saved (justification) are being saved (sanctification) will be saved (glorification) King James Version Romans 13:11 And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed." You see what it saying? Our "salvation is "nearer than when we believed." I thought we are saved is the correct way but according to this passage our salvation is nearer than when we believed. This verse proves there are tenses of salvation. This salvation the KJV is talking about is glorification. This is the salvation we have not attained yet. This is a great video because we are in the tense of sanctification and are being saved. The NKJV is correct.
@mengbomin
@mengbomin 6 ай бұрын
Worth noting that the King James Version was written when the simple present tense was in more use in day-to-day speech. You are unlikely to hear someone say, "I walk to the park." but rather "I am walking to the park." The King James Version was written when the former was more common.
@HebrewGreekKnowledge
@HebrewGreekKnowledge 6 ай бұрын
I understand the being to refer to classes of people, the lost as a group who are regularly perishing and those who are regularly being saved when they believe on Christ.
@Dwayne_Green
@Dwayne_Green 6 ай бұрын
This is exactly what I was trying to say with my school bus analogy!
@shirleygoss1988
@shirleygoss1988 6 ай бұрын
Since I am an Eastern Orthodox Christian, I believe I was saved at my baptism. I am being saved as I live the faith, in and through Christ. I will be saved eternally when mortality is finished at the end of the age.. I believe it is rather a non-issue, but one that can cause some confusion. Personal comment here: I hope you two boys are not disparaging me for being Eastern Orthodox. Or, for not having the education in the languages you each have.
@CBDEnglish
@CBDEnglish 4 ай бұрын
Baptism cannot save you. Only Jesus can. Only Jesus. Nothing more.
@shirleygoss1988
@shirleygoss1988 4 ай бұрын
@CBDEnglish Now, is this your own understanding, or is it that of your denomination? Since I have come to believe that the Eastern Orthodox Church and faith is the Church and faith Jesus taught and left with the Apostles, then I choose to follow Christ in His Church! Christ is the Head of the Orthodox faith and, as such, inspired the Apostles and their associates to pen the New Testament! Since they, as the first leaders in the Christian CHURCH, passed their positions on to later Bishops. For that reason, I feebly attempt to follow their understanding as to what Scripture means. The Holy Spirit, as promised by Jesus, is here to guide the Church into all truth! Therefore, since the Church says that Baptism is integral to our salvation, I hold to this teaching.
@CBDEnglish
@CBDEnglish 4 ай бұрын
@@shirleygoss1988 Your position is from your church tradition. You were repeatedly talking about your church tradition, church tradition, and church tradition. You church tradition is completely wrong. You have not cited a Bible verse for your position. My position is based on Ephesians 2:8-9 and Romans 10:9-10, Acts 16:31, Romans 3:28, Romans 4:4-5, 1 Corinthians 15:1-5, Acts 15:1-2, and other verses. Tell me, does any of these verses mention baptism? Do you think these verses are word of God and have the final authority about how to be saved over your church tradition? Do you?
@danbratten3103
@danbratten3103 2 ай бұрын
​@@CBDEnglish1 Peter 3:21 New King James Version 21 "There is also an antitype which now SAVES US -BAPTISM." Seems petty clear
@cindya9572
@cindya9572 Ай бұрын
This conversation leaves me with two questions. 1. Does the Eastern Orthodox Church teach that only believers of your faith can be saved? 2. Can a person of your faith ever lose their salvation?
@molliebrown6949
@molliebrown6949 6 ай бұрын
Excellent conversation!
@watchmen-nehemiah4v20
@watchmen-nehemiah4v20 6 ай бұрын
I have been saved, am being saved and will be saved. The alignment that is most important. *Jesus* *Who* was *Who* is and *Who* is to come. Who is for Abba also, as in "Our Father *who* art in heaven." The pronoun *which* is for things or places. So if you see a "which" utilized for God or Jesus, where did this come from? The pronoun *which* is NOT archaic English. Father, Jesus, The Holy Spirit are living. *Who* was, is and will always be correct for the Godhead. This ties in with the elephant in the room and that is that bibles are under alchemical or a type of sorcery attack. For instance, "Judge not, lest ye be judged" or "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you" no longer exist in any translation. These are clear, precise and a beautiful use of the English language. These are not choppy ( jagged) confusing or difficult to read aloud. This is how the KJV formerly read and why it has been considered as the excellent or gold standard English translation. So there are thousands of changes to all translations of bibles. The formerly majestic kjv bible is the most obviously being altered by an unfamiliar voice. The Holy Spirit will ( in fact MUST ) confirm what I have shared here. Follow Jesus, hear His voice while we yet may. - Bryan
@maxxiong
@maxxiong 6 ай бұрын
8:00 I have seen some KJV onlyists carelessly use the word "Alexandrian" to refer to rendering of the TR that match the modern CT translations rather than the KJV as somehow. It seems like just more name calling like how they say the NIV is not inspired. Personally the verse sounds like it is contrasting those who "are perishing" vs those who "are saved", but this rendering would break tense agreement.
@davidchupp4460
@davidchupp4460 6 күн бұрын
We are seated in heavenly places. Yes we ARE completely saved. To state otherwise is disingenuous.
@cherilynhamilton746
@cherilynhamilton746 4 ай бұрын
King James loved his wife and they had lots of kids. He wrote amazing love letters to her and wrote a lesson to one of his sons against sodomy.He attended church twice on Sunday. He had preachers come three times a week to teach God's Word to his whole court
@vanhalenou8124
@vanhalenou8124 5 ай бұрын
problem is ,I think-being saved almost takes away the instant forgiveness through Christ .we are complete in him so if we were to be 'hypothetically' on our last breath it gives us a more confident in knowing we are' present tense,saved however Paul said we die daily
@SoldierofChrist9
@SoldierofChrist9 6 ай бұрын
I am not a scholar but I believe they go hand in hand. There are those who are already saved, meaning the Lord regenerated their hearts, and there are those whom the Lord is currently setting things up for the moment, that was predetermined by His Will, for when He will regenerate their hearts i.e. those who are being saved.
@watchmen-nehemiah4v20
@watchmen-nehemiah4v20 6 ай бұрын
Yes and Yes. We have been saved, we are being saved. Also, at the appointed time we will be saved. The wicked flee when no one pursues but the righteous are bold as a lion. So regarding the lion shall lie down with the lamb Isaiah 11:6 and Isaiah 65:25 ( concealed ) and Rev. 5:5-9 revealed... what say you? Who is altering the written scriptures? Perfect love is for now... Standing upon the KJV as written today no longer is a place of safety. Have you heard a baptist pastor say "Lets all turn to the charity chapter" ... Fervent charity? Why not face what is evident and clear?
@keithfuson7694
@keithfuson7694 6 ай бұрын
Ww are already saved as to fact, yet we not fully saved as to act. God has to act in the future through Christ to make us perfect immortal and totally righteous
@olegig5166
@olegig5166 Ай бұрын
Does the NKJV teach false doctrine about salvation? I say a qualified no, but the NKJV along with other modern translations do not teach the full truths of salvation. Are we saved or are we being saved? Dr Wade hit the nail on the head with his 30,000 ft view. IMHO the real question is how or who is keeping us saved. At conversion we are spiritually circumcised which is the cutting apart our soul and our body. The Holy Spirit daily washes our soul with the blood so the sins of the flesh do not stain the soul. Our salvation is maintained by the Lord, not our continual works. An often overlooked scripture (Eph 2:6) tells us our spirit has already returned to God replaced by the indwelling Holy Spirit who does the work of keeping us saved. At the beginning I mentioned leaving off the full truths. Gal 2:16 in the KJV along with other scriptures tells us we are justified by the Faith of Christ, not our own faith in Christ. This is a doctrine found in the KJV which is lost in the modern versions. Think on the implications........The Faith of Christ never wavers, never faults or fails, it's Rock solid while our own personal faith is weak. Yes we are saved and yes we are in a continual work of being saved; but the Lord does the work, not us. Rom 3:30 tells us the one God justifies us "through" faith and Eph 2:8 tells us we are saved through a faith that is gifted to us. We are gifted the Faith of Christ which gives us the knowledge God will also raise us from the dead. Believers in how He died, was buried and resurrected are resting in the Faith of Christ.
@Apologetics1Peter315
@Apologetics1Peter315 6 ай бұрын
Good stuff. Have you thought about having someone on to talk about text-types and maybe how they do textual criticism from the internal evidence side of things? Perhaps Peter Gurry? Like it’d be interesting to see when and why a shorter reading wouldn’t be accepted and so on.
@Dwayne_Green
@Dwayne_Green 6 ай бұрын
Yes actually! There's lots of discussion to be had about text-types and how they're perceived today... I don't have a specific date in mind, but I will definitely be approaching the subject.
@cherilynhamilton746
@cherilynhamilton746 4 ай бұрын
Killed all day long.....dying to selfish ambitions and living for Christ!
@HebrewGreekKnowledge
@HebrewGreekKnowledge 6 ай бұрын
Dwayne, check out the few articles on Grace Evangelical Society on Continual Belief for some Good discussions on aspect and participles.
@keithfuson7694
@keithfuson7694 6 ай бұрын
Gods fully saved sons are perfect.
@fnjesusfreak
@fnjesusfreak 3 ай бұрын
I actually went with "becoming saved".
@dougholiday7523
@dougholiday7523 6 ай бұрын
1901 ASV "but unto us who are saved it is the power of God"
@sherlockhomeless7138
@sherlockhomeless7138 5 ай бұрын
I wish we had this many words in dutch. I recently found out you guys have two words in english for our word 'genade'. Grace and mercy. And they are different. I never realized
@CalebRichardson
@CalebRichardson 6 ай бұрын
20:48 Using a similar search returned 19 verses in the KJV where *ing follows the word “are”, compared to 278 verses in the ESV. Search: *ing AFTER are WITHIN 1 WORD are
@caseybyrd7671
@caseybyrd7671 6 ай бұрын
Depending what you think Paul meant rather it Justification or Sanctification in (1 Cor 15:2) the KJV have text concerning Sanctification it could be seen in ( Phil 2:13) it's not something new. Past (Rom 10:15) [Justification] Declaration of Faith Present: (1 Thess 4:3) [Sanctification] Work The Holy Spirit Future: (Rev 22:17) [Wedding] Present and Future (Phil 1:6) Sanctification and Wedding.
@aramanaod
@aramanaod 6 ай бұрын
Salvation is instant upon belief. You receive the Spirit, and that Spirit is life and that life is a person who is Christ. Act 10:44-45, Eph1:13.
@docbrown7513
@docbrown7513 6 ай бұрын
- And he commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that he is the one appointed by God to be judge of the living and the dead. To him all the prophets bear witness that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of sins through his name.” While Peter was still saying these things, the Holy Spirit fell on all who heard the word. And the believers from among the circumcised who had come with Peter were amazed, because the gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out even on the Gentiles. For they were hearing them speaking in tongues and extolling God. Then Peter declared, “Can anyone withhold water for baptizing these people, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?” -In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will, so that we who were the first to hope in Christ might be to the praise of his glory. In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit, who is the guarantee of our inheritance until we acquire possession of it, to the praise of his glory.
@MAMoreno
@MAMoreno 6 ай бұрын
Romans 5:9-10: "Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life." That's talking about something occurring in the future. Famously, Paul quotes Joel 2.32 in Romans 10.13: "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." Here is Joel's prophecy in context (vv. 31-32): The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the LORD come. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered: for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the LORD hath said, and in the remnant whom the LORD shall call. So Paul is not talking about a present state of salvation here. He's talking about a future act of salvation by God, which spares reconciled believers from divine wrath on the Day of the LORD. If you salvation is only in the present, you have no hope in the resurrection. If you have hope in the resurrection, then your salvation is not only in the present.
@cherilynhamilton746
@cherilynhamilton746 4 ай бұрын
King James could read ,write, and speak Greek and Hebrew by 5 years old. He was raised and trained by John Bancroft one of Englands greatest Christians.King James had a huge portion of the Bible memorized. The KJB was design poetically to be memorized.
@vusumzingceke6518
@vusumzingceke6518 5 ай бұрын
I love that punctiliar angle to this
@jeremypalma892
@jeremypalma892 6 ай бұрын
lol 1 Cor 1:18 NKJV this is literally my favorite verse…in my favorite version, I’m glad it’s not heretical haha
@cherilynhamilton746
@cherilynhamilton746 4 ай бұрын
Sanctification occurs by immersing oneself into God's Word. KJB we are saved ...a one time occurrence. Then sanctification...!
@TheRootedWord
@TheRootedWord 6 ай бұрын
5:00 Again the ignorance on the doctrine of Salvation arises among teachers teaching the Scriptures. The Bible illiteracy is so huge today it saddens me. Brief intro to the doctrine of Salvation on THIS issue: There are 3 stages of our Great Salvation: 1. Salvation from out of the world (and its culture) 2. Salvation from the bondage of sin (with victory over our sins now in this life) 3. Salvation into Eternal Life (passing the Final Judgment of God on that Great Judgment Day). If you do not have the first two you will not pass the third. So, from the vantage point of the person who has been called out of the world by Jesus and has answered that call, putting behind the ways and the culture of the world, this person has been saved. YET, he is being saved from his sins as he agrees with God and stops his sins. And he will be saved on that Great Final Judgment Day into Eternal Life, because he walked the Way of Christ (Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth, and the LIFE! No one comes to the father except by me. Clearly, by immediate context this is not about ONLY believing, but of doing and living. "Let us not love in word or tongue, but in ACTION and in TRUTH. Just as word and tongue cannot be separated, so action and truth cannot be separated. If you believe and hold to the truth of Christ, you will do the actions of Christ to walk on the way of Jesus.) We are just scratching the surface of BIBLICAL (not necessarily Evangelical) Salvation.
@sound-the-alarm7
@sound-the-alarm7 6 ай бұрын
In agreement with this layer of Truth. The astounding and miraculous process of sanctification includes what you have illustrated. There are also layers to "baptism" that also are steps. The body of Christ is severely malnourished because of 'shepherds' who are milk dispensers only. Do you know about the changes that are happening to scriptures? This is not perceived ( openly) by very many but this is already an issue now and is going to be known by those who love The Truth and will follow Jesus no matter what may come. - Bryan a sober and alert earthen vessel.
@freegracerevival
@freegracerevival 6 ай бұрын
Abraham believed GOD and it was accredited to him as righteousness. You however are believing in your works, perseverance, obedience etc. “Lord Lord did I not…” -(You) Repent.
@sound-the-alarm7
@sound-the-alarm7 6 ай бұрын
Ask for The Holy Spirit to teach you the deep understanding for salvation. 1 Peter 2;1-3 is *another* evidence on the progressions of salvation. Interestingly this verse is primarily about someone who is a new "milk" believer. Our maturation can be slowed by reliance on doctrines of men. Some fellowships 'leaders' only pour out milk. It's up to us to grow up in faith. The works meme that you are recanting is not rightfully dividing The Word of Truth. It is not a filled out or a matured understanding. Sanctification is a miraculous process of the greatest merit. God being greatest of ALL. What Abba says is true. Sanctify them by thy word, thy word is Truth - Gospel of John 17:17 as written in the heart and preserved forever in Heaven ( Psalm 119:89 )
@freegracerevival
@freegracerevival 6 ай бұрын
@@sound-the-alarm7 Abraham believed God and it was accredited to him as righteousness. Gods word is not mysterious and gnostic it’s simple. He just wants us to believe him. Which you have not done. John 5:24
@sound-the-alarm7
@sound-the-alarm7 6 ай бұрын
@@freegracerevival Yes "believe in Jesus to be saved" and this process is much more rich than you indicate here and in your previous points. The simplicity of The Gospel is forever established. The faith walk of a believer is varied and includes wilderness, going astray and great trials and difficulty. You may be called for His Glory, to share this amazing grace simply to those who are perishing. However, the road of salvation is much more than you indicate. This is not an argument, for it is clearly written. Have you read the book "Pilgrims Progress" ? Sanctification / salvation is a process regardless of your opinions or diversions of thought. This that is shared is not "Gnosticism" and that is clearly to be avoided. May Jesus of Nazareth be your daily bread as you work out your Salvation with fear and trembling. - Bryan
@royalpriest89
@royalpriest89 6 ай бұрын
Maybe this verse has nothing to do with Spirtual Salvation at all. Maybe it's referring to the impending end of the Old Covenant which occured in 70AD. Verse 8, Paul speaks of those alive at those time "eagerly awaiting the revelation", at that they would be confirmed to the end. They were going to be saved from the destruction, particularly of Jerusalem when Christ came in the clouds in 70. Modern people love to assume this letter was written to them, it wasn't.
@docbrown7513
@docbrown7513 6 ай бұрын
I am a staunch ESV, NASB, NIV onlyist now (depending on the situation)... so this confusion does not frustrate me anymore. As soon as they come out with a modern English translation that prefers the Septuagint where there is obvious issue with Masoretic OT... I will change. ESV is close but I think a few of the literal name-places add more confusion than necessary.
@mike29shan25
@mike29shan25 6 ай бұрын
I think this is why Heiser used the ESV. I have his books and although he says he prefers the Hebrew/Masoretic his books constantly cite the LXX over and over as it seems more accurate. I think LXX is the more accurate and honest text but i think tradition will keep the LXX out of our modern translations….🤔
@jimmu2008
@jimmu2008 6 ай бұрын
The last translation to use "saved" instead of "are being saved" is probably the (Catholic) Confraternity Version New Testament of 1941. It was also the last official English translation from Latin. Wycliffe also based his translation on the Latin Vulgate, perhaps the KJV translation of this verse was indirectly influenced by the Latin Vulgate. Of course, grammar changes in English may be the only explanation needed.
@SoberNSavedByGodsGrace
@SoberNSavedByGodsGrace 6 ай бұрын
This bas been something really affecting me, and something im still struggling with as far as others sending me this very meme and it causes me questions this vidieo was helpful any suggestions on additional resources for understanding this verse? And the difference between modern translations? I am just still struggling with it.
@maxxiong
@maxxiong 26 күн бұрын
I think the KJVO argument essentially reads a specific, technical definition of a word used in theological discussions into the meaning of the text, and criticize it based on that. And this is not how bible translators decide what to put in the text. Just consider examples like "justified" in James 2:24, and "baptism" (or "saved", depending on how you understand that verse) in 1 Peter 3:21.
@j.woodbury412
@j.woodbury412 6 ай бұрын
2nc Corinthians 3:18 in my KJV Bible in the textual footnote by "changed", it gives an alternate reading as "being transformed".
@Dwayne_Green
@Dwayne_Green 6 ай бұрын
Yes, it's the same issue as 1 cor 1:18... Is the present tense passive participle speaking of a continuous action, or a one and done action? There is a sense in which we are changed and given a new heart, but there's also a sense in which our change is gradual, we become more and more conformed to the image of Christ.
@CupOJoeOuttaIdaho
@CupOJoeOuttaIdaho 6 ай бұрын
Audience relevance. It has to matter to The people it was being written to initially. I believe they got this message before 70 ad so “being saved” really makes sense in the immediate sense to the audience. The KJV makes sense to us cause we ARE saved as Christians today. Yes?
@patrickjames1492
@patrickjames1492 6 ай бұрын
It sounded like Dwayne says seswsmenois, the perfect, not swzomenois, the present. That confused me for a while.
@Morphwales
@Morphwales 6 ай бұрын
The reality of what you are doing Dwayne and Mark is making excuses for a textual change in the new King James Bible. The context of this verse is that we ARE saved it is us who ARE saved it’s got nothing to do with anything continuous. the text is talking of the saved it’s not talking about any process, it’s talking, simply about us who ARE saved! You have to make excuses and try to change compare other passages and texts to justify your excuses that you’ve used to justify this change to God’s word! 😢
@MAMoreno
@MAMoreno 6 ай бұрын
So the verse is talking about people who have already perished? Obviously not.
@Morphwales
@Morphwales 6 ай бұрын
@@MAMoreno No the verse is talking to us who are Saved whether here on earth or in heaven.
@breadoflife2075
@breadoflife2075 6 ай бұрын
(KJV) For by one offering HE HATH PERFECTED FOREVER them that ARE sanctified. (NKJV) For by one offering HE HAS PERFECTED FOREVER those who (are being?) sanctified. Should not the NKJV read "For by one offering He "will" PERFECT FOREVER those who "finish" being sanctified?
@MAMoreno
@MAMoreno 6 ай бұрын
This is an "already/not yet" situation. The offering has already brought about perfection, but that perfection is realized in the present through the process of sanctification. If Christ's offering did not already bring about perfection, he would need to be sacrificed again, just as the priestly sacrifices were offered continually.
@keithfuson7694
@keithfuson7694 6 ай бұрын
Kjv readings are human tradition .
@docbrown7513
@docbrown7513 6 ай бұрын
For Christ did not send me to baptize but to preach the gospel, and not with words of eloquent wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power. For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. For it is written, “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.” Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the folly of what we preach to save those who believe. For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth. But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, so that no human being might boast in the presence of God. And because of him you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, righteousness and sanctification and redemption, so that, as it is written, “Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.”
@morganfrmn
@morganfrmn 6 ай бұрын
σῳζομένοις. In modern Greek is dressed up. Not being dressed. Or being dressed up. Now we know in English goodbye was short for God be with you or go with God. So let's just assume that σῳζομένοις over 2000 years had a bit of change. But what didn't change was the ending. And I can even see how it transformed into dressed up. So rest assured that these anti people are just wrong as always.
@JonStallings
@JonStallings 6 ай бұрын
So glad i am saved and I am being saved. Just please don't ask my wife 😉
@annakimborahpa
@annakimborahpa 6 ай бұрын
Does the NKJV teach us FALSE Doctrine about salvation? With Mark Ward #NKJV #BibleTranslation Response: 1. To provide some context for the KJV's "Us who are saved" and the NKJV's "Us who are BEING saved" of 1 Corinthians 1:18, the KJV and the NKJV appear to be in agreement in their translations of Romans 8:24-25 and 1 Corinthians 11:13. Romans 8:24-25: KJV: For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for? But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it. NKJV: For we were saved in this hope, but hope that is seen is not hope; for why does one still hope for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we eagerly wait for it with perseverance. 1 Corinthians 11:13: KJV: And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity. NKJV: And now abide faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love. 2. From Baker's Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology - Hope To trust in, wait for, look for, or desire something or someone; or to expect something beneficial in the future. [Bible Study Tools webpage /dictionary/hope/] St. Paul in Romans 8:24-25 appears to indicate that hope, that is, waiting in patience for what is unseen, is a corollary to the grace through faith by which Christians are saved. Yet St. Paul in 1 Corinthians 11:13 is emphatic that charity (KJV) or love (NKJV), although related, is both distinct from and greater than faith and hope. 3. The KJV and the NKJV appear to be in agreement in their rendering of St. Paul's Galatians 5:6: KJV: For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. NKJV: For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love. 4. Therefore, a question: Is a Christian saved by grace through faith while waiting in patience (hope) for what is unseen, if their faith is NOT working through charity/love, which St. Paul states is both distinct from and greater than faith and hope? Or is it a certainty that if one has faith, then it will automatically work through love?
@chessboxer35
@chessboxer35 6 ай бұрын
Why are my comments being del….
@Dwayne_Green
@Dwayne_Green 6 ай бұрын
I dont know. I haven't deleted any comments.
@jimmu2008
@jimmu2008 6 ай бұрын
Did you have links in them?
@chessboxer35
@chessboxer35 6 ай бұрын
@@jimmu2008 no, only sound arguments😁
@TheRootedWord
@TheRootedWord 6 ай бұрын
2:10 Evangelical is NOT Orthodox and that is really the point of this to take away with you. The Greek says "to us BEING saved..." NKJV actually got the Greek literally right in the English. It is neither past nor complete in any way. Now, if you want to call God a heretic, that puts you on the wrong side. The problem is not with this verse, but with the mistranslation of the Aorist in all the other passages. It is the TIMELESS tense that is concerned with the action, regardless of timing. The time of the action may be established by the contextual words, but not in the Aorist. THIS is the real problem, which has been lost. Not only that, I made a video putting it in the face of those who cry out John 3.16 with the wrong grammar. They say "that whoever believes in him will not perish but have eternal life." Some get the "shall" in there instead of the "will". However, in the Greek it is the Subjunctive. So "shall" in older English had more of the sense of the Subjunctive uncertainty than the absolute nature of "shall" in Modern English. The Subjunctive is best translated "may." So it is better translated: "in order that everyone being persuaded into him may not perish, but may be holding life eternal." Notice that the one is BEING persuaded INTO him, so that HOPEFULLY he may not perish (as an action regardless of timing - Aorist). And equally hopeful is the possibility that he may BE HOLDING life eternal. This represents the exact grammar. It would be wisdom to reflect it in English and preach God's version, rather than the Evangelical altered version.
@HebrewGreekKnowledge
@HebrewGreekKnowledge 6 ай бұрын
Your Greek grammar is poor and demonstrates a very elementary understanding of the subjunctive and a misunderstanding about the nuance of present tense participles. See the articles of the Grace Evangelical Society about Continual Belief to see a discussion about present tense articular participles. The subjunctive is used in John 3:16 not because the result is in doubt, but because of the condition “believing” The subjunctive is a mood of dependency, always secondary to some other action and dependent upon it. Thus, the term sub-joined, "subjunctive" mood. So, in itself it is not expressing uncertainty but dependency which by extension can express uncertainty when needed. By nature it is as certain as the action upon which it depends. “Mood in Biblical Greek does not convey how real/unreal, probable/improbable, or possible/impossible a statement is. The subjunctive mood often is used when referring to future events, but that shouldn’t place it in a category of something less real than the future indicative. The subjunctive in a statement about Christ’s return, for example, doesn’t imply that it is doubtful or somewhat less likely to occur. In the following two verses, Jesus explicitly says that he is providing facts and assurances. The subjunctives are translated with indicatives in English; all are very real, without a hint of doubt. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also. (John 14:3 ESV) For when they rise from the dead (Mark 12:25 ESV)” John D. Schwandt, An Introduction to Biblical Greek: A Grammar with Exercises (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2017).
@sound-the-alarm7
@sound-the-alarm7 6 ай бұрын
Daniel 7:25 kjv And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. "times and laws" what is the biblical definition of "laws" ? The altering of ink on pages is upon us regardless of your or anyone's opinion. Tomorrow and today are now listed this way in the kjv. to day to morrow, these words are now literally chopped up. Have you read the introduction to the kjv with the strange glorifications of queen Elizabeth and also with nursing men? These strange sentences with a disturbing voice and cadence are now increasing in bibles. Nursing fathers, men whose breasts are full of milk, a swearing God, a winking God do not align with The Holy Spirit. Lying signs and wonders have already begun. Matthew Henry and theologians will not help us here. The prophets names are altering. Does the expanded notes from the translators of the 1611 kjv bible permit this? The changes to scriptures is today self evident and undeniable. I and a hundred other reasonable men have confirmed this from multiple frames of references prior to sharing this. Hosea 4:6 *is* "My people *perish* for a lack of knowledge..." -Hosea 4:6 kjv. "Sanctify them by thy word, thy word is truth" - Gospel of John 17:17 kjv. But unto you that fear my name shall the Son of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall. -Malachi 4:2 Now look these 3 verses up. All 3 are altered today. All 3 of these examples have evidence proving that they are now graffitied over / changed. We have been instructed to write the word in our hearts. The preservation of scripture is now in the body of Christ. The living epistles who are alert and sounding the alarm also are testimony of these changes. Father instructed us to know and memorize His Word. We who have eyes to see and ears to hear are sharing this astounding information. The kjv is now saturated with confusing verb tenses. If you want to discuss translations with relevance and authority, you *must* know and acknowledge what is happening regarding the changing of God's written instructions. -Bryan
@notusedexer
@notusedexer 6 ай бұрын
This is so stupid. Go get a Textus Receptus, the one KJV translators used, and look it up. The Greek is clear. It's being saved. You may not like it, you may not agree with it, but that's what the Bible says and you damn sure don't have the right to change it.
@chris2fur401
@chris2fur401 6 ай бұрын
You do realize the nkjv was translated from the TR as well right? This particular passage can easily be translated both ways when you read it in Greek
@notusedexer
@notusedexer 6 ай бұрын
@@chris2fur401 ok. I'll accept that. My Greek Textus Receptus translated it being saved. I'm no expert on Greek but I know what my Greek Bible said and I looked up the word to double check but maybe I don't understand Greek. I just believed what the Greek Bible and dictionary that I have says.
@AJMacDonaldJr
@AJMacDonaldJr 6 ай бұрын
This is an interesting translation (from the Latin)... "For the word of the cross, to them indeed that perish, is foolishness; but to them that are saved, that is, to us, it is the power of God" (Douay-Rheims). "Verbum enim crucis pereuntibus quidem stultitia est : iis autem qui salvi fiunt, id est nobis, Dei virtus est" (Latin Vulgate).
@patrickjames1492
@patrickjames1492 6 ай бұрын
fiunt, not sunt, implies 'are becoming...'. The plural then becomes an interesting point. See Acts 2:47.
@REAL88E
@REAL88E 5 ай бұрын
KJb or make excuses for the corrupt ones being ok. Lol your not continually being saved. No matter how hard you try your body is going to die.
@michealferrell1677
@michealferrell1677 6 ай бұрын
I would recommend to you The book by John Murray , redemption accomplished and applied.
@cherilynhamilton746
@cherilynhamilton746 4 ай бұрын
"Being" saved is to support Calvanism Jesus died once for all ...whosoever" John 19:30 "It is finished"
@RevolutionDebates
@RevolutionDebates 6 ай бұрын
The reading is possible, but not profitable. Just like having Mary as the "mother of God" is correct linguistically, but it carries unnecessary theological baggage.
@HebrewGreekKnowledge
@HebrewGreekKnowledge 6 ай бұрын
If its the right translation, than it is profitable. Its surprising to me that a KJVO guy would complain about something being technically accurate but prone to misunderstanding while demanding that people use a 400 year old English translations with many unclear words and phrases that have changed meaning and also carry the baggage of proneness to misunderstanding.
@cherilynhamilton746
@cherilynhamilton746 4 ай бұрын
The field of experts...47 men 7 years most knew several languages up to 15 languages worked on the King James Bible. It is not (a version) but the Pure Word of God which was purified 7 times til final. There will never be such an astounding collection of scholars/preachers/language experts.
@rayhchc6451
@rayhchc6451 6 ай бұрын
🗨 Dwayne 🗨 Friend, why change it if there's hardly a difference?
@Dwayne_Green
@Dwayne_Green 6 ай бұрын
hardly a difference is not the same as no difference, with that being said I'm not entirely certain if "are saved" and "are being saved", are different. Are you aware of any place in 1600s english literature were the construction "are being" is used (its never used in the KJV)? Certainly with such a large corpus of writing, it should be somewhere to make a comparison. What we find is that the present tense form of to be (are) in the KJV can be clearly demonstrated to have a continuous force. Like the examples in the videos that were provided by Mark and I.
@rayhchc6451
@rayhchc6451 6 ай бұрын
🗨 Dwayne 🗨 Are vs Be are different. Please see Webster's 1828 def for "are": ARE. The plural of the substantive verb; but a different word from be, am or was. It is usually pronounced ar.
@MAMoreno
@MAMoreno 6 ай бұрын
@@rayhchc6451 Citing Webster is irrelevant. By the 1800s, we start seeing people using the verb phrase "are being ____." We don't see that evidence during the time of the KJV's publication. It would be akin to insisting that the KJV indeed means "road" (as in a roadway) and not "raid" (i.e. an inroad) in 1 Samuel 27.10, despite the complete lack of evidence that the word "raid" was distinct from the word "road" in English circa 1611. (In other words, "raid" wasn't its own word yet.)
@rayhchc6451
@rayhchc6451 6 ай бұрын
🗨 Moreno 🗨 May I remind you that Mark Ward used Webster's on his channel to defend his own arguments. Didn't he make a video that even refers to W28 in the title of the video? The whole video was dedicated to how W28 supports his definitions and interpretations. Wasn't that video even titled: Webster's 1828 is on my side Who gets to decide when, and when not, Webster's can be applied or referred to? YOU⁉️ If YOU get to decide, please explain how you came to that conclusion? Besides, Ward got a definition wrong in one of his false friends. How hilarious no reference was made to Webster's. Not even Merriam-Webster was used, a dictionary he often refers to. Why did he not refer to at least one of these two dictionaries to support his definition for that word? If you wanna know what that word was, you must ask 😁 But of course you won't ask, coz if you ask and discover Ward was indeed wrong, you'd need to do something about. I just can't imagine for one moment an indignant enlightened soul such as yourself would question a fellow indignant enlightened soul? That kind of thing simply just doesn't happen among the indignant ones! 🤣 Besides, Ward will accuse you of being a racist should you attempt to correct him. So what you're tempted to do now is to ask me why I didn't pointed it out to Ward, right? Go right ahead and ask me 😁😇
@MAMoreno
@MAMoreno 6 ай бұрын
@@rayhchc6451 If you watch Mark Ward's videos, you'll know that he recommends consulting the Oxford English Dictionary to make determinations. That's because it traces the development of words over the centuries. Noah Webster, on the other hand, drew upon the work of Samuel Johnson (whose 1755 dictionary influenced the 1769 edition of the KJV) and created a dictionary for 19th century American English speakers. It is not as reliable for understanding the English of the Tudor era as the OED is. And if you insist on saying the word that he supposedly got wrong, I'll address it.
@johnneufeld6019
@johnneufeld6019 2 ай бұрын
Are you married?or are you being married.
@Mr-pn2eh
@Mr-pn2eh 6 ай бұрын
Yes it teaches false doctrine about salvation
@permafrost7781
@permafrost7781 6 ай бұрын
Damn, you brought this anti KJV schtoolie here, I'm out lol.
@freegracerevival
@freegracerevival 6 ай бұрын
Same. What a soy boy.
@RevDavidReyes
@RevDavidReyes 6 ай бұрын
Ward is not anti KJV😂 But way to show your obvious KJVO colors.
@freegracerevival
@freegracerevival 6 ай бұрын
@@RevDavidReyes I am kjvo.
@permafrost7781
@permafrost7781 6 ай бұрын
@@RevDavidReyes KJVO? Heck yea, I'm not ignorant. What does your bible say in acts 8:37? If it's even there. Hundreds of others as well. If you can't see it in this day and age....takes one search 10 secs.
@RevDavidReyes
@RevDavidReyes 6 ай бұрын
@@permafrost7781 except you’re KJVO because you’re ignorant. I’ve come to the place where I don’t even consider kjvo brothers. KJVO is a cult, simple as that. I don’t mean people who prefer KJV. They’re still my brothers. But KJVO is a cult. Your acts 8:37 question is funny because that would mean KJV was the standard. I’d ask you the same question but regarding the Greek. Was it there? That’s the more accurate and scholarly question but of course you don’t care about that question. Your questions are all based on whether they’re in the KJV. We can’t start off the KJV. Because the KJV WAS NOT THE FIRST TRANSLATION. We need to start off the Greek. Learn Greek, then join the actual conversation. Casual.
@JeremyBurnett
@JeremyBurnett 6 ай бұрын
To be fair, there are several verses that were omitted from KJV that are in the 1599 Geneva Bible. So maybe the KJV is evil. Or at least printed with an agenda influence.
@LarryLarpwell
@LarryLarpwell 4 ай бұрын
this channel is an outworking of human flesh, not inspired by God.
@Dwayne_Green
@Dwayne_Green 4 ай бұрын
so is this comment, so we're even :P
@LarryLarpwell
@LarryLarpwell 4 ай бұрын
@@Dwayne_Green no, my comment is inspired by God, who has a righteous anger against the rampant ignorance satan is spreading with many channels like this.
@chessboxer35
@chessboxer35 6 ай бұрын
Straw man falacies. No defence for the change to being saved, The KJV is correct.
@jdc1264
@jdc1264 6 ай бұрын
Not really no
@chessboxer35
@chessboxer35 6 ай бұрын
@@jdc1264check the greek, the KJV is correct and clear.
@RevDavidReyes
@RevDavidReyes 6 ай бұрын
@@chessboxer35do you even know Greek? The Greek is “being saved”
@chessboxer35
@chessboxer35 6 ай бұрын
@@RevDavidReyes G4982 (Strong) σώζω sōzō sode'-zo From a primary word σῶς sōs̄ (contraction for the obsolete σάος saos, “safe”); to save, that is, deliver or protect (literally or figuratively): - heal, preserve, save (self), do well, be (make) whole. Total KJV occurrences: 110
@chessboxer35
@chessboxer35 6 ай бұрын
@@RevDavidReyes and does the greek say perish or perishing?? G622 (Strong) ἀπόλλυμι apollumi ap-ol'-loo-mee From G575 and the base of G3639; to destroy fully (reflexively to perish, or lose), literally or figuratively: - destroy, die, lose, mar, perish. Total KJV occurrences: 92
@sound-the-alarm7
@sound-the-alarm7 6 ай бұрын
Yes and Yes. We have been saved, we are being saved. Also, at the appointed time we will be saved. The wicked flee when no one pursues but the righteous are bold as a lion. So regarding the lion shall lie down with the lamb Isaiah 11:6 and Isaiah 65:25 ( concealed ) and Rev. 5:5-9 revealed... what say you? Who is altering the written scriptures? Perfect love is for now... Standing upon the KJV as written today no longer is a place of safety. Have you heard a baptist pastor say "Lets all turn to the charity chapter" ... Fervent charity? Why not face what is evident and clear? "Builded" is not a word... the evidence for this is able to be verified. For instance, "books written in the KJV style" ... many other modalities of verification exist, most importantly The Holy Spirit does confirm. Jesus is *sayING "Follow Me"* 💦 🗡️ 🫒
Why our Church USES the NKJV
48:30
Dwayne Green
Рет қаралды 2,1 М.
PEDRO PEDRO INSIDEOUT
00:10
MOOMOO STUDIO [무무 스튜디오]
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
wow so cute 🥰
00:20
dednahype
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН
艾莎撒娇得到王子的原谅#艾莎
00:24
在逃的公主
Рет қаралды 54 МЛН
Prank vs Prank #shorts
00:28
Mr DegrEE
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Why is the KJV different from modern translations?
1:31
BiblicalTraining
Рет қаралды 19 М.
Answering the Best Critic of the NKJV
49:09
Mark Ward
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Talking Byzantine/TR with pastor DOUG WILSON!
15:24
Dwayne Green
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Is the CSB a Gnostic Bible Translation?
2:16:03
Dwayne Green
Рет қаралды 415
Are the TR and Critical Text “Completely Different”?
27:21
Which TR Is the Perfectly Preserved One?
52:22
Mark Ward
Рет қаралды 10 М.
PEDRO PEDRO INSIDEOUT
00:10
MOOMOO STUDIO [무무 스튜디오]
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН