Dr. Payne has messaged me and asked to include this in the comments here. To the question of what he believes about the authenticity of other passages related to the discussion see his response here: No, I (Phil Payne) do not believe that 1 Timothy 2:7-14, 1 Timothy 3:1-2, Ephesians 5:22-26, Titus 2:3-5, and 1 Peter 3:1-6 are scribal interpolations. You can see my understanding of them based on standard exegetical principles at kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fpdkg8mK0JeVkoE.html and in The Bible vs. Biblical Womanhood (Zondervan, 2023). I do not even call 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 an interpolation because many scholars understand "interpolation" based on its Latin root verb "to polish" and so use "interpolation" to identify where a scribe deliberately "polished" text. I call 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 a "gloss," namely a comment written in the margin of a manuscript, probably by a reader. By convention, later scribes put it in the body text where they thought it fit best, either after verse 33 or after verse 40. They did this because they assumed that text in the margin was omitted by mistake since that is where scribes generally put text that they omitted by mistake. See Ulrich Schmid, "Conceptualizing 'Scribal' Performances: Reader's Notes" pages 49-64 (and especially p. 58) in The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research (ed. Klaus Wachtel and Michael Holmes; Atlanta: SBL, 2011).

It was a 2 1/2 conversation cut down to 36 minutes, good job. You captured the essence of the interview in your editing.

Excited to hear the internal evidence. I'm not sure i'd come to the same conclusions as Dr Payne on these points of external evidence, but I have received great value in seeing how someone can take them differently. Thanks for the hard work in pulling this together, Dwayne.

Sounds more like conjecture!

Great to be here very smart to listen closely... Amen

Thanks for this interview. I was looking at the time and was wondering how you were going to fit all the internal evidences in!

So does the egalitarian Dr. Payne believe that 1 Timothy 2:7-14, 1 Timothy 3:1-2, Ephesians 5:22-26, Titus 2:3-5, and 1 Peter 3:1-6 are also scribal interpolations?

Thanks for your contents notes to help follow along with Dr Payne's theory on 1 Cor 14:34-35. So agree with your disclaimer, dangerous to remove verses based on difficulty to hear or understand.

Not an easy follow but thanks Dwayne for interesting content…

Wow, great work 👏 Dr.

His just took the post child position away from Jane’s White why I’m KJVO. Why do we keep listening to textual critic? Why do we let these people rewrite our bibles?

This is a weakness of the Sola Scriptura approach. Because the tradition has been dispensed with, there's an avenue for these sorts of tortured arguments for innovation. In the Orthodox Church, we have a very long tradition of complementarian roles, and it doesn't hinge on scripture alone, but also on the grounds that it's the inherited wisdom of those who went before us. Much harder for modernists to make inroads (they still do, to an extent, sadly). If the NT doesn't explicitly say "Women can't be priests" it's because that was a given in 60AD. The fact it hasn't been done in church history is proof it shouldn't be done. When we look back at Christians in the past, people who were far more pious than us, lived the life far more faithfully than us, we can see a model to aspire to. It's sad so many people reject this and instead seek ways to retcon the Bible to accommodate post modernity.