+adrenalin = life or death situation

@@metelelee7536 + amphetamine

First time I m seeing this. You are on point.

Yes.. You are right.. ;) It is not easy job sometimes..

There are lots of people out there who seriously think its basically an office job to be sitting in a fighter jet :D Under one video about scrambling for F16 launch, such comment got dozens of likes and agreeable replies :D They should watch this video, I guess that only looking at cockpit/base walkthroughs when the plane is stationary doesnt give the full picture afterall :D

Aviation wise,they're right.

@ 0.31 some one busted their nuts real hard.

Lol🤣🤣🤣

it's a bit true ! the US pilot has taken a lot in his ass ! 😂

😅😅😅

Are they?

@@elta6241 Do your drive-by commenting elsewhere.

matchesburn Someone can’t accept that things don’t always stay the same, and haven’t.

@@elta6241 Amuse toi a traduire ça sur Google traduction connard

@frank lepigeon T as bien raison. Ces imbéciles ne savent que faire la guerre pour faire la paix. Heureusement leur pays est sur le déclin

That or whose plane does not stall and fall to the ground!

@@SuperMvrkthey wouldn’t stall easily these jets have power to weight ration of 1plus and have powerful engines

@@zenitu6914I mean. It depends. In most dogfights they always like to stay fast, maybe at 300-350 knots for most fighters, whilst some may operate better at slow speeds, notably like the F-18C and Super Hornet, which can bleed off speed quickly and bring the nose around with its nose authority. Sometimes these slow speeds are optimal and can bring some jets to the point of stalling, and since these usually happen at the deck at these speeds, there’s no altitude to dump the nose to regain speed. So sometimes stalling can kill in dogfights, although rare, it does happen.

@@zenitu6914 The ability of an aircraft to stall has nothing to do with engine power or thrust-to-weight ratio. It depends on the layout of the airframe and the air intakes. the planes in the video are moving at a speed of mach 0.45, at this speed no modern jet engine will stall, regardless of the layout

@dom com. it's dishonest because France is the country who won the higest number of battle in the history

@dom com. Do tell me how WWII has *ANY FUCKING RELEVANCE* to the topic at hand that is Rafale being a badass in a dogfight??? Also you are beinga fucking dunce and downplaying the frenchmen efforts in the WWII >_> How about you throw your bias out of the goddamn window?

dom com. America SUCK

@tfs2O3 What about the US that Started Al Qaida? And that by "Misstake" droped weapons to ISIS fighters instead of Kurdsish fighters...

Yup their pilots sure proved how skilled they were in 1940.. Lmaoooo

G-DOGG - Cool Adventures Yeah I was wondering on edge as hell. And my hart was starting to beat faster and faster. Lol. But trying to keep up with the raptor is some crazy stuff.

That's just the G force in dogfight that's just crazy but actually the Rafle was not fighting that hard because the F22 pilot was not that experienced so that was pretty much easy for the Rafale to Fox2 him... If you want to know more about the fight there is a really cool video about it in English and in French by ATE-topgun2speaker a former Rafale pilot

i can certainly hear it

I aminigi the enemy how he sounded

I totally felt the heavy breathing

Excactly that. But a lot of Americans here, theirs main "argument" for "F22 is much better" is F22 was in movie, or "it was on Discovery chanell the best"?

BTW there isnt a voice when you are locked, it's a sound. When a new radar has been detected (not locked or launched on) you hear a blip. When locked it's a constant beeping tone and when launched on it gives a faster beeping. If it's a fox 2 there is no tone unless they jet had a mws, which it's tome changes depending on the system

@Frank Jin Rafale can lock F22 at any range possible, no problem. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jdKHhNaImcC-loU.html

Harry Potter's invisibility cloak only works in movies

Blah blah blah. The whole point of the F-22 is to avoid these engagements. Whether that works in real life will have to wait until the first real air-to-air engagement - it may never even see that. Its a credit to the F-22 that it did as well as it did. It is a large and fast plane, similar to the F-15 it replaced. Most often the F-16 is the better plane in close engagement against the F-15 due to it being lighter and more agile, not a bad comparison to this engagement. The Rafale is smaller and more agile while still retaining two engines which probably give it a good amount of pickup when needed. BTW, hats off to this French pilot and his plane. He certainly earned it and the plane is definitely a beast in a dogfight.

Imagine the adrenaline

Senator

What about being raped?

How about against 8 SAMs?

@@Daisy-ef6bq 🤣🤣 you got a point

👍👍👍

great comment

+arno222444 yes but...... Rafale > F22 ! :D

always give props to french. They are excellent engineers always have been. Don't consider the f22 badass though. In my eyes it stopped way short of what I would make a gen 5 plane. t the very least would of added electro gravitics to help with the g force problem. It also needed another gun platform type I will not disclose do not want to give anyone this idea. this way in close it could pull maneuvers that would tear other planes apart.

It's not about friendly competition. Americans want to be the best! Was this exercise in Alaska?

Yeah :D

At 00:31, you can hear him poke his eyeball back into the socket.

@@springbloom5940 wait what?!

@@danielpadilla7601 Its a high-G joke.

@@springbloom5940 Ohhh ok. Sorry kinda got freaked out for a moment. 😅

Thank you for the brief

You're a hero man!

Can you suggest the source where these data are shown?

@@feynman_QED "The 241-to-two record was amassed over two weeks of air engagements. Tolliver noted that, in such battles, Red Air units were allowed to regenerate and return to the fight, but lost Blue forces could not. Even with such handicaps, in the largest single engagement, F-22-led forces claimed 83 enemies to one loss, after facing down an opposing force that had generated or regenerated 103 adversary fighters."

Great cope but the Rafale wins this one easily. Also OF COURSE the F-22 will be better than all Western Aircraft, I mean it would be like shooting yourself in the foot if your next generation aircraft gets beaten by an F-16/15/14

LOL excellent !!!

@kpb96m1 Pulling between 2 and 8G you can bet the F22 pilot is breathing just as heavy

@kpb96m1 🤣🤣🤣🤣 kids today hey... believe anything put in front of them. Need me to point out the many things wrong with your comment.

@@slingitsideways that one flew over your head higher than F-22

@kpb96m1 is that why je lost the fight ? :)

F-22 is not the best in dog fight but i wonder how they got in dog fight first of all. Because F-22 is size of marble to get spotted or Raptor would have detected it long before RAFALE

@@Borex2 don't worry it's not a real dog fight

akshay deshpande In reality f22 ain’ t even appearing on rafale’s radar and it will get shot down without even the pilot’s concern

@@w1z4rd9 Nope... Rafale also have very small rcs(0.5 sqm)..

@Apoorv Chauhan no it's not true.....Yes it can be locked by rafales but in a very rare case, in this case before this footage f22 killed Rafale 4 times and the game was of 5 killes

he's breathing so heavily to pump oxygen to his brain cause in a jet you can experience even 9 times the force of earth gravity and all the blood is pushed down from his brain to the legs

@@carroteer he knows that for sure mate

Right? Those are some damn fine combat jets. France should be very proud of the work it's done with those. They're ridiculously powerful fighters.

Lmfao

Lmfao

Lmfao

Damn good lmfao

There were no missiles on the Rafale and was flying clean that's why it had to run because it was running out of fuel.... How can you lock when you have no missiles?

David Burke What are you saying ? Rafale are often carrying captive missile with active seeker head but inert body.

EC 5/25 Corsair No, Rafale would no be flying clean and this is not accurate in a real dog fight scenario.

David Burke You think they run exercises like this to measure performance matrices yet they do not mount dummy missile et al? If they are simulating a MICA IR launch then without question they have a dummy MICA IR with a working seaker head on the wing rails. The question is are the drop tanks still attached? I think not.

LudicFallacies I'm sure they don't to maximize the Rafale's turn capability. I am also sure that if they where to put dummy missiles on they would not weigh as much as the real thing, especially when you want to catch a Raptor.

"the Rafale is still one of the best fighters out there" So say the French.

Dog fighters. But if it were about being an air superiority fighter with attack abilities? that'd be a completely different story. We're just isolating our focus to the subject measured. (It's like the anthropic principle in physics. lol)

@@trumanhw This is wrong, the Rafale has not been created for dogfights, it's just a multirole fighter, he also has one of the best Air/Air capabilities... F22 is a 5th gen fighter, Rafale is maybe the only one "4+" gen and maybe today he is a 5th gen because they keep updating it since a few year. But what I can tell you is, there are no "invisible fighters" in the US army, the rafale can detect all of them, it's just marketing... The rafale also has stealth capabilities.

jack tom the Rafale can barely keep lock in visual range lol. Rafale detecting f-22 in BVR is almost not possible

@@michaelrunnels7660 My mommy says I'm smart.

i see, we all come from mover

Hell yeah

Mover must review this ASAP!!!

Mover won't ever feature something negative about the f22 i think

Dude yes! I was going to leave a comment on his channel so he could do a video about it!

Mos intense 3 min that I had. After the merge when he screams under 7G and 8G, I was like "go go go You can do this!" These guys are superhumans, my neck is hurting just watching this lol

that's very innacurate

So an F-16 can sustain 9G. Will it win.?

@265justy Your head is stuck in the world of video games. Anything about 5G wears pilots down quickly, I know in your video game only 9G sounds like a lot.

Your wrong. In this specific scenario, the f22 was on a defensive role.

Keep crying child. today you can see trench warfare even with abrams challengers and leopards, himars ele.warfare drones, etc.. and this is not future of air combat but reallity today when 2 equals are fighting.. With 5th gen you can fight against 3rd world countries arica middle east south america... Try thisnwith eu russia china and you will come to basic dogfights..

Ofc f22 is a stealth fighter because close range will see you very easily

Lost and Found - The Face of America Abroad hi yo yo maneuver... it works against any aircraft, but its decision to make in split second

It did not. This is a gunfight and he never gets a solution. The Raptor is literally flying circles around him. The reason he suddenly breaks off the engagement in the middle of an aggressive turn and starts communicating with the ground, is because he just got killed. He did, by any standard, put up a valiant fight.

He killed the F22 with gun shot and as said the Raphael is an excellent fighter in the dogfight situation. The key is never to get this close but in heated reality this situation can happen. Small numbers of fighters could get boxed in and have to fight like this the dogfight isn’t over yet snd that’s why training like this continues today ragardless of what is frequently published online.

@@springbloom5940 You gotta be fucking blind, this Rafale is prettymuch on the F-22's 6 o'clock prettymuch all the time, he even calls fox 2 around 0:51 (which is an IR-guided missile). Also at 2:30 what is that if not a target solution??? It is not only just a solution but the killshot that ended the dogfight. Next time you start talking shit try to make sure that you dont make yourself look like a dumbass.

@@zameliz You have zero clue WTF you are talking about. Of course you could actually lookup this engagement and find out the info for yourself. Note how the video begins, in the middle of a high G turn. This is because its edited to exclude the initial position, where the Rafale is given advantage underneath and behind. From the go, he is chasing the Raptor. The video is over three minutes; the Raptor is visible for appx 18 sec total and *never* from behind. This is not by any stretch of the imagination, 'on his six oclock'(dont use words you dont understand, just because you think they sound cool). He does not declare FOX2, he complains "fuck... fox2", because his *opinion* is that he could've used a missile. He is however, wrong, because he was too close and in a hard turn; a missile would not have been able to make the turn at such close range. While too close for missiles, he was still out of gun range, so he had nothing there. Note that all but one time, the raptor appears from *behind* the turn. This is because the Raptor is out-turning him. He *never* at *any* point, gets a shot. The little box is not a 'lock', which you would know, if your knowledge reached beyond TV and poorly designed video games. That green line trailing the reticle(the box), is the ballistic solution, aka the bullet trajectory. Thats ehere the bullets go and to get a hit, that line must fit at least half of it inside the reticle, for at least 2 sec. No, no, no, you must be legitimately retarded if you think thats what ended the engagement. He was desperately trying to get a firing solution as the Raptor performed a hammerhead, turned 180° and came right back at him. It was after the Raptor got behind him, that he broke off the engagement, suddenly, right in the middle of a maneuver... because he.. got... smoked. This is three dimensional space, junior.

Actually it is called Rafale not Rafael...

RAFALE !! RESPECT SVP !!

RA-FA-L --> 'A' as in 'ARM'. Also the 'E' at the end is silent. It means 'Burst of fire' in the military shooting sense and 'Gust' of wind in the meteorological sense.

@tfs2O3 who care

RAFALE. RAFALE GOD DAMMIT

Is that even a surprise anymore?

My HUD kept pinging me “RELEASE KEYBOARD”

True..shit I read alot of useless comments..my head hurt. 🤕

I really don't care who won or lost, its an exercise, things are conducted in a controlled manner (maybe not decided, but managed).. The fact that these two pilots managed not to crash into each other is itself a testimony to their skills.. 😊🤙

I would have performed an inverted Split S, negative G, with a reverse Immelmann, at the end of the Loop. Or, Extended my variable geometrical wings, and slow down, and he would have flown right past me, then watch out for his jet wash, so I don't stall out, and have to bail.

00:31 Tries to stuff his eyeball back in.

No honor in BVR shots. Rafale wins

I mean, we already have like 30-35 squadrons of Su-30Mk1. We needed air superiority in a different generation. Plus, we might just get them shiny Raptors some day or the other for a specific unit.

@@dhruv1019 lmao India isn't going to buy 5th gen at all , they're pouring money on the amca

@@breastmilkgaming that doesn't change the fact that we're capable of purchasing more 5th gen. The AMCA has been in talks for years now. Every country's got a plan for indie 6th gen r&d . What's your point?

@@dhruv1019 IAF strictly wants a 5th gen indigenous fighter , amca prototypes will be out by 2026 & only USA/UK are working on 6th gen afaik because they've that money and tech. "EvERy CouNtrY" hahaha lol finish your 10 th first kid lmao you used "as a fact" as if you were correct dunbass, IAF won't be buying su57/f35s www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=zeenews.india.com/india/iaf-not-looking-at-foreign-5th-generation-stealth-jets-or-36-more-rafales-to-go-for-indigenous-advanced-medium-combat-aircraft-2238449.html/amp&ved=2ahUKEwih2J6GiafqAhVTfSsKHSovDjQQFjABegQIDBAI&usg=AOvVaw31QQ344dnkKByoC2ZZntvE&ampcf=1 that's why they say half knowledge is dangerous

@@breastmilkgaming instead of using premature insults to save your crippling insecurities , re-read what I commented. I said "capable of purchasing" not going to purchase i.e. IN TALKS. Just like the amca program has been re-scheduled like 5 times since it was initiated in 2008. And you must obviously know the Tejas project was delayed by 20 years, right? Wtf do you think the ministry did erstwhile? Kept duct taping ancient Mig-21s? No, purchased sukhois and recently, to create a special squadron, Rafale. It's called having a backup plan, an idea you'd be able to even consider, if you were an adult (apparently not).

True. Jet fighters can take a lot of force, the only limiting factor in combat is the pilot's ability to take g-forces. Imagine when there are jet fighters without pilot's, those things would be able to move like never before.

Man behind the machine is more important than the machine itself.

@@aravindhks3785 For now ...

@@aravindhks3785 For now, wait till you find AI piloted fighters turning at 30Gs. When that happens, the only limiting factor to how fast aircraft can go is material strength.

Yeah I give it like a hundred years or maybe they somehow come up with technology to minimize the gs the pilots feel in the cockpit first

Many good wishes to you as well. If only we didn't need these machines lol but nonetheless they're amazing

+gerry7man555 best comment ever

Its just that the rafale has much better sustain turn.

+f50koenigg F-22 driver gave up and went into the vertical after he made the frenchies work for it. props to them they hung in there and fought for it all the way. it was good all in good fun. i think in a realistic engagement, meaning no controlled merges, it would be over for the rafale before anything gets into a slow turning show.

what does that even mean...…… why would it crack?

@@patriotsfan1236 bcz rafale can and was built to handle more G's and it's better in sustained turn!

If a Rafale is on your 6 your ducked usually lol, but the F-22 is designed to nit have to dogfight, and should destroy the enemy from far away. The F-22 is capable in a Digfight, but almost nothing touches a Rafale

@@thefightingswallow7613 Sounds about right. They're both supermaneuverable, though, aren't they? How much can we know about their relative performance without actual flight data figures?

@@fim-43redeye31 We don't know they're true figures, but because if design we can make a solid assumption. The Rafale, having Delta wing configuration, will be more maneuverable because it has better AoA, however it can't win in a rate fight because the Delta wing burns energy like a mf. The Raptor is very maneuverable, but it just can't stand up to the Rafale in this situation. Maybe, if the Rafale pilot wasn't thinking straight, the Raptor would win

If boh were on the deck rate fighting the raptor would probably ein because it has better energy. The Rafale, at altitude, can dump it's nose and make up energy by using altitude.

@@thefightingswallow7613 Makes sense. I guess a Rafale can just turn if it's going fast enough and put its nose on pretty much anything, that makes life easy- thanks for the explanation

Rafale is twice lighter, so it has a better maneuverability at low speed and can more easily stay behind an enemy. It’s not bad for the rafale since it’s considered as a multirole aircraft

trespire the f22 kill zone is above 60K feet where it can out run out maneuver any attacking warplanes . The F22 wouldn't be used like a F-15 or F-16 in war time that is where everyone keeps getting it wrong .

idk. modern air combat is not ww2. you fire your missiles at long range. this is only a test whether the modern jet can shake off a bogey from 6 close range which would be low probability since you dont engage in close fighting if youre american

@@darugdawg2453 Yuh, as i just explained to someone above somewhere... This is like comparing an Israeli Uzi to a 416 Cheytech Intervention. The Rafale is VERY agile and can manouver at very slow speeds without stalling, but in that, the jet is fairly slow itself... pushing Mach 1.8 max. The F-22 is not a dog fighter, its an Interdiction fighter. They knew exactly what you stated back when they made this and even before back during Korea/Vietnam. They even made jets at that time with JUST missiles because the tech was just so good at the time that they didnt think they would even need to dogfight. Though, those situations do come up when you are low and slow doing patrols or attacking ground targets. The F-22 was designed at absolute max range engagements. Their speed is nearing a blackbird, classified but theoretical max is somewhere around Mach 2.5-2.8. With its AIMS and AMRAMs and extremely advanced targeting systems, it has a combat range of (now more than) over 500 miles. Thats from Kansas City, MO to right near Denver, CO. Hundreds of miles outside of visual range. Having to rely on radar vs a stealth aircraft that can give you the bad touch from 500+ miles away is a big gigantic nope. Your only options are to go into strong defensive actions as soon as you hear the AMRAMs locking you, flee before that happens... or splash down. In a real world combat situation anyway. In a situation like we just watched, we can see that the Rafale is very agile and an extremely good dogfighter, match that with an amazing pilot and you have a splashed F-22. But this situation would never happen.

@@darugdawg2453 Yuh, as i just explained to someone above somewhere... This is like comparing an Israeli Uzi to a 416 Cheytech Intervention. The Rafale is VERY agile and can manouver at very slow speeds without stalling, but in that, the jet is fairly slow itself... pushing Mach 1.8 max. The F-22 is not a dog fighter, its an Interdiction fighter. They knew exactly what you stated back when they made this and even before back during Korea/Vietnam. They even made jets at that time with JUST missiles because the tech was just so good at the time that they didnt think they would even need to dogfight. Though, those situations do come up when you are low and slow doing patrols or attacking ground targets. The F-22 was designed at absolute max range engagements. Their speed is nearing a blackbird, classified but theoretical max is somewhere around Mach 2.5-2.8. With its AIMS and AMRAMs and extremely advanced targeting systems, it has a combat range of (now more than) over 500 miles. Thats from Kansas City, MO to right near Denver, CO. Hundreds of miles outside of visual range. Having to rely on radar vs a stealth aircraft that can give you the bad touch from 500+ miles away is a big gigantic nope. Your only options are to go into strong defensive actions as soon as you hear the AMRAMs locking you, flee before that happens... or splash down. In a real world combat situation anyway. In a situation like we just watched, we can see that the Rafale is very agile and an extremely good dogfighter, match that with an amazing pilot and you have a splashed F-22. But this situation would never happen.

Play dcs

Play both

Fuck simulators and fuck tryhards Just play ace combat and have fun You might even try hawk aswell

I mean if u want arcade, go for ace combat. If you want simulation, go for DCS. There's no better one, just follow your love.

It is easy to play on ps4 but hard to fly in real life you have an enemy at your target and due to g force you sare passing out to have to controll both

Question for historians...HUD, radar, sensors, missile system...everything has been changed since then...

@@edouardmontfort7816 Ok. Well unless you are an aviation historian, your comment offers very little, if any help.

Well the Rafale has very minimal stealth capabilities so I wouldn’t say that’s what it’s good at. It’s clearly a good dog fighter though and that f-22 pilot got “out-piloted” on this one. F-22 is still probably the superior machine but I’d put the rafale up there with the su-35s and the typhoon as being a half step back but still being a fantastic fighter jet.

@@CH-px5vt another american expert pilot.. f-22 superior blah blah blah..

@@kunaljain3196 another hater with a country who cant create either one of these machines without outside help. Keep up the strategy of blowing yourselves up with home made pipe bombs. You just make it to easy

@@Cleans.Your.Faah. we dnt make ied's and pipe bomb we made brahmos.. idiot.. oh how will u know except a few rest of u just eat hamburgers and break your chairs

Sceptic Fungi that’s literally all u got when the facts where brought out the Raptor went 6-1-5 Rafael went 1-6-5

Firstname CANCEL Lastname DONE there are lots of systems and classified targeted systems that will lock without the pilots input

Ok goddamit you need to have the right pilot with the right machine it's not just the pilot or machine right pilot with right machine not just one

This engagement is unlikely to occur in reality. The F-22 pilot will see the Rafale on radar long before the Rafale sees him. I'm sure this was an engagement to test the maneuverability of each aircraft.

@@Jaden48108 Got a point there.

Honestly bro, I got no idea. For all I know it could've been simulating a lesser aircraft, or could've been training, a red flag fight. I generally don't know though what it was.

+1

tu sais pas de quoi tu parles, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mp5ojMWApr-xXZs.html le rafale est le plus complet au monde mais mange rivalise aussi en chasse pur avec le f22

@@user-nf7lg8zb5k Le SU-35 est redoutable en dogfight

While the euro fighter and Rafale are designated multi role air craft this really comes down to the fact that smaller nations do not have the budget to have an ASF and a work horse/ multi role plane. So their ASF has to do the multi role work as well, not to mention that the F-22 can do strike missions as well so it isn't limited to just air superiority. I have read that planes like the Euro fighter Typhoon and Rafale are 50/50 in close combat against the F-22, where the F-22 is suppose to shine is in BVR combat though there are methods and tactics to defeat its stealth advantage.

the standard F22 NEVER use external tank, so this is all lies...

@Ali Mohsin how there will be difference in stress for G force ? Whatever may be the machine forces applied for a speed and direction have to be same no ?

@@saurabhsawant6487 -- Seat angle and position. Although you'll be pulling the same G-forces, you can experience them differently. The F-16 notably changed the standard seat-back angle from 13 degrees to 30 degrees for comfort/g-tolerances. Think of driving up a steep grade and a shallow grade hill. Shallow grade it's easier to keep your speed up and less taxing on the engine. How this translates to seat angles -- the big thing you're trying to do is keep blood flowing to your head. If you're sitting straight up and you have forces pushing straight down, and blood's being pushed straight up, the forces have to directly counteract each other. But, if the blood's being pushed up at an angle, and the forces are still pushing straight down, there's less force needed to keep it going up. Your heart (the engine in this metaphor) doesn't need to push out as much force to keep going up that hill.

@@gnomish844 I thought g suites are for keeping the blood flow pushed up. Thanks for information. Not sure if I followed all of it , will need more understanding and reading from my side. Cheers.

@@saurabhsawant6487 -- G suits do help, too, but only so much. But they operate on the same idea -- keep blood to the brain. Everything you do to keep that happening allows you to pull more G's. Think of it this way, if you had 2 feet of tubing, would it be easier to get the water to the end if you were pushing it straight up, or if it was flat? Flat, right, since you're not working against gravity? Everything in between that 0 (flat) and 90 degrees (straight up) will get progressively more difficult, but will be *most* difficult at 90 degrees.

@@gnomish844 so I am guessing the seat changes angles as angle of attack and speed of the plane changes while positive or negative Gs?

It's just training, the French pilot is just trying to follow.

SMAKS EM SILLIFIED what kind of mental gymnastic do you have to go trough to really think that? Unbelieveable.

Hi

Hi

I guess most people know that

@@RaveSharrma Have you read the comments?

@@docducttape9270 those who know doesnt comment 😁

JJbullfrog1978 I suppose the F22 failed evading in a miserable way, maybe it was a training to train the F22 pilots how to evade.

Bullshit, stop trying to change reality by mentioning something that you cannot provide evidence for!

Overrated type of comment and it doesn’t even work in this case exept if you play dcs under windows 1...

yes "G"

And that was the rafale f2. Now we have f3r ; f4 planing for 2025.

@@gringologie9302 We Indians are going to get f3 soon.....Thank You France for this deadly weapon....Merci

No, kids who think 1 dogfighting exercise result means anything serious about the plane are in denial.

@@Youda00008 Cry a little louder😂😂

@@VV-xg5ci If you knew anything you would know that F22 has signature pods aka RCS pods on it for Nato training purposes. It increases its RCS. Reality! Denial is any clown thinking the Rafale will get a hud cue on a F22 without a RCS pod. Educate yourselves. All you armchair fighter pilots are hilarious!

Cephas Prashanth ever experience hard Gs?

amazing but not equal. The F-22 is at another class.

this was only one round out of several. there were ties and even wins for the f-22..the jury is out on this one.

In dogfight yes the rafale will have the best ratio bcz of better aérodynamic,better turn and more agile in this type of scenario

@@malefeetmalefeet105 Actually, no. This was from a series of training engagements conducted in the UAE between UAE Rafales, French Rafales, British Typhoons and USAF Raptors. Of the 12 F-22 vs Rafale engagments, 6 resulted in F-22 victories, 5 in draws, and 1 in a Rafale victory. Despite that, the French ministry of defense released this gun camera footage to tout the capabilities of their jets without mentioning that A, it was a UAE pilot that achieved this victory, and B, that it won one, but lost six.

@@USN1985dos no my friend! The report says it was a draw with rafale and f22 winning and loosing equaly. The question is not there, but in the fact that the f22 is supposed to not be threatned in such situation and avoid it easly! But in reality poeple realize that a rafale or typhoon can take down an arplain supposed to be more powerfull and manoevrable, and what it would be if it has to face a stronger opponent such as a su35???

des athlètes les gars !! jserais mort 46 fois en faisant ca hahaha

@BrokenSociety966 thanks

Rafale dont have vectoring

Thibault Papin no shit I’m talking about the F-22.

Rafale Canards helped a lot...

americans fold to anything that isnt absolute stone age tier, your cold war tech isnt doing shit to actual modern equipment

Fragile ego detected...

@@SteveIsHavingMC Let's look at US aircraft K/D ratios compared to adversaries lmao