Oswald was mad but he wasn't stupid. If he opened fire at the limo while it was still on Houston it would speed past him and leave him a sitting duck for the Secret Service agents behind it.

It isn't how snipers kill their victims, and Oswald would have missed Kennedy altogether. Every sniper knows that its easier to hit your target if its moving away from you than it is if is moving towards yo, at that distance. Also, Oswald would have drawn attention to himself because the SS were FACING the book depository, they would have immediately looked up and seen the rifle and Oswald in the window. Also, exactly what aaronz7056 said.

harder shot with target coming at you. plus nest wasnt set up that way

@@aaronz7056 Snipers in a room do not as a rule stick their rifles out of the window for all to see, they sit as far back as possible from the widow where neither they nor their weapon will be seen.

@@tonyoliver2750 Swell. Oswald owned the rifle. Oswald smuggled the rifle. A man was seen in the window who could plausibly have been Oswald. No bullets or fragments were ever found that didn't match to that rifle. No unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building. Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the plaza. Witnesses directly under that window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Oswald lied to police, refused to cooperate, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"

He was a demonstrable liar many times over who spent the 1970's firmly testifying the evidence showed the shots came from behind before he started cashing in lucratively as a conspiracy theorist.

Exactly! And who leaves the 3 shells all neatly lined up in-a-row instead of taking them so fingerprints or other evidence could not be linked to you? Nobody! Proving once more, the infamous 6th floor window outline was a planted piece to "prove" Oswald was the "guilty" person! He was never there! Barry Ernest book, "The Girl On The Stairs" (2nd ed., 2013) proves once and for all, there was nobody shooting from there, least of all LHO!

Thak you Sam Clemmons. Also Forrest gump.

I think that quip could sit on either side of the fence

I think not, the Warren Report was part of the cover up

​@@rlsiler8663I read the full 888pg Warren Commission when I was a kid in high school. I remember reading about how the FBI ballistics lab had to install shims for the scope just to be able to zero the rifle. I had many years of rifle-shooting experience up to that point, and would gain many more since that time. I also read the eye witness accounts, and the travel background of Lee Oswald. The WC report turned me into a skeptic. It was actually scary reading it, as it felt like they were flaunting the cover-up with that report, not actually trying to paint an accurate picture of what happened.

I think once a lot of people started reading it they knew it was bullshit. I actually think that the report opened a lot of eyes and without it I think people would go on to the next thing to worry about

Exactly! No way the bullet struck his back at that angle and exits out the throat. Especially when the emergency physicians said it was a clear entrance wound from the front neck.

Right even if the bullet was somehow able to tumble in Kennedy it would have tumbled up and out not into Connelly.

JFK's throat wound was more level with the ground, and came from the front. It was from a 6.5 Carcano fired from the apex of the fence on the knoll, if it went through his neck and embedded in the seat behind him. The frontal head shot would come from another shooter at the junction of the overpass and fenceline. Connally could have taken fire from TSBD and the Dal-Tex Bldg. The forensics points to a set of sequential ambushes along the kill zone on Elm. Look at a 3D map of Dealey Plaza, paying attention to the fenceline and where you would locate to place those shots. It's perfect really, with egress routes as well.

Yep, and that there is the problem. Well one of them. The wound in the back was only 5cm deep

@@chickenfist1554 You make a 5cm hole sound like a flesh wound 😀.

He never acted because it wasn't him - Please read about the french connection and Vietnam get your head around that first

She was attempting to get out of the shooting gallery which is exactly what anyone would do. Took her a while to figure it out but she wanted no part of that vehicle. There were multiple gunmen and the headshot came from storm sewer. Mob hit. No question. The day of the murder my school had installed an intercom system. Shortly after lunch school secretary plays the live radio broadcast of CBS Walter Cronkite. Sort time later they dismissed school but it was surreal and no one was sure they should go home. Like September 11 exactly

Um, you are aware, aren't you, that blood and gore went in all directions, splattering everybody in the limo. Only damage to the windshield, still in the National Archives, is a crack caused by a bullet fragment that also damaged the chrome plating... from the INSIDE. The idea somebody was assuming they would frame this on a lone shooter from behind while standing squarely in front of the limo (where, exactly...?), firing through glass (!) and past the ears of a carful of passengers as he shot Kennedy in the face is laughable. Same goes for the grassy knoll, where anybody firing a rifle behind that flimsy fence would have been absurdly obvious and very visible.

@@doncook3584 No, she was attempting to grab a piece of Kennedy's head, as she always very firmly said. No credible evidence for multiple gunmen. Zero. Storm drain would be a lousy vantage point and anybody firing from it laughably obvious. Let me get this straight: they were assuming they would frame Oswald for this as they shot Kennedy in the face from yards away? Connally's said all the shots came from behind. Witnesses under the sixth floor window said the shots all came from directly overhead. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind and Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the photos.

@@aaronz7056 naive.

@@doncook3584 That's your idea of a solid rebuttal to all the hard evidence I listed above...??? lol

Finally someone who knows what they're talking about. I was beginning to lose hope!

All lies.

@@jetcat132 Warning: Shill confirmed

@@chickenfist1554 Haha thanks for the insult, now I know I’m in the club.

@@jetcat132 Well I figured after calling people liars it'd be 1 - 1 It's a fair comment though, my bad

Henry Luce was reportedly an asset.

Owner of the TSBD building was at that time, Byrd, a long-time CIA asset.

You are correct sir

It was a jump seat, but Gov Connally was a tall & broad/wide man too. Also, that seat wasn't low enough or far enough to the left to make a difference for a SBT to work.

AND the road is pretty steep downhill !!! Jumpseat is a fact, downhill road is a fact Connelly turned is a fact. I've lost all faith in Wecht.

Thank you! I have been saying this for ages. They were not sitting in a straight line. If that was the case then yeah magic bullet, but you put them in the correct position with the president up and to his right it lines up perfect!

So the jacketed bullet struck and destroyed all manner of bones from both men yet remained in almost perfect condition? Plz explain.

Thank God, some people who get it! The conspiracy theorists (like Wecht and Stone) totally mis-represent the single bullet theory so it can easily be dismissed as ridiculous. That’s called a straw man argument. It’s also a LIE, because Dr. Wecht (at the very least) should know better. And when the conspiracy theorists have to mis-represent the truth (lie) in order to make their case, what’s that say about the validity of their position?

Because it's harder for people like that to profit off of tragedy when questions are actually answered!

a) As victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow. One bullet. b) Connally was seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right. c) Multiple and mathematically precise computer recreations done over the years by various investigators have consistently demonstrated all the victims' wounds line up on a perfect trajectory, and straight back to the sixth floor window. d) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him first. e) Bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrates. f) That bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle. g) Nobody planting any bogus bullet at the hospital within one hour of the shooting could possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot.

@@aaronz7056 One other point about someone planting the bullet. After five hours of surgery. Connallys doctor in front of the press said that the bullet was still in the leg. It was a non serious injury entry wound, so they barely looked at it. Turns out the injury it was only half as deep as the length of the bullet. So it was only half imbedded at its worst. Little doubt it came off in Connallys cloths, but who could have known any of this ahead of time. The last thing anybody would do is plant a bullet when it is much more likely it would still be in a person or in the limo. Unless, Connally was shot from underneath the Limo?

@@shermbloom879 Precisely (except for the shooter under the limo bit).

The "magic bullet" was the first shot, it was never found, it disappeared.

Yup. The "pristine bullet" proves there was at least one shooter from the front and that WC moved the bullet from JFK's gurney to Connally's to make their single bullet theory work.

The first shot should've been the easiest and the one most on target. However everyone knows the first shot missed. What if it was supposed to miss ? What if it was a signal ? Everyone says that only three shots were fired from the depository, why can't anyone do the maths ? They say the first missed, second hit JFK in the back, third hit JFK in the head. What about the bullet that hit the overpass, the one that hit the grass, the one that hit the chrome inside the car and the one that went through the windscreen? How many magic bullets were there ??

@@dev1346 Physical evidence we have of bullet impacts: 1. Curb on Elm 2. JFK's throat 3. Connally's chest 4. Connally's wrist 5. Connally's left thigh 6. Overpass pillar 7. James Tague's cheek 8. Limo windshield 9. JFK's head That's throwing out the windshield frame dent. The WC knew it had a major problem on its hands with way too many shots and impacts, so they needed to create not 1, but 2 magic bullets and 1 normal bullet that would account for 9 impacts. They actually posited a 10th impact with the tree branch for the missed shot. It's an exercise in mental gymnastics to smash it all together so they could have some thin story that avoided the obvious multiple shooter scenario staring them dead in the face. Kids who went to school, shut up when told, asked permission to raise their hands, and be good little boys and girls swallowed the WC, as the alternative is too uncomfortable.

@@LRRPFco52 Curb on Elm, overpass pillar, James Tague’s cheek - Shot 1 JFK’s throat, Connally’s back, chest, wrist, and left thigh - Shot 2 JFK’s head and windshield - Shot 3 It makes sense to me brother, still nothing there to disprove that’s how it happened. We don’t have to throw out the windshield, because it was caused by a fragment of the 3rd shot that hit JFK in the head. That fragment and others recovered inside the limousine were all traced back to the Carcano. The first shot didn’t hit a branch. It was concluded via an independent study completed in 2013, and first published in 2016. The first shot grazed the horizontal support of the light support at Elm and Houston just after the turn. It was deflected down range where it hit the curb, causing the cut to Tague’s cheek, then striking the overpass support.

I have seen full metal jacket bullets that went through cape buffalo that you could reloaded and used over again.

Governor and Mrs Connally testified that Governor was not shot by the same bullet, 2 shooters done

@@54upchuck After hitting even one bone?

@@mattlynn2866 Governor Connally never said that. He had didn't know when JFK got hit. Connally had always said he was hit by second shot. He said he knew the first bang was a gunshot, and he turned to see if JFK got hit. He says he never saw him, he turned one way and was starting to turn another when he got hit.

@shermbloom879 then the governor and Mrs Connally both lied to the HSCA I really believe based on exactly what was said you're incorrect. But in some of the many interviews the Connallys gave I did here the governor say that. Mrs Connally was adamant that it was a different shot that hit her husband

Everyone does this. It is irritating. It wasn’t a magic bullet. The President was sitting higher and to Connelys right. It’s a perfect line. But everyone wants to keep the conspiracy going.

Anybody?

Around the time he was in the Marines the military was starting to switch from the M1 to the M14. Neither of which was available to the public

@brianfitzpatrick1183 Do you have any idea what a comparable weapon to the M1 or M14 was publicly available for sale at the time?

@@brianb6957 Not many semi auto rifles available for the public during that time. I think Remington made a semi auto deer rifle but it was nothing like the military rifles. This is of course to the best of my knowledge. I was a younger back then lol

@@brianfitzpatrick1183 I would be interested in perusing the catalog that LHO supposedly ordered his rifle from. I wonder if any copies are still around.

It's because although there were reports given to the feds until the 25th that the gun found was a Mauser, the Warrenati insisted they'd made a mistake and the actual murder weapon was a carcano, which the feds likely already had. Hence all the fake order paperwork

It's badly crushed at the nose, and flattened down one side (not pristine, as Wecht keeps lying), perfectly consistent with drilling through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling and broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs.

CE399? It’s a hoax, and not a good one.

If there was a second shooter, to make sure the job was done, it still was coordinated by Russia as get back for the insult of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Oswald trained in Russia and just before the day of the assassination Oswald visited the Russian consulate in Mexico to get his game plan. I believe Ruby was a Russian agent in the US whose job was to take out Oswald so he could not divulge the truth of Russian involvement.

​@@davidclark573Mafia were double-crossed by JFK and RFK, after Papa Joe negotiated with the Italians, Sicilians, and Russian Joos to rig the election in favor of JFK in 1960. JFK was supposed to pull Bobby off their backs, but instead made him AG, where he really went after Hoffa and the Mafia like a pitbull. OSS had recruited a lot of Mafia hitmen during the War, along with Russians and Nazi defectors/double agents. Mafia were some of the main smugglers involved in the Caribbean, Europe, and even Southeast Asia for CIA operations in the 1950s-forward. The Kennedy bros even asked Mafia to help them whack Castro. Johnson was facing a huge criminal corruption scandal from Texas, and hated the Kennedy bros. Literally everyone in positions of power around them wanted them gone. Jack Ruby was one of the Mafia stooges who ran casinos in Dallas, smuggled drugs and weapons for CIA, but was always broke. His brother was an informant for the Bureau of Narcitics before he even went down to Dallas.

THIS ASSINATION WAS A VERY WELL PLANNED CONSPIRACY WITH MORE THAN ONE SHOOTER AND OUR FBI , CIA AND OFFICIALS DID EVERYTHING TO HIDE THAT THAT EVIDENCE 😮

It’s funny you say that… because even since the official story that is the WC report came out in 1964, there have been over 900 books published on the Kennedy assassination. 95% of those are pro-conspiracy covering over 300 active variations of conspiracy theories. This has had a great deal to do with convincing the majority of the public that there was some sort of conspiracy to kill Kennedy. As many as 65% of Americans believe it was a conspiracy, with 20% believing it was the government. The uphill battle now is in trying to convince people that there was no conspiracy, that Oswald in fact did act alone. The amount of evidence pointing to him is overwhelming, yet the CTers cling to these misguided, misleading and in some cases, offensive theories.

@@davidclark573 Yes, I’m sure the Soviets were hoping for WW3. C’mon man, that is just an ignorant thing to say.

...why don't you keep your madness going and say : " Gee....the anglicized version of the German name " Oswald" is EASTWOOD !! Therefore, the " Line of Fire" actor who's character feels guilty that he failed to save JFK in Dallas was REALLY THE SHOOTER !!! OSWALD=EASTWOOD !!!......AAAAAAHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!!

C.S. Lewis (the fake one) is Judy Garland, is Bruce Jenner (the former one).

The "Paraffin" test...

Case open: - he tested positive on his hands - a man was seen in the window who could plausibly have been him - no unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building - witnesses directly under the window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead - no bullets or fragments were ever found that did not match to the recovered rifle, the one Oswald owned and smuggled - Oswald immediately fled the plaza after the shooting - he was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as the man seen shooting Tippit and fleeing - he was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop minutes later - bullets from Tippit's body were matched to his revolver - he observed to police, "Well they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking them the penalty for cop-killing - he lied to police and refused to cooperate with any investigator - he acted so smug and placid he even convinced his own brother he was guilty - he refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association - his latent print was found on the rifle - his prints were found in the EXACT spots they would be on the sniper nest had he been firing from it - he made no attempt to blurt out anything about any conspiracy and instead just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked point blank on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?" But, have it your way, it must have been somebody else...

@@aaronz7056 tufts of fibres from the shirt he was wearing were also found on the rifle found on the 6th floor .

​@@aaronz7056liar, you will be held accountable on the day of your death.

@@rickjensen2833 I'll take that as a death threat and I've just reported it as such, you psycho.

Called “the humane rifle”.

Maybe decent for combat. That doesn't make it a decent sniper's rifle.

That is like saying the Tesla is a decent car so let's use it as a drag racer

😂

correct and it was commonly available through magazine advertisments

No, his notations basically "move" the wound from above the shoulder to base of the neck, big deal. Never mind that autopsy photos and x-rays clearly show the wound's exact location anyway.

@@aaronz7056 I didn't mean to imply that he somehow surgically physically moved the bullet wound. Geez. Lighten up.

@@jaredpeterson380 Sorry, you said he had "moved the bullet wound."

@aaronz7056 It's OK bro. I'm just being a smartass.

@Random Sasquatch With WiFi An empty slogan, which is defeated by the facts.

@@apointofinterest8574 chill....it popped in my head from the Kevin Costner movie.

@@randomsasquatchwithwifi4090 You must mean the O. Stone fiction film "JFK" which is a historical abomination that's packed with demonstrable fabrications and falsehoods; but to younger and thus more ignorant people, it's a documentary.

@@randomsasquatchwithwifi4090 Lol. I thought it was a Seinfeld reference when Kramer & Newman got spit on!

Direction a person's head goes on being shot is meaningless regarding what direction the bullet came from.

Also, Connally was turning to his right when he was hit by the 2nd bullet because he recognized the sound of the first bullet and that it came from behind them.

​@@Daniel-sh3os Exactly 💯 CORRECT

Thank you for the truth

@@Daniel-sh3os Connally was turning to his right? Did you read his testimony?

Nobody seems to speak about the jumpseat that Conley was sitting in 6 inches shorter than JFK seat

Wecht blatantly lies about the bullet's condition and about the positions of the victims during the shooting, it's a bit hard to afford him much credibility.

​@@aaronz7056Are you a medical professional who has specific training autopsy if not shut up because your displaying your ignorance

@@aaronz7056I used to think highly of him, but I now have him in my “kook” file.

@@aaronz7056 Explain how the round entered his back to the right of his spine and then went up and exited through the neck on a downward trajectory? This should be good........

@@laurad2442 Possibly because as any idiot can plainly see the limo was demonstrably travelling on a downhill grade from the plaza. How about YOU explain away ALL of the following: a) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. b) Stretcher bullet was also matched to Oswald's rifle. c) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo from behind. d) As Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his shoulder is driven down, his hat flips up and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow. One bullet, and ergo, from behind. e) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard, and turned sharply to his right. f) Wecht, on the other hand, demonstrably stages recreations of the shooting using two actors seated bolt upright at the same height, facing forward, knowing full well that's B.S. g) Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window. h) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and ergo through Kennedy's back and throat wounds. i) Bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. j) Nobody planting a bogus bullet at the hospital within one hour of the shooting could possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot. k) Witnesses a few feet directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. l) No witnesses ever heard or saw any gunman firing from any other window in the TSBD or any other building. This should be even more good...

Would you like to share with me that reason and which agency just to see if it matches with mine . From my research it was a mysterious group known as the secret team and the reason was because JFK didn't want outside interference in running American politics .

I find it incredible too: after 60 years all credible evidence still points directly at Oswald.

@@aaronz7056 Typical bot reply.

@@geoffdrew5207 No I just find value in alerting the unwary when they are being misled by crackpots so paranoid they assume anybody not on board for this silly conspiracy crap must be a "bot." lol

@@aaronz7056 If you are not a bot then you either work for a government agency or you have the interpretive powers of a mushroom.

No, he’s disingenuous. He knows the seating arrangement in the limo completely debunks his “magic bullet”, but he persists in spreading the lie.

We all know it makes perfect sense and is backed up by evidence.

Perfect sense to whom Some of the best shooters in the country attempted to do what Oswald allegedly did and could not pull it off. The entire assaniation was completed by a select group of agents and the majic bullet was part of the scheme. Im a retired policeman and in 39 years never saw a projectile do as many things and with no damage to it. One has to look at all of the evidence with an open mind.

@@robertchristianson1187 That's right, "the best shooters in the country" couldn't pull off 3 shots over 8-9 seconds (as victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate) at a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards away. Where do people read this crackpot rubbish?

@@robertchristianson1187 How's this for looking at the evidence with an "open mind?" A) As the victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down and his expression violently contorts between frames from a blow. One bullet. B) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the wounds all lining up on a perfect trajectory. C) The view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through Kennedy first. D) The bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition EXACTLY consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrates. E) If that bullet was a planted fake, the person planting it could not possibly have known: - a bullet needed planting at all - he would not simply get caught in that emergency ward with agents, cops and officials all over the place - exactly where to plant it where it would be plausibly tied to Connally - the "real bullet" wasn't still in Connally's leg, as even his doctors erroneously thought at first - he wasn't simply planting one bullet into evidence and blowing the whole plot F) Witnesses under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. G) Multiple and mathematically precise computer recreations by different investigators over the years have consistently demonstrated the wounds all track on a straight line directly back to that window. H) There is no evidence for a "select group of agents." Zero.

That bullet was never fired from a gun.

@@grandadmiralahab9085 Either it was never fired from a gun or it was fired into cotton wadding. The "Magic Bullet" excuse was moot anyway; and so is the question of whether the shooter could have accurately fired three shots in rapid succession. The first shot hit a tree branch and glanced off the rim of a traffic light. Another bullet hit a curb near the triple overpass, causing a chip of concrete to hit a witness on the cheek. Of the alleged three bullets, that leaves only one bullet to do all the damage that three bullets were alleged to have done. Multiple shooters, anyone?

@@AmericanActionReport Even fired through a ton of cotton wadding the bullet would be distorted. Mass increases with velocity. This works both ways when considering what the mass is impacting. "Science" is a thing.

@@grandadmiralahab9085 Mass is unchanged by velocity.

@@jimbrown9817 Tell that to Einstein. His words, not mine.

Dr Burkley verified the back wound at T3. Dr Ebersole placed it to the right of T4.

@@81overon Yes, it is clearly visible between the T3-T4 vertebrae and off to the right near the middle trapezius. With the downward trajectory, it would have exited out the chest near the area of the manubrium or top of the sternum.

What the heck did you say....???

huh?

HE WAS NOT ANGRY HE WAS SHOT, BECAUSE HE WAS NOT SHOT 😊

@@daggen7273 What happened then, he stubbed his toe?

That's right. Remember "Lee Oswald by himself" is absolutely essential to the narrative not falling apart. A really interesting question to ask yourself is, "what rating (out of ten) do you think the actual plotters of the big event of 22nd Nov '63 would have ascribed to it after the act?" Granted, they finally got their kill within the ambush zone, but there are many, many other aspects to this kind of operation beyond getting your target. The head shot aside, I think it was actually very unsuccessful. If you assess all the operational aspects, I would say the plotters might have only given it a 5 or 6 out of ten because the "rear shooters" failed so dismally. Think about it... If the rear shooter(s) had made a fatal head shot, then the back-up forward shooters could have simply packed up and slinked off. More importantly, the cover-up would have been made so much less complicated than it turned out to be. There would be zero, "Grassy Knoll" controversy among many other suspicions. With a low level of public suspicion, there would likely have been very little independent research and only a few books might have been written. Hardly anybody would still be digging, and interest in it today would be near-zero. I believe the failure of those first "rearward" shooters was a massive blow to the covert and growing presence of the deep state and all their shenanigans.... even to this day, and the problem is so much worse now.

The things about human trafficking is really real they most go get Small kids, they screen the woman. Most probably that's why JFK wife is still alive. How they perfectly missed her huge smiles

Never trust a beautiful Lady. When thing's like this goes down. She's questionable to me

for some reason I don't believe the CIA, FBI, SS, or any gov't agency....and it's getting worse by the day

So... you expected Oswald to carry the rifle with him into the street...?

@@aaronz7056 Don’t be silly. If it were you, would you not make plans to conceal your weapon? Wake up, think.

@@mikeharland3358 How about you think about this: - where, exactly, would Oswald "conceal" the weapon where an army of searching cops would not be bound to find it sooner or later? - Oswald would have been fully aware he would be zeroed in on as a suspect when he immediately fled the crime scene anyway and his absence would be bound to be noticed sooner or later - in fact, he DID "conceal" the rifle, dumping it where it was later found Of course, this weird and pointless side issue glosses over a few other details anyway: Oswald owned the rifle. Oswald smuggled the rifle. A man who could plausibly have been Oswald was seen in the window. No unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building. Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the plaza. Oswald lied to police (starting with his whereabouts during the assassination). Oswald refused to cooperate with any investigator. Oswald refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association. Oswald acted so smug and placid he even convinced his own brother he was guilty. Oswald just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked point blank on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?" Etc.

@@aaronz7056 - So you think Oswald's exit plan from the start was to leave his rifle, with his fingerprints on it, to be found by the authorities? Would you do that? I wouldn't. I would want it to take as much time as possible for authorities to figure out I was a suspect.

@@aaronz7056 - And there's the problem. If you're planning to kill the President and you want to get away with it, would you use your own gun? I think anyone who wanted to get away with it would use a gun not connected to them, wipe fingerprints off it, and wear gloves. Then they could leave the gun behind and it wouldn't matter as much.

I thought so too. It's so simple that it's too simple to accept. The Zapruder film (stabilized & enhanced version) you can see they get hit at the exact same time. It's alarming how vulnerable JFK was, and how there wasn't enforced protocol with dealing with crime scenes, evidence, autopsy pictures... not allowing 30 people in one operating room. Seems a lot of this would never fly today, and that day changed so much it's intense. Also, in the Zapruder film just before the headshot you can see all 6 occupants of the car move in synchronization, indicating the driver tapped the breaks for a second. Probably confused from the shots but in my opinion seemed untrained to just hit the gas at the sound of anything that sounded like a gunshot.

@@robberezowski68 There's a video titled "The Zapruder Film Mystery" which is very interesting. If the info in that video is accurate then it means the Zapruder film was altered and we can't really trust our eyes. For example, look closely at the back of JFK's head, it doesn't get blown out as described by the Parklands doctors. There's a bright spot on his temple, almost like a tracer round. The back of his head seems to be blacked out in the critical frames to hide the damage because it contradicts the official story.

@@misterG2006 The Zapruder film was 100% altered. Zapruder himself even said so. He likely was hit in the back of the head but the final kill shot came from the front right milliseconds afterwards. The magic bullet was complete bs though. The back wound only goes in about 2" for starters.

Gerald Ford admitted to moving the back wound for the good of the country 😂 The reason people believe the Lonespiracy magic bullet crap is because they're scared of the implications of multiple shooters and the CIA involvement. But don't worry America, Allen Dulles investigated and found no CIA involvement 😂

@@robberezowski68 How do you accept the fact that the round entered his back just to the right of his spine on a downward trajectory and then somehow exited above the entrance wound and towards the left through the throat? How is that even possible? Even if that could have legitimately happened, then the round would have had to have exited upward from the neck and out of the vehicle.

Absolutely incorrect media.nbcdfw.com/2021/11/jfk-convertible-dmn.jpg?quality=85&strip=all&resize=850%2C478

@@mikeberg5003 Connally was seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right.

@@aaronz7056 the first big problem before we think too far about their position is that President gets hit and raises his hands to his throat because he is aware of a bullet passing through him once, but the Governor, whom this bullet hits thrice is compeltely unaware and from the video we can all see, is completely fine as of the time the president was already almost clutching his throat, ofcourse towards the end of that footage we can see when the governor gets shot and his reaction

It was supposed to be yarhbough in the car johnson hated him and wanted him inthe car but kennedy wanted conally

Not exactly...down lower, but not to the left as has been reported. If you look at a photo of the jump seat in the back, not a drawing, it is not to the left 10" as many have tried to report. Besides, all one has to do is looks at the film to know Kennedy was hit first.

The assassination hearings were biased; Oswald was a decoy who was fooled. Roscoe White's wife worked for Jack Ruby. Roscoe shot Kennedy from the grassy knoll.

@@frankbrzozowski6343 Hold up, the first part is spot on. The second part isn't confirmed although it wouldn't surprise me

That makes two bullshitters.

Swell, pity all bullets and fragments ever found were matched to it and the shooting was successfully recreated by investigators using it.

@@aaronz7056 Fragments. Do you seriously believe the NAA results?

@@jimbrown9817 No of course not, I think it's much more likely some conspiracy knew it could safely approach scores and scores of police, FBI, Secret Service, ballistics experts, photographers, x-ray technicians, doctors, witnesses, whole commissions, etc. and persuade them all to obey illegal orders to falsify evidence, commit perjury by the dozen, and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason.

I owned one. You couldn't hit the wall of a room standing inside the room.

There were several shooters at various positions. That's why there are many inconsistencies with the crime scene. What the doc is saying is what most of the experts have been saying since that day

@@rlsiler8663 Their was 1 shooter period any other theory is pure nonsense

The magic bullet theory is just that, a theory. It was only created months after the autopsy. It was needed when the story of the missed bullet became known. The bullet path through JFK was never traced, it was assumed. The WC provided exhibits that "proved" the theory. Which exhibit do you feel best describes theory. The diagram that that shows the bullet striking JFL in the back, moving up to exit the throat, then moving down to strike JC, moving up to strike the wrist, then deflecting down to enter the thigh. The photo exhibit shows the bullet striking JFK in the back, exiting his CHEST and then striking JC. Which WC exhibit best represents the theory for you? The diagram with changing bullet angles and direction or the photo that has the bullet exiting JFK's chest? They both can't be right.

​@@garybrewster5657It doesn't matter if Wecht is correct or not. The fact of the matter is that this was a coup d'etat. At least 6shots from at least 3 shooters. Read all you can about it and you'll see it. I realize that it's unsettling to find out that factions of our own government did this. Then covered it up. But it's the truth. Lee's sole contribution to JFK's assassination was to be blamed for it.

cyril wecht has been for his entire career this nations pre-eminent forensic pathologist , the "nonsense " you refer to is a nobody like you sniping at the heels of someone as accomplished as dr. wecht !

Shots plural, at least three.

it,s worse than inferior ,it,s like an alfa romeo from the seventys.

No, but it was considered inferior by the Italian army lol

Connally was still turned when JFK was hit? Was Connally turned when he was hit - or was he facing straight ahead?

Problem is, the back wound had no exit, per Dr. Humes.

@@jimbrown9817 View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him first.

@@81overon Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the wounds all lining up on a perfect trajectory.

@@aaronz7056 Nonsense. Look at JCc wounds. Straight line. If he was hit turned sharply to his right the bullet would have exited the middle of his chest.

Unless you hold your beliefs about the JFK assassination in a manner akin to religious beliefs (evidence and facts don't matter) what he's saying makes sense. One bullet did not travel through two men, striking bone and tissue, and emerge missing three grains of metal. In fact, there was considerably more metal found in Connally's body alone than was missing from the "magic bullet". That's true. What's the old line, "You can have your own opinions but you can't have your own facts"? And the final, formal investigation done into the assassination of JFK, in 1978, concluded that probably at least four shots were fired and there was a conspiracy to kill JFK - that was what the government concluded.

He's just giving people the general idea to show how nonsensical the magic bullet idea is. Not giving you a mm accurate representation ready for Scientific American!

Sounds pretty specific to me, not a generalization. I'm old enough to see through BS and gaslighting. The hat is in the governor's lap the whole time.

Theory makes perfect sense and is backed up by evidence.

No bullets or fragments were ever found that did not match to Oswald's rifle. The throat wound has to be an exit wound: the view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been blocked by Kennedy's body and the bullet has to have gone through him first. Let me get this straight: somebody was assuming they would frame this on a lone shooter from behind while standing squarely in front of the limo (where, exactly?), firing through glass and past the ears of a carful of passengers, and shooting Kennedy in the face....

@@aaronz7056 Yes exactly _ "Into the neck and out the back shot from the front probably through the windshield. " as stated✔✔✔

@@hj179 Let me restate: a) no bullets or fragments were ever found that didn't match to Oswald's rifle b) as victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up and his expression violently contorts between frames from a blow c) victims' wounds line up on a perfect trajectory, and for that matter straight back to the sixth floor window d) the view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him before going through Connally d) stretcher bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle e) bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side f) if the stretcher bullet is a planted fake, it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot g) there was no possibly vantage point from which any shooter could have been standing unseen from which he could have fired through the windshield (much less without hitting anybody else in the car) and getting Kennedy in the throat, and anybody firing through that windshield would never assume in a million years they would be able to frame this on Oswald...

"a) no bullets or fragments were ever found that didn't match to Oswald's rifle2 "@@aaronz7056 but of course Aaron omits to mention that MANY FRAGMENTS could not be NAA tested . he further omits to mention that the NAA test that was conducted on some fragments is now regarded as seriously flawed . and even further to that Aaron omits to mention that officially one shot missed and was never found .in addition witnesses have bullets either causing a fresh furrow in the grass , striking down by the manhole causing dust or concrete to fly up , and a witness said a shot struck the street behind the limo and caused sparks to fly up . " as victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames" Aaron its funny then that Aarons bible the warren commission said that there was atleast 1.5 seconds between both mens reactions .so much so that the commission had to ask connallys surgeon dr shaw could connally have had a DELAYED REACTION .to which he replied NO , NOT WITH THE SERIOUS WOUNDS HE HAD .so zapruders camera filmed at about 18.5 frames per second , so that is mean there is a gap of about 27 frames between both men reacting NOT THE 1 TO 2 FRAMES he claims . but Aaron knows all this , i already pointed out all this to him . but that wont stop him re posting what he knows is not true . "c) victims' wounds line up on a perfect trajectory, and for that matter straight back to the sixth floor window" Aaron what Aaron fails to mention here is that the trajectory he speaks of (from the warren commission ) has a bullet hitting jfk on the RIGHT OF THE NECK , above shoulder level . and the autopsy photos show the bullet wound irrefutably several inches lower down ON THE BACK and BELOW shoulder level just right of the spine .so if the obvious is not obvious Aarons trajectory is not only wrong but based on a provable LIE . but none of that will stop Aaron continually saying the TRAJECTORY IS PERFECT . "d) the view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him before going through Connally" Aaron this nonsense ASSUMES that any shooter was IN A straight and DIRECT line right behind jfk . and sat or kneeling so as to be about the same height in the limo as jfk . there are several problems here . oswald was supposed to be 6 FLOORS ABOVE JFK . second elm street curves left to right and film and photo shows the angle of the limo and the men in it at certain times during the shooting sequence . i will give a good example . i have been told that connally would have blocked any shot to jfk from the knoll . yet willis photo shows jfk and the knoll above and to his front and right , and shows a clear unobstructed view from the knoll to jfk . if oswald was the shooter he had to be sat not only 6 floors above jfk but also off to the right rear of the limo . the secret service OWN recreation photos and film show a white chalk mark on the jfk standin and the connally standin is seen quite clear , all from the 6th floor window . surely Aaron has seen these stills ? . "e) bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side" Aaron not according to expert medical witness testimony of which all but one dr said that ce399 the bullet in question could not have smashed connallys wrist . so again even the warren commission disputes Aaron . "f) if the stretcher bullet is a planted fake, it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot" Aaron the problem here is that ce399 was never planted at parkland . 3 men saw the bullet that day and two of them (both experienced hunters and one was a former cop ) said the bullet they saw was POINTED TIPPED . the bullet in evidence is round nosed all most flat . g as usual involves much speculation on Aarons part . speculation is akin to theory , and is not proof .

@@aaronz7056 @Aaron Z Yes exactly _ "Into the neck and out the back shot from the front probably through the windshield. " as stated✔✔✔ and there were two men dressed as cops on the underpass.

While I agree on the revolver issue he could have done a partial reload to keep 6 live rounds in the cylinder. I wouldnt walk around with a half empty weapon when I could reload.

@@charlespratt8663 Tippit wasn't shot 6 times though

@@snelgrave101 Not only that but the revolver had been bored out. So everytime the gun was fired, it left different and inconsistent marks on the bullets, meaning that they could not narrow it down to that revolver exclusively. Also, when the casings were found by a witness and handed them to an officer they both initialed the casings. One officer also radioed them in (can't remember if it was the same officer) and said that casings were found from a .38 auto. Not only were the casings in evidence from a .38 special but they didn't have any of the initials on them, so no chain of custody. And adding to what you said, in a time when you could buy a revolver from practically anywhere without a trail, why would you mail order one leaving a paper trail, and then deliberately leave the shells at the scene? lol

@@chickenfist1554 So the patsy could be in place.

Witnesses saw him shake the casings out of the revolver and drop them near the scene after the shooting. Not so hard to understand really.

Wow

JFK was not sitting higher, or if he was, it was an inch or two at the most. JFK was taller than Connelly by about 4 inches -- JFK was 5'11" and Connelly was 5'7", maybe 5'8". If you look closely at pics that day, you'll see both men having their arms on the side of the limo at various points, and JFK's seat is not at the door like Connelly's is, and the door is a little further out than the edge of where JFK is by a few inches (3-4 maybe). The idea that he isn't directly in front of him is a myth cooked up by Warren Commission apologists to make the magic bullet "theory" plausible. Even if he's not, the distance, is negligible. Putting someone in a chair directly in front of someone else is perfectly fine for demonstration purposes. Changing the distances to support what those that argue were in allegedly place in the limo would not change the outcome of the analysis Wecht presented here. Its a red herring at best and dishonest at worst.

@@scott1564 Connelly's seat (these were custom seats added to the limo , they are not factory from Lincoln) is much lower than the rear seats in the limo. Plus as you put it JFK is taller than Connelly which accounts for the trajectory in the ballistics. Out JFK's throat and into Connelly's back.

I’ve been to Daley plaza. The book depository shot was easy. The shot from the gassy knoll was not possible.

@@angeloftheabyss5265 witnesses that were there on that day that saw and smelled the gunsmoke would disagree with your forensic theory.

It's easier than that. JFK's back wound was only 5cm deep lol

How did they know they needed to plant a bullet? And why would they plant a bullet that looked like CE399? Why would they want to fight that battle? Why wouldn’t they have fired a test round and use fragments, or a more heavily damaged version? They didn’t even know the Zapruder film existed or what it showed until well after Parkland where CE399 was found. It’s just nonsense, just absolute rubbish.

@@chickenfist1554That’s untrue as well. They didn’t probe the wound all the way through, although it would have been helpful.

@@jetcat132 The bullet found on the stretcher was not necessarily the same one that was finally submitted as #399. It was only after the Commission realized they needed to sell the single bullet theory that this magic bullet emerged.

@@jetcat132 Humes probed it with his little finger and felt the 'end'. Magic bullet denied, conspiracy confirmed.

Not in these days. Hard to believe he admitted it

@@michaelmiller6848 One moronic comment in reply to another moronic comment, dumfk and dumberfk, great stuff!

At least it’s not part of the magat infestation we have these days

most Jews are loyal democrats

Where he fired those bullets, in air?

They were run through by the same bullet. As the victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up and his expression violently contorts from a blow. One bullet. Connally was seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the victims' wounds all lining up on a perfect trajectory. View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him first. Bullet recovered from Connally's stretcher was matched to Oswald's rifle. That bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have done, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence demonstrates: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. If that bullet was a planted fake it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole conspiracy.

@@aaronz7056 , agree. I was being sarcastic. These conspiracy theorists never explain how these fourth and fifth bullets hit their targets and then disappear after hitting them. It obvious that after the bullet hit JFK it then traveled into Connally.

@@aaronz7056 Well said. Why is it a surprise that a bullet that went thru Kennedy and didn't hit bone would end up hitting Connally. Why would someone plant a bullet if Connally should already have a bullet in him? People have been misrepresenting the path of this bullet for decades by using false inputs.

@@aaronz7056dude you try way to hard to be anything but a paid disinformation specialist. Lengthy posts full of inaccuracies on EVERY JFK assassination video are a dead giveaway.

@@aaronz7056 Governor John Connally's account of the assassination shows that the single bullet theory is false if you compare it with the Zapruder film. This is something that I really only noticed recently. Connally said that when he heard the first shot, he turned to the right to see where the shot came from. He stated that when he was turning back to the left, facing forward, he felt an impact to his back, throwing him forward. He noticed he was covered with blood and realized he had been shot. His wife then pulls him down into her lap. Seems straight forward, and everything. At least that's what I always assumed. I figured the shot through Kennedy's back and through his throat entered Connally's back, exited his chest, hit his thigh, and wrist. Ok, sounds reasonable I guess, right? I never thought anything of it, until I actually compared Connally's account with the Zapruder film itself. This is where it gets interesting. The Zapruder film shows that Kennedy was shot in the back BEFORE Connally turned to the right. Connaly, according to his own account hadn't been shot yet, but Kennedy is hunched forward clutching his neck. Therefore, that shot DIDN'T hit Connally. So where did the bullet that exited Kennedy's neck go? If you watch the Zapruder film, at the moment Kennedy reacts to the throat wound, Connally's jacket collar flap seems to flip up. Perhaps the bullet exited Kennedy's throat, passed through Connally's jacket collar flap and either ended up in a car seat back or perhaps the front windshield of the car. Some witnesses claim they saw a bullet hole in the windshield. The bullet could have then struck the curb by the overpass. Now Connaly turns to his left, which is the moment he claimed he felt the shot to his back. He states he felt something like a fist slamming into his back, which threw him forward. When you look at the Zapruder film, this happens at the exact instant that Kennedy is shot in the head, not in his back. Could the bullet that hit Kennedy in the head be the one that also hit Connally? I don't know. The bullet trajectory doesn't seem to line up. But Connally was definitely shot at the same time as Kennedy's head shot. No doubt about it. Therefore, the single bullet theory is definitely false. Do your own comparison and you will see what I mean.

He doesn't care as long as he can keep cashing in.

No bullet holes in neck except anterior, below larynx.

Go back to sleep Princess, you’re not fit to tie this man’s shoes.

Where did that bullet enter JFK?

The assassination hearings were biased; Oswald was a decoy who was fooled. Roscoe White's wife worked for Jack Ruby. Roscoe shot Kennedy from the grassy knoll.

According to the limo specs, the jump seats are 2.5 inches from the door.

Swivel seat? Connally was turned almost 90 degrees to the right? Did you read his testimony?

@@81overon Did you watch the film?

@@rc4688 There were no swivel seats. If you look up Lincoln X100 you’ll find photos of its interior as well as exterior.

@@rc4688 I've seen the film. Connally was facing forward. This is his testimony: "About the time I turned back where I was facing more or less straight ahead, the way the car was moving, I was hit."

He didn't forget, he just lied.

Facts? Good one 😂😂😂

Thank god someone gets it. I was beginning to lose hope!

First shot : not in zapruder film/must be around the time that they turn to elm street.shot missed, but hit a guy (minor injury) in crowd that was watchin the president go by ... Second shot: hit kenedy and governor Third shot: jfk head shoot . rip JFK

@@RDX1981 Where about's did the second shot hit JFK?

Sounds like a lot of things you can't back up there

I think it's all pretty solid. There was no plot or conspiracy.

@@chickenfist1554 A lot more than you can.

@@bulow453 I'm not making any claims, so have nothing to back up. You on the other hand....