And any and all of them fail upwards

That's what's been monetized

97% agree, there's still a few good actual actors out there (until they say something stupid)

basically, narcissists under the flag of actor.

lmao imagine saying this under a video about doctor who the vast majority of the classic doctors were just playing themselves, Tom Baker most notably

A yes when sumones get blown up and put on life support they aren't disabled.

​@@mechakrakenNo they're a vegetable. people on life support aren't riding around in wheelchairs .

@@thedeadpoolwhochuckles.6852Oxford dictionary definition. "a piece of equipment that keeps somebody alive when they are extremely ill and cannot breathe without help" By definition you are wrong. You can be conscious while using one and As long as the life support system is small enough you can take it on a motorised wheel chair. Not to mention his is probably 1000s of years more advanced than we have.

So, they think that if you are disabled, you can't also be evil! If Davros had red hair, would that associate being evil with being Ginger? Oh we'll just make Davros an able-bodied middle aged heterosexual white guy, they are all evil, aren't they??

Davros sacrificed his body for his "children". He's not disabled, he did it to himself willingly.

I have an Asian doctor.

Yeah Hollywood?? Seem to think there's two races White and Black That's so not true

.... fezes ARE cool ! 😅

@@Abuamina001 yep. Along with bow ties and long scarves.

He was quite good at football, though...

Have u seen the new episodes??? They're not really cool but geeky and corny.

@@user-mm9hg1bw8z they’re not cool, geeky, or corny. They’re full bore propaganda now.

The whole LGBTQIA+ thing had to fight lethal, literally lethal forces to exist. The battles won have left a generation with less to fight for or about, which is their aim. Queer writers in Sydney, Australia wrote in the early 90s how tolerance and acceptance ruined their ability to shock the middle classes and subvert expectations. So people who grew up loving something like Star Wars or whatever now feel compelled to reimagine it in an activist way, but it falls flat, because our values-free shopping mall doesn't give a shit about your sexuality or anything at all.

Well compelling people doesn't work. Hollywood box office is crying this year. I'll never watch this twaddle or any of the other messaging.

reveals how they treat children... forcing the child to be what they want and not who itll become

@@elgatochurro i saw a whole page of weird posts complaining that a royal baby had been born but all the posts were upset at the baby's status as boy or girl being announced before it could work it out. What you just wrote could be interpreted two opposing ways.

@@xyaeiounn Im talking about the lengths these people go to to enforce their views of the world onto their children and anyone else. but with kids? the kids dont have much of a choice compared to a friend.

It was the 2015 Christmas special with me. I just got bored with Modern Who, I still go back and watch the Classics repeatedly though.

Heaven sent and hell bent are a great ending to the show (with the wedding of river song as a fine addendum)

@@Grimmlocked I'm still of the opinion that Modern Who had at least three chances to end, 1) around the 50th anniversary/2013 Christmas special, 2) 2015 Christmas special, & 3) 2017 Christmas special from what I understand but they had to just keep going.

Start of Matt Smith for me. 😅 I used to love the old black n white reruns when I was a lad...

I saw a few Capaldi episodes and thought he was great in the role, but poorly served by the writers. I'd already lost interest but did catch the first Jodie Whittaker episode at a friend's house and I just felt embarrassed for all concerned. Doctor Cringe.

Even before that when they introduced Jack, he was pretty well accepted, not because of any orientation, but because he was just a really charming character.

The fans aren't their target audience. The kids are. This is upbringing. Genuine brainwashing.

I miss the show when it had Jack Harkness and Martha Jones. You know, back when it was all homophobic and racist!

All kids aren't straight white males

They outright push their sexual desires through the screen. How is "i was snowmanned" acceptable for a family show? This is as dirty as these people fantasize among themselves.

If it was about representation or equality, their would be a push like in the past when people made their own shows. Their would be a push for more unique stories with "diverse" casts. But it's been 90% rewrites, remakes, and subversion. They steal an IP, tell you they hate everything about it, then show you they hate everything about it, and you're supposed to clap because it's now "diverse." I'm black. I grew up watching shows with everything under the sun. I went from watching stuff freely to now being wary when something seems "diverse." The worst part is, is when the wariness is proven right.

Show proof they want to destroy things

​@@sianaisstfu. Also u aren't black. Ppl done that countless times and u iditos still complain about it

True. They just see us having nice things and saying 'Nope! You're not allowed to have nice things!'

Activists aren't happy. That's the reason that they *become* activists. Since misery loves company, they want to ruin everything that you enjoy.

The PM is never elected by the public. In a general election the public votes for their local MP.

All of them pushing the boundaries of tolerance and increasing attraction to populist nationalists. For better or worse in the long run.

Totally normal democratic phenomenon

The _a l i e n s_ we had to worry about were never the Slitheen!

elected by the WEF and UN

Gatekeeping and exclusion is a GOOD thing. I realize that now.

I joined it in 2007, my earliest episodes were reboot with Ecclestone. At first, I found it very cheesy and cheap. But after few more, I kept watching till Capaldi. It was getting a bit obvious by then, they are gonna kill it. Good time.

I have no doubt since it all started that it is reverse psy, pushing it to incite hate, same happening with more current events, divide and... tactics. Their narcissism makes them blind to the damage they are causing to themselves.

I hope u can still read what I replied, I can't.

The trouble with politicizing Homosexuality is that you can disagree with a notion in politics so we either end up with Homosexuality you can disagree with or enforced homosexuality and an abandonment of our political values.Either way its bad for Gay people and straight alike.

One big reason as someone else who is also part of the G is that it feels inauthentic

My gay cousin, and his black, gay friend....HATE this.

I don't know much about how licenses work , can't you just stop the subscription.

@@yuvrajsingh099 yes, but it means you can't watch _live_ television anymore. The term _live_ in the licence fee's case doesn't mean "being broadcasted as it's being recorded in real-time", it means streaming the television signal, as in everyone's watching simultaneously as opposed to watching a recording or video on demand. A repeat on TV can be a _live_ broadcast since it's coming over the airways. So yeah, we have to pay it to watch any _live_ TV, even the BBC's competitors! However that money goes to the BBC. It really is an outdated, dreadful system, that has really overstayed it's welcome.

@@SpareSomeChange8080 That sounds like very bad thing.

@@yuvrajsingh099 yup, and what's worse is because the BBC isn't allowed to advertise, it's made this very unique situation where the BBC's competitors don't want to scrap the licence fee either, even if they receive no money from it. The licence fee essentially keeps advertiser's away from the BBC, and keeps them with the competition, so they all win; except the public who are divided on scrapping it.

Dr. Where?

Dr. WTF

Dr. Stereotype

Dr.twerk-master-3000

Dr. What The Hell Is Even That?

You have it somewhat wrong. It's not that they don't want to insult people in wheelchairs, they don't want people associating disabilities with evilness. Which is the funny part, because they are the ones who clearly made that association in their own heads and assume everyone else will too.

It is insulting, and they do know that. That's the point.

They didn't "want to associate evilness with disabilities" but NO ONE WAS DOING THAT. It's so insane. It's like just because you, the current showrunners somehow associate disabilities with evil people doesn't mean literally everyone else does. That says far, far, faaaar more about these "We're so inclusive!" idiots than it does the general population. And they don't even realize that's what they said about themselves.

@@Nixlplix You mean I was wrong for all those years to slap random strangers in wheelchairs crying out 'this is for the genocide of the Thals' and 'Go back to Skaro mutant'. Ah gee, have I some apology letters to write.

It's funny, because evil takes many forms, even in the most unsuspecting places.

>>by a far more controversial event: the JFK Assassination

Who tf hates him? Also u idiots don't watch the show

Thanks for describing this guy. It fits nerdotic and bowlstreak too. Nce. Them hating on doctor who anyway

​@@DJ-LD I feel like video essays have just died and turned into whatever this video is

He needs to just go away.

Makes me want to return just to walk away again.

Look up 2 broke girls, season 2, the launch episode, another stereotypical gay black dude

@@tagir9123They’re all the same

How tf he is a gay stereotype

​@@tagir9123how

​@@alexman378no u just racist and homophobic

There's a reason across the pond Hollywood is going down like the Titanic.

One of the only well argued comments that isn't just plain discriminatory. Not the actors fault the writers fault

Dr Moon was a good example.

I bet you in real life Ncuti Gatwa hasn't seen an entire episode of either classic Doctor Who or the new Classic Doctor Who. I think RTD has just given him the basics and shown him a few of his own past episodes of course, but I don't think he'd be able to keep his gob shut through an entire episode, and it shows because he says "I'm the Doctor" in a way that implies nobody else has ever played him/her before. Like it's all about him and not the character. And that's why the 13-14 minutes I tried to watch, of The Church On Ruby Road, but when they started with the pantomime song, that was me, finished. And before I get bombarded with comments accusing me of this or that, I genuinely thought that this might be an upturn in Dr Who's fortunes, but then Disney got involved and that was that, hopes dashed. I mean I don't mind a little bit of inclusion here and there. But to ram it down your throat at every turn. There isn't enough time for any story that had any meaning except for the obvious....which I just said there's too much of.

fax, and i am just sad, i loved this show

Nice visual poem. But I would add flatulence to the twerking.

So, basically, Matt Smith...

​@@DAZzler3K That's 11th

Pretty much

@@egg2520 You forgot to include John Hurt as the _War Doctor_ which they have to shoehorn in after Paul McGann (# 8) because Eccleston refused to return for the 50th Anniversary. That makes the _War Doctor_ # 9, Eccleston #10, Tennant # 11 and Matt Smith the 12th and final incarnation of the Doctor. And there they should've stopped...

@@DAZzler3K I would have liked if Trenzalore was the actual end. Like the Time Lords decide to make the Doctor young but that's it, so he decides to retire in peace.

The BBC repeated the first episode the following week, before screening the second. On that occasion, An Unearthly Child got six million viewers. The Church on Ruby Road had consolidated figures of 7.49 million, so one could argue it got more viewers than AUC, or fewer, based purely on those two screenings in November 1963 (when the population was smaller and not everybody owned a TV set). I think we all know which of the two is the better episode, in terms of script and acting etc.

It aired, what, the next day?! I don't know how this is never remembered. I wasn't even alive back then but, despite being a child, I was agog at finding out that the premiere episode had been up against news that world-shaking. I have never forgotten that. It is part of the glorious legend and legacy of the show and cannot be repeated enough.

After something like that, it's the darker, more topical shows that thrive. After 9/11, for example, "24" saw a massive boost in viewership that led to the show's meteoric rise in the US. Same goes for Battlestar Galactica.

@@jaffarebellion292 An interesting observation; thank you for that. And, did you mean the latter incarnation of Galactica?

@@systembinarygaming Yeah. The Ronald D. Moore version.

@@argorath 🤣😂😆🤣😂

Mater, it was always for the socially infirm. Liking the show got you beaten up in the playground back in the day.

@@cheapfinish6224 😆🤣😂 did it, aye?🤣

True. It was this nice and sometimes spooky show about this charming yet strange man traveling around all of time and space and protecting the Earth (mostly the latter thanks to Jon Pertwee's run; the budget had to be cut and so a lot of the show was basically earthbound for a while).

​@@Wendeta-hq2cpThe Jon Pertwee era is the most political agenda ever, even more that the Seventh Doctor era who want to destroy Thatcher.

It is 100% impossible for your statement to be any more accurate then it all ready is.

I am disappointed that Tenant went along with this travesty, Ncuti Gatwa you are an immature insecure narcissist that does not represent the gay community so stop your crusade and take a free flight back to Rwanda your can express you sexuality there, good luck with that. As for Davis well he has sold his soul to Disney and other bedfellows ?.

The Left in a nutshell.

Not pissing on the ashes, they are just adding more fuel to the fire.

Womp womp

There will be a breaking point.

The West in general

By the little hats

So has Merica effff yaaa

@@generalgrievous398 it will be too late.

Like everybody, even Tom Baker is just a diva.

Its more like a spawn of Russell T Davies gayness. Maybe he has the hots for Gatwa.

The real Doctor walked off into the sunset with Ace and was never seen again.

@@mayotango1317 Don't ever recall Tom insulting fans or demanding they love him or else. Try again, luv. Go back to school and grow a brain while you're at it.

@@codyw1 Matthew Waterhouse says something else, especially how drunk the diva jerk used to get. Ncuti Gatwa was only honest, you guys only live on hate and trolling. Especially listening to a loser like Dalewstrek or Nerdrotic who doesn't know how to tell Cassandra Nova from Polaris in the Deadpool 3 trailer.

"Love for the original" You make me laugh XD XD XD

so did you enjoy the kiss in Good Omens? Childrens TV?!

@@joso7228 hahaaaà😸🐾

I cant say im angry at him. After all, they live in one very solid bubble. You step out, they will never let you in, slowly poisoning your life, calling people who would dare to hire you and tell them you are a hater. This is a mindhive, virus that is very hard to treat. You have to be really brave to go against them. And indeed, very few did.

Did he actually said that?

@@gameover9390 He really did. I simply couldn't believe my ears. I watch the clip again on iPlayer to see if I'd mis-heard him, but no. A complete disregard of the past, the canon, of everything.

@@toxictony4230 I think I’m going to need a minute or two just to process that.

I think you guys might be misinterpreting that. Just before then, he says that the show keeps moving on and evolving, and earlier he talks about how any new viewer doesn't need to know anything about past lore to jump in. I don't take that to mean that past lore is irrelevant (the specials had loads of callbacks), but rather that they're not shackled by it and are focusing on the new, which is something the writers have always been doing. DW lore is massively contradictory, don't forget. There are two origin stories for the Daleks, the Doctor is given different numbers of regenerations, used to have one heart, is stated to be half-human in the 1996 movie and yet also the timeless child. When he says it "doesn't matter", it means that the writers can focus on making interesting stories without worrying about the wiki, and that sort of fresh start is what RTD did back in 2005 anyway. Thinking he meant "just forget about the past" is reading in malintent that's not there imo.

​@@Nebula.Dragon _"the writers can focus on making interesting stories without worrying about the wiki, and that sort of fresh start is what RTD did back in 2005 anyway."_ And good writers are actually able to write stuff that dances with the old while respecting it, instead of trying to rewrite it. Or was something like Timeless Children something that was especially needed or that interesting to rewrite origin of the Doctor? I remember there was plenty of interesting stories e.g. for Eccleston, Tennant and Smith which did not try to rewrite the lore still being highly praised both by critics and audiences. How did they ever manage to do that? Or was it before they tried injecting modern day politics in to everything. Based on user ratings and viewing figures episodes like Timeless Children which many seem to disdain did not seem to hit very high marks. Compared to The Waters of Mars, Midnight or e.g. Blink. To say you need to constantly rewrite the old to be able to write interesting stories that would tell quite a lot about about you as a writer, words like unimaginative and self centered come to mind. In a world like doctor Who there is little obstacles to actually create something wholly new and creative only limit being budget - how to actually practically portray something totally imaginary while staying within limited budget. Example from another world is Don Rosa, an former Disney artist who loved Carl Barks stories and practically wrote most of his most popular and refered stuff basing and leaning on Barks stories and references. Rosa among Barks is on the most loved Duck/McDuck storytellers. Somehow Rosa managed to create lot's of great and interesting stories while worrying about the lore and characters Barks had created mostly feeling sorry if he had to do some minor changes or retcons. Funny how all that works.

The companions will double as airbags.

It wasn't just that he was crippled, he was damaged, and unnatural, prolonging his life because he couldn't bear the thought of losing it, and was terrified of death. Davros was meant to be the anti-Doctor, selfish and sickly, unwilling to let go.

2017? As far as I'm concerned, the end was "The Husbands of River Song", and that was Christmas 2015.

@@TheRealMichaelH True bro. The Doctor ended on a happy note, spending his last night with his wife before she went on to be saved by his younger self. The End.

I wonder what color swatch is used for necrophilia on the flag

Dude how ridiculous is ur comment

@@isaacmaskey468 No more ridiculous than yours I'd wager.

Yeah, i knew i was right to feel uneasy about them buying the rights to the show.

The problem is, it's already hard enough to find the original seasons with Hartnell and co. and now they're reusing the "Season" branding over Series, combined with the fact they're going from season "1" again which is going to further obscure the original show too. It's really quite sad.

@@BlueEyedVibeChecker At least they’re on iplayer, minus an unearthly child which is hung up in a legal battle right now.

An Unearthly Child is on DVD. It comes as a box set with The Daleks & The Edge of Destruction. The set is called The Beginning.

The idiots that decided to take the BBC's best IP and partner with Disney need sacking; they really do. Disney has vandalised _their_ best IP's and ran everything into the ground, imagine what they're going to do with the BBC's properties.

factor in the share of houses with a TV set and things get even worst

yeah its way worst when u look at the nba and there was no internet

Also the current census figures are probably a low estimate as utility and supermarket data puts actual population estimates over 70 million if I recall correctly.

The market was only in the UK back then. Now it's international. So the figures are worse.

and in 1963 Hartnell and co had to build a brand from nothing not walk into an institution known worldwide.

He isn't a supposed actor. He is the lead actor. Also wtf h are talking about

@@kuggacouragegx6093 I'll explain it in a language you can understand..... Doctr who is terribal now. It was gud but it's not know. 😂

@@kuggacouragegx6093 The number one rule in improvisational acting is "Yes, And..." which means that you are allowed to change things in the story, but only if you accept what happened earlier. You never shut down what the other actor did before you or it shuts down the entire routine. You roll with it and play the game with everyone else. I think what Kentlindal is trying to say is that the new actor for the Doctor (and most everyone else involved in the show) is refusing to say "Yes, And..." by instead trying to shut down all of the prior development of the series and do something different with it.

@@PlayStonkers wtf are u talking about

@@kuggacouragegx6093 I was explaining what the "Yes And" rule is since you were asking. That's all. I don't really know how to make it more clear.

Disney took over Dr Who and Star Wars, what'd you think? As someone whose never enjoyed musicals it pains me to see my absolute favourite childhood show get so brutally massacred the way it has with Chibnall and now Disney.

me too ! i watched capaldis 1st and was driven away ! i only watch the classic show now !

I have not heard a more compassionate and succinct appreciation than this - and that is set against so many others posted here. I used to help my son make DW videos when the camera was the size and weight of a wardrobe. He, and I, once, totally immersed in the unlimited creativity and capacity of the myriad multiverse DW could conjure on a peanuts budget. Now it’s DEI preening drivel. Kids need to be behind the sofa safely frightened again. What about the Weeping Angels returning as a metaphorical construct of the evils of pernicious Social Media? And a Doctor with some authority. End of hissy-fit. Regards all . John K. And yes, I vividly remember that day when JFK was murdered. 🦖

That...was beautiful, man. Made me tear up!

Capaldi was *so* good. I didn't care for Smith, and I hated Clara, but other than her 12 would be my favorite Doctor.

I enjoyed the first season, what seaons would you reccomend a new comer?

@@elgatochurro from the new era, basically all the doctors (except the 13th). Trust me, you will love it

Marvel and DC's superhero comics have gotten badly hit as well. Now that sales have cratered they've decided maybe all the diversity hires weren't such a good idea.

= Nothing to look up too.

Are you fucking? Star Trek has ALWAYS been all of that. Dr. Who, too. No idea what in the piss you're on about with Bond and Indiana Jones unless you're talking about Bond being more real instead of camp of pre-Craig. And Indiana is woke as far as trying to win over obvious bad guys like Nazi's, Bolshevik Communists and whatever the hell the newest movie was about.

Even the Famous Five was changed by the BBC at Christmas.

Imagine thinking Star Trek wasn’t always highly politically progressive, I assume you’re joking because no one is that dumb

If you say so, them we know for certain it's false XD XD XD

It hasn’t historically only ever gone one way, and that’s the point. Hundreds and hundreds of roles for POC were played by white actors in TV and movies. This is simply a rebalance. I just can’t fathom what makes people so scared of it

They call it inclusion by discrimination and exclusion. Just be careful to not accuse them of discriminating because that could earn you a phobe title.

@@Shineinpoverty Who calls it that?

I lived in southern England in the early 1970s as a military kid. Even in the middle class, families with TVs were very much the exception, not the rule. Ditto for refrigerators, washing machines, etc. England was equivalent to a third world country then.

Plus you needed a substantial sofa to watch it from behind… speaking from personal experience here…

And you factor into it the death of President Kennedy and most people were gripped by the news. When it was repeated afterwards and the media had loosened up a bit, the result was completely different by a few million and stayed at those heady heights for years. More or less when that other odious cretin JNT got involved it really went the way its going now---Space Pantomime. I used to love reading the target novelisations of stories I was too young to have seen, but I could still see Hartnell or Troughton in my minds eye, thus had a lot to do with the brilliant cover illustrations by Chris Acchileos and the other guys I can't remember their names, sorry. But if you were to take any of the past 3-4 years of the show and write novelisations of the episodes they would be terrible and very unreadable. Which is a shame because a lot of young people are getting more and more reasons to not learn basic skills because they aren't given the right encouragement to get up off their backside and put their iPhone or tablet down and do something else with their minds imagination. But it's just what all the politicians want. A docile and numb generation to manipulate easily. Then the takeover will happen......

It's not a kilt without a sporran (the purse like thing on the front). So he's just wearing a dress.

You do realise he wears a bunch of costumes throughout the series

@@edwardreed67 You do realize they are doing social engineering on the masses not entertainment, right?

@@DrWarbird What the fuck does that have to do with costumes?

@@edwardreed67 The costume only really changes with the actor. The Doctor has always had a certain style going on, with changes usually being smaller when we're talking the same regeneration. For example: The 2nd Doctor always wore ill fitting clothes and a crooked bowtie. If you look closely sometimes his pants had a different pattern. The 3rd Doctor always wore a smoking jacket even if it was a different color, same with his cloak. The 4th Doctor always wore a long scarf, even if it wasn't always the same colour. The 5th Doctor's shirt sometimes had red or green on the inside of the collar, and his pants occasionally changed colour ever so slightly, but it was still the same outfit. The 6th Doctor was obviously a mess but somehow still pretty consistent considering the colourful theme around it. The 7th Doctor always had his panama hat on, even with the movie outfit, which was the least similar to his original one. The 8th Doctor's outfit was still a green coat and waistcoat underneath, as seen in his first and last appearance, even if the clothes themselves were different, so he was still recognizable. The 9th Doctor had the least change, only changing his jumper. The 10th Doctor had 2 whole suits, but both fitting the same design. He still had his coat to tie them together. The 11th Doctor always had his bowtie, even if ditched the tweed jacket for his purple coat, the green coat acting as a bit of a transit outfit. The 12th Doctor had that mess at the end where they put the hoodie together with the shirt and waistcoat, but otherwise his outfit was pretty solid and didn't change much, his most recognizable feature being the fact he wore his shirt completely done up, his three coats being the same design even if differing in terms of color and material. The 13th Doctor was ironically pretty stable, but her outfit was a hot mess. Not like 6, but still. The 14th Doctor was meh and he didn't even change his outfit at all. I think you get my point.

And there's a good chance the new fans secretly hate you (the creators)

​@@kanna-san.Who hurt you?

Yeah, they're called kids. Doctor Who is a kids' show, and kids like this. They're just not as intolerant or bigoted as you are. Deal with it.

you do realise DW was always "woke" right?

first they exclude us next they will exterminate us for not liking doctor rwanda.

That's just racist. If they had good writing I wouldn't mind. It's the writing that's the problem, not the ethnicity. Also, the law never specifies he needs to have an English/Scottish accent it just has always been that way.

@@Cringeharvester There it is… “it always has been that way” because DW is a British institution. Also, they lie that he’s Scottish when in reality he’s an immigrant with citizenship. He’s not even a first gen immigrant. I never mentioned race in my comment, if he was a Brit, I wouldn’t care. Also, growing up in Edinburgh he has developed a mix of Scottish and his foreign linguistic profile. Doesn’t make him Scottish or British.

@callumager537 why does it matter where he's from if he can still be a good doctor. You might not be being racist to black people but you can still be racists to other nationalities (because that classes as racism) such as Rwanda

@@Cringeharvester I literally just explained why. He may very well be a competent actor and a fit for the part, but at least acknowledge that this goes against casting the traditional etiquette that has been clearly established for over 60 years. Saying that someone who is born in Rwanda is Rwandan is not racist. Saying that someone who is granted citizenship doesn’t make them Scottish is not racist. Allow the filters in your mind to ponder whether your argument make sense before you decide to post them.

@@callumager537 but it's racist to judge the series based on their ethnicity.

Can Men PLEASE stop Hugging on TV and in life. It's unsightly.

Dr Who has been like this since 2005. Didnt you get the memo?

@@purefoldnz3070 lol no

@@AndrewsMobs lol no what exactly?

75-78 are my golden years for the programme

checks more boxes that way.

So they can get more of that sweet, sweet ESG cash.

(Yu Gi Oh fusion card)

I have friends from all over the place and find it disturbing that there is some kind of freedom fighters out there that has to remind them of their skin colour? I would tell those people! Hey!! They are people! Not a colour

@@Gibson1976uk I get it but our skin color is immutable. It is not something we can chalk up to chance. It’s who we are. More time than not people group together based on color but obviously it’s more than that but that IS a factor.

Giving the bits I was able to watch without wincing, he is an expert at being mediocre.

​@@yourikhan4425Like the fart aliens or the melodrama of Rose live?

@@mayotango1317 Are you implying that when he mentioned "white mediocrity" being celebrated, he was referring to RTD's writing? Interesting take.

@@demaupin Is not the same?

@@demaupin RTD has written some of the best TV scripts I've read

It’s not. He fails on many levels. He makes no real points. He could have discussed the writing issues present in series 11 but he went after 13 and Yaz being in a relationship in series 13 instead. He makes so many basic errors that it’s clear he doesn’t watch Doctor Who

@@AnomalySource The writing is shit, the story lost its magic ages ago, there easy, don't need a whole video for it

13s era was The Timeless Child Show. No Doctor involved. He still hasn't returned

I still don't understand how there is more doctors after his 12th regen

@@MolGaeilge There aren't. That's when the writers killed the show.

Far less of the population had TVs back then and a lot of fans were so turned off by the Whitaker/Chibnall era that they'll have a hard time finding their way back. There's just a lot of factors that make a direct comparison impossible.

Stupid. It is over 60 years. Also it isn't ruined

@@kuggacouragegx6093 It is ruined and don't be so rude. Everything wrong with society.

@@flyhyland stupid it isn't ruined. Yall are reaching cause yall weren't even fans,also don't tell me not to be rude yet u idiots are just being racist and homophobic clowns and wish death for the show and wishing harm in the actor just cause he is black

@@kuggacouragegx6093Exactly. I want more twerking gay black men in my british science fiction show!

It's been canceled before (and even lost some episodes forever) so it can be saved and rebuilt again.

It's not even fan fiction, which has the distinct merit of at least being written by people who love the source material. This is anti-art and anti-fiction, where all the basic rules of narrative drama are ignored, the conceptual premise of the show is mocked, and the loyal audience are left feeling humiliated and shamed. And it's so very deliberate.

You had me up until the "RIP" bit. I would sincerely love it if everyone in this comment thread put their energy into creating fan fiction instead of burning it all up with resentment.

Nah cut it off to when capaldi regenerated instead, the 9th doctor to 12 doctors runs are incredible

@@CloutMasterCam There were some great episodes. I agree it went downhill after Capaldi.

I am one of those young people, and no, none of us are watching it. They want to appeal it to the activist morons who endlessly demand and tantrum for this sort of thing, not realizing that those scum don’t actually watch these productions. I grew up on doctor who, but I would never watch it now. They had a whole new generation growing up with it and loving it, and then they killed it in our name. They’re out of touch.

Not holding their breath but making reactions on Tik Tok

As a 20 year old no we are not watching this

My 20 year old niece is into manga and D&D and my 21 year old nephew is into partying and FIFA. Doctor Who, not a chance 😃

Yes, there are those of us who are excited for the new season and the new Doctor.

Let's recontextualize those debut ratings: Ncuti Gatwa's debut episode "The Church on Ruby Road" drew 6.2 million people in 2024. Over 450 channels 100s of streaming services 1000s of video games 10s of Social media video channel William Hartnell debut episode "An Unearthly Child" that drew 4.4 million people in 1963. 3 Channels

@@studyaccount6987 2024- Dr. Who well known UK TV series that has been shown all over Asia, Africa, Oceania and North America. 1963- some new kid's show about a man who lives in a phone box or something?

An stupid comparison. Only Hartnell had a debut. Gatwa only joined a show that had been established for 60 years.

In Ncuti's defence, the show had lost a great deal during Chibnall's... attempts at writing Jodie's doctor. He could've been better had he A. Not been directed by Chibnall, and B. followed Capaldi, Matt Smith, or a Jodie directed by anyone but Chibnall. Not saying he was overly good, I'm still subjecting myself to the cruel and unusual punishment that is Chibnall's 13th doctor and having to take days in-between episodes to recover from the crinjuries I endure from cringing so hard while watching.

@@studyaccount6987 So you're saying that more distraction due to social media and streaming services in 2024 somehow compares to 1963 with just radio, movie theaters and TV's with 12 stations? Cool.

A woke activist out of touch with the locals? Perish the thought!

As a gay man who started watching during Tom Baker's run in the '70s I find the woke dross shoveled out over the last 7 or 8 years totally depressing.

Its not meant to inspire.

@OneofInfinity. Okay. Do you feel anything positive from this, then?

@@OneofInfinity. 'be kind' of course it is

Nope.

Imo it fell off with Clara. Such a cardboard character.

@@TotemoGaijin You're not wrong, her other incarnations were fun and quirky, then the actual Clara was a stroppy stick in the mud. I did like that her arrogance got the better of her in the end, even if they did still give her a get out...

There's a reason the 70's is considered the "golden age" of Who.

Loved Tom Baker, he and Eccleston are by far the best Doctors IMHO.

@@gregsmith7949 1970 to 1981, Pertwee and Baker, *Iconic* !

Yeah, like the political agenda message and the feminist Sarah.

2006 to 2015 was the golden era of the morden series David tenant, Matt smith and Peter Capaldi where truly one the most iconic actors that played the doctor, I really miss the playsets and action figure waves they used to have during 2006 to 2015

Precisely. The Doctor should always be seen as 1 singular person. I've always hated when the show (particularly in New Who) would have the Doctor say "I've had so many faces, been so many people". No! He's one guy who changes, not multiple people or personalities!

We had that for one movie. It was called "Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them". But the studio didn't know or value what they had. They could have sent Newt anywhere, with his companions, bigger-on-the-inside office, lock-opening lapel celery. Instead they ruined the sequels with wokeness and memberberries.

@@ikept_the_jethryk2421 That was set in the Potterverse though, so we couldn't.

Last bearable era

You make me laugh XD

I thought witiker(sp?) was a good doctor but the writing that season a shit.

This

... that almost reads like a blurb for a Hitler biography. Maybe that's what we're watching here ? (Or more accurately, not watching.. and from a distance.)

💯I keep thinking the same thing

At least 10 got a happy ending before the show was confirmed dead for good.

Maybe if the make a series 15 they could octuple down on die...er dei and make the doctor a black gay transgender lesbian in a hoverchair who has the mental age of a 12 year old to check every box...that will work this time. (wonders what they are smoking to get some or avoid it at all costs)

The irony is that a female Doctor and even a gay black male Doctor could actually work, but not like this! Gatwa could be a good Doctor if he doesn't overplay his gayness and he responds appropriately to the alien threats, after all, an alien threat is the same whether you are gay or straight. The fact that he is black is neither here nor there. I'd support Idris Elba for the Doctor. Racism isn't an issue here.

Never expected the new Doctor to come out with attacks on white people and talking crap like he’s the victim! We didn’t start this fight! He did

"Nothing else is canon" in your mind maybe. In fact, the canon is controlled by the rights holders who can do whatever they jolly well please. Timeless child is canon. Bi-generation is canon. Lesbian Doctor is canon. Bi Tenant is canon. They won. They destroyed it. They did it intentionally to stick it to the straight white majority. They did with hatred in their hearts, because they hate who they are and someone must pay.

You say but we must wait for after the shows have run.

No really, the show sucks in the 80s.

Totally agree - ended with Capaldi. He was the 13th incarnation including including the War Doctor - end of regeneration cycle in old lore.

To be fair, Peter Davison, Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy were all utter shite! The show has been a roller coaster over the decades. We are in another big dip currently!

What’s message exactly?

If you think the constant neutering of TV shows like this isn't a problem, then you truly are an idiot.

This is RTD now. Chibnall did some huge damage but RTD is making it worse.

Stfu. It didn't ended. Also stfu when u dint even watch the show

It literally didn't though. You clearly haven't been paying attention.

@@TheMoonRover They're being sarcastic, my dude.

@@worthybutter2004 Obviously. What makes you think I didn't notice?

@@TheMoonRover Because you said "it literally didn't" and it in fact literally didnt end. Thats not how sarcasm works lol.