Thanks for watching! Want more Web DM in your life? Get our podcast here: www.patreon.com/webdm

"Wrestle a dragon into submission?" It seems you're familiar with the tale of Los Tiburon.

I like these guys. Haven't played a tabletop RPG in years, but these guys bring it all back and help re-kindle the interest. +1 guys, keep it up!

*Just me again , wondering through old Web DM videos & watching them .*

What I really don't get about Druids in 5E is that each of the "druid" images in the book has an animal companion, but the mechanical character DOESN'T have an animal companion.

I'm really liking these videos so far. I play Pathfinder/Homebrews, but a lot of what you guys talk about here applies to tabletop RPGs in general. Keep up the fantastic work!

I like the interview format they have, flows really well. man, younger gamers are spoiled with all these awesome spaces to consome, share, and create DnD!

After you all play plenty of 5th edition I would really enjoy if you went back and did a more in depth overview of your experiences with the classes. Possibly describing both mechanics that worked or didn't, as well as fun things the character did. As someone who has only played from 3.x onward, comparisons of each class and archetype between their equivalent in previous editions would also be great.

I love every class in 5e, but my heart belongs to the Monk. What's that? You want to hit me with an arrow? *Catches arrow. Here, have it back: *Throws arrow back for eight damage.

lol "I'm a second level monk" I don't know why but I cried when I heard this. In a way I think that I'm very much on my way to becoming a 1/2 level monk

Aw ranger gets no love. Regular range attack + hunter's mark + colossus slayer + archery style and sharpshooter feat instead of any ability score improvements and that's one hurt monster. Stay in the back and keep moving that mark. Sure you lose some attack bonus but that damage can't be beat! Love your videos guys. Best part of any Wednesday is seeing you guys uploaded a new vid. Keep it up!

I loved the concept of Nine Swords. Similarly, I loved the addition of maneuvers to the average Fighter's moves list in 4e. What I didn't like about either is how... gamefied, or spellcastery they became. For a hybrid fighter/caster, it works well, but... there's some core disconnect I have to fight with when you have prepared spells as a swordslinger. And I don't mean in addition to; I mean when your sword techniques and battle maneuvers are prepared; when you're a master swordsman, an expert on the global scale, you have to have an eight-hour sleep to restore your martial techniques, and a meditation over a book in the morning to set aside exactly which ones you'll use and how often you'll use them. At-Will wasn't even a casting option in 3rd or 3.5e, so while Wizards didn't have access to stuff like Light at anytime, there were also sword moves dedicated champions couldn't use just... whenever. 4e fixed that issue, but it became a big issue with me of how focused 4e was on miniatures. Movement and forced movement became a bigger tactical deal, which I love, but at the same time you lost some of that element of freedom, some of those options players could take to more handle the situation outside of the expectation of the rules. There was no dedicated ten-foot shove option for many players, least not without feats focused on that, but when you're fighting an enemy near a ledge it was more forgiving in 3.5e for the DM to give you a roll and let you adapt. In Fourth, since it was so measured in what could give movement and how much, that many "squares" could be too imbalancing. Overall, I like the blend 5e strikes a pretty good bit. There were losses and gains, and we got the Battle Master which feels better to me as a class option than some of what we had before.

We had a ranger in our group and by mid-levels, he was the most devastating member of our party, taking half of a dragon's HP in one single Crit attack.

dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/unearthed-arcana-ranger-revised They have once more went over the Ranger. I do love how they are trying to fix the class and I think this time it works really well. Specially the Beast Master one is much improved.

You guys are fucking fantastic TY!

when I first read a bout the druid I didn't even care about the wildshape all I wanted was the companion and the casting spells and I enjoyed that character. It's a minor annoyance though that can be fixed with house rules.

Hey guys, now that you've been playing 5E a lot, how do you like the ranger builds? Do you feel like they need homebrew work to be worthwhile playing, or did they end up being an interesting class after all?

Can you do an episode on mundane weapons?

Can you do one with the lv4 and 5 casters?

I wan't to know where they get there T-Shirts?

where do i go to see people play?

ranger ua my god its so goooood the revised ranger. please forget the normal one

I'm just getting into the game and I don't know anything about it..what are those comic/books on the start of the video??

I have a problem with monks they are supposed to be the shao-lin type monk the problem is all the abilities and terms, monk weapons they get are all Japanese not Chinese

systems with classes suck. that said, you guys are cool. subbed.