It's the trial of grasses for you.

Can't run it properly on my PC or else i would've played the shit out of it

Not even that, hasn't even watched the trailer. I call bullshit.

It's not "not played the witcher" , the dude know absolutly NOTHING about it...

I literally said: "A reaction video on a Witcher trailer when we're almost 2019?". What's next a reaction video to the Skyrim trailer?.

I'm sorta jealous. Imagine being able to play TW3, TLoU, Uncharted, GoW, RDR2, etc for the first time.

Wow is only 14 #destroyed

It is sad to say the least. Not because he played only WoW for 15 but because he missed such masterfuckingpieces like this ans Bloodbore

that's american neckbeards to you.

I actually miss the feeling of playing a new game and knowing absolutely nothing about it. I actually went into Skyrim completely blind, never saw gameplay, reviews, didn't even know what the Elder Scrolls series was (I was 12 at the time, so go easy on me). It had a feeling of wonder that I had only experienced one time before, playing WoW for the first time, also knowing nothing about it (I was 8 at this time, so had even less awareness of the gaming world). Today, I simply can't get that kind of experience from a game anymore, as I'm always watching reviews, gameplay demos, anything that can help me formulate my opinion on how much I like it, resulting in the feeling of discovery to be dampened. I feel this is mostly due to companies pulling "sneakies" on their customers these days, promising one thing, delivering another. Simply can't trust companies anymore.

Both the DLC's were amazing to me. They both had their own fantastic atmosphere. HoT had a more impressive story but I think the other dlc was more fun, what with the fairyland and such.

but the combad is so fucking boring in this game...

Blood and Wine felt like separate game .... you want DLC ? Take this extra 150 hours of content xD I mean who does that :D

Eder Rabanales yeah blood and wine was so amazing. That dlc could have been a game for itself. And the colours and graphics in blood and wine. Just amazing

@@MrBuurt And wow? Fucking LOL

I loved witcher 3, and a lot of other single player games. But warfronts are absolute garbage, the only thing I can compare them to is lfr without bosses, just killing lfr trash mobs. Also I got a 390 piece from a warfront, I raid mythic and that piece was the highest ilvl I ever got, and it came from shitty warfronts, so the problem for me is that they give gear, should make them only give up to 370.

It can be boring when W3 is your first Witcher ever and you don't know characters or story

The Witcher 3 is the worst game ever.And here's why: Since I finished it 3 times already, I simply cannot play and actually finish other games.Experiencing a game like Witcher, with such amazing story,world and pretty much everything in it.Makes it hard to play ANY of these other garbage games out there, even if they are "AAA". Therefore Witcher 3 ruined my gaming experience. Since Witcher, the only game I could finish was Thronebreaker...What a surprise.Might be able to finish the latest Assassins creed, maybe, prolly not, it's boring af already, after a few hours.

People who say the Witcher 3 is boring are the same people who'd vote fornite for the game of the year.

the fight system and gameplay in Witcher 3 is one of the most boring ones in rpgs, game could be the best game ever but the fighting is so boring i never could finish this game

The best game ever made. It ruined all other games for me. (to this day) every other game feels empty, bland and boring. And i have tried all higher rated games. Gonna give RDR2 a try, hope that will change my mind.

NPC #6621461 DUDE I FEEL THE SAME WAY

it would be when the combat wasnt so fucking boring in this game

blood n wine made combat a lot better tho

@@MrBuurt The combat is servicable, it's not meant to be the main selling point of the game like it is in Dark Souls.

Not the best game, rpg elements like combat and economy are meh. But certainly best around these 5 years.

@@63Limar With games like Dark Souls , Red Dead , Gta coming ouy in the span of those 5 years I would call Witcher 3 best game of the year it was realeased, nothing more.

@@dumitrache12 it's your opinion, I think third Darksouls was meh, would rather have Bloodborne on pc than DS3, bought it and was too bored to finish, I don't like GTA games and RDR2 doesn't seem fun to me too.

@@dumitrache12 I would say the witcher 3 is better than all the ones you mentioned there. The witcher is amazing on a technical level, it's got great storytelling, great gameplay and to top it off it's one of the most consumer friendly games out there. Sure if you're specifically looking for a really tough challenge dark souls will be more your thing, but dark souls is not as good on a technical level and the storytelling isn't anywhere near the level you see in the witcher. There are certain preferences that could make you enjoy some other games more like setting, difficulty etc, but as a whole I would say none of these games are on the same level as the witcher 3.

Played the 1 and 2 in max Difficulty, but I couldn't even get 15h of playime in the 3.

exactly

Lol

DAMNNNNNN

Haha

Rob Campion thought the same oh Well here we go again

It’s a crime not to have played it yet. 😂

Witcher 3 > All games

They are entirely different genres tho. But I agree for sure.

Easy now, easy now

@@sunkeneyes9564 What are you trying to say?

@@whennever8202 I'm saying let's all have a fucking breather and assess the situation. Witcher 3 is better. BUT. RDR2 has done something no game has ever done to me before- wanting to complete while not wanting to. That entire game is a depressing realisation that the more you progress, the worse things get.

God of war, red dead 2, last of us, halo and witcher 3 are the ones for me

I played it 2 times but i already forgot a lot of things, probably will play it this year again.

I am at my 7th playthrough mods are so good

Becouse its Polish game :D

id argue thats the worst part of the game

@@angeloscarberry1574 nah that goes to the romance scenes lol

John Kim like he said “some people get bored watching a vine video”

@@Yarzu555 I find The Witcher pretty boring. And i hate Fortnite. Sorry dude !

@John Bennett leave the kid alone. Let him enjoy his league of legends. Or overwatch.

@@AnasyaChantelimbe I feel bad for you, Witcher 3 is probably the greatest game of all time and that's not my opinion, it's a fact.

@@m4sch1nom29 How come ?

And the funny thing is you meet him at the very start of the original game, long before the DLC and when you do, you think nothing of it. Plus i wouldn't say he is an antagonist.

Dragon D Hitman nah he got like 30k hours in WoW

Can't please these Fortnite kiddies, man. They're called zoomers for a reason.

He's not wrong. Witcher3 combat is mediocre and bland. Story pacing is slow.

@@RepliesMuted Witcher 3's combat is have a wide spectrum , and even more combos can be unlocked by skillpoints, also , this "mediocre , bland" combat system is also true for almost every other popular RPG games , the highly praised Skyrim is the biggest example of it. There is literally no combat there just left click spamming and even the majority of the weapons have the same single animation... Story pacing is just as slow as you want it to be , but to be honest i never seen anyone who would complain about a complete and good written story because of it's pace. I enjoyed every single conversation in the game , because it felt real , it had an impact , weight , also the ability to choose how you wanna continue the story in major ways are still blow my mind , and still there is no game what could do anything like this. The game have over 200 quests and every single one of them (even the tiniest side missions) have about 3-4 endings depending on how you act , and what you say , like wtf...if you get bored of it then the problem in you and not in the game.

Witcher 3's combat is serviceable at best. The rest of the game is about walking around, talking to people and reading text. If you're not into that then you won't find the game enjoyable.

Gaunter O'Dimm has to be my favourite villain in any game or film ever as well ay

Was the first scene from a dlc? I can't for the life of me remember. I may have missed it completely. I remember when I first saw this I was so stoked to get to this scene.

@@beauraymond11 if you're talking about the first cinematic that asmongold watched then yeah its from B&W dlc, but there's 2 paths you can take a that stage (investigate the girl in the cinematic or the queen's sister) so if your like me and chose the sister then you wouldn't have seen this confrontation in game

@@albatross7524 thank you!

Albatross You actually never see this confrontation in-game. The cinematic takes place after the events of blood and wine, where Geralt goes back to Toussaint to kill Orianna. She never dies in the game, no matter your decisions.

it's 2 different worlds. wow is faster paced. take a quest. kill 10 mobs. boom reward. take 5 more quest aoe pull click items, bonus quest. While in the witcher you talk, choose options, travel. enitrely different. But i'm not saying witcher was boring. Tho i get why some people think it is compared to wow.

My problem with why i think the game is boring is mostly because i feel the economy is fucked, and the fact that i have to do a bunch of sidequests before i can go to the next zone unless i wanna be under leveled.

The other one being D:OS2?

@@Byggherren except that the sidequests often have just as good or as good a story as the main quest instead of just being throwaway content

@@Guitarman5705 not only that but the random stories that are told in random locations without quest tied to them at all. Pretty sure its in Velen theres a building I came across on my looting fest that had a 3 corpses which looked like a Mother and Child lying on the bed and the father hung himself across the room. And that house just adds/helps to emphasize how dark The Witcher UV really is.

I laugh too xD

witcher = Greymane vampire lady = Sylvanas

it triggered me so much

Witcher 1 sucks? What? It is better than the second part. Old graphics dont make game shit

@@softan Disagree with you on that one chief, I couldn't finish the first Witcher because I hated the gameplay so much. Story was fine, but I just couldn't deal with that clunky combat system. 2 was improved in nearly every way possible

@@SpellbreakWiki Yeah, I heard good things. It's definitely on my ''to play'' list. Gotta finish my PS4 Spider-man game first tho

Denis Vezijak well.. the first one is meh.

@@michael6079 Honestly, the first one is better than the second one, story-wise and gameplay wise. Pluus the atmosphere was amazing in that game haha. but to each their own

I personally wasn't having as much fun with witcher 2 because even though it was set in an open world map, you only had a couple of paths you could take to your destination. I remember there being a single piece of log in my way that you could easily walk over irl without any effort but in w2 it was a completely impenetrable barrier, and that's the case with pretty much all other tiny obstacles in the game.

Left Thumb First one is better than the sequel gameplay and story-wise? Just no.

@@whennever8202 Story was better for sure imo. Geralt's start of the story was pretty fun and. Gameplay wise, I loved the 2-sword mechanic which (I think) was forgotten in other two, well, less focused on I think. Locations and maps were great full of atmosphere Buuut it's my opinion, and my memories of the game.

This is not his channel, he won't watch this video as it is recorded from his stream

most streamers can't finish witcher 3 cause it's long as fuck.

dimkacracker even Forsen finished it

@@mortolify real? dlc as well?

dimkacracker yup, vod is on KZfaq aswell.

dimkacracker yeah man its a long game but very very enjoyable i think Asmon would have a blast playing it maybe not on highest difficulty

agreed. he saw them as no different than the other monsters.

That's not a silver sword....

@@giorgis.2748 after having a second look, you are right. my point still stands however.

@Rohan Andrew ye geralt sorry.

Witcher 3 is a bit longer than 100 hours, it`s more towards 250 with all DLCs and the replay value is sky high.

Know Never I just finished all of witcher 3 stories no side missions left although a fair amount of ? And I ended with 130 hours yet I see people take 200 hours to only finish the base game wtf

@@LeeSong325 Did you skip the conversations? I don`t know, man... it`s impossible to beat the base game in 130 hours. But then again, I missed out an absolute ton of content on my first playthrough as well.

Know Never I finish the base game twice both hovering around 80 hours maybe I just use fast travel more often

@@LeeSong325 You finished Witcher 3 in 80 hours??

If you want you can watch Witcher seris from 2002. That's better then this trillers