Thanks

Thanks

Thanks

Thanks 😊

Thanks for watching

Thanks

Thanks

Thanks so much.

Thanks for sharing your opinion.

Probably Sunday. Lots and lots of footage to go through and edit.

@@KrisandMike awesome, thanks! We’ll be there in about 3 weeks so this is perfect timing.

Not sure. Thanks for watching.

Yes that was giving the finger to Ecuador. But I think he would have taken Glas regardless of that. Negotiating died down around the same time as the amnesty announced. Hard to say. Thanks for watching and your comment.

Yes, when AMLO opens his mouth, crap comes out. I don't know about his policies or how good a president he is, but he says things that are completely unnecessary and gets in trouble. This is not the first time it happens. Having said that, it's not up to Ecuador to say that Glas is a criminal and has to be arrested by any means necessary. It is the country considering granting asylum that dictates whether asylum is legitimate. In other words, the country granting asylum determines if there's a crime, not the country issuing the arrest warrant. I think the reason so much condemnation has come against Ecuador is because if this can happen to a relatively neutral country like Mexico, in a relatively non-threatening country like Ecuador, then it can happen to anyone anywhere, unlike, say, what happened in Crimea thousands of miles away from most other countries. I fully agree that internal politics led to the raid, but by golly he did it wrong! You don't invade an embassy. You surround it with cops and wait for the dude to come out. It would have been a defacto house arrest because Mexico would have been unable to remove Glas out of the country, just like Ecuador was unable to remove Assange out of England. I wonder how Ecuadorians would have reacted if England invaded their embassy to remove Assange.

@@PhoenixBeI Moreno handed over an un-convicted Australian citizen over to the Brits at the USA's behest where he continues to languish five years later in a 6x12 cell. A despicable act on Moreno's part. Just sayin'.

@@tomg1247 agreed!

Clearly you have an agenda and we aren't getting into politics here. All the examples I used for breaking international law are all well documented.

Obviously I hit a nerve with you. Not getting into a debate. I did not say it was right. I explained all the potential rationale. Chemical weapon use is clearly documented by many in Syria. No need to respond.

@@KrisandMike Chemical use in Syria was "documented" along with the fake white helmets, by Western interests. It's been shown to be fake a long time ago.

@@KrisandMike Written by American reporter John Kiriakou. "It should be obvious that the NATO-backed regime is the perpetrator of nuclear terrorism yet the Western governments, media and the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency all adopt a shameful ambiguity about the perpetrator. The Western sponsors are covering up for a nuclear terrorist regime in Kiev because the Western governments are fully complicit in the terrorism. John Kiriakou points out that the same playbook was used in Syria. When the Syrian Arab Army was gaining the military upper hand against NATO-sponsored jihadi mercenaries trying to overthrow the Syrian government, the Western media then reported alleged chemical weapons attacks by the Syrian army. That resulted in the United States, Britain, and France launching air strikes against Syria. It turned out that the chemical weapon attacks were false flags conducted by the CIA and MI6-trained proxies."