English Electric Lightning | Ugly as hell but also heavenly charming

Рет қаралды 15,925

Күн бұрын

We are investigating the BAC Lightning, the first and last purely British-designed Mach 2 jet. #lightning #militaryaviationhistory #militaryaviation #jetfighter #royalairforce
What was the highly-complicated development history of the Lightning?
What were the superiorities and shortcomings of the aircraft?
What were the odd design features of the Lightning?
Why was the aircraft not successful in the international market?
00:00 Introduction
00:53 Historical background
01:57 Programme history
06:49 Users
07:22 Specifications
08:18 Design
12:21 Operational history
Welcome to our new content. As the Weapon Detective, we are investigating modern weapon systems of the Second Cold War. The Weapon Legends is about the older weapon systems. We tell their epic stories, which made them a legend. The Weapon Legends investigates these stories, reads between the lines, analyzes, and tells the untold. You can find technical information, historical backgrounds, what happened during the development processes, combat experience and political projection. Let the wisdom of history show us what the future will be. Let’s investigate the veteran weapons of the past together.
© Royal Air Force, Royal Saudi Air Force, Kuwait Television, French Ministry of Armed Forces, Imperial War Museums, BBC, AP Archive, British Pathé, Smithsonian Channel, British Movietone, U.S. Air Force, Italian Air Force, PeriscopeFilm, Dassault Aviation, Swedish Armed Forces, Royal Navy, Ministry of Defence of Saudi Arabia, British Airways, Lockheed Martin, Defense Visual Information Distribution Service, U.S. Department of Defense
Music: Royal Air Force March
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends videos
• Weapon Legends
Please click the link to watch our other British Systems videos
• British Systems
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends-Air videos
videos • Weapon Legends-Air
/ weapondetective
/ weapondetective
weapondetective@gmail.com

Пікірлер: 89

@WeaponDetective 2 ай бұрын

Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends videos kzfaq.info/sun/PLEMWqyRZP_Lq9j4Wz2QHo6dptTW3-tdIo Please click the link to watch our other British Systems videos kzfaq.info/sun/PLEMWqyRZP_LrA_rFwr_1Gk4JBymGPNxSJ Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends-Air videos videoskzfaq.info/sun/PLEMWqyRZP_Lpl6SQpA2WBti_WsykOgtgy

@fredtedstedman Ай бұрын

The FRIGHTNING !! The problem with Britain is that politicians kept moving the goalposts .....it is a wonder we got any planes at all !

@hmmjedi 2 ай бұрын

Calling this jet Ugly is enough to start a fight calling it brutal looking yes but not ugly... a great jet and much bigger in person than it would seem in pictures and until the F-15's came to Europe the Lightning was the fastest launching interceptor across Europe and could still surprise even in her closing days... and at the time she could outrun just about anything...

@NeroontheGoon 2 ай бұрын

The Lightning was ugly? Madness! The Lightning was beast on a wing!

@ronjon7942 2 ай бұрын

Yeah, even this American thinks ‘ugly’ is inappropriate. ‘Brutal’ is a good word for it, for sure. Why that damn white paper had to surface so Duncan Sandys could destroy the fine British aviation industry…that was even worse than former SecDef Gates canceling our promised 750 Raptors.

@NeroontheGoon 2 ай бұрын

@@ronjon7942 WELL, At the behest of our diversity hire president for the time, you know, free cell phones and shit!

@ronjon7942 2 ай бұрын

Yep, him too. Thinking about Gates is bad enough, but the other guy…that’d just ruin my lunch. We had so not have him again for a fourth term if his puppet manages to steal another election.

@MrDino1953 2 ай бұрын

But…it is ugly, and got uglier when they put that bulge under fuselage, then external tanks on top of the wings.

@bill8784 2 ай бұрын

With Lightnings screaming over the house on the air base I grew up on as a child, and having been fortunate to fly in one, I can assure you the Lightning is one of the most beautiful aircraft ever made. Far more impressive than the F104 too.

@ronjon7942 2 ай бұрын

Oooooo them’s fightin’ words! :). How did you manage to get a ride? That had to be amazing - I remember reading about it as a kid and having to verify I read it right that the Lightning had a rate of climb of 50,000 feet/min. I was very upset that was a much higher rate than the F-4, and even bested the F-104 by a smidge, but after that I developed a keen respect for British jets. Learning about the TSR.2 helped as well. I grew up wanting to fly Phantoms and Starfighters, but alas, colorblindness. Maybe they’ll start turning up on the warbird scene. I’m glad for you that you got to ride in your baby.

@bill8784 2 ай бұрын

@@ronjon7942 The F104 was very impressive too and of course the F4 was a brilliant all round fighter and was the Lightning’s immediate replacement. I was lucky enough at university to join the University Air Squadron part of the RAF Volunteer Reserve so had basic flying training care of the RAF in the 80s and also got to go up in a variety of aircraft including the Lightning. I remember my RAF flying instructor who had flown Phantoms telling me how amazing the F16 was when they had had mock dog fights against them in West Germany and I must admit I would love to have gone up in one of those too.

@ronjon7942 2 ай бұрын

That is great - thanks for sharing.

@user-zs5nr8dd1z 2 ай бұрын

@@ronjon7942Nah. they're not fighting words at all. The Lighting had many firsts in climb, stern close rate etc AND it is THE most beautiful jet fighter ever built. The Blackburn Buccaneer is THE most beautiful low-level bomber and the Canberra is THE most beautiful multi-role bomber. No, you gotta agree that all that is pure truth, doncha?

@bill8784 2 ай бұрын

@@user-zs5nr8dd1z The Buccaneer was a beauty too. And as you say so was the Canberra which we also had out in Germany and as I am sure you know along with the Harrier and Hawk is one of the few jet aircraft “exports” the UK has made to the land of the free.

@cedhome7945 2 ай бұрын

I saw one at an airshow in the 1970s and the full almost vertical take off is probably the most shattering thing I've seen. Children not prepared for the absolute power where crying and screaming.

@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын

... children were* crying ...

@georgebarnes8163 2 ай бұрын

The only aircraft to catch and pass Concorde, others tried and failed.

@jaws848 2 ай бұрын

As Han Solo would say "she might not look like much,kid,but she has got it were it counts"

@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын

... like much,* kids,* but she has got it where* it counts.

@chrissouthgate4554 2 ай бұрын

Here to give some love to the Victor Tankers!

@BlueMoonday19 2 ай бұрын

The First Cold War title still takes some getting used to

@piet8803 2 ай бұрын

I was lucky enough to see 4 of them fly side by side in South Africa a couple of years ago.

@habahan4257 2 ай бұрын

Excellent video with unique footage as always. However, I think the Lightning is weird not ugly, and absolutely charming.

@JP-mx1zs 2 ай бұрын

Best fighter of the time alongside with the F-8 Crusader, my 2 favs of this epoch

@PGHEngineer 2 ай бұрын

It's not beautiful, it's handsome. It's masculinity in jet form. It's power over nature.

@Adrian-qk2fn 2 ай бұрын

One thing you didn't mention in your video was the disastrous Duncan Sandys Defence Review of 1957 which cancelled virtually all manned fighter and combat aircraft development. The P1 later the Lightning was going to be the last manned fighter developed by Great Britain before Missiles took over.

@olivierpuyou3621 2 ай бұрын

It's true that it's still a shame to have sacrificed its aeronautical industry when Great Britain was at the forefront of world aeronautics in the 40s and 50s. From an outside point of view it is even incomprehensible. On the other hand, with a combat radius of only 250 km, I wonder what its effectiveness could have been in the event of a real engagement? Thanks for the video.

@farrazaulia2917 2 ай бұрын

Cool video man

@michaelogden5958 2 ай бұрын

I didn't know the Lightning was so far ahead of its time!

@alexanderleach3365 2 ай бұрын

Built for speed, this beauty was.

@eltenda 2 ай бұрын

Cold War classic! Great video!

@phelansa23 2 ай бұрын

I suppose beauty is in the eye of the beerholder. But having had the privilege to actually walk around one of these (at Thundercity), I think they are gorgeous! Weird…. But gorgeous.

@LessAiredvanU 2 ай бұрын

The official and speed and height numbers are just that; what was officially announced. The speed may have been in excess of Mach 2.3, but this was achieved at heights above the supposed maximum ceiling so neither was admitted to. However, F.6's did practice intercept attempts against SR71 Blackbirds, who flew a lot faster and higher than the Lightning's published figures. Strange that... and the fact that MiG25 reconnaissance aircraft did not appear to have challenged British airspace in the 1970's and '80's.

@Leptospirosi 2 ай бұрын

It was a fast and powerful interceptor, with good manoeuvrability too. What crippled it against the competition was Range (worse then an F104), high service costs and the Redtop/Radar combo. It could marginally faster as an interceptor then the F104, but what can you do if you cannot shoot down the target due to horrible missiles performances and no guns (added, but too late)?

@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын

... worse than*

@mohammedsaysrashid3587 2 ай бұрын

It was a wonderful video about British electric lightening aircraft ( ugly as hell and heavenly charming) shared by an amazing ( weapon detective 🕵️‍♂️) channel. Video clearly explained all characteristics of that aircraft's and historical designs of several prototypes

@tigerland4328 Ай бұрын

* English electric lightening...not British

@n1k2-ja46 2 ай бұрын

It's a fighter plane developed in the UK after WW2, and honestly it's the coolest! The engine has an unconventional vertical arrangement, with additional tanks above the wing surface. What a great idea!!!!!!!!!!!! Ps. Is it true that at one time, it took one aircraft to fly in an anti-aircraft intrusion mission (scramble) when normally two aircraft would fly? I want to know the truth (I heard that it was done to save on fuel costs). WW2後にUKで開発された戦闘機で、正直一番カッコいいよ！掟破りの縦型配置のエンジン、翼面上部の増槽。発想が素晴らしい!!!!!!!!!! Ps.一時期、対領空侵犯任務（スクランブル）で通常なら２機で上げるところ、１機で上がっていたのは本当ですか？真実が知りたい（噂では燃料代節約の為と聞いていましたが）。

@timking2822 2 ай бұрын

"Heavenly charming"? Interesting concept of heaven.

@user-tn1vc1xz5d 2 ай бұрын

The thumbnail photo is extremely beautiful. Unusual fuel tanks but i think it works on rhe Lightning.

@ronjon7942 2 ай бұрын

Right? Double-take. Reminds me when I first saw a grainy picture of the Jaguar with its overwing Sidewinders, as a kid. I was studying that pic like an analyst trying to figure out how the airplane above it got edited out!

@yarmud 2 ай бұрын

Speed has a meaning

@abeelvago 2 ай бұрын

We've got about 11 mins of fuel, let's make every second count, I mean it, we're down to seconds of fuel

@dumptrump3788 2 ай бұрын

And don't forget, the Lightning could break the sound barrier vertically. So rotating from the end od the runway, to 90deg it kept accelerating past Mach1. It had to, there'd be little warning of incoming soviet bombers & it had to get high & fast in a real hurry, all the while being so close it'd happen under UK ground radar direction, so no need to carry a heavy radar.

@daniellabra4186 2 ай бұрын

When Britabia used to imagine, create and build...

@wiktorberski9272 2 ай бұрын

Really interesting plane with rather untypical engines layout. And fule tank located over the wing :)

@petegarnett7731 2 ай бұрын

The overwing tanks were only for ferrying. Definitely never intended for use in combat.

@wiktorberski9272 2 ай бұрын

@@petegarnett7731 I know. But they look really intersting

@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын

Definitely NOT an ugly plane. The only thing ugly are the above-wing tanks.

@ludovicbon5903 2 ай бұрын

A beautifully ugly monster like as only Brits have the secret . Impressive as hell ! Fast, agile, climb like a rocket and fuel hungry as a rocket too .

@ronjon7942 2 ай бұрын

Guess I didn’t realize this competed with the Fairey Delta. I thought the Delta was a proof of concept example.

@TheCodbutt 2 ай бұрын

A friend of mine took one up to 74,000 feet, and said someone else on his squadron had taken one to 83,000, and had a photo of the altimeter to prove it.

@Swaggerlot 2 ай бұрын

'Ugly as hell' is a term reserved for US (second generation) aircraft designers.

@adamzhu2313 2 ай бұрын

Another great video on an unique aircraft! Just curious, what kind of accent are you speaking?

@WeaponDetective 2 ай бұрын

Our narrator is a Turkish-American

@adamzhu2313 2 ай бұрын

@@WeaponDetective Thank you for the answer! I am always curious about culture and language stuff.

@guinnog2 2 ай бұрын

A unique combination of an incredibly capable aircraft, whose main armament totally didn't work.

@martinbayliss3868 2 ай бұрын

When new the armament was the best in the world. The missiles on the Lightning were better than anything the US had at the time. The fact the UK was still using them up to the late 1980s tells you how good they were.

@guinnog2 2 ай бұрын

@martinbayliss3868 On the contrary, when introduced the Lighting had missiles that literally never worked. After a complete redesign they got missiles which might occasionally work. They also had a pitiful range, especially in the context of their service in Saudi Arabia.

@georgebarnes8163 2 ай бұрын

This is the aircraft that did the Kessel Run in 12 Parsecs

@thorshammer8033 2 ай бұрын

Remember when that tech accidently took off in one

@dukeford8893 2 ай бұрын

Homely, perhaps, but not ugly.

@iaf010 2 ай бұрын

The wheel turns..

@MBCGRS 2 ай бұрын

Only scored 2 kills.... A USAF C130 Hercules. Shot down by an American pilot. And another Lightning that had been abandoned by ejection...

@marcusliu9782 2 ай бұрын

Do you need to fly upside down to drop those fuel tanks?

@mark_dauz 2 ай бұрын

Brits depend too much aviation industry to the US n european allies.. Only france keep their aviation industry with pride n dignity.. Brits got so many talented engineer but goverment doest not have will to support it..

@themeatpopsicle 2 ай бұрын

What other production aircraft had an over-under engine layout?

@georgebarnes8163 2 ай бұрын

The British Short Sperrin, it was the 4th bomber after the Valiant, Victor and Vulcan, it was never put into production but had stacked engines on both wings.

@ronjon7942 2 ай бұрын

I wonder why it never reappeared on anything else in operation.

@taichung465 2 ай бұрын

I'd love to see who'd win in a dogfight between a Lightning and a Draken.

@chrisleung3978 Ай бұрын

Dogfight, draken

@misterbig9025 2 ай бұрын

Can the Lightning do a dogfight against, say, MiG-17?

@gazzertrn 2 ай бұрын

Ugly ? i think its the best looking jet ever to grace the skies . And the records it broke speak for itself .

@dukeford8893 2 ай бұрын

What records? Name one.

@gazzertrn 24 күн бұрын

Held the record for fastest acsent ,from take off for years.

@maxkazzora4234 2 ай бұрын

You are so wrong on the British Lightening fighter being ugly. So so wrong on that. And it was one beautifully designed fighter of the 1960s. The Lightening was a sleek and innovative fighter jet that was up there with the best of US fighters. Of course you have your opinion as do I. But if it were put to a vote you would definitely lose. 😂😂👍

@davidrobertson5700 2 ай бұрын

7:48 blatant, blatant mistake. Who else can spot it 🤔

@richardsanders3567 2 ай бұрын

The lightning is not ugly

@Rafael-nz6pp 2 ай бұрын

No, no. The Lightnings are bautiful. They look fast almost in a sci-fi way. It became a bit off only when they tried to store fuel in it.

@Sir_Godz 2 ай бұрын

such a compromised design even the russians would blush

@jona.scholt4362 2 ай бұрын

Disagree the Lightning wasn't as sexy as the 104. The F-104, in my humble opinion, is one for the most hideous machines, let alone aircraft, ever made.

@chitlika 2 ай бұрын

F104 fast in a straight line and thats about it killed its pilots in droves

@Idahoguy10157 2 ай бұрын

@@chitlika… Germany had the high accident rate. Other air forces flying the Starfighter didn’t have that

@dukeford8893 2 ай бұрын

@@chitlika "Droves"? What a load of crap.