Im going to Russia and start digging their soil, i would be lucky if I can find a tank buried underneath it

i might find me beloved MS-1

And they are all burnt out in Ukraine...

It's like finding money on an old pair of pants

It looked like an old IS tank when it first came out..l

Good on her for finding such gainful employment, a whiskey tenor like that can crack concrete.

Which version of T-80 cypirot has had? T-80E or T-80U

@@IndoAtheist T80U and T80UD

"90 pieces could very easily handle 400 turkish M48a5." In Ukraine they can't handle with Turkish Bayrakters and US Javelins :D

@@askme5805 yeah...imagine those 400 junks against apilas, spike NLOS and ARHRITAS STEALTH DRONE! Bayraktars will be useless against IRON DOME and SPYDER long range a/a missile system

@@askme5805 javelins are overhyped. Many issues were encountered by AFU soldiers

Death trap for the tank crew because it blows up after 70% of hits.

Cheeki-breeki tactics!

ukraine doesnt have to imagine

Russian BLYATMAN !

Only if germans knew that, they could have won.

​@@fungames24 skill issue

Its worse than any modern tank in armour and accessories

@@tomwelshshore exactly, too many people calling it bad because of its autoloader and too many people calling it good because of its relikt ERA. It’s just an upgrade to an obselete tank to help it stay relevant

@@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here T 80B is very outdate. I dunno why Russian MoD don't choose the T 80U for the modernization program. Instead, they make a stupid shit modernization kit without CITV and APS , and throw these tank to the battlefield that full of modern threats like ATGM and etc. They don't care about soldier's live, just make it as cheap as possible and we see the result.

@@mrmakhno3030 What result did you see, that russia gaining land? Land will make more soldiers. You live for yourself. They live for their descendants. Nature will favour them and give them unlimited resources.

@@fungames24 the result I see is they lost so much tank that they need to send reserved T 80BV to reinforce.

Kuev will be in ruins soon, dear friend, but not the T - 80

@@borisboris3644 We are now into year three of the three day operation, so I would say that your prediction is doubtful. Good luck with coping though

россия делает оружие для войны.а не для выставок. все что нужно в нём есть

its the drivers seat, what is there to modernize

@@janko7245 an automatic transmission? a steering wheel instead of a sticc? more electronics?

The autoloader

@@janko7245 What the BelgianFried told you, a freaking steering wheel and automatic transmission for starters and hopefully for the entire crew,air conditioning system. But that's not the end of it, this tank also needs a thermal imaging 360° observation device as well as Active Protection System (the Russians invented DROZD, 1st gen APS and the only T-80 tank that was equipped with it, got destroyed in Ukraine), now they have a new gen called ARENA APS, but it's not even in service. So yeah, in case ANYONE's wondering "what's there to upgrade?", there's some food for thought.

අඩෝ

From India too

@@mr.waffentrager4400 India... ??🤔🤔

Привет из России!

@@praveenranndika5083 yes I am from India Any problems ?

@Prince Harambe no we have T 72s.

@James Cunliffe how are you buddy?

@James Cunliffe I am glad to hear. What is your favourite beer?

@James Cunliffe American Budvar or Czech?

You ever seen a t72 get hit? They go up like roman candles

Ukraine use the t80 too

Who forgot? Maybe other countries which not paid for it, but Russia paid last payments for lend-lease else in 2011. It was heavy for country debt about which everyone talked each year. Actually last payments was planned up to 2030, but Putin with some miracle paid everything much yearly.

Much is made about Lend Lease when really it was but a trickle until after Stalingrad. And by then, the tide of the war had turned decisively against the Wehrmacht. Without Lend Lease, the USSR would have won the war in 47-48, instead of 45. But it would have won. What was more decisive, was Allied Intelligence that, along with the Soviet informers within the Japanese Prime Minister's office, that informed the Stavka the Japanese would not attack in 1941. The redeployment of some 40 divisions from the Far East, plus the return of Zhukov, was the deciding factor in throwing the Germans back from the gates of Moscow. There is an obsession whenever the Second World War comes up about how important the Allied second front in France, strategic bombing of the Ruhr, and the importance of Lend Lease to Soviet victory. When in actual fact, most of the time, the Allies were instead tooling around in the deserts of North Africa to protect British colonial conquests, and only opened a second front after the Tehran conference when Stalin could speak to Roosevelt directly without British interference. What should be absolutely clear, is that WW2 for the Allies, was more about delaying Allied entry as long as possible to bleed the Soviets white, protecting British imperial conquests, than any commitment to destroying fascism. British bankers as late as 1943 were still financing German industries.

Jealous? 😂 vivo Russia 🇮🇳 🤝🇷🇺

Because of numbers, there are 6000 in reserve, unlike 600 of 80U! They are for the Arctic, where won't have too much competition

@@pashapasovski5860 And? Its not like they are planning to upgrade 6000 tanks!

@@jafon9 if they're not planning to upgrade most of those tanks, then why upgrade it in the first place?

Oh yes! How yesterday's powerful Russian military propaganda, now swiftly returned to the times of Chechnya 1995-96

@@dewygreen4646 hit any tank with a javelin and it’s a goner, no matter if it’s Russian or NATO. No chance. No tank in the world has close to enough armor on the roof to stop a javelin. Russian armor technology has always been great, all their problems are on the logistical level which fuels bad tactics

@@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here So, if all their problems are on the logistical level which fuels bad tactics... that means they returned to the times of Chechnya 1995-96. Chechens didn't have Javelins at that time, yet the turrets were flying, too.

@@dewygreen4646 logistical issues were not as big of a problem in Chechnya, it was more poor leadership, sloppy planning with a sloppy execution

@@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here It seems that for decades, ALWAYS there is something in the way of showing Russian tanks their splendor on the battlefields

This Tan is intended for the Arctic Troops. This is a new compound for the protection of the borders of the Russian Arctic. This tank has a huge advantage over other tanks of the Russian Federation. It has a gas turbine unit, and in conditions of severe frosts, it does not need to spend almost an hour to warm up the engine. The gas turbine engine starts within a minute or two. In short this is an Arctic tank

And more. Russia does not build them anew, it takes them from warehouses where thousands of t80s are stored and makes them from T-80BV M. In fact, getting a new tank is much cheaper than building new ones

Agreed let's force the Russian Federation to make gaijin add an armor package to a tank in a videogame

Hey the T-80BVM has been added as a tank in war thunder

Its a tucson cheap but a great car

The T-80 is now produced, so as the T-72s and T-90s. Yes there are old tanks but they work good. Unless not taken care of it and jsut keeping it in one place. Why are they flying? Because the crew isnt trained good enough so as they take wrong moves and panic.

Well actually not even western tanks have a good chance against Javelin

@@Rhino123yey well it’s an anti tank guided missile for a reason. you know, to destroy tanks

u cringe

People, don't be ridiculous, any anti-tank rocket will destroy every tank, east and west. jvalin, NLOW, cornet, these are shells that are made to destroy a tank, they have incredible penetration, every tank is destroyable with that weapon.

How is your ne-o-n-a-zi Brotherhood counterofensive going in ukraine

And i was pretty sure the tank that had its turret flying is the Leopard-2. M1 Abrams also does. Must be something about the positioning of their loaders or something like

There is no problem with that. It's designed in a way that such things won't set it off.

No ERA is that sensitive especially not relikt even early era which was much more sensitive wouldn’t go off from that

The Abrams would also be able to do this because it also uses a gas turbine

@@Koyomix86 but it's too heavy to actually drive through

@Joshua Nellis armata goes 59 mph on good roads. Anything above 50 kph is hard to achieve off-road. These fantasy numbers of 90kph by the moskali and ami subhumans are just propaganda purposes. You rarely go over 40 kph without the engine roaring like a dragon

...and Russia will be sold as under Jelzin. Every Russian with a brain will NEVER vote for Nawalny.

they fought the ukranians and the ukranians losz

those are losses based on how much Ukraine claims it. And it is completely irrelevant to the video

T-80U and T-80UK has Kontakt-5 ERA, which is the same ERA as both T-90A and T-72B3. T-80BVM use Relikt ERA, which is the same ERA as T-90M and T-90MS

I expect that, assuming there's still demand, the T-80Us will get a similar upgrade when they are a few years older, for the sake of efficiency.

@@copperlemon1 no. T80b were pulled from tank graveyard, they have low service time compared to T80U which has been the backbone of artic troops.

@@Lcr34 That is a shame

You think so🤣

Not sure how well it ended for the ukie NLAW crews that got vaporized by return fire..

Omg nlaw hdtcgt gc 🤓🤓🤓🤓

@James Cunliffe The one in Belgium, I believe.

Not one chance i live in chicago we have shit that can take them tanks out

​@@bobbuergermeier8022 You can sleep in peace. We don't need Chicago or Killadelphia.

@@bobbuergermeier8022 like what? a .50?

@@user-ne9rx8xi9y and how did it go? XD

Can't. they all blowed up

​@@AMRapideSyour abrams is doing good?

hahaha ibrams challenger 2 and Leopard 2 would fly too if a kornet hits it

@@Ivan-pw3sn Have you seen any flying turrets from western tanks? Kornets were used by Iraq against Abrams and they only managed to disable 2 tanks. Hezbollah used them too many occasions against Israeli Merkavas. I've seen multiple hits against the Merkavas and the tanks were still moving and fighting. Stop being a Russian fanboy. 🤣

The MIA was nowhere to be found.

I hope you mean APFSDS, as the ERA armour works against HEAT warheads.

@@dabelli3818 down low where the roadwheels are there isnt any ERA

@@jacobhill3302 why you want to shoot the roadwheels with HEAT-FS if you can shoot the tank itself with APFSDS?

@@Kalashnikov413 its particularly vulnerable there on the hull because of the carousel of charges for the auto-loader. One rpg-7 hit there and the turret will pop.

@@jacobhill3302 oohh, so you mean shoot the lower side, not the roadwheel itself?

Yeah, but they have more than ten of these

@@theimmortal4718 so far Russian armor is getting take out like fish in a barrel

@@mackjsm7105 Absolutely wrecked. The armata seems to be pretty irrelevant since only a little more than a dozen have been produced and the economic slide Russia has been going through has put the coffin nail in that project. 90% of the Russian armor in Ukraine right now can be killed with an AT4 or RPG. The rest get NLAWs and Javelins.

@@theimmortal4718 what a crazy time.

@@mackjsm7105 Sure is

Too expensive...me choose T-72B3 😎

*bruh moment lol*

@@Kalashnikov413 and it's not the first time they do it on this channel xD lol

all tanks even the m1 abrams will blow up the turret by a side shot, or did you already forget the abrams in yemen?

@@joaquinbeazley6814 wrong, is very rare and none blew off turret and sent it in air, in Yemen only 20 were hit and only 8 were total losses, the rest were recovered and repaired, stop dreaming up stuff that never happened, only time a Abrams lost a turret was when it hit a huge ied with 155mm shells and that only happened like once or twice

Fpv and boom, your "best artillery" goes boom