They all are pretty intelligent. Defense can't handle that.

Dr. Kinsey reminds me of another knowledgeable AND professional Expert, and that would be BCI Expert Matthew White from the Pike County Massacre Trial in Ohio. Neither Dr. Kinsey OR BCI Expert Matthew White are know-it-alls. They are BOTH very impressive and humble.

@kathismith: The defense attorneys were ridiculous. Of course it’s difficult to defend such an obviously corrupt, guilty, physically repugnant, client. I bet they charged a boatload of money. Wonder if he, or maybe his family, actually paid them. He’s kinda like Number 45 when it comes to corruption and not paying bills or lawyers. However much they were paid they didn’t earn it. They were real bumblers for being considered big fish hotshots in their little scum covered pond.

Those lawyers think they can twist everything and the jury will believe it. It was a juror who figured it out when they went to visit the scene. Very smart young man and very humble. He took the task he was given seriously.

Dr. Kinsey’s good reputation AND knowledge in his field of profession, AND NOT being cocky/a know-it-all, reminds me of the BCI Expert Matthew White from the Pike County Massacre Murder Trial in Ohio. 8 family members were shot and Murdered in 2016 by the Wagner family because of child custody. 6 of the Murdered victims were shot while they were in their beds late at night, and 2 of the Murdered women had babies and the youngest Murdered victim was only 16 years old. It’s the Rhoden and Gilley family Massacre.

Agreed. He exudes it.

Agreed. Don't forget integrity.

It was pretty funny when he laughed after he was shown the CAD drawing depicting 2 shooters 😂

He is the teacher I could learn the most information from, because he has style.

@Marcco lol what? It aged just fine. Actually better seeing how he was a state witness an the state won the case.

That's true. And your acknowledgement of that is charming.

He had a nice smile and very professional

I laughed when he was shoving the stick in the box. Funny.

Just wish his wife would say; "come here honey, lets push those little hairs backward that are matted down on your forehead inexplicably." "There, that's better, now go have a good day."

@@lahaza6515 - 😂😂😂 My thoughts exactly!!!

Urinalysis???!!!! 🤣

Yes he was smiling and pleased to be there as an advocate!! God bless you sir!!!!❤

Go back to making SLED Incompetence. That SLED lady. She may lose her job. Pitting the experts against each other. All circumstantial evidence.

Doesn't take much to impress you then does it?

@Mean Queen Jeanie - your handle seems to reflect the depth of your empathy. This trial has revealed a lot about human weakness. Some find it easy to fault other's failures. When someone shows strength of character, they deserve to be recognized.

@@sortasassi1 Ditto

He corrects the Defense trying to wiggle around the most simple things like conical direction of pellets!

Not really, he works for the NRA.

So?

He knows how to speak in court which is one of his main job tasks but his content is a lot BS covered with his PhD. He worked against a guilty guy this time but this dude is working against any defendant with his BS.

@@WorldifySanity​, "following the money" in these cases leads to the lawyers who were (and still are) suing Alex AND BUSTER Murdaugh AND Gregg Parker for the boat crash case and for Gloria Satterfield's death. It was, and still is, in the interest of those lawyers to FALSELY pin the murders of Paul and Maggie Murdaugh on Alex AND to falsely pin Stephen Smith's on Buster. I know how that works because I WAS FALSELY ACCUSED of crimes to force me to abandon a civil lawsuit. In my case, I defended myself WITHOUT A LAWYER to a jury in a trial presided over by none other than Judge Clifton Newman; and, thank God, the jury refused to convict them the first time; and I later, STILL WITHOUT A LAWYER, got THAT SET of false criminal charges against me dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. How do I know that Alex was wrongly convicted of the murders? FIRST, because SOME OF THE SAME PROSECUTORS were in his case and mine: Donald Zelenka, John Meadors, Creighton Waters, Johnny James, David Fernandez, AND Sara Heather Savitz Weiss ("Hatchet-for-hire Heather"). SECOND, because that gang used on me the same tactics they used on Alex in his murder trials. THIRD, because I am a medical doctor with specialization experience in Pathology among other specialties although I am NOT a board-certified forensic pathologist. I know MEDICALLY the time of death is closer to 10:00 pm than to 9:00 pm. FOURTH and now-foremost, now that I read Becky Hill's book in its entirety, it is clear that, no only did she tamper with that jury, that jury had been tampering with itself all along INCLUDING A MALE JUROR (who voted "guilty" and convinced the not-guilty/unsure jurors to change their votes to "guilty" then flew expense-free to New York to talk about the verdict on national TV) having received "thousands of dollars" from "three friends" to stay on the jury instead of returning to work and getting replaced by an alternate. It boggles my mind that people brag about these things and even attribute them to God, when they are crimes. It is crime enough for that juror to have received outside money to stay on that jury. It would be an even bigger crime if that outside money was being funnelled through that juror's "friends" from, say, the lawyers suing Alex Murdaugh and Gregg Parker. THAT is where "following the money" leads me. Peace!

@@louesparza8003, "following the money" in these cases leads to the lawyers who were (and still are) suing Alex AND BUSTER Murdaugh AND Gregg Parker for the boat crash case and for Gloria Satterfield's death. It was, and still is, in the interest of those lawyers to FALSELY pin the murders of Paul and Maggie Murdaugh on Alex AND to falsely pin Stephen Smith's on Buster. I know how that works because I WAS FALSELY ACCUSED of crimes to force me to abandon a civil lawsuit. In my case, I defended myself WITHOUT A LAWYER to a jury in a trial presided over by none other than Judge Clifton Newman; and, thank God, the jury refused to convict them the first time; and I later, STILL WITHOUT A LAWYER, got THAT SET of false criminal charges against me dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. How do I know that Alex was wrongly convicted of the murders? FIRST, because SOME OF THE SAME PROSECUTORS were in his case and mine: Donald Zelenka, John Meadors, Creighton Waters, Johnny James, David Fernandez, AND Sara Heather Savitz Weiss ("Hatchet-for-hire Heather"). SECOND, because that gang used on me the same tactics they used on Alex in his murder trials. THIRD, because I am a medical doctor with specialization experience in Pathology among other specialties although I am NOT a board-certified forensic pathologist. I know MEDICALLY the time of death is closer to 10:00 pm than to 9:00 pm. FOURTH and now-foremost, now that I read Becky Hill's book in its entirety, it is clear that, no only did she tamper with that jury, that jury had been tampering with itself all along INCLUDING A MALE JUROR (who voted "guilty" and convinced the not-guilty/unsure jurors to change their votes to "guilty" then flew expense-free to New York to talk about the verdict on national TV) having received "thousands of dollars" from "three friends" to stay on the jury instead of returning to work and getting replaced by an alternate. It boggles my mind that people brag about these things and even attribute them to God, when they are crimes. It is crime enough for that juror to have received outside money to stay on that jury. It would be an even bigger crime if that outside money was being funnelled through that juror's "friends" from, say, the lawyers suing Alex Murdaugh and Gregg Parker. THAT is where "following the money" leads me. Peace!

So true! The jury was amazing too!

Smart people, being honest, telling the truth clearly and succinctly… 👊🏻!! Refreshing 🥰

I believe this man should be called an expert witness. He certainly knows what he's talking about. The defense is just wrong. He did a great interview tonight with the interview room. He's now involved in the Stephen Smith investigation. Great interview!

I bet it did. Don't think the defense was wrong?

Open your eyes and see them for who they are? All these opinions were great but whom do you believe, I believe the defense attorneys doctor

I love him and his truthfulness and temperament!

Hope these great people void out the evil doing ones like Murdaugh!

@@jackpack3506I hope too

👌👍🙏🙏🙏💪💪

Well said. Very well said. ❤️

Great and True words. Great man.

Me too! He was so humbled that the jury asked to thank him in person at the end of the trial. Without a doubt he connected with this jury.

Dr. Kinsey became emotional when he talked about the injuries Paul suffered.😢

I want to give him a hug 😢

i watched someone blow their own brains out when i was 14 ever since then death and gore dont bother ne

@Lindsey Montague: I don’t think he meant he was actually present when someone killed him or her self. When he’s giving examples he may say “I saw a suicide” meaning he reviewed or studied a suicide case. In future if he should happen to refer to something that he observed in the evidence in this case he might say, “I saw a murder” maybe referring to the unique situation of two murders, one shooter, and all moving around after first shots before the immediately fatal shots. He didn’t really see the murders happen; else everyone would jump up and say, “You did?!! Who did it??!!” 😊

@@loditx7706 He's been a cop im sure there were scene he arrived to that were still active. Its quite possible.

Totally agree … Dr. Shannon Curry in the Depp vs Heard case was stellar & made the psychologist that Amber’s team used look far from competent or professional, imo.

I absolutely agree. I think Megan Fletcher the expert forensic scientist also did amazing

Dr. Muffins

@@somerando7233 😂

It seems to me that in nearly every field, that's the way you can tell an expert from someone out of their depth. If someone is unsure, they'll fluster you with a lot of jargon and hide behind technicalities. The most talented expert I work with in my field is just like him - very humble, straightforward, makes his field sound easy while *really* knowing his stuff. And has no issue saying 'I don't know'. (He's an engineer and he always turns up in an old t-shirt. Never once, not in the most formal of cultures and countries where we sent him, was anyone less than happy to see him)

They literally proved nothing. It was a mob trial with zero physical evidence. Pretty sad to watch that happen in the American justice system. The circumstantial evidence wasn't substantial and there was more than enough room for reasonable doubt. The jury just didn't like him because of a bunch of nonsense that shouldn't have been let in lol.

Amen

@@1corrsfan​, "following the money" in these cases leads to the lawyers who were (and still are) suing Alex AND BUSTER Murdaugh AND Gregg Parker for the boat crash case and for Gloria Satterfield's death. It was, and still is, in the interest of those lawyers to FALSELY pin the murders of Paul and Maggie Murdaugh on Alex AND to falsely pin Stephen Smith's on Buster. I know how that works because I WAS FALSELY ACCUSED of crimes to force me to abandon a civil lawsuit. In my case, I defended myself WITHOUT A LAWYER to a jury in a trial presided over by none other than Judge Clifton Newman; and, thank God, the jury refused to convict them the first time; and I later, STILL WITHOUT A LAWYER, got THAT SET of false criminal charges against me dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. How do I know that Alex was wrongly convicted of the murders? FIRST, because SOME OF THE SAME PROSECUTORS were in his case and mine: Donald Zelenka, John Meadors, Creighton Waters, Johnny James, David Fernandez, AND Sara Heather Savitz Weiss ("Hatchet-for-hire Heather"). SECOND, because that gang used on me the same tactics they used on Alex in his murder trials. THIRD, because I am a medical doctor with specialization experience in Pathology among other specialties although I am NOT a board-certified forensic pathologist. I know MEDICALLY the time of death is closer to 10:00 pm than to 9:00 pm. FOURTH and now-foremost, now that I read Becky Hill's book in its entirety, it is clear that, no only did she tamper with that jury, that jury had been tampering with itself all along INCLUDING A MALE JUROR (who voted "guilty" and convinced the not-guilty/unsure jurors to change their votes to "guilty" then flew expense-free to New York to talk about the verdict on national TV) having received "thousands of dollars" from "three friends" to stay on the jury instead of returning to work and getting replaced by an alternate. It boggles my mind that people brag about these things and even attribute them to God, when they are crimes. It is crime enough for that juror to have received outside money to stay on that jury. It would be an even bigger crime if that outside money was being funnelled through that juror's "friends" from, say, the lawyers suing Alex Murdaugh and Gregg Parker. THAT is where "following the money" leads me. Peace!

I’d be willing to bet Alex felt just the opposite.

The very thought he discovered it was his Dad shooting him; completely haunts me! What a horrific discovery!😮😢

As a parent the thoughts Paul had seeing his own dad about to kill him makes me blood run cold. I cannot fathom the evil of this man to kill the two closest people to him. Buster's lucky he didn't take him out too

And then think about how Maggie witnessed her own husband kill their son, and then immediately be killed as she was running to her son…

Alex Murdaugh is a monster. The last few moments of Maggie & Paul's lives were tragic & horrific. I don't know how soulless a person has to be to kill their son, then their wife. Cold blooded monster.

☺😚🥰😍

Having watched a great deal of testimony from the court trial nobody made it clearer to myself the appalling shooting of the lady & her young son. Absolutely shocking. It beggars belief that someone could do such a terrible thing to anyone & yet this was a husband & father. My heart breaks for their lives cut short in such a dreadful way. May God grant them peace in his kingdom ❤

I completely agree!

Malice aforethought

@@sortasassi1 🎯👍

Ya alex being a lawyer and trying to plan this horrible act he would of staged the scene...my opinion he was not expecting Paul's video to ruin his plan...Alex lying about being at the kennels is a huge problem for him...GUILTY in my opinion

What a genius to use 2 family-owned guns to shoot them & blame it on some random person. He really overestimates his intelligence & underestimates others'.

I'm sure his sense of humor is what keeps him sane!!! He's got a really difficult job but explains everything in detail very understandable!!! Love his testimony and honesty!

When you been through alot not phases you

He remained me the so-called expert in My Cousin Vinny, and this gentleman will be the ladie that opposed his expertise 😊

Couldn’t agree more Dr. Kinsey is very intellect in regards to his craft he has presented, demonstrated evidence clearly and credibly outstanding man of honesty ❤

It's a good thing you were impressed by the lawyer asking questions of Dr. Kinsey. He's the elected Attorney General of South Carolina an i think he's C. Water's bosses bosses boss.

The guy is just honest . Pure honesty and not making anything up .

I’m with you. I would be very interested in a book about his life. He seems to love life and he could definitely brighten up other people when having bad days. He’s a one in a million type of person. Or maybe one billion lol.

Judge Newman, as well!!

Agreed. He's a man who knows, and knows that he knows. And that is the kind of man who deserves respect.

Such a good point - writers of the universe, pls contact Dr Kinsey! We want more of him

Only if your kid is set on Alex being guilty.

Yes indeed this very bright Dr. Kinsey knows his craft very well the defense attorney wasn’t able to score on him congrats Dr. Kinsey, you’re truly brilliant 👍

Who doesnt know what the lines "trajectory" was, great knowledge

He is clearly bias, defense expert did not say the shooter is 5'2", he said following the line will the best height, it would change if closer or further out Then he implies the cardboard can be manipulated and under cross he realises it also went into the wood, he also said depending on how the shooter was standing and holding the gun, the defence arent going to show a guy holding gun in awkward position at the distance indicated, i would have to be sarcastic at the distance, also he didnt say he has 0 confidence with the distance the pathalogist indicated, he is being bias towards prosecuter

He is not saying anything bad about SLED, he just has 0 i repeat 0 confidence in other expert that sounds bias, he dosnt say i have 0 confidence in the way SLED carried out colating and examining evidence

Smiling at the end when talking about pauls injuries, very unprofessional and inconsiderate to family of the deceased, look at alex face towards him at the end

Alex Murdaugh

Some dumb people think at least two did lol. First time in history two premeditated murders where the killers came unarmed. Makes absolutely no sense. Yet they believe that but cant comprehend one man bringing 2 guns and using a different gun on each victim to try and make out 2 gunmen. Not possible they say. You cant help being born stupid i suppose. Glad the Jury had intelligence to work it out right.

Exactly, no one go to murder someone and counts on finding a gun to use at the scene

This attempt is so poorly executed that its comical (except for the subject matter).

Great sentence once you ged rid of those pesky adverbs

I didnt see that at all tbh. I dont get the cases theory of motive or their experts testimony of what happened. The defenses expert made a lot more sense.

@@SmartJanitor ?

@@Jonintheronin you think it was two unknown assailants??

I think could have stated some things more clearly, but he does know his stuff.

Me too! I think he’s amazing!

And this lawyer Griffins sounds dumb and confused himself🤨

I don't know why the defense attorneys aren't corrected,held accountable for badgering, harassment witnesses, and leading in questions!!

Me too 😂😂😂

Praying that is never necessary

Same!!!

Right, imagine getting THAT expert from the defense team trying to solve our murder? NO justice for us, especially if the jurors aren't as great as these here! Maggie and Paul received their justice. Unfortunately, it won't bring them back though.

@@cathybrown4102 I too pray it's never needed!

He is golden!

Jury has same impression, hopefully.

I wonder what his IQ...is? He is an emotionally intelligent man as well!

I love his accent, reminds me of my pastor

​@First Last omg.....

​@First Last 🤣

@@user-on6sz6li7xdoesn’t sound like it

He’s wearing a wedding ring

Brilliant, absolutely brilliant! I could never imagine a finer expert in his field. As a lay person knowing very little about guns, ammo, etc., he was easy to follow and down to earth in his ability to share his expertise in an understandable and gifted manner. Thank you, Dr. Kinsey. Yes, it would be fascinating to learn about your life and when, how you came into your chosen profession and expertise. I've always had great interest in learning how ppl choose their career pathways. Thank you for helping us understand.

One of my favorite lines is "Well it didn't turn around and go back out of the top of his head." Just a great relatable witness and he showed his humor, which I loved.

Wouldn't the blood And scrapes made who ? Shoot!

As the female Colleton County investigator stated when she sat in on Alex's first interview along with the investigator from SLED in the police vehicle at Moselle: Alex had an authentic emotional response when speaking about seeing Paul's body & brain. The investigators initially thought it was a grief reaction & the investigator instinctively touched Alex's shoulder to console him. She now believes it was that Alex was emotionally jarred & shocked in seeing the damage he had done to Paul (I/They did him so bad). It was bad. And Alex was responsible for it.

When did the defense say two shooters?

@@HD_Diesel_Mechanic I’m not going to find it for you but all you have to do is Google it.

@marybethklinzak - that's EXACTLY what I thought. The defense attorney completely confused me. He bumbled thru his entire cross-examination AND he kept asking the same thing over and over and over trying to get Dr. Kenzie to change his responses. His entire cross-examination was cringey and painful to watch.

ChrisBradleys World right!! Dr. Kinsey should have asked defense attorney how much they were getting paid!!