USA Owners Clubs,Utd,Pool,Ars.. Conspired greedy Super League But City are Cheaty City Vs Establishment?🤔

That's not true look at Chelsea, west ham were bigger but Chelsea went into huge debt and took 15yr of continuous debt until they started to get money back, city meanwhile just couldn't wait 20yrs so they cheated instead.

👆Needs to comment on everything.

Talent rules. Money follows. Wokey.

@@tastypymp1287 Cope. Seethe. Cry. 😿

Did you listen to the bit where it was stated that there was no evidence of cheating?

no evidence mate. keeping crying and cope

who have been punished?

there is 0 evidence of any cheating, hence city a seeking legal charges against the league for bringing up lies to hinder the club

Nope it was designed to stop clubs going bankrupt by depending on rich owners for their finance.

​@@lilbaz8732 You cannot be that naive....

City has never been a small club. If you really want to help smaller clubs we need to completely change how the money is distributed through the football pyramid.

@@lilbaz8732 Oh yeah I'm sure that's why half the clubs in the world like Manchester United, Barcelona, and Real madrid ARE IN DEBT

@@Nal1 most companies have some form of debt. Most people do aswell, mortgages etc... Ask yourself why did smaller clubs vote for ffp? The efl voted it in. The prem (which needed a 2/3 majority). Most countries in europe. If it was only a plan to keep the big clubs big and the small clubs weak, why would they vote for it?

All the clubs in the Premier league started in the same boat. Small clubs like City had 147 years to become a big club, Liverpool, United and Arsenal became big clubs off there own backs through hard work and success on the pitch. That didn't happen for city so we should allow them to piss over 150 years of football history and be in a position they haven't earned all because they've been given unlimited money to spend by a state with an active slave trade who are using them for the sole purpose of sportwashing there dirty global image?

Absolutely not there are clubs which have grown organically and their overall sponsorship, commercial and broadcasting revenue has increased over the years Brighton, Brentford, Bournemouth and Fulham have over the years staying within FFP rules.

A big point is that you should not spend more than you earn. All agree on that. Who does that hit? The smaller clubs will need years to develop their revenue - taking it step by step. The bigger clubs a very different possibilities to further expand their income sources. It really hits the smaller and middle clubs the most. Thus its effect is that the big ones remains big and the smaller ones must have continued success both on the field and in economics to to make a huge stp upwards. The fair play rules majkes the steps steeper and higher for small clubs to climb.

It depends on what you would call ruining football, we have the best sides in Europe, our national team now consistently gets to semifinals/finals the lionesses actually won the Euros, I mean just because your or my favourite team isn’t winning doesn’t mean the game is ruined, if anything the game is better than ever in the U.K. It’s probably not sustainable but to act like the game is worse is crazy

@@SgtS1lky tell him

Well first of all, that's not true! However - it's funny that nobody seemed to find that an issue when King Power sponsored Leicester, Aviation Gin are a major sponsor of Wrexham etc. etc.

No, it is true. All of their sponsors have money funnelled through them by their owners. Cheats.

@@jackpowrie3 that’s not cheating is it 😂

@@Fozykeno it’s considered cheating by FFP standards, that’s why numerous charges relate to over-inflated sponsorship revenue/income.

@@TT-hx9nj not when you cook the books in their entirety, make up how much the payments are and run the club at a catastrophic loss but pretend you are within FFP. But obviously, they are totally innocent.

Nope, there was no bitterness there. Just reporting.

How about "If guilty". How can a team that is solvent be subject to these charges (under FFP) yet a team that has debts ( loans an unpaid transfer fees) of almost £1Billion be ok under FFP. The City of Liverpool is now to become the 51st state of the US with the take over of Everton. People go on about the UAE and Saudi and their connection to the PL yet after the Everton takeover, Liverpool, Everton, Manchester United and Liverpool all have US owners. It seems to me that the American owners are unhappy with the competition from non US owned teams and want to stop it. Also Aston Villa, Bournemouth, Burnley, Chelsea, Crystal Palace are under US control. Anyone see a pattern?

@@grimreaper-qh2znhow about, understand City have 115 charges? There’s no way not one of those charges aren’t real, cuz otherwise this headline of 115 charges would be ridiculous. City deserve punishment, and they need one of the worst punishments, or even multiple.

@@yobask8855 You should check the points. Most are just repeats of the same charge, year after year after year. There are basically 4 charges and anyone of these being dismissed gets rid of about 30 or so of the other charges.

@@yobask8855the 115 charges sensationalist headline you keep hearing is actually comprised of a much smaller amount of actual charges broken into much smaller sections. If you read through the charges it's actually like 4 big charges and they will all be dismissed immanently because there is no evidence to support any of the charges. Saying that they must be true because of their quantity is a complete fallacy, and the headline is obviously ridiculous because that is what sells the papers and increases viewership of the news.

@@all-caps3927 They aren’t just headlines. The reason nothing is happening is because the the Premier League don’t want to punish man city because of the total views they would lose if they were to punish them severely, which is why there is no evidence, they just want to stall it out as much as possible. And saying that at least some are true, isn’t complete fallacy, because how random would it be to bring up 115 charges? The media praise man city so much that they wouldn’t just do them randomly like that. And even if a lot of the charges could be small, if u add them up, it’s massive so that makes ur point invalid. Just please stop talking

No mid-season transfers allowed or change of manager > benefits the wealthy only ! Squad for the season !

The debt is the owners that bought out shares with debt City has been cooking the books there's a difference Also united fans protest their owners literally every year, I haven't seen city do the same once

civil case not legal case

City has no legacy. It died when the dictatorship took over. Nobody respects that entity now.

but it won't keep coming because there is no constructive evidence to prove that we're cheating

Not will. Has

Man city engañado. No es necesario más palabras.

How can you support all 3 from hibs fan 💚

​@@adidasaddict2023 Hey at least he's not a Hearts fan😂

So what?

I made a formal complaint to the BBC but of course it was brushed off.

As they should. Why should cheaters have uninterupted glory?

When were they supposed to run it?

@@dlaldlaldlanutsntnstn1418 who cheated man united?

Arabic Culture - depends on cash inducements - this is how business works - maybe World-wide. Follow the Money !

We'll said,bro

But they don't know city is pride of England

That’s quite the leap in assumption

Because they have spent within their means of what they have earned. Too difficult for some fans to understand it seems.

@@Crovon1 Actually, I know that, but if you think that Manchester United and Arsenal have earned more than City in these years and that is why they have spent much money. You are literally making mistake. Not only City, but also all big six clubs in the premier league are doing the same thing.

@@mw1076 I don't think you realise how big Arsenal and Man Utd are compared to City. Just because City are dominant in recent years, they don't have the history or fanbase. Both Utd and Arsenal have global fanbases.

@@Crovon1 yeah , I agree with that, but city is also a big franchise nowadays. We are talking about a team who wins 3 premier league titles in a row, not a ordinary team in the second or third championship of English football. The whole world now watch their matches because of their players and their quality of playing.

@@mw1076nah city are small mate compared to other top teams with history. I don’t see many folk wearing city shirts outside Manchester

Perfect timing indeed. Go Inter!

What do you mean the timing is incredible... (BTW, Arsenal fan). Of course their gonna post it when its most relevant you cretin 😭. Its the whole point of news. It's like covering a natural disaster AT THE TIME OF A NATURAL DISASTER

journalism was always about timing, are you are a 15 year old m*ron

@@Joey-ct8bm Inter... wow, have you seen how many FFP violations they have... would seem your support of Inter is actually nothing to do with financial fair play!

West ham fan here called jealousy simple as that. If it was manure or Liverpool nothing would be mentioned. City have best coach in the world and team too now get over it you manure dumb arses

Exactly

Where have you been for the last 5 years? :D

@@97D3ADLIVERPOOLFANS The court has the evidence already. City have wrapped it up in legal mumbo-jumbo so we don't get to see it now. However, there was evidence they over-inflated shirt sales from right after they were taken over. It was common knowledge. I suppose you've only been following this story for five minutes, and armed with the results of whatever Google search you did, feel as though you're an expert. 😀 As for spending - it's irrelevant in context of this argument. Spending above the allowed ratio is the issue.

@@MaterLacrymarum There is no proof

​@@yikeslikes4457the der spiegal emails are the proof

Agreed they don't want a team as good as city beating them perhaps super league do

Be careful what you wish for because where city lead most teams follow

They would finally be caught, no matter how long it takes

Like Blackburn did. Like Man Utd did. Like Chelsea did. It's always gone on in the Premier League. Too much at stake to not do so...

Damage the sport irreparably? That horse bolted with the creation of the Premier League in 1992!

It is what every other winning club has done.

@Paul Leach When did Manchester United buy a title 🤔. It was our youth setup that helped us win the league

@@lsd358 Cole, Yorke, sheringham, keane we’re all part of your youth players 😂

lol don't hold your breath

Not exonerated > money talks > unproven or out of time was the appeal verdict

LOL....... 🤣

I don’t think so, but a club like Bayern Münich actually earn money to finance the club.

City is a mediocre club globally. Who knows city apart of the owners country and UK fans? U can’t say what you just said. They spend way more than what they make. They buy their way through year in year out. Money stops nonsense!!

Because cfg owns alot of clubs which generate revenue

You're a clown. The earnings are literally what is disputed here. Sponsorship revenue. If you think city can generate more sponsorship revenue than Real Madrid, then you should check yourself into a mental hospital

Not true. In fact, it's a rather stupid thing to imply. FFP applies to all teams, no matter who owns them.

@@MaterLacrymarum lol

Man city are that greedy they belive they earn more profit then Real madrid who are owned by the spanish goverment blaten cheats

Worst Game is football..😂😂

I think you should changed that '0 UCL' buddy

You forgot also: 22/23 Premier League - Arsenal 23/24 Premier League - Arsenal

Then Premier League is finished. Manchester United, Arsenal, Liverpool and Chelsea will join Super League.

Correct, and it's been bastardised to suite, it's not what was originally planned for it.

Chelsea leave the chat…

Supposedly bigger revenue than Real Madrid is ridiculous.

EPL already had massive income before city became rich, and we’re already miles ahead of other leagues, so I think you’re overstating it. It’s the EPL itself and it’s reputation that being in the money.

What are they thanking them for!? Thanks for making a mockery of the league. Thanks for making it pointless. Money laundering so that they can buy all the best players is not a good thing

the premier league was doing just fine. what are you talking about?

What a clown

You haven't won it yet enjoy cooking more books

"Us" - LOL 🤣

What a load of old crap........

Yes, Cas said that the sponsorships were not proved to have been above market value.

Theyve bought everything

​@ianodonnell5765 You would believe anything, huh? SMH