They are really nice lightsabers

I never realize that the word “Sith” was referenced in the original trilogy. On merchandise from back in the day, Vader was referred to as a “Dark Lord of the Sith”. Like I said, I never noticed that not being mentioned in the OG films; I just assumed it was in there somewhere,

I remember when I was a kid, I would watch the trilogy over and over again, trying to learn as much as I could about the Force and what it truly meant. Each time I watched it with fresh eyes, challenging my presumptions. I'd look in dictionaries and encyclopedias to research religions and terms, trying to figure out where George Lucas got his inspiration from. By the time the Jedi were fully explained in the books, I was already a master.

It’s crazy that the word Sith isn’t mentioned in any of the original trilogy movies! I’d love to wink a custom lightsaber from you!

Superrrrr Dope!

Sith meant, "The Since"; meaning, a race and religion from a long ago era. Since Dark Side Force-users were last known to have existed over 1000 years ago, anything related to them was always seen as something from the distance of time and place.

@@anthonyyoutubefan7567, the word "sith" actually used to mean "since" in English, as did "sin". Geoffrey Chaucer uses these words in the Canterburry Tales.

@@davidwarren7279 I'm willing to bet, George Lucas was inspired by Old English, and used it for The Sith.

I don't think that's true and I'm from 1975

@@anthonyyoutubefan7567 "Sith" does show up in Old English (Shakespeare also uses it once), but it's equally probable that Lucas got the word from an alien insect that appears in John Carter of Mars (which also has the word "Banths")...which was much closer to his sources!

Which was a good change for the Emperor...I mean why would Vader be a number 2 to someone if he could just kill him and take his place?

@@daggerhell99 probably because the empire wouldn't have worked like that in the original script. In real life if a general murdered the president he wouldn't become the new president

From what I can remember about the original movies the emperor didn’t really become the “dark paragon of the dark side” until return of the jedi.. which in empire vader wanted Luke to join him in taking down the emperor, but in rotj he basically said the emperor is too powerful

In the preface to the novel of the first movie, the Emperor is a weak individual, hiding away and being manipulated by the governors.

Sorry OP but all of that is incorrect. The Lucas written novelization of A New Hope included details about Palpatine, and making Vader Luke's father was the idea of the director of Empire Strikes Back, not Lucas.

For instance, the novel has Lucas' name on it but was ghostwritten by Alan Dean Foster... But all the novel's material is from Lucas, of course.

A great *storyteller* . 😉

@@DaPhunkPhenomena I read many of Alan Dean Foster's sci fi adaptions over the years as well as his original novels. Splinter of the Minds Eye, The Black Hole, Krull, The Last Starfighter and the his Spellsinger series were my favourites. In no particular order. Many of his other works have also entertained me. A very accomplished, but possibly underrated author.

He was also a shit writer who was saved by his editors and the studio telling him "no." Once Lucas got the power to do anything he wanted, we got "I hate sand." Lucas was great at coming up with imaginative ideas, I won't dispute that. But it was the OTHER people he worked with (even his own wife, who edited the hell out of the original film's script) who actually had the talent to bring those ideas to life.

@@Ambaryerno People are back again with the "Star Wars was saved in the editing" narrative... 🤣🤦‍♀

Was it Burger Chef or Burger King? I remember Burger King posters and Glasses.

This literally happened to me too. My mom said she assumed it was an organization that Vader led.

@@7thwheelIn my area it was Burger Chef for the original Star Wars, for Empire and Jedi Burger King had the glasses.

oh yeah! they had kids means with toys and posters! I think they had toys out before Kenner did!

When I was in fourth grade in 1988, I asked a class mate:"what's inside the Storm troopers?" His answer:"Meat..." Well I thought that sounded legit..

Vader was often referred to as a/the Dark Lord Of The Sith in publicity for the first movie. It was never elaborated on. It didn't seem to arouse much curiosity among fans. As far as titles went, people were far more intrigued by what a Moff was and what in particular made one Grand.

@@zacmumblethunder7466 Correct. "Sith" was used in the story books of the late 70s/early 80s.

Not even George was able to predict the success of Star Wars. That was why he had Alan Dean Foster write Splinter of the Mind's Eye, which likely would have been the sequel had Star Wars not become the huge hit it was. Granted, I am sure he had some inkling of what he had on his hands, considering his focus on the merchandising rights, but still not on the scale it became.

@@samanthaadams619 Yeah, it was odd that there were references of Darth Vader being a Sith Lord in the storybook from the first film back in 77/78 when I got the book. I was just under 10 and had no real info on the Sith other than the storybook and a few other brief mentions

Honestly, I think the original films are better for not mentioning sith and just going with the assumption Vader is a fallen Jedi

Surprised he didn't report lord Vader to Human resources. That was clearly inappropriate office behaviour

@@Trebor74 it was known as just “resources” as the empire was pro human and didn’t employ aliens…..Thrawn aside.

@@kevincassidy2008 humanoid,not necessarily human 😂

@@Trebor74 I think he actually does on one of the novels lol

@@Trebor74 in the cannon comics he becomes Vader’s boss after Death Star 1 suffers the wrath of the war criminal luke skywalker.

And from then on in the Legends spinoff stories that kinda continued to be the case! The Kotor games had a BUNCH of sith who wore facemasks, and Ive seen no shortage of sith lords wearing masks in other star wars media. Not all, mind you, but most of the named important Sith lords

If I remember right, there were still shot from the movie in the center of the novel and they have one with the caption “Darth Vader, Lord of the Sith.” It’s been over 40 years but I remember that for some reason.

@@stuartbagley2586 No not in the 1976 edition I have. They do have short character summaries in the photo section, but with Vader's no mention made there of Sith. They used the headshot still of him from the deleted scene with Bast - which was one of the more common headshot they used for him back then.

@@jasemalvis2140 As I recall, Revan and Malak did wear masks not unlike Vader's - and in the Disney sequels, Kylo Ren's mask is almost an exact replica of Revan's. It took a long time for the Expanded Universe to decide exactly what the Sith looked like. Originally there was the Noghri species, which was introduced as a race of Imperial bodyguards in Timothy Zahn's Thrawn Trilogy in 1991. Supposedly, the vaguely death's-head facial features of the Noghri were supposed to have inspired the look of Darth Vader's mask, until it was revealed that Vader already had his mask when he first encountered the Noghri. Then, several years later, it was decided that the Sith were a group of Dark Side cultists of many different species (mostly humans) who had appropriated the culture of an alien species from Korriban also called the Sith. I remember that a making-of book about THE PHANTOM MENACE showed that many Sith tattooed their faces, and that Darth Maul took this to the extreme.

Maybe it’s referring to the white skin, notice how him and palpatine have it but we didn’t know why in the OT maybe that was originally caused by the dark side in early drafts, and mauls early concept was similar to mother talzen and dooku was similar to ventress and both of them have pale white skin.

Lucas had a whole heap of ideas originally. Luke was to be the new Flash Gordon. Lucas had tried and failed to secure the rights to the old 1930s serial and decided to make his own version. As the original novel states, the whole rescue the princess and blow up the baddies was "From the adventures of Luke Skywalker." Luke was also female at one point, as can be clearly seen in one of Ralph McQuarrie's concept paintings. The impression from the novelisation is that The Empire will be mortally wounded by the destruction of the Death Star, and even more so by the death of Tarkin. It's never stated as such, but Tarkin seems to have been manipulating the doddery old Emperor to get as much power fir himself.

It was also mentioned in the movie novelization while Vader remember his fight with Obi-Wan while Luke is taking his helmet off...

I remember reading that, in some childrens Scholastic, or Highlights magazine, and this was in 1980. But even then, it went into detail of 9 movies, how it was lined out. But in that magazine, that was the first time I heard of "Sith Lord".

I heard there were as many as 12 screenplays. So...the possibility of 12 movies by Lucas.

Sometime from the release of *STAR WARS* in 1977 to the release of *THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK* in 1980, George Lucas commented publicly he had a story outline that would cover nine separate movies. The first two movies in '77 and '80, plus *RETURN OF THE JEDI* in 1983, would be the middle three of the nine.

Yup, Topps Green Border Star Wars trading card # 217 is titled "The Dark Lord of the Sith." I think that was the first time I had heard the term.

@@billgrindler4653 Same here. That's where I remember seeing the title of Sith first being used.

I first saw it on, of all things, a commemorative Empire Strikes Back glass Burger King were selling, showing Vader and Boba Fett together. A short bio on the back of the glass referred to Vader as the Lord of the Sith. I still have that glass today.

@@Corn_Pone_Flicks might be worth some money now haha

Bruv thts wht he says in the video lol

And since the bonus material has so many different authors, they often create new plot holes that have to be patched up again.

Regardless, at the end of the day it creates a lot of open ends to add history and more stories for us to dive into on our exploration of a galaxy far far away

Remember, they also cut 30min.

Cheers 🍻

Not so much plug plot whoies.rereales. the movies as intended.

And now we have the Inquisitors

Now I can't help but wonder if the word was ever used in the Marvel Star Wars comics (a collection still needing completion)

"Darth" means DAR--k..lord of--the. si...TH"

@@jackprescott9652 no wayyyyyyy !!!! Holy st

I read the novel a few times growing up, and honestly forgot I had for a while. I started remembering scenes that weren't actually in the movie xD

Yes, marvel comics was sued because of the graphic novel. Which came out 2 weeks before Empire strike back. And had the entire novel of storytelling with out deleted pictures

The original trilogy is a master class on world building, the movie just drops you into this universe that feels alive

@@joaomotta7791 even if there were no sequels and SW77 was a one off it still builds a fantastic world.

@@scottianson5133 There's enough in the dialogue to suggest the Empire would crumble without the Death Star. "Fear will keep the systems in line. Fear of this battlestation". The impression I got way back then was that Luke and his pals would be hyping off around the galaxy getting into all sorts of post-empire adventures. Probably crossing paths with Darth Vader on a regular basis ( "You killed my father", "You bleey up my planet", "You planted a homing beacon in my ship" ) in a series of fun space romps. By the way, thanks for the SW77 moniker, I much prefer it to "A New Hope" or "The Original movie".

Not really, the fear will keep them in line is after they remove the senate. Without the detahstar they could either just have more str destroyers to bombard people to death or they could have the senate.

@@matthiuskoenig3378 Well, that was before the prequels and sequels, when I thought the series was going to be about the fantastic adventures of a farm boy turned galactic warrior, rather than having the focus slowly changed until the 9 films actually end up being all about Palpatine and his attempts to produce a side-kick/heir.

Then, he procede to sell his son (Star Wars) to a minor abuser (disney).

And then Disney just ruined it

​@@BaneTheManI just ignore the Disney content. Anything produced after 2014 just kills my interest in Star Wars.

Is it? Pokémon’s the highest grossing franchise in history.

@@SonicTheHedgehog-mh6uw Ask any random person what they know about Star Wars. Then ask them what they know about Pokémon. There’s your answer. (Hint: most people will know more about Star Wars than Pokémon)

yeah I have a hard cover star wars book from late 76

yep! Bubblegum cards were great at this too.

I had that storybook! Also, I think the Burger King Star Wars glasses that came out alongside Empire had him referred to as Dark Lord of the Sith or something very similar. It was out there as long as I can remember. (Also in the 1990's Evan Dorkin's Milk and Cheese comic has them don Darth Vader helmets and refer to themselves as Dark Lords of the Sith as they wreak mayhem on their surroundings.)

There was a VHS release of the original trilogy in the 90s (hard to find now) that had a lot of behind the scenes interviews with Lucas. He even described Anakin’s battle with Obiwan from Mustafar (years before ROTS filmed) and an ancient battle between Mandalore and the Jedi. For some reason I misunderstood it at the time and thought that Vader hired the Mandalorian army to take out most of the Jedi. What’s weird is that the story has evolved so that the Clones took out most of the Jedi, and the Clones were replicated from a Mandalorian foundling. And the armor, while not Beskar, has similarities. So it makes me wonder if the original plan did have Mandalore vs Jedi at the end of the Clone Wars, but then he changed it yo Clones vs Jedi. Who knows? And unfortunately… i can’t find that footage now.

The Special Edition is a director's cut. Not much of the old footage was added in, though, except for the scene between Han and Jabba.

@@PreppingWithSarge Check Star Wars the Annotated Screenplays. Many of the things from the prequels already existed in Lucas' mind prior to 1977. He had Mace Windu, dianoga, Journal of the Whills, Starkiller, Utaupu, and Mustafar in early versions of the scripts and the backstory/lore. Jedi were originally called the Jedi Bendu before he shortened it to just Jedi.

Including with his dialog in his original Bristolian accent?

It actually annoys me a bit that many of the details included in screenplays are scrapped before the filming even begins, and continue to exist - if at all - only in the films' promotional material. I realize, of course, that one of the main rules of screenwriting - and filmmaking - is "Show, don't tell." But audiences enjoy having an understanding of the strange new stuff they're seeing. What's interesting is that when a fictional story is heavily inspired by real - or at least realistic - events, the movie will indeed go into detail. THE GODFATHER, APOCALYPSE NOW, and GANGS OF NEW YORK are three films I can think of in which additional details are communicated to us either by a narrator or by a character speaking the movie's dialogue. It's supposedly a screenwriting no-no, but it can work if it's presented in a plausible manner.

Same with Pandawan.

Your parents are truly gods....

You would've seen the original cut which most people haven't seen. The first edits were 3 months after the film came out!

I think I saw it re-released in theaters sometime between 1995-1997. It was definitely before Phantom Menace was released. I think i was only about 5 or 6, at the time. The only memory I have was the Death Star battle.

@@fieryphoenix586 You saw the Special Edition in 1997

@Wild Blunt Hickok I saw the original cut. I do have foggy memories of some of this. But I was around 6 years old so..... :)

Saw it in the theaters in ‘77- it was a whole new experience to someone who grew up walking ti the neighborhood theater every Sat-the attention to details-the look of grimy looking ships-so called “used future”- the sounds seeming to come from all around you-it was definitely different!

It’s still too soon to make jokes about Alderaan , RIP

​@@trustyourplug "Impressive...MOST impressive."

But how many people really knew about Star Wars lore in 1976? It was out there but the vast majority of people didn't know anything about the Star Wars saga until they set foot in the theater in 1977.

Yeah, but then we knew everything

@@DixiePokerAce the book was released just six months before the movie, and unless i'm mistaken sold out before the movie premiered. i could be entirely wrong, but by 1979 i think the novelization was in it's 30th printing. i'm certain marvel's comics mention the sith, and of course those were huge sellers. imo, anything involving pre-ESB counts as 'from the start.' you're right, few people outside the culture knew about SW before the movie, but before ESB was released we had *all* heard 'dark lord of the sith' many times. i'd thought it was used on one of the trading cards, but i can't find any examples of that so i'm thinking that may be a false memory.

@@williamward9755 we knew everything we needed to, the rest is just a money grab, lol.

I remember "Sith" from the book, but I'm not sure if it ever registered with me that the word never was used in the original trilogy. There's also the emperor's name. Palpatine was in the prologue of the novelisation, but never in any of the movies, until Episode 1.

Originally, it WAS his first name. Darth was not a title until 1999.

I also thought this and thought it was just discontinuity upon rewatching it as an adult.

Obi-Wan even calls him, 'Darth' when they duel. Sounds kind of silly, now that all the baddies are named 'Darth xx' for some reason. Also, why have two titles? Everybody already calls him, 'Lord Vader'..

Darth and his sister Ella, the Vaders. Who is more well known.

@@elfthreefiveseven1297 Good luck with this one. I haven't been able to generate a single lol with it for years.

I do remember some of the Topps trading cards mentioning Vader as a Dark Lord of the Sith.

@@nowthatsjustducky The phrase appeared in magazine articles as well. It just seemed like some sinister underworld club, like the Masons or the Dr Who Appreciation Society.

@@zacmumblethunder7466 I like to think that someone thought it was a cool word, and made a note to further develop it into something big later... a preplanned retcon or something like that.

Another reason why they might've cut it is that the Death Star might've seemed less foreboding and the Rebel's victory ring hollower if the film depicted an Imp officer openly calling the whole idea of it stupid.

@@jeffbenton6183 I think you're spot on, there. The big re-edit involved jettisoning anything that didn't drive the main plot. There was a lot of dialogue filmed that, while not being exposition as such, went into more detail about the politics of the Empire. Most famously in the completely deleted scene where Luke talks to Biggs at the station. I waited 40+ years to see that scene, and when I did it was a mega disappointment.

Well, at one point, the Clone Wars was supposed to have been the great wars fought between the Jedi Knights and the Mandalorians. Boba Fett having been one of the few remaining Mandalorian survivors. That would've been far better than what George ultimately brought to us via the Prequels.

There's is comic with the original story for the first movie. It's really cool and I think there are some assasins called sith or something.

Despite all the extra content on DVD releases and all the books, comics, TV shows and games the Star Wars movie are so mysterious. We're constantly finding out new things about them.

They never said "Sith" in the 1977 movie. What are you talking about?????

Extra dialogue and EU aren’t canon so consider them theories

@@vintifada7115 Some people prefer to maintain the old legend's EU as their cannon or chosen story line~ and that is completely fine.

@@mcsmedia8081 Not exactly. They should know that’s their headcanon, but it also never was canon Disney purchase or not and I can prove it if you’d like to get specific. Those stories were not always compatible with George’s movies and vision because he wasn’t creatively involved. Even in the sense that was canon at all, George never considered them HIS Star Wars from his own mouth so it’s impossible to tell people “guess what? Here’s extra info about a thing George didn’t make so this must be true.” He let Lucasfilm hand out licenses, but it’s not the same

@@vintifada7115 If you are going to offer to prove someone's enjoyment of Star Wars and the EU as illegitimate, especially if you are going to attempt to disprove the legitimacy of the old EU by being an extreme purist with the definition of legitimate SW being what George Lucas himself wrote~ then you are trying much too hard and caring way, way too much. Let your enjoyment of Star Wars be yours, his be his, and mine be mine. We all love this work of art. I really enjoy vanilla Empire At War and Forces of Corruption~ but it is the moding community that really turned that game into something really really special. Let art be art and story telling be story telling. This is not the Council of Nicea and we are not deciding what is and is not biblical cannon for generations to come.

@@mcsmedia8081 It’s not about saying what George Lucas wrote is the only legitimate Star Wars, it’s not about saying don’t enjoy EU content, it’s not about saying you can’t have your headcanon. It’s about saying you don’t even know where George Lucas canon stops and your headcanon starts. You don’t even know you were never supposed to be able to make “I didn’t know” or “did you know” arguments based on admittedly GOOD stories from the EU. It’s another universe. The problem becomes important (bc who cares about Tagge) when the morality messages of one if not the most impactful stories of the 20th and early 21st centuries becomes changed and bastardized into something Lucas didn’t intend. People think he was trying to give one moral message when it was entirely another. All of these points build on another. It’s important to be clear don’t mix your story sources or you’ll change the meaning. And the best way to do that is to say look canon is canon bc that’s also the truth: EU is not canon despite how good and enjoyable it can be at times. And to have to do this is all bc I said “hey that Tagge survived is basically a theory” 🤔🤔🤔

You should know that the Star Wars comics launched in 1977.

"Only a master of eveel, DARTH" sounded so weird. I don't know any other instance of it being used that way.

It is, indeed, a bit strange such a simple line was omitted, as to the reference to the Sith. Maybe it was just to not have people scratching their heads, when it was never fully explained, but I like a bit of mystery on that level. Leaves me wanting to find out more about the universe.

That is because, at the time, it WAS his first name. "Darth" as a Sith title did not exist until "Darth Maul" and "Darth Sidious." Back when Vader and Anakin were separate characters, the Sith's actual birth name was "Darth Vader." First name Darth, last name Vader.

At 13 in 1977 I remember the Dark Lord of the Sith.

@@thewanderer7307 It was obscure and it was there in 1977. It was more like saying Tuesday instead of Wednesday back then.

I had this as well and can confirm…

I seem to recall that most of the merchandising and magazine features, etc had some reference to him being _a_ or _the_ Dark Lord of the Sith. I also read that Darth had proven more popular than anyone expected and would feature more in future movies. It made him sound like a Moriarty to Luke's Sherlock, rather than the central figure of what would be six movies. Whether that was a publicity person's flight of fancy or one of George's passing ideas, who knows.

Lol glad you enjoyed

Full transparency: I want the lightsaber in that give-away.....SO bad. 😊

Vader was ranked #3 by the AFI, behind Hannibal Lecter and Norman Bates, on the list of best movie villains (out of 100).

Hopefully we’re all here for that one. Check back on this comment if you can, see if it ages well. 🤘☝️👍

@@darthwizzywizard WizzyWizard...... Soundz like a mix of STAR WARS & DOUBLE DUTCH BUS.

Wasn't it last year that was celebrated?

Yes the studio souvenir pamphlet mentioned Dark Lord of the Sith back in 1977. It was a reference we Boomers know well.

@@Smenkhaare Not just you Boomers, but us Gen-Xers as well. Or did you forget about us.... AGAIN? ;)

@@IggyStardust1967 Sorry...Boomer Limitations. :D

I was thinking the same thing - that description was definitely on something I had back in the days of the original release. I was thinking the cardboard for the action figure (Darth was my 2nd after Chewie), or I had a giant sized Marvel comic adaptation that went about 1/3 of the way through the movie - I may have seen it in there. Somehow not recalling the exact context of first seeing a phrase 45 years ago - I must be slipping!

@@daviderickson8699 It was all in the brief descriptions in the guide you bought. Remember the souvenir guides for big movies?

Thanks for the kind words of support

I appreciate the prequels more since I see my kids having fun watching them. But even my 8 and 10 year old don't like TLJ and RoS.

The mismatch between the actual movies-as-released and the surrounding merch universe really bugged me as an obsessive-compulsive kid. You watch a movie three times over a year and a half (this was pre-VHS of course) and then you see a Bossk action figure and a lizard that stormtroopers ride and you're like, "Wait, those weren't in the movie--who/what are those--OH MY GOD DID I MISS A PART?" One gets the feeling there are minor characters that are created and filmed and show up for a frame or two just to justify an action figure. I'm surprised there isn't a Biggs action figure (maybe there is now.)

I know! "Dark Lord of the Sith" was all over the place at the time. Trading cards, toys, magazines, articles in newspapers. I got a bit fed up of hearing the phrase. I was never a fan of the Spectre organisation in Bond (I prefer lone evil masterminds who are dispatched in inventive ways) so the Sith seemed to be being promoted as the SW equivalent.

@@chrisparkes2179 does that make him a Sithy?

I had that book too! lol. But Tagge's name has been pronounced "Ta-jee" for as long as I can remember.

The action figure, collector cards, and other things noted him as the Dark Lord of the Sith.

95% certain I heard it pronounced "tag" in the Star Wars radio drama. I've never heard it pronounced with a soft g until recent KZfaqrs. I'm gonna need an official source to prove otherwise, not just some randos pronouncing it that way.

Found it! 3: 33 :16 of this video. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aJ6Rl9eayr6xcp8.html

It IS pronounced “tag” 100%

no they were'nt. scroll above.

>ruined the original trilogy with CGI

@@paddington1670 sad that cgi ruins a movie for u

As amusing as this is, a plan in regards to stories doesn't necessarily mean having every single detail figured out and etched in stone. It simply means that the general vision and framework for the story is there. Many elements can be changed along the way. In this instance, its debunking the idea that the Sith were a prequel addition that had never been considered prior, when in reality it very much was planned.

That’s apart of story righting, you would never know these things if he didn’t tell it.

Leia was going to be Luke's sister long before Return of the Jedi. Yoda said there is another and Leia since Luke's presence and heard his plea for help while hanging at Cloud City

those lines should have been re-inserted into the 1997 special editions, instead of all that CGI crapola. Another Lucas fail.

I don't remember the ESB comic--it must not have made a big impression on me; what I DID remember is that the first Star Wars comic about the first movie. For the powerhouse it eventually became, I always looked back on this comic and remembered how 'poor' the artwork was. No doubt, the creators of said comic probably thought it was going to be some low budget POS film with 'Corman' level effects etc...Little did they know they were catching lightning in as bottle.

@@nickmitsialis It pretty much saved Marvel, which was starting to go bankrupt at the time.

@@patriarch7237 The ESB comic or SW? I imagine once the first film hit the big screen, the comics probably sold like crazy

@@nickmitsialis The original Star Wars. They started on it before the film was properly released, so had no idea what they had on their hands. It was such a hit that it saved Marvel. After they'd covered the original film, it made follow up comics very difficult to write, as they knew a sequel was likely but had no idea what would happen. Hence the characters wear the same clothes they had in the original film throughout, until the ESB comic was produced.

@@patriarch7237 Yes! While I never caught the clothing aspects of the post movie comics I do recall I was crazy for nearly anything tied in to SW, until ESB 'fixed in my mind' how things 'should be' and it immediately quashed any of the 'lesser' offerings; remember Admiral "Wermis", whom Vader was always grabbing by throat? Never happen once force choke became a 'thing'. Same with That dreadful 'Splinter in the Mind's Eye'. The thought Vader laughing like some mustache twirling villain (as he toyed with a light saber wielding Leia) or having his arm cut off by Luke was truly absurd in retrospect. But I do remember the TORTURE of waiting for the next movie to come out--Three years seemed like an eternity

I would say 1977-2012 since we were still getting good content from George and the EU.

Long may the Disney era reign, a mary sue in every sequel!

Explain to me how Rey is a Mary Sue. Not being rude, I just want to watch you flounder to back your claim considering how little basis it has.

Andor was literally one of the best things ever for star wars. I would put it just below episode 5, as the second best star wars content every created. The symbolism, everything in Andor is so well crafted

@@herroberbesserwisser7331 thanks, but given the damage done prior and the fact that the main protagonist fate is already known, it’s over for me… I no longer recognise Star Wars.

Zahn, in particular, used that term, I think, because "sith" hadn't been clearly defined and Lucasfilm wouldn't let him create a definition. So "dark Jedi' was a safer term

@@meganofsherwood3665 Vader was never described as a "Dark Jedi" in the Zahn Trilogy. Sith was even mentioned in the LucasArts "TIE Fighter" video game sequel to "X-Wing"...

@@TheJeremyHolloway correct, he never described Vader that way. He did, however, use the term for fallen Jedi & (I believe) other users of the dark side

I remember when I was a kid just getting into SW, coming across a collection of old comic strips (ones from before the movies came out) referring to Darth Vader as a "Sith ghost" and couldn't find 'sith' anywhere in the dictionary. :) haha "What is Sith??"

In Disney +'s short series Light & Magic, about ILM, Lucas; says he only used around 25% of his plans, ideas, concepts in 1977- A New Hope.

@@DavidLLambertmobile A lot of that stuff was constantly changing.

@bonchbonch yes, Luke because of his pilot skills was to use a New Y wing type bomber not a X wing, which were flown by senior pilots. The ILM crew couldn't get the Y wing set up in time so Lucas switched Luke to a X wing pilot.