I was thinking the same thing to type. 100% agree with you.

Even more so real life camera angles. I’m thinking about the first creed movie. Opening scene, no music no talking just the camera on him then behind him good camera skills make all the difference

The fact the director himself is a stunt man makes it even better That’s why this movie was so good the camera angles the positioning of the cameras and the stunts everytbing

Yeah gives you a better appreciation for the the type of movie/show when we the audience gets to you see how it was made

This ain't Van Damme era no more.

AAAAANNNDDD MEGAN ANDERSON IS IN THIS ONE 🥵

This guy is saying shitty CGI but I still see they are using shitty practical effects (flashy ones or excessive explosive effects). Practical effects and CGI effects are not easy to use as they require knowledge and time, most of the time they don't hack it, but they got the job done.

There's still CGI... 0:45 for example. Both serve a purpose and integrating practical and digital effects takes a lot of skill.

@@panther7584 CCI, practical effects or not, it still boils down with the story telling, James Cameron once said, a good movie no matter how bad the graphics or doesn't have a volume the viewers can still understand what they are watching and at the same time the viewers will love the movie. I think what makes extraction a good movie is more about the story.

You even know what CGI is?

No CGI? What about 0:45?

@@Infinite-if7uq that's for bg

yt opinions

and no wokeism

@@cubul32 KZfaq opinions?

TRULY 💯.....I've been saying that for a very long time....The Stunt Artists' , as I call them NEVER get the recognition they thoroughly deserve in this industry! These gifted individuals RISK THEIR LIVES to make the Actors look good & alot have lost over the years too. You get an Oscar for best makeup & a song....but doing death-defying sequences into a reality you GET ZILCH!!!

Thats why i love action movies!!!!

Hear! Hear!! The stuntmen are the unheralded heroes of all successful action movies.

Seriously under appreciated.

Don't the stuntmen/women who become directors in their own right and use their well-thought-out visions on film.

real action movies!!!!!!

Hellyeah! About time. I'm sick of this leftist soyboy liberal agenda horseshit.

The Maverick effect!

It actually started back a few years ago with the less recognized movie Need for Speed, the race car movie that actually flipped the cars etc with no CGI at all

@@francoisessomba1305 I'd say the Nolan effect.

It was good but I really hope that they explain how he survived cos what really made Part 1 good was that it was steeped in realism.

@@bernardabang4107 this ones time frame might be set before the first one. Only way that would make sense since no one would survive what 6 shots to the body and one threw the jugular vein? No way he survived that.

@@kieranluke3810 No its not. A vid came out showing him swim up after getting shot in the jugular so its not a prequel. We wait for the explanation.

glad to know im not the only one obsessed with extraction lol

@@aladdinaldilawi7098 it was a good movie with excellent gunplay. What's not to like?

could be possible ... he was wounded and smashed up ... yet could have lived. would be sweet to see.

You won't get it

@Cosmic Guardian he didn't die

@Cosmic Guardian Tyler Rake got shot in the throat and walked that shit off. It wouldnt be the craziest thing to happen.

@@Wavemaninawe it was obvious Tyler survived at the end of the movie though…