Better performing live in Airshows than in front of green screens for Hollywood flicks, Maverick 😂

@@BitterTruth123 uit know that Meveriick was flying jets that are not even in service right?

Su 35 is a cheap knock off of the f16. It is a weak shadow of the mighty mig 25.

@@seanhunt138 😂😂

Fun fact - the SU-27 is the only Russian fighter aircraft with a positive ata kill ratio.

It doesn't. Su-35S is the final version with Irbis-E PESA radar.

@@fighterjet1651 I'm afraid you are extremely uninformed

@@truth959 Fell free to inform me then, because Im not aware of any AESA radar update ever being mentioned with the Su-35S :)

@@fighterjet1651 I know you're not aware. That's why I told you are uninformed, lol 😄

Great, thats why I told you to inform me, preferaby with a link to a source that supports your claim.

Thank you!

Yes, but only according to US sales propaganda relating to the supposed integrated electronic battlefield. It also helps if one jet can fly rings around the other, because, as we all know, our electronics are subject to faults and flaws from multiple causes--from simple severe weather to solar storms and other infrastructure issues beyond our control.

@@Michael.Chapmanyeah and the Russian propaganda gets ignored right? Lol

@@kevinmyers440 Instead of propaganda, consider raw performance objective data, such as world record holding climb rates to 60,000 feet eg: the beautiful but elderly Su-27: 59,000 fpm v modern F-35: 45,000 fpm or modern Su-57: 71,000 fpm v the proud F-22 'Raptor': 62,000 fpm. Thrust vectoring also plays a significant role: eastern fighters have long used 3-dimensional thrust vectoring which permits mind-blowing super-maneuvering... Why did the Skunk Works only incorporate simple 2-D vectoring into the F-22? The price was already prohibitive, I suppose. The F-22 is capable of superb pull-ups in 2 dimensions, but we see no true super-maneuverability in the modern sense. Am unsure if it can pull a technically correct, fully complete Pugachev's Cobra, first demonstrated sensationally to the public by Viktor Pugachev flying an Su-27 way back in the day, at the 1989 Paris Airshow. Lastly, I will never forget respected Australian Military Analysts stating at the time when we Aussies purchased a big load of F-35 aircraft from our allies, the USA: "This purchase will hobble the Royal Australian Air Force for the next 50 years"... down here we live surrounded by supposedly hostile countries who all use aircraft that fly in a superior manner to the F-35. Despite any perceived electronic battlefield capabilities, the playing field is heavily biased against the little F-35 "Lightning'.

My brain washed friend, no one wants the F22 plane and that plane is sitting in the hangar because it is too expensive to maintain and useless against long-range Russian missiles. But since you are brainwashed, we will forgive you.

Except the only thing the F22 has ever actually shot down is a hot air balloon...

Yeah and Zelensky will be the F-22 pilot, eh?

it's actually stupid..

Change the channel's name from Military TV to Clown Tv.

@@TheRealBillBob BS TV is another alternative

Send them to Ukraine please🤡🤣

google: Su-35 kill-shot F22 Syria

​@@chris-hg3iv radar won't even know what fighter jet hit them

​@@elohssvjeon1752 em, Sukhoi su-35 could detect incoming f22 from at least 120 miles, f22's stealth characteristics is massively overstated. F22 is bad by design. And if f22 turns on his radar-well, it's not a stealth anymore.

@@dominicbrunsmeier you have 0 understanding about jets i will let others exlpain to you

Funny, but F-15 is a lot worse by all characteristics than SU-35

@@Dheis74747 It's too early to be cracking such jokes, even from one who swallows Russian "creative" specs whole. For example, research the SU-35's vaunted Irbis-E radar.

depends on which jet has the better radar and missiles

I will disappoint you, but the SU-35 is better than any US aircraft. RCS F22 according to our measurements is 0.1-0.5 (depending on the angle of exposure), the Su 35 radar sees the raptors at a distance of 180-250 km and can attack at an angle of even 90 degrees (the raptor cannot do this), the Su 35 uses missiles with a range 300 kilometers or can transmit information to ground air defense. Also, the Su 35 sees the raptor in the infrared range at a distance of 100 kilometers, the raptors do not even have optical detection systems.

@@user-yj1on3bf1v The Bible teaches us that Russia will win in Ukraine. ( Daniel Chapter 7 verse 5 Russia is the "Bear") The war will be expanded and more countries will be destroyed. That means a direct conflict with NATO with no proxies. Russia defeats NATO and we find in Ezekiel chapters 38 and 39 the Gog/Magog war Russia's Allies which include Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey and also Germany. This logically means that after NATO is defeated Germany and Turkey align with Russia and therefore NATO is dissolved and the USA is evicted from Germany. This is the future and is what the Bible instructs us. Stealth is now old tech. The Americans have admitted that low level radar can now see stealth. There was an American general that was astonished and asked the British radar tech how he could see and track the stealth plane as it's radar signature was the size of a pigeon. He replied that pigeons do not fly over 250 mph. Veteran radar operators are now seeing stealth. This is a normal development and usually your tech advantage has a limited shelf life. The BVR arguement was used by the Americans in Vietnam. The Mark 1 F4 phantom did not have a gun and the Americans were forced to install a belly gun strapped onto a weapon hard point. Later F4s had the gun incorporated into the design. The Americans lost many many pilots to the Mig. Only 16% of missiles fired by the F4 found their target and the American pilots found that they were forced into dog fights because they needed to be able to identify friend or foe when multiple targets were present. The kill ratio was so lopsided in favour of the Russian Migs that the Americans were forced to create an air to air combat school called "Top Gun" made famous by Hollywood staring Tom Cruise as Maverick. I believe this scenario will be repeated but the difference is that this time the USA will not have the time to leap frog pass the Russians in tech. If you neutralize the stealth with an updated radar in the Russian fighters and also their AWACS then the Russian SU 57 will feature a plane that is twice as fast, double the range, has a much higher ceiling and will be much more maneuverable in a dog fight than anything the USA have in their current fleet. The American pilots have been instructed to do BVR fights only but I see a disaster coming for the USA and Maverick will not save them.

@@user-yj1on3bf1v You don't know what you are talking about. Wars are won by money and by numbers. During WW2, USA built 500-600 bombers in a month. USA can produce hundreds of F-35 whereas Russia can not even make ten SU-57 or SU-75. You can not beat hundred F-35 with ten SU-57.

@@galaxymess During the Second World War, the USSR created 70 thousand tanks. In heavy battles, there were 250 artillery pieces for every kilometer of the front. You said correctly that numbers and the size of the army win. The USA now doesn’t even have shells for artillery, US gave last 70 thousand for Ukraine and then sent these shells from Ukraine to Israel. Haha, disaster. That's why they gave Ukraine cluster bombs. The US and NATO arsenals are now almost empty. Nowadays, North Korea produces 1.5 million 155 mm shells per year, which is more than the United States and NATO each year. Russians produce more than North Korea. In Russia, since 2022, the production of drones has increased by 20 times, tanks by 3-4 times, airplanes and helicopters by 2-3 times, shells 10 times. Russia now has an army of about a million people which has the best combat experience right now. There are also millions of bombs in Russian warehouses, which are now being converted into glide munitions. Thousands of tanks have been in storage since USSR times. And if you compare the quality of weapons, then the weapons of the USA and NATO are no good. For example, artillery quickly loses accuracy due to the fact that the barrel is deformed. While the Russian artillery works as at the beginning of the war. You have not yet realized that the USA and NATO are now without pants. When the Russians come, it will be a quick end. And you haven't seen our bombs with a damage radius of 100 meters yet.

@@user-yj1on3bf1vkeep dreaming that paper tiger dog shit ain’t nothing compared to us fighter . They like china j16 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

And considering neither of these platforms have ever seen actual combat we'll never know...

The Russians have the range, their R-77 missile, the US theoretically has better radar...

No other plane in the world can also be used as a submarine.

dont be so sure. air superiority will come down to who has the best missiles and radar. Russia is several years ahead as admitted by a u.s general, and also cornel

It's stats are trash for a fighter engagement. It's a strike aircraft, not air superiority, the F-35 would get it's a s s kicked by Chinese and Russia fighters.

The Bible teaches us that Russia will win in Ukraine. ( Daniel Chapter 7 verse 5 Russia is the "Bear") The war will be expanded and more countries will be destroyed. That means a direct conflict with NATO with no proxies. Russia defeats NATO and we find in Ezekiel chapters 38 and 39 the Gog/Magog war Russia's Allies which include Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey and also Germany. This logically means that after NATO is defeated Germany and Turkey align with Russia and therefore NATO is dissolved and the USA is evicted from Germany. This is the future and is what the Bible instructs us. Stealth is now old tech. The Americans have admitted that low level radar can now see stealth. There was an American general that was astonished and asked the British radar tech how he could see and track the stealth plane as it's radar signature was the size of a pigeon. He replied that pigeons do not fly over 250 mph. Veteran radar operators are now seeing stealth. This is a normal development and usually your tech advantage has a limited shelf life. The BVR arguement was used by the Americans in Vietnam. The Mark 1 F4 phantom did not have a gun and the Americans were forced to install a belly gun strapped onto a weapon hard point. Later F4s had the gun incorporated into the design. The Americans lost many many pilots to the Mig. Only 16% of missiles fired by the F4 found their target and the American pilots found that they were forced into dog fights because they needed to be able to identify friend or foe when multiple targets were present. The kill ratio was so lopsided in favour of the Russian Migs that the Americans were forced to create an air to air combat school called "Top Gun" made famous by Hollywood staring Tom Cruise as Maverick. I believe this scenario will be repeated but the difference is that this time the USA will not have the time to leap frog pass the Russians in tech. If you neutralize the stealth with an updated radar in the Russian fighters and also their AWACS then the Russian SU 57 will feature a plane that is twice as fast, double the range, has a much higher ceiling and will be much more maneuverable in a dog fight than anything the USA have in their current fleet. The American pilots have been instructed to do BVR fights only but I see a disaster coming for the USA and Maverick will not save them.

The only thing the f22 has ever shot down is a balloon...

@@maigepresents5840 That is the official count there may have been clandestine encounters that neither side admits to, which is rather common.

Lol, yeah sure, maybe in a world where Hitler was a just a fancy everyone-loving jew.

​@@maigepresents5840😂😂😂😂

Sometimes our little single-engine Australian F-35 'Lightnings', with their lack-lustre 45,000 fpm climb rates will face technical issues. God help them if that happens, or if Australia hasn't purchased the complete 'entire suite of USA designed electronic battlefield implementation equipment.' Once the F-35 (or even the F-22) is cut-off from their long-range electronic battlefield infrastructure they may well be doomed... due to their inherent lack of fundamental aerodynamic capability.

Why would it be a joke?

What information can you add to this intriguing fact?

Mostly maintenance costs and weapons. Fuel is a very minor cost. In flight the skin of any stealth aircraft will take some minor damage, all of which decreases it's stealth so that has to be fixed right away using advanced materials and techniques. Parts can not allowed to operate until failure and so are replaced long before any expected failure. Missiles are fantastically expensive, especially the US missiles which are more advanced, so anytime one of those is fired replacing it is a major cost. For example, just one AIM-120D costs over $1M USD. Installed cost of full armament for the F22 is around $8M USD.

Да вы что.Ф22 даже Су 30МКИ не ровня.

it does not matter. if you study this question, you will know that the su-35 is better in all components

Su 30 detect the shit of f35 before f35 detect the su30 you american are good just in fake realty 😂

@@salahben8410WRONG 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@salahben8410 Russian propaganda clearly worked on you 😂😂😂

@@salahben8410keep dreaming delulu Russian paper tigers

Why don't you send them to ukraine then 🤔

🤣🤣🤣@@hellgates_javed6451

Not even. F-22 is too far ahead.

Well actually no cause there are 10 fight-capable su57. This comparsion on the other hand is actually what could happen on the air fight.

Yes & No, because Su-57 technically is still not a stealth aircraft compared to F-22, F-35 & J-20.

12 prototypes is hardly valid

f-22 only use to destroy balloon, it's a joke to Su-57 🤣

The SU-57 has a radar cross section of between .1 m^2 and 1 m^2 vs the F-22 .0001 m^2. It's no contest - the F-22 is both harder to detect and has better sensors. Plus American pilots get a lot more flight hours, which maintains and builds skill.

su57 is 4.5th gen plane

And American pilots get the training and flight hours

@@recoil53 yeah like any other air force that can produce their own fighter jets.

@@Benz2533 I'd bet the American pilots get the most. And I doubt Russians get much flight hours.

@@recoil53 at this point it is better not to assume anything when it come to training.

@@Benz2533 Why is that?

It was a super stealthy Chinese balloon. Newest tech, managed to cross the ocean and then America unnoticed.

1 shot for f22, 2 shots for f16. The balloon hasnt got much heat.

This would be a useless comparison. Su-57 has the same engines as the Su-35 and also was found to not have good stealth characteristics (India refused to buy the final product from Russia because it didn’t meet 5th gen fighter requirements and was just a bad plane) Even Russian Su-35 has terrible avionics compared to Western fighters (US and European made) this is why a bunch of countries are opting to buy Rafale over Su-35’s

@@disillusioned8686 I agree with you, but there is another reason , And it is that many countries are afraid of the sanctions that the United States may impose, and we do not forget Egypt, which was threatened with penalties in the event of the completion of the Sukhoi 35 deal with Russia.

A duel implies the Su-35 knows the F22 is there.

so what? su 35 much better in all, radar Irbis can detect f22 at distance 180-250 km and can shoot down f22 because russia use long range missiles (300 km)

@@user-yj1on3bf1v Impossible f22/f35 can target lock with GPS a high tech than su35/su57 they are shoot down by F.!

@@MrPrasert94 haha, GPS, It seems you don't even understand anything about these matters. planes don't aim through satellites, trust me. I gave you the information he is an engineer who creates radars, he also knows the test results on models like F22. So this is correct information. Russian planes are better at everything, you just hear a lot of Western propaganda from all sources.

@@user-yj1on3bf1v HaHaHa ..Where are U su 57..where it is show the power on Ukranin capital.Why Putin cannot take on Ukr in time?? hahaha!!NO su 57 for attack Ukr!!.

@@user-yj1on3bf1v Or are your su57 fear our Patriot missile! ..hahaha!!

Baloney.

When fighting hand-to-hand a knife is a much better weapon than a rifle but the guy with the rifle will never let the guy with the knife get close so it doesn't matter. F22 doesn't dogfight, it's invisible until it kills from a distance.

I see all you do on this channel is lazily mock US aviation with false stats. You also make arbitrary claims without evidence, so your point of view is heavily flawed comparing the Su-35 and F-22. The F-22 is an air superiority fighter, but still capable of delivering guided munitions just the same way as the Su-35. You additionally have no reputable source regarding the presumed Indian shoot down of the Pakistani F-16s. Also, all combat statistics show that the MiG-21 has an abysmal combat record, resulting in a < 50% success rate for all MiG-21s, and the Indian Air Force alone has killed more of its own pilots and it’s own civilians in accidents than actual combat kills.. so congratulations on being better at destroying yourselves than anything else.

@@TDS1108Gaming think about it! A 2nd generation aircraft, which causes damage cevelian, became the reason of death own pilots can destroy fancy f-16... Can you imagine that?🤣🤣🤣 And India had shown the proof of f-16 in media... If you have any doubt, you can checkout that online... You can't deny that mig-21 is a falcon destroyer and f-22 is nothing but a belloon killer... 😉

Russian jets are more expensive to operate in the long run. That is one of the reasons Russia lost sales of their fighter jets.

I recently red that USA resume production of of F15 due to its more effectiveness. I think those 5th gen fighters are very noisy

@@eagle_orstkho But isn't it always a bit noisy on the battlefield? And doesn't the modern soldier wear earprotection?

@@whitebeauty759 i mean noise in the meaning of capricious

@@eagle_orstkho ​ Thats not true, the main reason the U.S. is acquiring the F-15EX is the slow production rate of the F-35, not because the F-15 is better or more effective. Though it is a bonus that the F-15 can carry larger weapons.

@@kaijenkins4513 i think its all about capricious exploitation of those 5th gen jets