Federer had 0.01% Chance of Winning the Point... What Happened Next is Legendary!

Рет қаралды 42,675

Tennis & Chill

15 күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 18

@fb30xhk 13 күн бұрын

Impressive collection of high-quality clips - nice work

@johncardenas972 6 күн бұрын

Djokovic--most successful player with all the important records. Federer--the most naturally gift, the amazing arsenal of skills and the fans' favorite.

@Inspiration_Connect 12 күн бұрын

i cant get over the control RF has under such pressure

@vidyasonavane9602 13 күн бұрын

This video will be on repeat for me.❤️❤️❤️nothing beats Roger’s sprints to the net and to the baseline. I will rather watch Roger’s old videos rather than some boring, hitting from the baseline 30+ pt rallies. Roger would be the best tennis person to ever hold a racquet if the courts had not slowed down. And the bonus: the best outfits, great slow motion shots, complete with beautiful hair, oh and u don’t have to hear an annoying grunt, and the stunned look on his opponent’s faces.

@carlosmeza5922 13 күн бұрын

Absolutly agree ...boring long and noise tennis

@tennislover8660 12 күн бұрын

The way Granollers looked to his camp.

@EkiAyanru 13 күн бұрын

❤❤

@zoechicken9445 8 күн бұрын

You could play the perfect point against this dude, and still lose.

@Victurf 6 күн бұрын

0.01 %....Démontrez-le mathématiquement puisque 0.01 % est de nature mathématique ! Nous sommes impatients de vous lire !

@kennethwilliams4874 12 күн бұрын

How was that potential winning percentage calculated, exactly? I swear, KZfaq videos can have the dumbest titles...

@soheiladam7510 10 күн бұрын

just ignore it like many people do. Advice: don't take KZfaq seriously.

@kennethwilliams4874 9 күн бұрын

@@soheiladam7510 How about this, instead? KZfaq videos that don't incorporate such nonsense to begin with. "Federer had almost no chance of winning the point...what happened next is legendary!" See? Not difficult at all.

@angerisdiscipline3913 13 күн бұрын

Djokovic is the best but federer is the biggest legend of tennis

@initialize21 12 күн бұрын

Well, Federer had a better peak and better natural skills and talent. So Federer is indeed better

@whydoihavetousegoogl 12 күн бұрын

@@initialize21 Federer was just farming before the Big 3 materialized, Djokovic peaked during the Big 3. He's the best, only slightly, but he is the best. Federer is better looking though for sure

@plinsf 12 күн бұрын

It's one reason why I still consider Federer the GOAT, even with Djokovic's better stats.

@angerisdiscipline3913 12 күн бұрын

@@initialize21 this is up to speculation my friend , djokovic's peak looked really scary in 2011 and also from mid 2015 to early 2016 when he won the 4 slams of that period , statisticly during that period no one dominated tennis like djokovic did in the history of tennis and federer was playing well in 2015 as well as andy murray who was in prime time , about 2011 season I think it was even more impressive considering nadal was at his peak federer was at the end of his prime but still very good and Murray was getting very good . To me djokovic doesnt have any weakness and therefore is more complete than federer for the entire course of their carreer, the peak for peak conversation for me is 50-50 because the eye test tells me federer of 2005/2006 might very well blow peak djokovic out of the court but also djokovic statisticly has done insane stuff for me to count him off , in the end it will come down to the type of surface they play in and it will always be 50-50ish imo