Nathan for You > The Rehearsal

​@@NoctuaOlivae- I'd disagree

Same haha

Nah bro. He was trolling the entire time. Haven’t you been paying attention?

i am glad it ended when it ended

I’d argue he didn’t find anyone. The escort doesn’t count since she is clearly doing it for money and to be on camera, not because she likes Nathan

​@@gupoll i think they meant Bill found someone. I do definitely think Nathan and Maci relationship was purely job for both of them - Maci literally getting paid for it, while Nathan using her for the show.

@@mmaclipsuknow it’s unknown if Bill actually ended up with the drama lady (or maybe he did and they said it after Finding Francis) but I hope he did

@@gupoll it made for a memorable ending though

Or it could simply be that he indeed does « this » professionally. « This » being acting in general

@@s1me007 or lying in general

​@FaffyWaffel who hasn't lied to get a job?

I think the episode resonates in it’s portrayal of a real tangible emotional setback. Often we’re not sure of our decisions and wonder what could’ve been. Seeing an old man acting on this impulse up to such an anticlimactic conclusion demonstrates the struggle of human connection better than anything I can think of. Sometimes we don’t know what we want, and more often than not we don’t truly want anything in particular other than human connection. Unfortunately that is the one something we can’t force.

i think it’s more of an earnest exploration of a guys sad life. i think bill got closure after the events of the show and genuinely appreciated the journey

I didnt get it until I heard the beep

A Side of smooth song would’ve been great too

Thanks Carmen! This video was a final for my visual essay class and right now I have no plans to make more but I do have some short films in the works if that sounds appealing. I appreciate the kind words!

Glad to have surprised you :)

Thank you!

I try! I work full time as an editor and try to dedicate a little free time for my own creative projects. I have a short film coming out on this channel later this month and would appreciate it if you checked it out :)

of course, I'll put the notifications on :) @@bornuglyfilms87

This was a milestone in comedy history

The main theme from the video game LA Noire. I thought it would work perfectly as just a chill background song

i think you’re consciously trying to have the opinion that this work has no deeper meaning when overwhelming evidence clearly shows the contrary. humor, especially this humor, doesn’t exist in a vaccum. the show isn’t even cynical as a whole. not everyone gets humiliated, people take the ideas in stride, they’re silly and wacky people out in the world. and there’s nothing humiliating about that

@@georget4141 If you like to tell yourself that liking Nathan Fielder's comedy makes you sophisticated, go ahead. The point of the show is to make fun of people, as well as Nathan Fielder being silly and absurd, it's very funny, and his schemes are often very clever, but it's not some kind of meaningful high art or whatever, unless you have reason to believe otherwise, but I haven't found any compelling reasons in this video.

@@ReddoFreddo what? you think i’m smart signaling by thinking about this really complicated show? very strange take and not accurate at all

@@georget4141 How is it complicated?

@@ReddoFreddo its an exploration of human nature, which is an incredibly complex topic. just think about this finale. bill is a complex person, and i would have never gotten an intimate look into his sad life without nathan for you. its profound, the story of a life full of regret. but its not mean, really. Nathan likes bill, he helps him. we see bill for who he really is, and i think many people can relate to bill in certain ways. its ok to read deeper into media and entertainment. and the people who do so have no other agenda than that these things interest them. if i were you i would try to steer away from the assumption that people looking for deeper meaning are doing so in order to feel sophisticated, because not only does that entirely miss the point, but it signals a kind of insecurity/superiority mindset over people who make those kinds of explorations. you can read nathan for you however you like and be totally right about seeing as a pretty superficial concept. your view is imo totally valid. but allow others to see it how they want, and if you have legitimate arguments disputing that then voice them, instead of just making blanket statements and character attacks.