The Fast Lane Truck 10000lb-ft......must be the HO Cummins

Ten Thousand lb-ft of Torque! Sweet!

That's exactly 9390 more torques than my old Ram with the 5.9 Cummins!

Come on guys....

0:18 What is this embargo thing?

owner of the gas staion says the same thing when he see u in that truck

😂

Hey, they say if you don’t have to look back at your truck as you walk away, you bought the wrong truck! I still love my 2008 Dodge Ram 1500, even after 325,000 miles!

@@deereman8237 with those many miles on your ram have you had to replace a lot of parts and how has the durability been like air conditioning and transmission?

If you don't look back at it you bought the wrong vehicle. Coming from a fellow owner, I honk mine like 3x and look back it make sure its there even if its there.

Metalbass79 it’s that Canadian touch 😏 🇨🇦

Steve got me back on TFL

Forty some years ago I rode around a lot in a friend's '75 Dodge three-quarter ton with one-ton springs. We spilled a lot of beer on ourselves in that pickup.

̇George H. Lol 😂👍

What a disappointment that it has a lever to shift into 4x4. I didn't expect that on the Ram that's loaded with tech

@@sevnlight6313... I prefer manual shift on anything 4x4. I like to "feel" it shift.

bad grammar

@@tylerjackson4168 Most people don't like the lever 4x4 shifting. When I sold my ford many comments where on the lever 4x4. Why would Ram go modern with a dial transmission shifting? But fail to put a dial 4x4?

@@tylerjackson4168 You got so much tech on the ram even more than ford. Not even Toyota does that on the Tundra. Which is the oldest tech in ALL trucks

Droog II thank god The annoyance of Nathan isn’t in this video

Power Wagon Don' Care!

@@chevyon37s Thinking Steve has forgotten more about off-roading the Nathen has ever learnt. :)

Nathans grin would have violated the embargo.

Negative Nathan

Canada, I got all the Wagon footage you need.

Yeah kinda funny it only has like 20hp and 28tq moee than Tundras 12yr old 5.7. AND it has over half a liter more displacement lol. Come on fiat

yea true but at least it has the 8 speed now. Should really wake the 2500 gas Rams up. The previous 6 speed had poor gearing.

The only place where FCA lags: engine options. The competition is getting tough, and the PW (RAM Rebel) really needs and engine option to distinguish itself from the rest of it's more pedestrian siblings, and to stay current. I say bring over the 6.2: V-8 Hellcat engine and spread the joy around. Even a slightly detuned version would declare the PW undisputed king of the hill, and turn the competition green with envy. I say 2020 would be a very good year.

@@pryme2013 Heavy Duty trucks are just tuned that way. It's best in class. Also, they of course do make a 6.4L V8 that easily makes far more power and torque in other applications like the Durango and Grand Cherokee where it makes 475/475 HP/TQ and in Chargers and Challengers they make 485/475 HP/TQ.

@@pryme2013 Also, it makes 29 more hp than the Tundra's 5.7. lol

You're the only one.

@@krane15 nope

@@krane15 I love them and will only buy trucks with them.

@@TheKillerMarine why?

Justin Davison because they’re more reliable? Simpler, less expensive, and cheaper to repair? That’s my reason, at least. Dodge is known for having junk electronics. The more manual/mechanical stuff, the better.

jrhunt414 would be great on the back of my 76 w200 440 4 speed ‘wagon

Oh my man, do I got videos for you

That manual 4x4 lever tho. Damn just when you thought they nailed the best tech truck ever..

Sevn Light yeah I guess it really depends on the person. For the money you’re paying I would expect a button though. But, I still like the old school lever.

manual is the best, it will never fail. Its called long term reliability. Electronics fail, just like your smart phone.

@@jakelamb39 Seems like a step back. Not even Toyota does that on the Tundra. I think it sort of defeats the purpose of having a transmission dial going modern

@@repairvehicle Then they should have gone with a lever to shift into drive if they were aiming for reliability and not modern tech. You actually shift more than use the 4x4

His Grin would have been an embargo violation.

Nathan! This might be a prototype, Nathan has two speeds Stopped and Foot to the Floor!

Waa àlnu

right... that 2wd climb

stickloaf that “crapy” slant is one of the best mule engines ever created.

"Crappy slant six". First time I have heard that...

Max G not to mention the towing capacity. 10k lbs for a heavy duty truck???

That's because of the shocks on it probably. The frame and axle's can handle it obviously

James Avery it’s just sad to hear it called heavy duty and not be able to stand up to heavy duty standards

James Avery and thank you for the info

@@davidseinen3483 yeah but it seems you cant have it all

Man, floor transfer case but knob shifter. I have no clue what the designers were thinking. Let's take it back here, but new school the shifter! Brilliant Karl!

Cause we know off-roading

I have a 2016 pw. Just changed the oil, coolant flush and repaired my winch cable (after recovering 3 jeeps from shit ton of snow last week-great photo), After reading all this commentary I'ma gonna go drive that wagon on a saturday afternoon. Slightly mod'd shes a screamin beast. Hope you get your '18 back soon - damn good lookin truck. Thanks for what you do, brother, so many others can go burn fossil fuel on a Saturday afternoon.

@@brett9736 I've gone to 2 Ram 2500s the last being a PW also. Driven them and enjoyed the hell out of it in my own way. I haven't brought mine to Moab which was the ultimate goal before I joined the service oh maybe when I get a chance, as of now my 18 is stored and babied I did the oil changes and replaced the air intake myself just the basic stuff. she sits on 35s but will get 37s later on. It just bugs me why they have to go with rotary knob shifter on the 19 when the column shifter could've been paired with the 8-speed.

Well, it's not supposed to be a do-everything, no sacrifice vehicle, it's primary an off-road vehicle that gives up capacity for its off-road abilities. Still, you at least can do some towing and hauling with it, and you at least have options for lighter, lower spec and higher capacities.

My guess is someone is confusing "cargo capacity" with "payload capacity". They are different. Cargo capacity is the rating of well, cargo. The calculus takes into account the following: 150lb person in each of the available seats. Say a ruck has 6 seats x 150 lbs each. That is 900 lbs. Those 900 lbs are deducted from the payload capacity and leaves a cargo capacity {what you can put in the bed) of 1,100 lbs. Otherwise, six big dudes would exceed the weight this truck could carry. If I am wrong and the payload is less than a Ridgeline or minivan then Fiat needs to go back to the drawing board ;-)

@@jamesvelvet3612 You might be surprised. The standard payload of the previous model was only slightly less at around 1,450lbs. If you add in features, it's only less than that. I don't see why the new one would be much better.

trucks can always haul more than the manufacturer says.

Luckily Me my wife and two kids dont weigh 700lbs

I did and will again

@@catsaretasty *Marines

I've seen power wagons in the low to mid 50k and during their sales you can get them up to 10k off

...especially if you take said $70K truck off road...

That would be legit, this really has me wanting a PW, might have to trade my Rebel in, guess I will wait to see if they make the TRX

Tyler Murphy with a black bottom .

@@jamesweinzierl7399 Two tone Malone is the way to go

Make mine Red!

I think they had the truck on a rock where it was leaning to the right making it bend over, that's not it on a completely flat surface.

I saw that as was well. Hmmmm 🤐

🧐

That's how they sit on the solid axle rams kind of odd. But a company makes a lvl/lift kit that come with perches and bigger coils that make the coils sit straight.

Ya the radius arm trucks have a really sketchy looking coil from the factory. They do stay in there even with a bit longer than factory shocks but they don’t exactly look great.

Couldn’t agree more. 1100lbs payload on a 3/4 ton is a joke. I’m pretty sure the Honda Ridgeline has a higher payload.

and only 9900lb towing

It’s also an off road truck with a gas engine. Not meant to be that much of a work horse but it’s meant to have a fun aspect too. If you need a work truck I wouldn’t recommend a power wagon, but it’s good for fun.

1100 lbs that is absolutely pitiful. There are sedans that can haul that much payload.

They designed the suspension to articulate well off road and they lifted it. If you want those features you're going to sacrifice payload/towing. If payload and towing are most important you will give up some offroad performance.

A trd pro is not nearly as capable off road

Yeah I'm trying to figure out the 1100lbs part myself.🤔🤔🤔🤔

@@djayt1215 I guess it really depends. if it doesn't fit on the trail it doesn't really matter how capable it is. Different tools for different jobs.

@@MrGreatness412 my guess is the springs that get you high ramps scores also take away a lot of payload. the axles, brakes, frame etc is the same so if you swapped suspension or got a tradesman with the power wagon package I suspect you get a lot of it back. Something else to consider is that the power wagon has a unique radius arm up front that flexes more than the standard suspension but offers a lot less lateral stiffness. That combined with the softer springs and the higher CG probably combine against it.

@@PatrickRich I think your right. Purely an off road tool. That is if you can get it 2 fit.

jabojr kind of defeats the purpose of what they were trying to show the new lower crawl/ 4 low ratios.

@Jim Bond Yea, I'm an old guy now, but when I was young and drinking, hell we pushed everything to max. 35 years later, I still have my leg bleed from where the my motorcycle fell on me and the tail pipe burned threw my shin and I was riding over bolders in a dry river bed after a 1/5 of JD, not to smart, but it was fun. We never had anyone get out to spot, what's that all about.

@Jim Bond not everybody who gets an off-road truck gets it for fun... some people just need to get to places or work in places harder to reach. They don't want "fun to drive" for everyday commute/work- they want easy and relaxed.

Jim Bond don’t like the craw control, don’t use it simple as that.

@Jim Bond I used it on my 2018 Power Wagon, I mean I have it so why the hell would I not use it right? That said I also am on the old school side of things so when I play my truck I'd just lock the diffs and go real easy on the brakes going a trail.

HyperXism there’s always an embargo on releasing driving impressions when the media first gets to test a vehicle. Many choose to just not post any article or video until they can completely talk about the vehicle.

@@joshtavenner3073 Wow! Didn't know this. Thank you for the explanation!

@@joshtavenner3073 been scrolling the comments looking for this, i honestly couldn't tell if he was joking in the beginning haha.

J name Yep. Sort of apples and oranges. Also, however, these are the two big off-road trucks on the market besides the midsize trucks. Power wagon is super at slow crawling and articulation situations. Raptor is good at a very large spectrum of off-roading. Would be a very interesting video. I’d love to see them put side by side on some extreme steep terrain testing traction and also some real articulation tests as well as some mud and water tests.

They did do one with a Tacoma trd pro, raptor and power wagon

@J name Seeing the two may also help someone decide which truck is better for their purposes.

I have both (2 year old) and yes you are talking about two different trucks completely. IMO - for paved streets, sand, off road high speed driving and just everyday driving the Gen 2 Raptor wins. For towing, mudding, work, low speed, bad gravel roads, hauling and low speed technical trails the Power wagon rules plus it costs much less and is more ready to use right off the showroom floor. I love them both but for different reasons.

Daniel C bruh it’s an off-roader, and it has a 2inch lift the truck isn’t meant for towing the power wagon is meant for rock crawling and grocery shopping

Ya, I am just baffled as to why FCA didn't just put air bags on the back along with the factory coils. Then the truck does everything. I added bags on my 16 PW and it does everything a regular 3/4 does. Only cost me 300 for the bags, put em on myself, and they made it a beast and it did nothing to my flex. I regularly play hard off-road and then go put 14,000 lbs on the ball when I grab the trailer and excavator and go make those green stamps. Have to make all that money so I can pay in my account down at the gas station owner's place. Lol

Maybe they call it a heavy-duty because it weighs more than the factory it was built in?

Because it is other than the springs.

It’s meant for rock crawling and grocery shopping not towing a 12k trailer daily up the Rocky Mountains

Gm is shit so

Modern GM products suck!

And what does the power wagon have. Besides a front locker, a sway bar disconnect and factory winch. The 6.2 has more power, 10 speed, lift kit and a shitload of cameras. Oh and apparently according to this video more payload and equal towing to a "heavy duty" power wagon

They couldn't even put a front locker in the AT4. Skipped some important details

Watched a tfl video about the at4 the spokesperson said they wanted it to appear off road

ErnestoRivera86, yup... I noticed that too, “26inches of departure angle”, really???

So is a Raptor. It is the whole point of both trucks...

Well yes...if you needed a truck for payload you would option for payload...not for the ability to rocl crawl

I’ve had 3,000 lbs in the bed of my 2008 Dodge Ram 1500 and it handled it fine! Only rated for like 1,250 payload though... oh well, warranty is long expired anyway!

...which is normally done with a work truck, not a leather seat equipped, parking-sensor beeping, iPad in the dash truck, LOL....

Power Wagon is a 2500

It's a 2500 8 lug... it's a HD truck!

tedll75 Done with Negative Nathan

Manley Williams because they didn’t turn the sensors off. They even say the water/ mud is setting them off. I recently had a lot of problems with snow sticking to mine and setting them off lately.

Drew w same here with snow & ice making them sound. Fortunately after a few seconds they disable themselves automatically. Same with towing, the rear sensors disable after a few seconds. They can be manually disabled/enabled by a push button on the center stack. Front & rear buttons to allow control over each.

Because the power wagon don't care that you're annoyed

Then go get a regular 2500 and not have the articulation, front/rear lockers, disconnecting swaybar, lift, and Warn winch. And it isn't a Dodge anymore.

Ram don’t care. Dodge cares even less.

...No thanks Fiat... There, FIFY. Dodge trucks went AWOL shortly after the Germans dumped Chrysler.

Those aren't even 1/2 ton numbers. Those are compact truck numbers, both the Toyota Tacoma and the Chevy Colorado have 1,400 to 1,500 pounds of payload

Don Leamon I agree with u. I’m a stock truck kinda guy

You didnt see them get stuck on the rock they edited it out.

3:52

I agree. I prefer the column shifter. I don't really like the shifters in the center console like in cars. One advantage to the knob would be it doesn't take up a lot of room but still not a fan.

Ram haters like you should love the rotary shift knob; so you can play with your own stick shift while driving.

I perfer column shifter! So much easier to get in a lower gear to slow down heavy trailers or go down icy hills in the winter. No looking for a gear shift button or anything like that! I also like the fact that the column shifters are directly connected to the transmission in the Ram trucks!

Freddy Armijos stop watching fake news bs on KZfaq with “reviewers” that have never owned anything more than a Camry

Reviews of poor reliability is from consumer reports among others. For example Mercedes cars are aweful. Very expensive junk cars I know because several work colleagues have them. Always in shops. Always something wrong. Always huge repair bills. Thousands of dollars.

Pretty sure the 1500 rebel has a bigger payload 🤷‍♂️

@@bullzits icom coil springs on 1500 are cheep and heavy duty

That's just what FCA advertises. I put air bags in my 16 PW and pull 14,000 on the ball ( 16' dump trailer and 4 ton excavator with multiple buckets) almost daily. The bags don't hinder flex and they weren't expensive either, see I consider it a win win. Other than the crappy gas mileage, it's a beast that does everything I want it to.

@@bobvincent4841 that means you are exceeding the vehicle rating. It is rated to tow what it can based on the stopping performance, not it's ability to get a load moving. Maybe you aren't to far over the tow capacity to be considered dangerous, but you still shouldn't.

@@lonespartan31289 but similar(non Power Wagon) Ram 2500s are rated to tow much more. I've read that it is because of the liability of lockers, low range, disconnects, and a heavy load. Never underestimate the ability of the general public to do something really stupid and blame the manufacturer.

Yea that would drive me nuts. Drive for 150 - 200 miles then your fuel light turns on again.