Note how the pilot can drop the plane slowly for touch down, compare to AV-8B Harrier pilots that's required to turn down the engine quite significantly and slam the plane at the last one/two foot.

well its not that impressive compared to su57 flatspins.

thanks for telling me to look i hadn't noticed the video i was just listening to the sound

Blaise N'kufo Su57 is shit compared to F-35 lmao

@LOCKON And it failed lmao

copywriter hahaha

But it's really not that good lol

@@BaguetteGamingOfficial rocket scientist spotted.

@@mayankmishra1186 yes thanks to my 2 months of youtube studying I am now an expert on the field

@@BaguetteGamingOfficial i never knew lockheed martin is running such educational programs on youtube.

They do seem to crash... a lot

29% turned out to be operational, and many many many models seem to just fizzle out somehow. Lockheed is a money grabbing corporation, the US government better get these contractors in check, this is of utmost importance.

@@Darakyoutane I've noticed a lot of the nato countries have issues with them as well. Watched a video of the British navy sending one into the ocean lmfao, you know though American acceptionalism at its best

​@@jlo7770Apparently mistakes can happen sometimes

@@Rorywizz well it's a 100 million dollar mistake everytime one of these f35 decideds to act up. I will accept that that unqualified woman "fighter pilot" did ditch an f35 into the south china sea and that was 100% her fault, but "mistakes" in engineering should be ironed out before they're nilly willy flying over civilian infrastructure and the pilot gets ejected over land and the jet f's off for 50 miles until it finally crashes into someone's yard. The faa is kinda stringent when it comes to flying. If I slapped some garbage together and it had a high failure rate I sure af wouldn't be able to fly it. But then again we can look at Boeing and see those jet liners are falling apart mid flight and the faa doesnt particularly seem to care cuz the tax payers will be stuck paying for it. It's not a "mistake" when there's a ton of videos out there of these jets doing the exact opposite of what they're suppose to do and that flying into the ground or water. It's more than a simple "mistake"

Me too.

Mw moment

Reminds me of the time I did and yes very awesome!!! ⚡️ 🤘

Me too.

dude i fly them all the time! (in gta ;-;)

Konstanley Jerknov reverse card

Konstanley Jerknov kzfaq.info/get/bejne/etGjhrOLucCpg2Q.html

This dude is just jealous he probably lives in a broken down house and has never been laid, only from his mother who probably regretted having him and thought about having an abortion

Konstanley Jerknov Soviet Union*

Lol who's mad? I love my country :)

Not really or maybe it’s just evenly distributed propulsion keeping it naturally stable

@@Sanyu-Tumusiime Yeah bro,we are definitely going with your *maybe theory* when it comes to the f-35 Advanced sensors

@@ptbro3334 Yeah bro, you're not even from the country which makes them

@@Sanyu-Tumusiime yeah and neither of you have know what you're talking about so who cares

@@davidhasslehoff4379 i was an aerospace engineer

Like- JESUS christ it’s loud. Only plane as loud as the F-35 is the goddamned Harrier

@@sierra6993 that’s because the thrust bounces onto the ground and shakes the ground creating more intense vibrations and even more noise it also requires A LOT of power for VTOL

@@encryptedaviation1452 it’s also probably because it sits still instead of passing by fast

It’s also powered by the damn PW-F-135 engine, the most powerful engine fitted to a single engine fighter

right, i had to research its sound by watching this video because i saw one at a way closer distance than this camera man and it was silently hovering in a residential area just above street lights at night going into between two hills illegally by skunk works and i was the only witness. must be a prototype or a ufo disguised as an f35. at edwards afb area.

wahahahah

Yeah, that's the whole point of developing VTOL aircraft. Being able to land and takeoff from pretty much anywhere is a huge tactical advantage, it goes a long way towards nullifying the tactic of targeting one's airfields.

Agreed, the british were launching Harriers from container boats during the falklands war in the 70s, the argientines were wondering how they were getting fighter jets to the war after destroying the british main carrier!

Urm the Argentines never sank a carrier?

Italy, for example, really benefits from VTOL jets because they don’t really have a lot of adequate runways. They loved the harrier, and when they have enough money they intend to buy the F-35B.

probably much older, they are just ready to show it to the public

@Franco Firewall VTOL TECHNOLOGY HAS BEEN AROUND FOR 50 FUCKING YEARS WE ARE LIVING IN THE FUTURE

@@arenomusic STOP BEING SO AGGRESSIVE PLEASE!!

Meh, they designed it based on aircraft which was 30 year around (Sukhoi 27 and it's descendants, direct connection to engine design of F-35)

@@gr8cescale his name say music though

michaels house? What game are you talking about?

@@smokecrash2147 GTA V

@@nityasingh3 But there isnt even a harrier V II in GTA V let alone a helipad or a suitable landing spot on michaels estate

@@smokecrash2147 ive added F-35 mod, And the tennis court of Michael's house is perfect for vertical landing and takeoff

@@nityasingh3 ...

It needs to lift the equivalent weight in air to itself to stay hovering. Insane to imagine standing underneath the engine or fan

@@theelephantintheroom69it melts asphalt which is why you find them doing stovl takeoffs (short takeoffs) using the vtol instead of straight up vertical takeoffs, so yeah i wouldnt want to be under it

Harrier: allow me to introduce myself

I think the biggest difference between the F35 and the Harrier is the lack of need for cooling water (I could be wrong, I just vaguely remember someone mentioning it) and the F35 having stealth capabilities like the F22 does.

@@samrodriguez3311 ikr? VTOL aircraft have existed for a long time yet some people see this video and think its new

Star Wars in real life. Looks just like an x wing taking off lol. Or should I say the x wing looks like the f-35 lolz

It's 400 year old technology. Isaac Newton gave f=ma. Just didn't know how to engineer it.

It just seems wrong, doesn't it? Like it's completely unnatural, yet it's hapoening

@@julians.2597 To me, it's not wrong in the sense it shouldn't happen, it just doesnt seem correct, it's more of a "It COULD do that?"

well there is a difference in helicopter and planes moreover you dont usually go and see a monkey climbing tree but you wont set your eyes off if a fish was doing that

and to think this could have paid off my student debt!

@@LebronCCP well, I guess the US cares more about air defence than about student dept.

Yeah feels just like sci-fi

Where is any video demonstrating this "VTOL"s ability to transit into horizontal fly? Oh yes. Look for ever, find no thing what so ever.

@@worldoftancraft either not developed enough or done before but not revealed due to it being classified. many things about these jets the public doesnt know, because enemies can take all that data and make counters for them, rendering all the advanced tech almost useless

@@itzbrezaa do you understand that VTOL without being able to transit to horizontal flight is a useless plane-vtol? And it can, some videos show. Yet they aren't popular

Yes u're right, I only ever see osprey did that

Boring joke...

This is the best joke I've for heard for so long

@@bodhisattwamondal4969 No.

@@bodhisattwamondal4969 Umm... no

Boeing joke ...

More like, how many alien crashes it took to come up with the technology.

Ismail Kitmane this ^

@@ismailkitmane3719 🤯🤯 burst my brain. Hmm that's a good one.

laughs in B2 Spirit

@@ismailkitmane3719 It's simple as shit. A five year old could come up with the design. You just need the engineers to make it work without blowing up. That's why it takes *time* and we're seeing it just now and not fifty years ago.

Acutally this is the worst price of shitty aircraft i ever seen. It wasted so much on the Defence Budget and now Congress keeps buying it. The navy still have difficulties with it's carrier landings as for maintain the aircraft is too expensive. The f14 Tomcat is the best and sexist aircraft i ever seen. (Lmao this is a joke, the f35 has it's pros and cons.)

If you like set squares yes...Concorde was a beautiful piece of engineering. This looks like a ruler and a set square made love no thanks.

@@codyhernandez791 this plane has serious stalling issues

How much fuel it Burns? Hi trust engine needs hi fuel to fly small wings aircraft..

Unreal engineering definitely. That vertical take off is so useful in some situations. Planes are just fascinating machines.

Dreams? Over in the UK we had VTOL in the 60s 😂

@@urbanmidnight1 please read carefully, I said VTOL SUPERSONIC fighter :) The Harrier jet is not supersonic, as impressive as it is!

Gaand Faad News hahahah

Search: YAK-141

Phạm Thọ only 4 built used for tests

lol exactly

A bee dies when stinging what do you mean by that

@sigma_frenchie4075 Muhammed Ali

Not the first or second time a plane said this

😂😂😂😂😂

@@indianjudge5860 no I hate that.

Funny. Laughed.

More like F35b:I want to be a stealth Harrier!

Calthecool That would be fun

Wouldn't be convincing because it's extremely loud, like all jets are. Genuine UFO's make no sound even when in close proximity only a slight humming noise is sometimes heard.

@@FrankyPi uh oh, do you precisly know what a UFO is?

@@Tacticaviator7 Bob Lazar confirmed

Interesting you should say that. In summer 1969, my family lived in Berkeley Missouri which is a few miles east of Lambert International airport-St. Louis. Lambert airport was the location of the Headquarters for McDonnell Douglas Aviation. Just days after the lunar landing of Apollo 11, my father was driving my sister and I on Lindbergh Ave. approaching Interstate 270/255 which is northwest of the airport. As we approached the highway overpass we saw something over the roadway. This area was not undeveloped like a farmer's field. It was primarily a business community with car dealerships and restaurants. Beyond the interchange on all sides was single family residential housing. It was of course not unusual to see aircraft considering the proximity to the airport, but this did not seem to be moving. And it was no helicopter. It was primarily white with orange painted highlights and it was floating essentially motionless. This being a summer day around 11 am, and clear blue skies, it hovered over the southeast cloverleaf of the interchange at about 200 feet. And it was LOUD. As we got closer to it my father began slowing down our car as we all looked at this thing, mouths open in amazement. We weren't the only ones either. It was a Saturday morning and traffic was very light, but other cars on all the various lanes and directions were slowing to have a look to the degrees that traffic came to a halt. My sister asked, "What is that? A UFO?" She was 4 years older than me, my being 5 years of age. I think my father's reply was along the lines of, "I dunno." We passed by it within several hundred feet at a snail's pace while it rotated slightly. Once we were about a quarter mile away it rose to a higher altitude and moved away. The discussion for the next ten minutes was obviously what it was, how it stayed in the air and where it came from. Considering the recent moon landing and related extraterrestrial life/UFO discussions on the news, my sister admitted to being afraid of whatever it was. When we returned home we told our mother and older brothers about it. Big mistake. Of course they assumed we were kidding. When our father confirmed what we saw, he also became the receiver of frowns and snickering from our brothers. My mother asked him if it was true, which he said it was, but even mom gave him a look of "Seriously?........" Eventually we learned it was better to not bring up the subject anymore for fear of mocking. Many years later, while visiting Schaeffer's Hobby Shop in south St. Louis, (I was probably in my early twenties) I was looking through the "In Action" series of Squadron aircraft soft back books when something caught my eye. On the back of one was an artist's rendition of the aircraft I my sister and father had seen many years prior. It was the "Harrier In Action" book. I was very familiar with Harriers and many different types of aircraft being a model kit builder almost exclusively of 1:48 scale. I had completely forgot about the incident but seeing artwork of the Harrier, reminded of it. I looked in the book for an explanation of it, and remembered that prototype military aircraft were painted white with orange highlights for higher visibility during flight testing. The reason the aircraft was over that road in 1969 I learned was that the US Marines were very interested in the AV-8 Harrier for its VTOL capabilities. McDonnell Douglas had been partnering with Hawker Siddley to purchase Harriers from the British. The aircraft floating over the highway was being tested, and scaring the shit out of my older sister. And setting her my father and I and probably numerous witnesses up for unwanted mockery from our family members when we told the tale.

Planet America

And than get killed by a random ww2 yak 9 cuz usa planes sucks

@@BenitoakaDuce You’re either willfully ignorant or extremely uninformed

@@zainjavaid4371 ahahahha lol don t u think the f 35 is the best jet? If u think this its clear the amrrican propaganda reach u already sry dude but i don t talk with jerks.

@@BenitoakaDuce I never said anything about the f35. Look at all the other standards in military aviation that have come out of the United States, the f16 being one of many examples.

exactly!

Thing is, it won't. It can only VTOL with half a fuel load and no weapons, so.

It is marketed as a STOVL. The only people who call it a VTOL are probably uneducated in the fact it can't do a proper vertical takeoff.

+Karuiko It was meant to be VTOL but it isn't. So they changed how they market it. It's meant to replace the harrier

Protoman lol

I was born at Pax River...My dad was an aircraft mechanic in the Navy.

GTA sa

A man of culture i see

Ahhahaa

Best comment! It brings back so many memories.

Actually the hydra jet from gta sa and gta v are taking from a av-8b harrier jet, not the f35b

MashedPixels r/woooosh

@@harrapanman621 boards?

@@carcinogenicthalidomide3057 mai bhi 10th mai!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

@@carcinogenicthalidomide3057 physics kaisa raha?

@@jaibhardwaj4886 to padhai kar esab mat dek

GTA 5 Online basically.

@Indian judge Please stop copying and pasting that piece of shit joke on any comment involving a helicopter.

Unfortunately its Corona time

@@Ghakimx P-996 Lazer pad (Or hydra)

1970: First in the world VTOL aircraft - Yak-38, made in USSR. 😂

Harriers been made awhile ago tho

Some planes in that ear already have VTOL

Go and see yak 41 m made by ussr . Fir pata chaelga f35 kaha se aya hai

Harry Tasker cleaning up the 20th floor.

@@yashdeepkeer6937 yes i agree , par kuch ussr ki planes bhi usa ka copy hai

They should have called round to Hawker Siddeley for a cup of tea and a chat. We had this shit sorted out 70 years ago. No computers, no simulation.. just British engineering prowess.

@Hunter Hebert well, to be honest, neither am I and probably nor he is.

@Joe. Biden have you done real research on the f-35?

@Joe. Biden well hey it takes time to make a good aircraft

@Joe. Biden you forgot?

You will, dw😊

😂😂😂

Lmao

it looks like its photoshopped lol

It’s crazy how small that van looks comparatively and it is in the foreground.

High bypass ratio gives it a very good fuel efficiency without acterburner

Powered by Pratt & Whitney

The lift system that allows the aircraft to fly verically is a Rolls Royce development.

@@raymondchiu7582 both the swivel nozzle and lift fan is Rolls Royce…

​@georgeqzzy1468 nope, Google who makes the engine, the F135 engine. Pratt

and bae systems??

probably close to a ton every minute.

200 metric ton per second Edit : understand sarcasm

it's not small. has a maximum takeoff weight of 27 tons. about 9 tons being the fuel. by close to a ton I meant several hundred kilograms.

@@marble25 so based on your previous comments .... F-35 max flight time is a minute ..... Well I m really proud of my old MiG s yeah it's synonymous to flying coffin and boutique plane but it can run for hours.

Yep, thats why they dont take off vertically with a full load, and/or weapons, always full standard take off, or short vertical take off, (saves gas) but i did see a scenario in an article once written by former miltary planner say in a contested area with no fob for aircraft, but air dominance is had they could use parking lots for short hops, and to take off climb out and meet a tanker, until a suitable fob can be made, that would be awesome, because lets be honest seeing an F-35 or future fighter complete a mission from a parking lot with no runway is just awesome to think about

Recommended such as nuclear gasoline like USS Navy as usual, in order to be efficient for landing & vice versa

Now it's 7

Ya 7 for me too

Hello Dr. Sehgal...😂😂

@@shivankursharma7999 haan bhai bol

And lightsabers, next time you look outside there might be a xyston class Star destroyer outside waiting to blow up earth

Yes, gundam will be there too

Lana 2000 ?

@@Artonix2000 stupitest? Would you like to try again?

@@ef-5tornado495 to get a “real life lightsaber” we would need an insane power source to work as the kyber crystal

The Harrier jumpjet vtol aircraft, an English invention/piece of engineering entered service with the Royal Airforce, on the 1st April 1969, some 44 years before the Lockheed plane.

​@@stephendorrington8962You didn't catch onto the joke about the random van driving by.

@ОСЬМИНОГ - ШОУ How is a MiG 2 times better? It has a lot of different features, but like any plane there are trade offs. I’m personally excited to see what this jet can do.

@ОСЬМИНОГ - ШОУ like, no, not really. They aren’t that much better. And frankly, I don’t think anyone who cares for their country in the world would want the Russian influence attached to the purchase. Note to people who like democracy

@@EternalShadow1667 lots of countries in Asia use russian tech. Turkey being a major example when it made orders for s400 units when US refused to let it purchase patriot systems.

What do you mean doge please tell me I'm literally shaking rn

Are u f 35?

Nothing specific just T H I N G S

@@proplayer-sc8xt LOL

So you just get high

Fuck you bitch you made my day😂😂😂😂😂😂

BaiKO 😶😂

Okay

BaiKO lol

BEST. COMMENT. EVER.

Joh1002mm hah fuck off, Russia made 3 5th generation fighters, Su47, Mig1.44 and Yak141 during 1990s, when USA didn't even develop F22 prototype , and now Russia has Su57, it gone late because of USSR collapse and economy crisis, it's all fine now and Russia will reply every American fighter by creating it's own new Russian equivalent the Yak141 designs were sold to Lockheed Martin and they made the JSF Programme which is now the F35, the Americans have copied the Russian tech and you little fuck giving us some history lessons? go learn yourself kid

I work on the ec130 a aircraft that is over 30 yrs olds and there is a ton of top secret capabilities I'm not allowed to know about unless it's needed for my job.The f35 is less than a decade old highly advanced and lockhead Martin contractors do most of the in depth maintenance.There is a ton of things we don't know about this aircraft.Unless you actually work on the aircraft your opinion is equal to nothing considering half the people on Don't even work on aircraft in general.

Sariel Reigns Сариэль Царствует su57 production was just cancelled dummy. finally realized how behind the f35 they really are.

Joh1002mm stop acting like a nerd no one likes it

Know the difference between 4.5 and full on 5th gen dumbfuck. @@iii5169

that was sea harrier old vtol jet!

+aviatorEngineer I have not seen vertical take off.. just vertical liftoff and hover... do you know of any clips on here that show the f35 taking forward flight after vertical liftoff? If you know of any would you be willing to copy n paste the url here pls? I am really curious.. there are a lot of clips on here but none that I have seen show actual forward takeoff into flight from a hovering state after vertical liftoff... thx frien~

+KMurdock1974 I think that is still impossiable because it needs speed to get the lift on the wings,when they would try to forward fly,aircraft would probably stall and crash.

+Kico Horvat not nessesarily, look at the second engine stage, it probably a gradual shift to forward flight to maintain Vtol

+!〈VihurahDaGamer〉! I know,but I have yet to see IT going forward after VT

I haven't found any such video, but I tried it in Flight Simulator, and it was able to transition from vertical to horizontal flight fine.

I did not realize the size of the car before seeing that plane wow

there was a man at 0:12

@@geniusmarcsays2434 there is a man in the plane

You do realize that van is in the foreground right?

@@kennyc9662 I'm not familiar with film. Shouldn't the van being in the foreground make it appear much larger in comparison to the plane in the background? Unless the plane really is huge. At 0:12, it really doesn't appear to be that big, but the van makes it look huge.

decade

Really? Saying the F-35 "will be exceptional" without any proof of performance or combat use isn't accurate, at all. The F-16 was a rather successful design, while the F-35 was developed strictly to become a cash cow for Lockheed and the MIC.

Ha,ha, ha hilarious humour. What words will we eat? The opposite will be true in your old age you will eat your words.

FrakU2 For now, enjoy having zero government support to its citizens since all of the money is going in this garbage plane!

In simulated fights between the F-35 and the F-16 the F-16 had a win rate of almost 100%. Im sorry, but if the new, incredibly expensive Plane cant even beat the one it is supposed to replace you can not really talk about a "exceptional job"

@@beastman1927 which aircraft?

@@boingobadger9846 This

No it cant, practically

+Docktor Jim Not even close...

+Docktor Jim B2 bomber is more expensive than an f-35

MEK'N'ISM BEATZ Fewer built. They actually serve a purpose, as well. The F-35 can't carry enough bombs far enough to be a serious bomber, and there's no such thing as a dog fight any more.

Docktor Jim I was just answering your question "the most expensive thing"

MEK'N'ISM BEATZ Well, as a program, the F35 costs a lot more. More units, each of them not particularly useful.

you better take time to admire it because he was already deadborn

thanks

Aviation fuel*

Legendary comment, gotta love Back to the future

For just one reason it replaces the Harrier jump jet. The lift off is a bit gimmicky but being able to land on Naval carriers without hitting the side or running off the end must be a god send. The Navy carry out more planned, precision strikes & a stealth jet that can see over the horizon with VTOL is great for that.

Yet the project for the plane lasted for over ten years, without a single mass-produced version ever built. And, it costed more than all of the US fighter planes costed since the P-47 and P-51... combined. Badassery can't be promised now, can it?

Sky Eye - You're using COSTED incorrectly. That form would be used if you were in the process of calculating the cost of a job (mainly used by accountants and financiers) - but not for a sentence like this. Just use COST here.

Sky Eye WRONG and you know it or are just plain ignorant.

+matthew mckean less than 10%, get over it crybaby

+Sky Eye WRONG, they are in production.

AJHHAHDFGHDAFHDFGHADFHADFGHDFHDGF

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH

@@vaxton r/hadastroke

HAGAGSHAHHSHSHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHSGAGSHJDIXHWHSIZUSBWUHAHAHAHAHHAHAVWVW DDVJ2IJE8EDJBWHAHAHAHHAGAH

Susssosഅംഒഒഞൊഝനൊചഝഠഥങഛഥശചഥ

Nah