Probably pretty well against the BMP. For the T-90, sides and back would be vulnerable - depends on the ammunition type used of course... But we don't know for sure!

@@shephard I thought about it a little more, and considering the fact that the T-90's first line of defense is a wall of shaped charges designed to push incoming projectiles back, I think this weapon's high rate of fire would allow it to quasi-double-tap it's way through the reactive armor. Still, though, I'm not sure if the second 50mm would be able to get through the hull. At the very least, it could open up a window for an M1 or Leopard MBT to slap it with the 120mm, or land multiple hits on the T-90's tracks and weapons. Essentially, it could disable a T-90 but not destroy it.

roadhouse699 give the crew a headache until they bail lol

It would shred a BMP in a five round burst. It would stand a really good chance of completely blinding a T-90 and making it a combat kill if there were no supporting forces with the tank and it saw the tank first.

roadhouse699 Most likely than not, by the time all those bullets can penetrate the skin, the vehicle carrying this thing would have already been blasted by the T-90’s gun.

Correction, a ROBOT Golf Cart

That cart is actually a humvee replacement but the video is squashed making it look all short and stumpy like a cart. I’d pay good money to see one on an mrzr

I mean, Deception 100 ftw?

@@romeotango5597 saw one on the freeway the other day, looks just like a humvee but without any body panels.

Seems par for the course

Bryon Slatten this needs more likes 😂

Um are you talking sbout shooting the traffic with that??

@@adnitesean5005 It's about sarcasm. I would prefer driving a tank for my afternoon commute.

@@laoshij9382 i get it, i just bout to do the same

And that just between Valencia and a Santa Monica.

I'm going to have to hit the gym if I'm going to be carrying this around the field.

@@orlock20 mount it on a slightly used Barbie Car and drive it around like a SAS troop

Sure thing king Kong.

chris graham cool sign me up

James Brinley It will not be long before someone is insisting he has a constitutional right to own one of those.

The imagery of King Kong using big ass cannons like they’re handguns against Godzilla is in my head now. Thanks chris graham

Depends what State you're in.

👍

Alternating double barrel? The mechanics of that wouldn't be too hard..

@@Gainn but for some reason it is rarely used... (Exept on planes I think)

this one gets 'em off quick enough - don't wanna melt the barrel...

It would be a 50mm BOOOOORP gun

Bro enough that old and tired , who fucking cares

@Anne Isopod what kind of question is that ? Because I state the phrase is getting old and tired , I get accused screw you .

Seth Howard Epstein isn’t dead brother. “Epstein didn’t kill himself” is just a distraction from the fact that he’s not even dead.

@@scallen3841 bro you are the one that replied to a three-month-old comment. Also Epstein didnt kill himself.

@@Renigade16 Lol and if you keep saying that it will come true ? No investigation no proof of any wrong doing .

Goota see on battleship gun

Up gun means putting this on a existing vehicle. Not making this bigger.

@@kyle857 would be awesome though

I've fired the 120mm once.

Would love to See a Yamato edition 460mm Chain Gun

It is musical somehow.

Same here

No it weighs about as much as the prius, and ot fires 50mm shells its therfore a destructive device and needs even more then the atf to approve it

@@Zretgul_timerunner what hapened with 2A??? dont i have some right to have such a thing with out restrictions???

@@bateriesrl6591 Nope your own gov says as much. Your 2A also indites you to be a militiamen *well regulated* one at that i doubt your neither a part of an militia nor actually well regulated if an 50 mike mike is your home defence weapon or atleast thats what the us gov thinks.

In America, u can mount anything on Prius, u just need proper suspension buffs and frame reinforcements and money.

@@comradevlad7459 u cant mount something that weighs bloody as much as 3 priuses on even a uppgraded prius unless you want it to be one shoot, you need muniton and that shit weighs even more. And unless your prius made of ceramic plating the sheer recoil whould sheer of the gun from the prius.

We came from the same youtube recomendations brother

Exactly what i am waiting for.

Bosstown Dynamics is a parody of Boston Dynamics

A friend at work thought that robot was real until I found the entire video. I was laughing so hard my sides hurt 🤣🤣🤣🤣

andre M you’ve been promoted to Capt.-Major Obvious. Keep up the stellar performance.

Hello - if CNN has used this footage, we would like to know further details about where you saw it if possible. Many thanks - Shephard Media Team.

@@shephard I was sarcastic, becouse they used that one gunranch footage saying, it's was from Syria. 😂

@@jannerahkamaa1011 😂 Good one!

@@jannerahkamaa1011 ....Kentucky, gateway to Syria. The Middle-East is so much closer than you knew. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pbGkppeo0daRnJc.html

@@jannerahkamaa1011 they seem a little bit too hasty.. as usual, huh?

Yes.

Gotta imagine how much recoil that would make though. It would probably flip over any vehicle it was put on.

@@ThatOneSniper Not Really. A wide enough base, big enough tires, or bracing mechanisms (Think legs or like on most Diggers.). You really could slap this on something like a Jeep. I've seen Technicals with the equivalent of an 88 on the back... Shooting. Yeah the suspension was all but Knocked out, but it worked.

They aren't autonomous, but more like really big, badass RC cars

@@ThatOneSniper if they shot sideways or on a hill it could be dangerous in a car lmao. The M10 TD had similar issues in ww2

They should name it the CowBell

Lee Sparks I wonder if my neighbor are worried about me when I’m taking the garage can out to empty...

It is already on ac130 lol

Zeta Nova correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the AC carry the 40mm bofors gun?

@@sxleong it carries both

@@sxleong don't u play cod

Zeta Nova 1)the ac-130 atm carries a 5 barrelled 25mm getling gun, a 40mm bofors gun and a 105mm howitzer 2)COD is fun but horribly inaccurate. 3)I'm not rich enough to play COD.

What about deafeningly loud?

it was ABC, dumbass

ABC*

ABC...CNN has already championed Fakery.

Link please

"Live footage of Turkey bombing innocent Kurds in Syria" ABC News

You would disappear off the face of the 🌎.

@@jamesdewey3259 You'd certainly go with a blast...

9mm will end my life as well and yours. An American using this tool is being strategic.

@@Adventure_fuel One would hope that whomever this weapon is issued or sold to, that they would only ever use it strategically, anything else is unthinkable!

A near miss is enough

Fuck yeh

Yesszir!!!

Dont forget one for the spring gun mechanism on the front door, for when you are out.

@Muhammad's sexy Pig ah don't worry just get anti-air missiles :D

It's a good squirrel gun. Bought this for my nephew last year. He broke a couple windows.

Give me the real Porsche.

lol

There you go using all the metric magic math.

I'll sign the petition.

FullMetalChicken *shows porsche 911*

@mike force cringe

@mike force 1) stop liking your own comment 2) I have freedom of speech so why wouldnt i took advantage of it? 3) If you can't handle it, don't respond to it, you have no right to tell me how to live my life. 4) there is no study that says quiet = more intelligent so that's an ignorant thing to say

@mike force You got a problem with someone owning a 50mm chaingun?

@mike force you have the best words. I could go on and on about the bestness of your words. Such bigly words. Words the likes of which none of us deserve to hear. You keep doing you.

Impressive doesn't mean anything. A high rate of fire is only useful against medium velocity air targets (or a handful of other highly-niche roles). It is wasted on something of this caliber and role.

@@dposcuro are you saying that seeing a 50mm cannon firing at the rate of a machinegun wouldn't be impressive? That it wouldnt impresse you? You sir must either have a very dull existence or are a GA-TL1 Longsword pilot

@@NathanSherwood114 Can you point out where I said it wouldn't be impressive? I said that being impressive, doesn't mean anything. Being impressive, doesn't make it good. Being impressive, does not make it effective. Would it be awesome to see/hear/feel a 50mm cannon that fires at 2000+ rpm? Hell yes! But...the practical problem is? There is no reason for it. It still won't destroy MBTs, IFVs will still only need 3-5 shots for reliable kills, and it would be utterly wasting excessive ammunition against infantry. Besides, this cannon is rumoured to be capable of 600 rpm, which is more than enough.

@@dposcuro Goldmarble the way you framed your response was very much: Why are you thinking about this in terms of awesome? Awesome has nothing to do with military development. Starting with something like"as impressive as that would be" would have conveyed your meaning better

@@NathanSherwood114 True, my apologies.

God rest his soul. I hope they got his body from that plantation after the war.

Just don't lead em as much!

I thought Zakus carry bigger calibre. Even the RX-78 Gundam's Vulcan Head is 80mm.

Dereenaldo Ambun that depends, the Mk 1-2 Zaku machine gun is a monster 120mm canon. The RX-78-2 head Vulcans are 75mm machine guns. Basically CWIS. However, the Zaku-FZ was also equipped with a smaller gun with more ammunition.

Same here lol

Yep : (

Sounds nice but it'll never happen, lol.

Something like the swedish Bandkanon maybe?

Why not a 155mm chain gun

Railguns probably be in full swing before that would happen, at which point 120mm chain guns would be pointless.

naval cannons my dude, they already exist. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ZrFodb2grK6dXac.html

C B no I just find the American gun problem almost comical.

C B well said that’s basically what I was saying in my comment.

test it on china!

Most likely on US soil tbh

rheir is few modernisations of the ground forces of usa last 40years

I don't think the Bradley can handle this. Especially if its going to be transporting infantry

I would feel so sorry for the crews that would have to take it out of the turret for GST , maint , ETC. Plus loading a belt into the ready boxes would be a bitch because they are so heavy, it's hard enough to load a belt of 25 if you don't have the forearm and hand strength

No this is going to the Striker. The Bradley do to it's rather.... compromised, design can't really be mounted with a big enough turret to house this weapon, in theory you could redesign the vehicle to do so, but the changes would be so extensive the current production line for the Bradley would be rendered useless leading to the nesesity for a rather expensive governmental investment on a vehicle that is and was for all intents and purposes obsolete in the early 90s.

@@anarchyandempires5452 if they put this bitch on a Stryker they better atleast leave room for the TC to stand out of a hatch while maneuvering

I'm waiting for the 120mm 9 barrel gattling gun. So they really can lay down some supressive fire 😅

There are already 120mm+ auto cannons in naval service for many decades. Would be impractical on most land platforms.

@@kyleharris1555 link?

@@TheEsseboy Heres a modern advertisment on one: m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Y9uejbJ7qsDOc2g.html Here's a modern one firing twice: m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8x8o8ihl93Dco0.html I can't link non KZfaq, but if you search for 120mm or 127mm autocannon there are some British and American guns from the 50s. I looked for vids on them, maybe you'll have better luck.

4x .50 cal.

You mean caliber .50 50 caliber refers to barrel length.

@@sirmoke9646 In the navy, yes, in the Army not really. unless your using huge guns the army doesn't use it like that instead a 0.50 cal is the same as cal .50. as its referring to bullet diameter and type. In Navel guns then yes its length instead of diameter. Case and point the Iowa class battleships use 16in .50 caliber guns while the older North Dakota's use 16/45. Then today you have the 5in 64 plus, I've lost track but you get the point. That said many today associate caliber with bullet diameter regardless of gun type. After all the word itself is a measuring term so length and diameter really don't matter. It just depends on what your building and need to keep track of certain aspects for production. The Navy has always had its own thing compared to ground forces.

Pretty sure ground forces use calibers to measure barrel length, at least with tanks. The Leopard 2 has a 120mm L44 or L55, depending on variant, and many other tank guns are measured in this way. I’m not sure the navy is doing it’s own thing, as much as just using a standard method of measuring the length of the bore of a gun.

Thanks

A whiff of grapeshot.

I like your thinking. We need a Super Warthog with a 50MM three barreled gun that can hold like 12 Air to Ground Maverick missiles also

​@@smithnwesson990 Who needs missiles when you have cannons.

Just slap it on the Bradley that's what they did to it in the first place. Then and a few portholes and machine gun turrets and middle launchers and whatever they can stuff on it.

@@bryanmartinez6600 With any luck, the entire US military will one day be replaced with a single Bradley armed with every conceivable weapon in the world.

@Mathieu Morin If we're gonna make the ultimate money sink, I say we just strap an F-35 to the bottom instead. Wait, no, let's do both.

@@bryanmartinez6600 this thing wouldn't fit on a bradley in any shape or form.

@@metaouroboros690 umm...

That should compensate just fine for my little...

What you're referring here is not horsepower (technically hp is generated via engines of sorts) what you're looking for is the velocity or momentum. To do so you need to calculate the muzzle velocity of the projectile, every action have an equal and opposite reaction, the force generated from the exiting projectile will inflict back to the motobike therefore pushing it forward with a given speed.

what-if.xkcd.com/21/

If I mounted a GAU-8 on my car, put the car in neutral, and started firing backward from a standstill, I would be breaking the interstate speed limit in less than three seconds.

@@imm0rt544 Horses do generate a lot of methane due to their diet - this must produce a degree of useful thrust, especially if you fit a re-heat to the appropriate orifice - this must still qualify as horsepower surely? Think of it - a horse at the head of a column of blue flame at mach 2 - but don't be behind it in a buggy.

Those are targets

@@PilotTed you missed the joke.

@@FrAnC3sCoN123 tbh now a days it is hard to know when people are joking about firearms because sadly many people know nothing about firearms or weaponry in general and even ask things like that.

Why yes, i thought that's why we were all here...

Why couldn't we see the damage? Ok, it shoots, what happened on the other end?

I just saved alot of stress by switching to IDGAF *duck evaporating

@@WAJK2030 true true.

@TheLance3185 totally not what was emplied. Try to keep up.

@TheLance3185 stop being stupid *shitweasel* .

Why do you yanks have to kill everything? You're all morons!

OneLastHitB4IGo that would be a perfect idea, complete overkill, probably against the Geneva convention, and very expensive, but a perfect idea none the less.

Someone make this man a general.

Looking closely, it seems to me that the barrel is reciprocating a bit. Can't tell how much, but the first rapid burst (approx the 43-62second timeframe) it seems to do it, if you watch the muzzle brake closely. Plus there's that giant brake. If the gas venting is any indication, that's seriously cutting down on recoil transmitted to the mount. But I'm not an engineer, so that may be a meaningless item as far as how much recoil mitigation is actually due to the brake.

menckencynic impressive capability. Should lend itself to use on lighter armored vehicles.

All chain guns are effectively hard mounted in AFVs and absorb the recoil that way. It's not much energy compared to the weight of the vehicle.

@menckencynic Fair enough and I probably replied too soon, seeing some videos after showing such compensation

It's all about technological advancement. A 20mm gun today would be more powerful the a 20mm back then.

Yeah, you just didn't have things like food, tanks in any appreciable numbers, fuel for what planes you had or any way at all to really strike back at Germany, until the US gave that to you in WW2, but do carry on.

Shrike142 So did Germany.

Then u tea Bois went nuts with a “quick firing” 183mm (or 7.2 in) gun.

Lads don't let this get to you. Thr U.S. deployed similar weapons during the war aswell. The current era 50 cal is the same as then afterall. It's just about tweaking and fine tuning for newer technology integration

This is developed for the next generation Army fighting vehicle replacing the Bradley